The W
Views: 134130424
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.6.11 1809
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Senate approves detainee protection bill
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(579 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
messenoir
Summer sausage
Level: 47

Posts: 406/449
EXP: 734858
For next: 31351

Since: 20.2.02
From: Columbia, MO

Since last post: 1884 days
Last activity: 1750 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 6.10.05 1549.25
Reposted on: 6.10.12 1549.31
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/10/06/news/detain.php

Kudos to Democrats and Republicans passing this bill so handily. I sincerely hope this is not vetoed by the White House.
Promote this thread!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 121

Posts: 2603/4025
EXP: 19622870
For next: 433884

Since: 22.4.02
From: Outside of Boston

Since last post: 68 days
Last activity: 18 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 6.10.05 2142.10
Reposted on: 6.10.12 2142.37
If it si, Bush is gonna have some 'splainin' to do. The potential for bad press outweighs any justification he could have.
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 117

Posts: 1307/3732
EXP: 17643901
For next: 204047

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 7.10.05 0534.51
Reposted on: 7.10.12 0539.29
Look,I am all for treating prisoners of war right and all, but there are times when getting information out of a war prisoner might save thousands of lives. So signing this bill handcuffs the president's military. So I will be disappointed if he doesn't veto it.
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 101

Posts: 1476/2743
EXP: 10528843
For next: 188869

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 240 days
Last activity: 142 days
#4 Posted on 7.10.05 0913.50
Reposted on: 7.10.12 0914.46
    Originally posted by AWArulz
    Look,I am all for treating prisoners of war right and all, but there are times when getting information out of a war prisoner might save thousands of lives. So signing this bill handcuffs the president's military. So I will be disappointed if he doesn't veto it.


Except that as the level of inhumane treatment increases AWA, the level of accuracy decreases. My heart says do whatever to these bastards but my head says that it creates more problems than it solves.
JoshMann
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 1762/2159
EXP: 7324793
For next: 144148

Since: 17.11.03
From: Tallahassee, FL

Since last post: 3630 days
Last activity: 3628 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 7.10.05 1021.29
Reposted on: 7.10.12 1022.16
The bill passed through the Senate 90-9, so even if Bush does veto it, they have more than enough of the required 67 votes to overturn that veto. At least in the Senate. The tricky part will be getting 2/3 in the House, which are far more Bush-supportive. Also it's dicey because each and every member of the House will be going back to their district this time next year to explain themselves one way or the other.

The bottom line is that for better or for worse, how the house acts on this may be decided by opinion polling. Especially since Presidential election support isn't what it was a year ago.




(edited by Blanket Jackson on 7.10.05 1131)
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 140

Posts: 2753/5634
EXP: 32772139
For next: 514348

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 1 day
#6 Posted on 10.10.05 0204.54
Reposted on: 10.10.12 0205.02
Here's a link to another article about the same topic.

As I understand it from reading an article in the paper a few days ago, the House has passed a similar defense budget bill, only without the anti-torture language involved. The two bodies of Congress will now have to get together to reconcile the differences, and the article I read didn't seem optimistic that the anti-torture language would remain in the bill.

If the U.S. is going to have any kind of moral authority at all to lecture the world so adamantly on human rights, this must pass. Before we can tell China that their political prisoners can't be forced to sew together soccer balls with their teeth or be killed and their body parts converted into feminine hygiene products, we must pass legislation that makes it clear, in no uncertain terms, that the U.S. does not condone torture under any circumstances.

If we're gonna be the good guys, we need to act like it.

So it doesn't surprise me at all that President Bush is against this legislation.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Bombs drop and Smurfs die
Next thread: Not all terrorists are Muslim...
Previous thread: Apparent failed bombing attempt in Oklahoma
(579 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Senate approves detainee protection billRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.256 seconds.