The W
Views: 95567263
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.4.07 0533
The 7 - Movies & TV - Daniel Craig is James Bond #6 Register and log in to post!
(793 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (13 total)
John Orquiola
Scrapple
Level: 121

Posts: 83/4478
EXP: 19946594
For next: 110160

Since: 28.2.02
From: Boston

Since last post: 125 days
Last activity: 89 days
#1 Posted on 14.10.05 0800.30
Reposted on: 14.10.12 0800.43
I'm still one of those few remaining die-hard Bond fans.

I loved Pierce Brosnan as Bond and I thought he had at least one more in him, but Daniel Craig is an interesting choice as Bond. The tougher, grittier-style of Bond didn't work so well when Timothy Dalton had the role, but Dalton's two Bonds in the 80's weren't among the best movies of the franchise, which helped kill his chances to continue in the role. There's a romantic aspect to Bond that I'm not sure Craig has in him, or if they'll even emphasize it as much as they did with Connery, Moore, and Brosnan, but for manliness, steel-eyed toughness and ruthlessness, Craig is as good a choice as any. Bond is an assassin, after all.

I'm glad they went with someone like Craig who could grow into the role and not with an established big name star like Hugh Jackman some of the other names bandied about. Although, James Purefoy, who plays Marc Antony in HBO's Rome, would have been my choice and his name was never mentioned as a contender.

Now, hopefully, Casino Royale will actually be a good movie and not a series of wild stunts and lousy double entendres.

(edited by John Orquiola on 14.10.05 0601)
Promote this thread!
Kevintripod
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 529/2197
EXP: 6508086
For next: 142604

Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 7 hours
AIM:  
#2 Posted on 14.10.05 0904.38
Reposted on: 14.10.12 0904.48
Who ??? Color me underwhelmed. Bad choice in my opinion.

I think James Bond should always be played by a well known actor. Unless Daniel Craig catches fire with the fans when the 3 films he is working on come out before his James Bond debut (Munich, The Visiting and Have You Heard), he will be a Bond failure just like George Lazenby and Timothy Dalton were.

Sean Penn and I both think that they should have gotten Jude Law to be the new Bond. :)

(edited by Kevintripod on 14.10.05 0705)
Von Maestro
Boudin rouge
Level: 46

Posts: 367/512
EXP: 709756
For next: 2023

Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 35 days
Last activity: 2 days
#3 Posted on 14.10.05 0958.38
Reposted on: 14.10.12 0959.03
    Originally posted by Kevintripod
    I think James Bond should always be played by a well known actor.


Kevin-

I have no real opinion on Craig, but remember that Sean Connery was an unknown when he got the role, & Pierce Brosnan was basically just Remington Steele LONG before he got the Bond role.
Kevintripod
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 530/2197
EXP: 6508086
For next: 142604

Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 7 hours
AIM:  
#4 Posted on 14.10.05 1142.48
Reposted on: 14.10.12 1142.55
    Originally posted by Von Maestro
      Originally posted by Kevintripod
      I think James Bond should always be played by a well known actor.


    Kevin-

    I have no real opinion on Craig, but remember that Sean Connery was an unknown when he got the role, & Pierce Brosnan was basically just Remington Steele LONG before he got the Bond role.


Sean Connery was the very first James Bond before the series became a successful movie franchise, so I have no problem with an unknown actor being used in that situation.

As for Pierce Brosnan, I at least knew who he was because Remington Steele was a somewhat successful weekly television show in the U.S. and the U.K......I'm betting alot more people at that time knew who Pierce Brosnan was compared to the amount of people today who know who Daniel Craig is.

But like I said, Mr. Craig might become an instant star when his 3 upcoming movies are released, so this whole conversation might be moot.

(edited by Kevintripod on 14.10.05 0944)

(edited by Kevintripod on 14.10.05 0945)
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 3073/3273
EXP: 12514224
For next: 157760

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 9 days
#5 Posted on 14.10.05 1417.08
Reposted on: 14.10.12 1417.19
This thread is about three days too late. (The W)
Kevintripod
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 539/2197
EXP: 6508086
For next: 142604

Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 7 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 18.10.05 1551.06
Reposted on: 18.10.12 1551.23
(MSNBC.com Article)


Call him Bland, James Bland

By Jeannette Walls
MSNBC
Updated: 12:29 p.m. ET Oct. 18, 2005

They’re calling him Bland — James Bland.

Last week, actor Daniel Craig was named to replace Pierce Brosnan as Agent 007. Among the other actors eyed during the lengthy search, the producers reportedly found Hugh Jackman “too fey,” Colin Farrell “too sleazy,” Eric Bana “not handsome enough,” and 5’10” Ewan McGregor “too short,” according to an alleged memo picked up in the overseas press. But plenty of fans of the series are finding the “Layer Cake” star too unBond-like.

