JayJayDean
Scrapple Level: 136
Posts: 2400/4750 EXP: 29484378 For next: 612614
Since: 2.1.02 From: Seattle, WA
Since last post: 2975 days Last activity: 2553 days
| | Y!: | |
|
| #1 Posted on 15.11.05 0901.35 Reposted on: 15.11.12 0901.46 | NFL PLAYOFF SEEDINGS AFTER WEEK 9
AFC 1. Indianapolis (9-0) AFC South leaders 2. Denver (7-2) AFC West leaders 3. Pittsburgh (7-2) AFC North leaders 4. New England (5-4) AFC East leaders 5. Cincinnati (7-2) Wild card 6. Jacksonville (6-3) Wild card 7. San Diego (5-4) 8. Kansas City (5-4) 9. Buffalo (4-5) 10. Oakland (3-6) 11. Miami (3-6) 12. Cleveland (3-6) 13. Tennessee (2-7) 14. Baltimore (2-7) 15. N.Y. Jets (2-7) 16. Houston (1-8)
NFC 1. Seattle (7-2) NFC West leaders 2. Carolina (7-2) NFC South leaders 3. Chicago (6-3) NFC North leaders 4. Dallas (6-3) NFC East leaders 5. N.Y. Giants (6-3) Wild card 6. Atlanta (6-3) Wild card 7. Tampa Bay (6-3) 8. Washington (5-4) 9. Minnesota (4-5) 10. St. Louis (4-5) 11. Detroit (4-5) 12. Philadelphia (4-5) 13. Green Bay (2-7) 14. New Orleans (2-7) 15. Arizona (2-7) 16. San Francisco (2-7)
Wild Card Matchups: AFC: Jacksonville at Pittsburgh, Cincinnati at New England NFC: Atlanta at Chicago, N.Y. Giants at Dallas
First-round byes: AFC: Indianapolis, Denver NFC: Seattle, Carolina Promote this thread! | | whatever
Bierwurst Level: 91
Posts: 772/1874 EXP: 7287912 For next: 181029
Since: 12.2.02 From: Cleveland, Ohio
Since last post: 1447 days Last activity: 1407 days
| #2 Posted on 15.11.05 0942.11 Reposted on: 15.11.12 0942.25 | New England is turning into the Padres of the NFL this year.
I like the way this year is shaping up. Looking at the potential playoff matchups is intriguing. | brick
Bockwurst Level: 53
Posts: 400/535 EXP: 1113476 For next: 43650
Since: 17.1.02 From: Pittsburgh, PA
Since last post: 3974 days Last activity: 3970 days
| #3 Posted on 15.11.05 1125.20 Reposted on: 15.11.12 1126.00 | and the draft order:
1 TEXANS 0.630 2 JETS 0.444 3 CARDINALS 0.472 4 49ERS 0.481 5 PACKERS 0.519 6 TITANS 0.593 7 RAVENS 0.630 8 SAINTS 0.704 9 DOLPHINS 0.407 10 BROWNS 0.500 11 RAIDERS 0.630 12 BILLS 0.370 13 RAMS 0.407 14 LIONS 0.444 * 14 VIKINGS 0.444 * 16 EAGLES 0.639 17 CHIEFS 0.556 * 17 CHARGERS 0.556 * 19 REDSKINS 0.622 20 BUCCANEERS 6 0.556
* indicates tie, order to be determined by coin flip. | R-Dub
Pickled pork Level: 32
Posts: 38/181 EXP: 200514 For next: 5930
Since: 25.8.05 From: Michigan
Since last post: 1445 days Last activity: 727 days
| #4 Posted on 15.11.05 1142.53 Reposted on: 15.11.12 1143.00 | Well, there goes my utopia. All of a sudden, the NFC North decides to look respectable (well, kinda). Say it ain't so! If this keeps up, they could have 3 teams over .500. Let's see, what's on the radar? Carolina @ Chicago. Detroit @ Dallas. Minnesota @ Green Bay. So, if all goes well, it could look like this:
Chicago 6 - 4 Minnesota 4 - 6 Detroit 4 - 6 Green Bay 3 - 7
And that's if GB can actually get a win. Well, anything's possible. At least I hope so. From there, it starts looking tougher for Chicago (Tampa, Pittsburgh, & Atlanta over the next month). Well, I guess there is still hope. But with these teams, who knows? But a man can dream.... | Jaguar
Knackwurst Level: 116
Posts: 3127/3284 EXP: 16927191 For next: 396954
Since: 23.1.02 From: In a Blue State finally
Since last post: 1894 days Last activity: 1894 days
| #5 Posted on 15.11.05 2311.32 Reposted on: 15.11.12 2311.41 | So what was the story with the Buffalo/KC game? KC just showing their age, or what? | Whitebacon
Banger Level: 104
Posts: 1997/2567 EXP: 11706137 For next: 156028
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 110 days Last activity: 10 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #6 Posted on 16.11.05 0058.39 Reposted on: 16.11.12 0058.52 | As best I can tell, Green got sacked six times, threw three picks, and lost a fumble, while Larry Johnson ran for 130 yards, and had another 40 receiving. I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps. | Reverend J Shaft
Toulouse Level: 75
