The W
Views: 115704235
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.8.09 2125
The 7 - the-w.com Site Feedback - Sig blocking? Register and log in to post!
(319 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
KJames199
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 122

Posts: 47/4248
EXP: 20297513
For next: 340559

Since: 10.12.01
From: #yqr

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#1 Posted on 23.8.05 1232.13
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1232.14
You know what would be neat? The ability to block signatures from individual posters. I don't want to avoid all sig files, but some of you have really obnoxious sigs and I hate them and I hate you as a result. I want to be a happier person, and the best way I can think of accomplishing this is by making CRZ and Guru do a bunch of extra work to implement a feature that has likely been suggested and shot down already. Or maybe it exists already and I'm an idiot? Who knows.
Promote this thread!
whatever
Bierwurst
Level: 85

Posts: 701/1822
EXP: 5667436
For next: 231128

Since: 12.2.02
From: Cleveland, Ohio

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 10 min.
#2 Posted on 23.8.05 1239.49
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1240.29
That has to be one of the funniest posts I have read in quite some time, and it works on so many levels.

Offhand, if the sig is annoying, wouldn't the rest of the person's post probably annoy you as well? Then you could just select the "Ignore this user" option and all is well. Only downside is that you could still be bothered by the damn avatars.

(edited by whatever on 23.8.05 1340)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 221

Posts: 6721/16934
EXP: 161559903
For next: 1458297

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 53 min.
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 23.8.05 1306.58
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1312.12
    Originally posted by KJames199
    has likely been suggested and shot down already
BINGO - not even two weeks ago (The W).
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 1197/3844
EXP: 17301429
For next: 22716

Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 1126 days
Last activity: 1086 days
#4 Posted on 23.8.05 1316.09
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1318.41
Of course, if you don't mind not seeing people's avatars either, you could switch to dial-up mode. No sigs there.
EddieBurkett
Boudin blanc
Level: 96

Posts: 1216/2429
EXP: 8756871
For next: 231948

Since: 3.1.02
From: GA in person, NJ in heart

Since last post: 23 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#5 Posted on 23.8.05 1358.25
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1359.01
    Originally posted by CRZ
      Originally posted by KJames199
      has likely been suggested and shot down already
    BINGO - not even two weeks ago (The W).


To be fair, that isn't exactly what he's asking. Still, I can see how its similar enough.

I don't know what browser you use, but Firefox lets you block images from a given server. I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that most of the annoying sigs involve large banner-type images, so you could just block those images and that should help alleviate your issues.
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 1199/3844
EXP: 17301429
For next: 22716

Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 1126 days
Last activity: 1086 days
#6 Posted on 23.8.05 1442.42
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1442.42
    Originally posted by EddieBurkett
      Originally posted by CRZ
        Originally posted by KJames199
        has likely been suggested and shot down already
      BINGO - not even two weeks ago (The W).


    To be fair, that isn't exactly what he's asking. Still, I can see how its similar enough.

    I don't know what browser you use, but Firefox lets you block images from a given server. I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that most of the annoying sigs involve large banner-type images, so you could just block those images and that should help alleviate your issues.

And actually I think that is something you can do with any browser, by messing with the hosts file.
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~atman/spam/adblock.shtml
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 140

Posts: 1409/5891
EXP: 33146792
For next: 139695

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 hour
#7 Posted on 23.8.05 1519.05
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1519.29

    I don't know what browser you use, but Firefox lets you block images from a given server.


The problem with this is FireFox can be way too broad about the range of images it'll block.

If I want to block the still-annoying team flags and someone's got them hosted on imageshack (because it's free), I've blacklisted the whole domain instead of just the single picture. The stuff I want to see is gone, but I won't be able to see a magazine cover someone's posted on the same site easily anymore. There shouldn't be a tradeoff.

The way they have it is not without it's uses - it takes care of rotating ad banners pretty effectively - but it's often like trying to pound a nail with a sledgehammer.
KJames199
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 122

Posts: 49/4248
EXP: 20297513
For next: 340559

Since: 10.12.01
From: #yqr

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#8 Posted on 23.8.05 1627.22
Reposted on: 23.8.12 1627.33
    Originally posted by whatever
    Offhand, if the sig is annoying, wouldn't the rest of the person's post probably annoy you as well? Then you could just select the "Ignore this user" option and all is well.


I don't like blocking individual posters because a conversation with the stupid bits cuts out is still annoying, just in a different way.

You're right in assuming that the people with the most awful signatures are usually also the people with the most awful posts.

    Originally posted by ol' Zimmerbutt
    BINGO - not even two weeks ago (The W).


Not entirely the same thing, but yeah, I knew a similar issue had been brought up (and down) recently.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: WOTD - TEH SHOOTAR~!
Next thread: One Question topics
Previous thread: More time on certain forums?
(319 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - the-w.com Site Feedback - Sig blocking?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.178 seconds.