Craig — perhaps better known for dating Kate Moss and being briefly implicated in the breakup between Jude Law and Sienna Miller than for any of his movie roles — was introduced to the press last week when he was brought to a press conference on board a speedboat. But the daredevil quality of the stunt was completely undone when Craig appeared wearing a life jacket. Craig compounded the problem when he commented that the ride had scared “the [bleep] out of me.”

Craig’s often-stiff answers to reporters’ questions also did not impress. “Why do you want to play Bond?” the gum-chewing Craig was asked. “Why not?” he replied. “What are the reasons for Bond’s enduring popularity?” came a question. Craig replied: “I don’t know the answer to that.”

The London Mirror called the event “embarrassing.” Complained one Brit TV commentator: “He looks more like a banker than James Bond.” Some fans are even less enthused. “Daniel Craig will NOT be my James Bond,” lamented a poster at CommanderBond.net on a thread devoted to Craig-bashing. “I really want this to be a bad dream.”

EddieBurkett
Boudin blanc
Level: 91

Posts: 1255/2285
EXP: 7316646
For next: 152295

Since: 3.1.02
From: GA in person, NJ in heart

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 3 hours
#7 Posted on 18.10.05 1605.44
Reposted on: 18.10.12 1609.34
I can't believe they called Wolverine "too fey"...

... and yet, they aren't wrong (theboyfromoztickets.com).
TheMASKEDComputerGeek
Chourico
Level: 36

Posts: 218/261
EXP: 282297
For next: 25816

Since: 7.1.02
From: Franklin, Wisconsin

Since last post: 108 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 18.10.05 1616.28
Reposted on: 18.10.12 1621.34
No matter who they cast, if the movies are as shitty as they've been lately, it won't make a damn lick of difference who's playing Bond.
ICEMAN
Landjager
Level: 61

Posts: 808/927
EXP: 1860898
For next: 15709

Since: 23.5.02
From: Nashville,TN

Since last post: 1686 days
Last activity: 1375 days
#9 Posted on 18.10.05 1718.55
Reposted on: 18.10.12 1719.24
What in the hell does "fey" mean?

I'm not a bond fan and I'm kinda underwhelmed. He looks kinda old. And I agree with John about James Purefoy. He really does look the part.
Kevintripod
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 540/2197
EXP: 6508086
For next: 142604

Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 7 hours
AIM:  
#10 Posted on 18.10.05 1743.14
Reposted on: 18.10.12 1743.27
I'm still surprised that it seems that Jude Law wasn't even considered for the part.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 109

Posts: 3066/3504
EXP: 13892813
For next: 66877

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 116 days
Last activity: 87 days
#11 Posted on 18.10.05 1750.48
Reposted on: 18.10.12 1752.15
    Originally posted by Kevintripod
    I'm still surprised that it seems that Jude Law wasn't even considered for the part.


MGM/UA has always been fairly adamant about keeping costs down on Bond films if possible, especially since they're SFX heavy (and thereby pretty damned expensive). Thus, it makes sense that they find a new Bond that's lesser known (or "cheap") and develop him into a viable character. There's a huge amount of people that'll watch Bond movies just for Bond, so they don't really NEED a big name.
EddieBurkett
Boudin blanc
Level: 91

Posts: 1256/2285
EXP: 7316646
For next: 152295

Since: 3.1.02
From: GA in person, NJ in heart

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 3 hours
#12 Posted on 18.10.05 2226.38
Reposted on: 18.10.12 2228.02
    Originally posted by ICEMAN
    What in the hell does "fey" mean?


Here's what dictionary.com says. (dictionary.reference.com)

Fey is a term used for elves in lots of fantasy literature. So they are calling him elvish in a sense. Really, its a euphemism for gay.
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 2099/3059
EXP: 11334171
For next: 137274

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 1798 days
Last activity: 1732 days
#13 Posted on 19.10.05 0224.18
Reposted on: 19.10.12 0224.19
Jude Law's a weak-chinned pretty boy without an ounce of the toughness needed to play Bond. Craig, on the other hand, is a fantastic actor with exceptional work in films such as Road To Perdition, Sylvia and Layer Cake. Go watch him first, then come back and kvetch about why you don't tihnk he's right for the role. He's certainly a lot closer to the original Connery mold than any of the guys cast after him.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: More show cancellations.
Next thread: Wallace and Gromit
Previous thread: Serenity (Spoilers Abound)
(793 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: New James bond FINALLY named - What's Your Favorite James Bond Movie? - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - Daniel Craig is James Bond #6Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.207 seconds.