The W
Views: 116451796
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.9.09 2115
The 7 - Baseball - MLB Manager Changes
This thread has 5 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(457 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
Roy.
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 811/1040
EXP: 2273747
For next: 61893

Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 3061 days
Last activity: 1530 days
#1 Posted on 5.10.05 1033.35
Reposted on: 5.10.12 1037.34
Well, Jim Leyland (sports.yahoo.com) is the first new manager hired this offseason. I thought maybe he was a better choice than Manual for the Phillies last season. It'll be interesting to see what he can do with the Tigers. Just how far away are they from being a good team? I don't get to see much of the AL (besides Yanks/Sox).

I think Jim Tracy would be a good fit in Pittsburgh. It seemed like he wasn't the one who should have been fired from the Dodgers, as it seems like the crappy moves the GM made lead to the Dodgers demise, not so much the manager's job. Some reports have him as being the frontrunner for that job.
Promote this thread!
whatever
Bierwurst
Level: 85

Posts: 750/1824
EXP: 5692246
For next: 206318

Since: 12.2.02
From: Cleveland, Ohio

Since last post: 26 days
Last activity: 15 hours
#2 Posted on 5.10.05 1319.06
Reposted on: 5.10.12 1320.03
Also of note, John Hart stepped down as the GM of the Rangers. So long, architect of the Tribe run of the 90's!

If Tracy ends up with the Pirates, man, what a fall.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Griffey, Giambi win Comeback Player awards
Next thread: Touch 'em all Tom. Touch 'em all.
Previous thread: 2005 MLB Playoff Prediction Thread
(457 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: 2005 MLB Playoff Prediction Thread - Monday Night Baseball coming back. - Whatifsports.com - More...
The 7 - Baseball - MLB Manager ChangesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.277 seconds.