Posts: 373/1235 EXP: 3776764 For next: 50157
Since: 25.6.03 From: Home of The Big House
Since last post: 1429 days Last activity: 12 days
| #7 Posted on 16.11.05 0801.12 Reposted on: 16.11.12 0801.14 | (deleted by Reverend J Shaft on 16.11.05 0902) | wesman1111
Cotto Level: 17
Posts: 13/40 EXP: 22783 For next: 1960
Since: 2.1.02 From: Harrisonville, MO
Since last post: 3272 days Last activity: 3150 days
| #8 Posted on 16.11.05 0914.22 Reposted on: 16.11.12 0914.47 | Originally posted by Whitebacon Green got sacked six times
Originally posted by Whitebacon I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.
Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them. | haz
Landjager Level: 66
Posts: 618/904 EXP: 2447951 For next: 13913
Since: 2.1.02 From: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Since last post: 3506 days Last activity: 2170 days
| #9 Posted on 16.11.05 1539.57 Reposted on: 16.11.12 1539.58 | Originally posted by wesman1111
Originally posted by Whitebacon Green got sacked six times
Originally posted by Whitebacon I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.
Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.
Isn't this handy... I was at the Ralph on Sunday for the Bills-Chiefs tilt.
In terms of the Chiefs offense, they ran roughshod over the Bills D with LJ from the very start.
However, as soon as they started to pass, everything went wrong. Yes, Green had a lot of pressure, but he also threw a lot of really bad balls. He hit Gonzalez down the middle at will, but as soon as he tried to throw outside, he was nowhere near the receivers...
They should've continued to give the ball to LJ. He ended up with 140 yards and could've had 200 if they kept going to him...
In terms of Buffalos offense, they made very few plays. Losman came in for Holcomb, who got his bell rung. Losman played pretty well, made two outstanding TD throws and that was it... | Whitebacon
Banger Level: 104
Posts: 1999/2567 EXP: 11706137 For next: 156028
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 110 days Last activity: 10 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #10 Posted on 16.11.05 2010.31 Reposted on: 16.11.12 2011.07 | Originally posted by wesman1111
Originally posted by Whitebacon Green got sacked six times
Originally posted by Whitebacon I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.
Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.
Sure there is. They can't get open against anybody, making Green have to stand in the pocket entirely too much, and allowing teams to focus on Gonzalez and leave the outside in man coverage. | haz
Landjager Level: 66
Posts: 619/904 EXP: 2447951 For next: 13913
Since: 2.1.02 From: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Since last post: 3506 days Last activity: 2170 days
| #11 Posted on 17.11.05 0714.27 Reposted on: 17.11.12 0714.36 | Originally posted by Whitebacon
Originally posted by wesman1111
Originally posted by Whitebacon Green got sacked six times
Originally posted by Whitebacon I think you can put the blame on a shitty receiver corps.
Green had no protection all day. I heard someone describe the O-line as Swiss cheese yesterday, and that pretty much summed it up perfectly. With Roaf out and Shields hurting, the Bills were able to rush at will whenever the Chiefs were in a passing situation. While the Chiefs don't have any all-pro type receivers, there was nothing about the way the game went that could be blamed on them.
Sure there is. They can't get open against anybody, making Green have to stand in the pocket entirely too much, and allowing teams to focus on Gonzalez and leave the outside in man coverage.
As I said above, Green couldn't hit the broad side of a barn on Sunday, whether the WR's were open or not. There were a couple of plays where the wideout did a quick out, got some spacing, but Green put the ball 6 feet outside of where he was supposed to.
IMO, Sunday's passing struggles were on Green totally.
| ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | | | | | | | | | |