The W
Views: 95568975
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.4.07 0732
The 7 - Football - Pats LB Tedy Bruschi out for 2005
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(334 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (13 total)
The Thrill
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 1865/2781
EXP: 9710729
For next: 289306

Since: 16.4.02
From: Green Bay, WI

Since last post: 13 hours
Last activity: 13 hours
#1 Posted on 20.7.05 1640.32
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1641.19
ESPN.com article

He's hoping for a comeback in 2006 from that stroke he suffered 10 days after the Super Bowl.

So are we, pal.
Promote this thread!
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 109

Posts: 2077/3623
EXP: 13808967
For next: 150723

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#2 Posted on 20.7.05 1642.57
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1643.38
What a classy guy. The NFL needs more people like him. Here's to a Pro-Bowl 2006 season for ol' #54.

(edited by Mayhem on 20.7.05 1652)
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 698/1094
EXP: 2323419
For next: 12221

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 88 days
Last activity: 13 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 20.7.05 1645.27
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1645.49
    Originally posted by The Thrill
    ESPN.com article

    He's hoping for a comeback in 2006 from that stroke he suffered 10 days after the Super Bowl.

    So are we, pal.


My sentiments exactly. You beat me too it though by about a minute, so I deleted my post in the other thread.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 1358/1857
EXP: 5247684
For next: 184560

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 329 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 20.7.05 1657.08
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1657.19
This sucks. As a Pats fan, I hope Tedy can come back in '06 and help us go for a fourth-straight title. As a fan of Tedy Bruschi, though...I just hope he doesn't get himself killed.
PsychoticMidget
Polska kielbasa
Level: 25

Posts: 66/128
EXP: 84729
For next: 4892

Since: 2.12.04
From: Detroit, MI

Since last post: 2932 days
Last activity: 2932 days
#5 Posted on 20.7.05 2055.08
Reposted on: 20.7.12 2057.28
gugs, your friend is dead-on about Peyton.

This news sucks. Tedy's been one of the faces of the Pats, one of those who balance with class the rantings of a TO or Freddie Mitchell, and while he obviously needs the rest/time off it's also a shame he won't be out on the field.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 2922/3273
EXP: 12514339
For next: 157645

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 9 days
#6 Posted on 24.7.05 0149.55
Reposted on: 24.7.12 0150.10
Allow me to quickly derail this thread:

So, I keep seeing these stupid commercials for "Quite Frankly" on ESPN about the Patriots that end with, "Oh yeah... and they have Tom Brady. Quite frankly, that's all you need."

This drives me fucking nuts. The Pats have one of the greatest defensive teams of all time. Without Tedy Bruschi and company, there *are* no Patriots. While Brady has certainly proven time and again that he can get the job done, I cannot stand how much of the credit his unduly given for this team.

Urgh.

-Jag


And as mad as I still am for the Pats beating my Cats, I really hope Tedy makes a full recovery and comes back to kick at least a few mores years worth of ass.

(edited by Jaguar on 24.7.05 0251)
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 115

Posts: 2496/3934
EXP: 16325726
For next: 485689

Since: 22.4.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 20 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 24.7.05 0320.10
Reposted on: 24.7.12 0320.39
Yes, but you're over-thinking the show. There is just no reason for it to exist. Mostly because the opinion espoused in the ad makes raquet_girl (of "Sharapova is great!" incessant The Pulse promo fame) look profound.
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 700/1094
EXP: 2323419
For next: 12221

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 88 days
Last activity: 13 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#8 Posted on 24.7.05 1742.25
Reposted on: 24.7.12 1742.25
    Originally posted by Jaguar
    Allow me to quickly derail this thread:

    So, I keep seeing these stupid commercials for "Quite Frankly" on ESPN about the Patriots that end with, "Oh yeah... and they have Tom Brady. Quite frankly, that's all you need."

