The W
Views: 112797799
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
26.5.09 1958
The 7 - Movies & TV - 10 Years of UPN and WB
This thread has 7 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1940 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (29 total)
Omar Padilla
Chourico
Level: 38

Posts: 242/284
EXP: 347038
For next: 23412

Since: 3.1.02

Since last post: 1421 days
Last activity: 1420 days
#1 Posted on 19.7.05 2005.40
Reposted on: 19.7.12 2007.57
The WB and UPN both got their start in January 1995 (about 2 days apart from each other, UPN on Jan. 11 and WB on Jan 13.) and have since brought us about 100 hours of good TV and lots of Moesha and The Jamie Foxx Show and there has been hardly any online coverage of both of these networks early willingness to lose millions and millions of dollars every year.

During some early journalism classes we were told that these two networks were started mainly due to the other big four networks keeping the rights to their shows and running them through syndication and screwing over the independent TV sations when they would offer up the scraps at 3 times the price. A perfect example of this was FOX keeping The Simpsons and Married..with Children and just recently selling off a limited number of episodes. All of this happening while it was these guys studios that were producing a lot of the other networks big shows.

When the WB started it provided one night of primetime comedy on Wednesdays and I don't remember one single show but ALWAYS got a full dose of Michigan J. Frog during promos.

Some early UPN shows I remember were 'Platypus Man' with Richard Jeni and another show titled 'Pig Sty' from which I don't recall anything other than the name.

Of course, both networks still continue to struggle, finding a marginally hit show every couple of seasons but it's almost a given that the bottom of the Nielsen ratings will be occupied by some type of UPN or WB programming. Not being seen in a lot of the country might have something to do with it along with having their original programming airing at odd hours but it's been a decade for each network and it looks like they're going to be sticking around no matter what the cost.

Promote this thread!
Battlezone
Potato korv
Level: 55

Posts: 546/696
EXP: 1277035
For next: 37163

Since: 27.2.03
From: Seattle, Washington

Since last post: 2726 days
Last activity: 231 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 19.7.05 2037.12
Reposted on: 19.7.12 2037.15
UPN, it seems, has struggled a bit more than the WB, partly because of a lack of quality programming early on (The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer? Homeboys in Outer Space?), partially because it's always been seen as the Black Network, and partially because it never had that Buffy or Dawson's Creek to build on, Smackdown! notwithstanding.

And anytime they have a critical hit that doesn't bring in the ratings, it seems to get cancelled (Platinum, Kevin Hill).

(EDIT: Whoops, guess I was wrong about Veronica Mars being cancelled. I *do* remember it and Kevin Hill being on the bubble a while back, so I must have gotten them confused. Well, as much as you can get a show about a black male lawyer confused about a show about a white teenaged girl.)

(edited by Battlezone on 19.7.05 1933)
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 139

Posts: 1380/5811
EXP: 32191500
For next: 276027

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 43 min.
#3 Posted on 19.7.05 2109.21
Reposted on: 19.7.12 2109.46
Uh no.
PeterStork
Sujuk
Level: 65

Posts: 386/1009
EXP: 2319133
For next: 16507

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 428 days
Last activity: 190 days
#4 Posted on 19.7.05 2143.12
Reposted on: 19.7.12 2143.22
    Originally posted by Omar Padilla
    During some early journalism classes we were told that these two networks were started mainly due to the other big four networks keeping the rights to their shows and running them through syndication and screwing over the independent TV sations when they would offer up the scraps at 3 times the price. A perfect example of this was FOX keeping The Simpsons and Married..with Children and just recently selling off a limited number of episodes. All of this happening while it was these guys studios that were producing a lot of the other networks big shows.


The last line's the winner: WB and Par said "WTF are we doing taking license fees when we can make the big time ad bucks?" Par had been wanting to do this since the late 70's; Star Trek: The Masturbatory Motion Picture was originally supposed to be a series that would anchor UPN. Fifteen years (or so) later they did this with Voyager. Given, you don't deny the big four your shows, since Friends and ER made more money for Dub on NBC than they ever would have on The WB. It's just another outlet for your corporation to make bling.

I've no clue where the idea of the big four networks "keeping the rights to their shows" comes from. The studios own the show and license x number of runs to the networks over a four-year window, then renew. Syndication begins, and the cycle runs until one year after the show leaves first-run network TV. Meanwhile, the off-net runs of big four primetime shows ended up on these locals; ABC and CBS affils were too busy running local news and The Wheel to be worried about Cosby reruns. If nothing else, local indys had MORE power without the netlets, as they were able to run Star Trek: TNG and other syndie first run hits (they had those back then) in primetime as well as a lot of local sports events that got better ratings than Blue Collar TV. It's sort of win-lose for the locals; you gain some prestige and lower your costs, but lose your identity. Witness KPLR-St. Louis.

As for their struggles, the biggest hurdle is respect. Fox got it with Married... and to a greater extent The Simpsons, and with the NFL in '94 grabbed the brass ring and improved their affiliate lineup. WB and UPN got scraps, and haven't kept a solid network identity or enough quality programs to attract attention. I hate to harp, but look at Gilmore Girls: critics hail it year after year, but it's gotten ONE Emmy nom in five years (costume design.) Why? It airs on The WB. It's all about respect and public perception.
Kei Posiskunk
Kolbasz
Level: 47

Posts: 90/481
EXP: 764582
For next: 1627

Since: 7.1.02
From: Central PA, USA

Since last post: 410 days
Last activity: 403 days
#5 Posted on 20.7.05 1457.08
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1457.14
One of UPN's best early shows didn't last long at all. My mother in Frederick, MD had UPN long before I had it here in Central PA, and by the time we got it here, the one show I liked from the network's debut, "Live Shot", was already cancelled.

