#3 Posted on 20.10.05 1030.42 Reposted on: 20.10.12 1032.08
That's the best online animation I've seen.
Having said that, it seems the problems might be solved by simply choosing another store. I've been working in papers for over 15 years, and I worked for a year at the local Wal-Mart (Electronics section in the age of MC Hammer). Can we as a nation please get over the "Wal-Mart is bad" stories? Shop elsewhere, y'all.
Since last post: 1219 days Last activity: 261 days
#5 Posted on 20.10.05 1915.26 Reposted on: 20.10.12 1916.39
Of course many of the smaller towns that Wal-mart opened stores in already had a Target / K-Mart / ShopKo / Meijer / Pamida / other regional/national chain in town anyway, so they were just competing with other big box stores.
Why didn't anyone complain about the other stores running mom and pop stores out of business?
What makes a Super Wal-Mart any worse than a Super Target? (apart from labor issues?) Both want to make as much money as possible with the lowest overhead. Target markets to the younger, "hipper", trendy, metropolitan demographic while Wal-Mart markets to the more conservative, Midwestern, Christian, suburban/rural demographic.
#6 Posted on 20.10.05 1940.09 Reposted on: 20.10.12 1940.23
Originally posted by ZundianTarget markets to the younger, "hipper", trendy, metropolitan demographic while Wal-Mart markets to the more conservative, Midwestern, Christian, suburban/rural demographic.
Which is exactly the point, kind of. Marketing plays into it, a little disdain for flyover nation, and the extent to which Wal-Mart controls its content in order to market to that demographic. Really, I think the last one's the only legitimate beef, but that's where the Internet comes in, unless you're REALLY remote.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE