The W
Views: 97629308
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.7.07 0545
The 7 - Baseball - ALCS Register and log in to post!
(229 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
Deputy Marshall
Liverwurst
Level: 65

Posts: 348/1138
EXP: 2328256
For next: 7384

Since: 28.6.04
From: Troy, NY

Since last post: 350 days
Last activity: 191 days
#1 Posted on 13.10.05 1249.53
Reposted on: 13.10.12 1250.37
Rather than tag onto a thread simply congratulating the White Sox, I figure I'd go the route of the other Championship Series thread and start one here.

Opinions on the play in the bottom of the 9th last night? I see a lot of people who saw the replay this morning say that they felt the ball didn't hit the ground. Maybe the Fox network had a greater framerate due to the live feed, because when I saw it last night I definitely saw the ball go up into the glove.

All the complaining though is moot, because this all could've been avoided if LAA had put more runs on the scoreboard If the Angels (my pick when the postseason started to win the pennant) want to win this series, they're going to have to rely more on their bats and less on costly fielding errors made by the White Sox (as happened in Game 1).
Promote this thread!
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 211

Posts: 6959/16099
EXP: 138683214
For next: 48652

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 13.10.05 1302.54
Reposted on: 13.10.12 1303.02
    Originally posted by Deputy Marshall
    Opinions on the play in the bottom of the 9th last night?
I see a lot of them here (The W).
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: NLCS
Next thread: God bless Josh Paul
Previous thread: Yankees Suck
(229 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: AL Rookie of the year candidates - AL Wild Card Thread - Schilling vs LOU - More...
The 7 - Baseball - ALCSRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.224 seconds.