    This drives me fucking nuts. The Pats have one of the greatest defensive teams of all time. Without Tedy Bruschi and company, there *are* no Patriots. While Brady has certainly proven time and again that he can get the job done, I cannot stand how much of the credit his unduly given for this team.

    Urgh.




Truthfully, up until this year I though he didn't get enough credit for the Pats success. The past few years, you always heard more hype about Manning, McNab, and Vick. Between the 3 of those QB's there is only 1 Super Bowl appearance. If anything, the Pats success isn't really dependant on one player. It's a total team effort.
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple
Level: 114

Posts: 1120/3844
EXP: 15820491
For next: 489126

Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 262 days
Last activity: 223 days
#9 Posted on 24.7.05 1957.46
Reposted on: 24.7.12 1959.01
It's like I've heard said. There are 3 parts to football. Offense, Defense, and Special Teams. Let's say Offense and Defense each decide 40% of the game, and Special Teams decides 20%. Well, the QB really doesn't have any effect on the running game (unless he's Michael Vick, or in a way, if he's really bad), so that means that he has no effect on half of the offense. This means that at most a QB can affect 20% of a game, which, by itself, is obviously not enough to get a win. So no QB should be praised (or penalized, for that matter) by how many wins his team has. Or let's put it another way. How many rings would Manning, McNabb, Culpepper (I'm not including Vick because he can't throw) have if they were the QB of New England?
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Level: 108

Posts: 1723/3386
EXP: 13199394
For next: 321149

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 7 days
#10 Posted on 24.7.05 2014.17
Reposted on: 24.7.12 2015.58
    Originally posted by Mr. Boffo
    It's like I've heard said. There are 3 parts to football. Offense, Defense, and Special Teams. Let's say Offense and Defense each decide 40% of the game, and Special Teams decides 20%. Well, the QB really doesn't have any effect on the running game (unless he's Michael Vick, or in a way, if he's really bad), so that means that he has no effect on half of the offense. This means that at most a QB can affect 20% of a game, which, by itself, is obviously not enough to get a win. So no QB should be praised (or penalized, for that matter) by how many wins his team has. Or let's put it another way. How many rings would Manning, McNabb, Culpepper (I'm not including Vick because he can't throw) have if they were the QB of New England?


Except a good QB can have an effect on the running game the same way a bad QB can. A defense can't stack up against the run when they have to always be ready for a good QB to strike the same way a defense playing a bad QB can load up the box because the opposing QB is not a threat.

Also, the offense, defense and special teams all work together to gain field position, rest and so on. A good offense gives their defense rest while controlling the ball and also doesn't hand the ball to the opposing offense in good field position. It's {edit: NOT} like the three facets of the game are completely independent of each other.

(edited by TheBucsFan on 25.7.05 0212)
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 151

Posts: 4751/7534
EXP: 42806337
For next: 490239

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 290 days
Last activity: 290 days
#11 Posted on 24.7.05 2025.05
Reposted on: 24.7.12 2028.23
    Originally posted by Mr. Boffo
    It's like I've heard said. There are 3 parts to football. Offense, Defense, and Special Teams. Let's say Offense and Defense each decide 40% of the game, and Special Teams decides 20%. Well, the QB really doesn't have any effect on the running game (unless he's Michael Vick, or in a way, if he's really bad), so that means that he has no effect on half of the offense. This means that at most a QB can affect 20% of a game, which, by itself, is obviously not enough to get a win. So no QB should be praised (or penalized, for that matter) by how many wins his team has. Or let's put it another way. How many rings would Manning, McNabb, Culpepper (I'm not including Vick because he can't throw) have if they were the QB of New England?






The Patriot Super Bowls have to be looked at through different prisms. And this is leaving out whatever percentages coaching and weather gets:
The first was about 50% defense, 35% special teams and 15% offense. Brady was a second year back-up QB, and his job was not to screw it up. He came through with big drives for them, but it was primarily the defense and special teams making big plays, especially in the AFC Title Game against Pittsburgh. They were a team that wanted to play the game in the teens, and were successful doing it.
The second was more of a 45% defense, 40% offense, 15% special teams (the punter sucked). They could shut teams down or they could win shoot-outs. They could win a 10-6 game or a 38-34 game.
The third flipped it to 45% offense, 35% defense, 20% special teams (punting didn't suck). Though they still had a very good defense, the defense was vulnerable deep along the sidelines due to the cornerback injuries. The offense was improved as they had a reliable running game that gave Brady the ability to play action, and a receiving corp that allowed him to throw deep. They could keep teams down at times (Jets, Ravens, Colts in playoffs), but they were more likely to beat a team 31-20.

As for the McNabb/Culpepper/Manning question: McNabb would have a ring. Culpepper wouldn't, but that is more fumbling QB playing in cold weather than anything else. That, and 41-0 the only time he got to a conference title game. Manning is interesting, because he wouldn't have to face Belichick, but whether he could win a title playing on a team that deals with elements instead of playing on a fast-track in a bubble is a difficult question.
On another Manning tangent: Is the biggest game of his career this November when the Colts go to Foxboro? The weather probably won't be awful (although there was a major November snowstorm each of the last 2 years) and if the Colts lose that game, it is probable they will have to play at least 1 round, if not 2, on the road in January, in all likelihood in a cold weather stadium.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 144

Posts: 3702/6668
EXP: 36469937
For next: 240457

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 17 hours
Last activity: 15 hours
#12 Posted on 25.7.05 1425.04
Reposted on: 25.7.12 1429.01
See, the homefield argument is why I roll my eyes whenever people talk about Peyton as one of the great QBs. Everyone is like "Well, if the Colts ever get home-field, watch out," but if they were a real team, they'd just get it done no matter where they played. You never saw Joe Montana whine about not being able to play playoff games in Candlestick; he'd just go into Texas Stadium or Giants Stadium or RFK or wherever and take care of business. The fact that the Colts haven't yet adapted to playing in the cold (after a few seasons of being kicked around by the Pats) tells me that there is something fundamentally wrong with that team that home-field won't fix. Maybe it's time for Tony Dungy to move on in order to get the team really blossom, like with the Bucs and Gruden.

But anyway, back to Bruschi. It sucks to see such a class guy suffer such a random injury. Best of luck on a full recovery for 2006. And, not to go all Paul Maguire, but you're telling me that the Patriots won't adopt a 'Win one for Bru' attitude this year?

(edited by Big Bad on 25.7.05 1525)
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 2215/4698
EXP: 21572092
For next: 264570

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#13 Posted on 25.7.05 1427.41
Reposted on: 25.7.12 1429.02
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    See, the homefield argument is why I roll my eyes whenever people talk about Peyton as one of the great QBs. Everyone is like "Well, if the Colts ever get home-field, watch out," but if they were a real team, they'd just get it done no matter where they played. You never saw Joe Montana whine about not being able to play playoff games in Candlestick; he'd just go into Texas Stadium or Giants Stadium or RFK or wherever and take care of business. The fact that the Colts haven't yet adapted to playing in the cold (after a few seasons of being kicked around by the Pats) tells me that there is something fundamentally wrong with that team that home-field won't fix. Maybe it's time for Tony Dungy to move on in order to get the team really blossom, like with the Bucs and Gruden.


Also, they could...I don't know...actually EARN homefield advantage by being the BEST team. That's a thought.

The Colts-Pats AFC Divisional Playoff "Game of the Week" recap on NFL Network is the best show on TV. I could watch it every day.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Edge gets stupid...
Next thread: Ricky Williams rejoins Dolphins...
Previous thread: T.O. "They hated on Jesus, too. "
(334 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Vladamir Putin... Super Bowl Champion!?!? - Patriots Super Bowl Ring Pic - Troy Brown re-signs with Pats - More...
The 7 - Football - Pats LB Tedy Bruschi out for 2005Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.212 seconds.