As far as the WB's early shows, the only ones I can remember are the Married...with Children ripoff "Unhappily Ever After", and the so-bad-it's-funny soap opera spoof "Muscle", which revolved around the heirs to some obscenely affluent gym...
Juggalo101
Italian
Level: 34

Posts: 172/240
EXP: 246967
For next: 6687

Since: 27.4.04
From: Atlanta

Since last post: 1214 days
Last activity: 1213 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 20.7.05 1644.08
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1644.37

    UPN, it seems, has struggled a bit more than the WB, partly because of a lack of quality programming early on (The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer? Homeboys in Outer Space?), partially because it's always been seen as the Black Network, and partially because it never had that Buffy or Dawson's Creek to build on, Smackdown! notwithstanding.

    And anytime they have a critical hit that doesn't bring in the ratings, it seems to get cancelled (Platinum, Kevin Hill).

    (EDIT: Whoops, guess I was wrong about Veronica Mars being cancelled. I *do* remember it and Kevin Hill being on the bubble a while back, so I must have gotten them confused. Well, as much as you can get a show about a black male lawyer confused about a show about a white teenaged girl.)


Let's not forget "The Mullets."

(edited by Juggalo101 on 20.7.05 1446)
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 1109/3844
EXP: 17147990
For next: 176155

Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 1033 days
Last activity: 993 days
#7 Posted on 20.7.05 1650.12
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1650.51
Didn't The WB air "The Oblongs"?
Tenken347
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 775/2791
EXP: 10255067
For next: 99365

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#8 Posted on 20.7.05 1752.54
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1753.16
I'd forgotten about Muscle. That show was pretty funny.
J. Kyle
Boudin blanc
Level: 96

Posts: 1297/2468
EXP: 8848318
For next: 140501

Since: 21.2.02
From: The Land of Aloha

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 20.7.05 1808.12
Reposted on: 20.7.12 1808.31
They shouldn't have cancelled Haunted.
PsychoticMidget
Polska kielbasa
Level: 26

Posts: 65/128
EXP: 93781
For next: 8496

Since: 2.12.04
From: Detroit, MI

Since last post: 3703 days
Last activity: 3703 days
#10 Posted on 20.7.05 2045.55
Reposted on: 20.7.12 2046.07
God. 10 years of some of the most laughable television on the planet.....Voyager, Enterprise, every single original comedy on UPN, every single original family drama on WB....if it wasn't for Smackdown, I'd never have watched either of these channels.

Now when Adult Swim/Cartoon Network has their anniversaries, that is cause for celebration.
XPacArmy
Frankfurter
Level: 60

Posts: 625/848
EXP: 1704204
For next: 68584

Since: 13.5.03
From: Woodbridge, VA

Since last post: 933 days
Last activity: 930 days
#11 Posted on 21.7.05 0440.38
Reposted on: 21.7.12 0440.38
    Originally posted by AngryJohnny
    They shouldn't have cancelled Haunted.


I agree but Matthew Fox got LOST out of it so I can let that one go. On UPN I loved Nowhere Man and even Sir Mix alot's show The Watcher.
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 136

Posts: 2595/5479
EXP: 29381796
For next: 715196

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 10 hours
#12 Posted on 21.7.05 0605.26
Reposted on: 21.7.12 0606.20
The only reason I ever watched the WB (in Indianapolis, anyway) was for the Pacers games, and the only reason I ever watched UPN was for Voyager (but not for very long) and of course SmackDown. So, yeah, ten years of more or less completely forgettable, disposable television.
J. Kyle
Boudin blanc
Level: 96

Posts: 1299/2468
EXP: 8848318
For next: 140501

Since: 21.2.02
From: The Land of Aloha

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#13 Posted on 21.7.05 0719.20
Reposted on: 21.7.12 0719.40
    Originally posted by XPacArmy
      Originally posted by AngryJohnny
      They shouldn't have cancelled Haunted.


    I agree but Matthew Fox got LOST out of it so I can let that one go. On UPN I loved Nowhere Man and even Sir Mix alot's show The Watcher.
They could've run two seasons (thirty something episodes) and wrapped up the subplot before canning it and sending Matthew to Lost!

At the very least it's nice to know I'm not alone in wanting the rest of that show on DVD.
    Originally posted by PsychoticMidget
    God. 10 years of some of the most laughable television on the planet.....Voyager, Enterprise, every single original comedy on UPN, every single original family drama on WB....if it wasn't for Smackdown, I'd never have watched either of these channels.
I understand knocking UPN's comedies but WB's dramas? For every piece of crap like One Tree Hill there's something like Gilmore Girls. It's almost like they have a sense of Feng Shui for show quality.

And my major knock on both networks (But UPN especially) is prematurely pulling the plug on its better shows like the new Twilight Zone, the aforementioned Haunted, and even less remembered stuff like Nowhere Man and Game Over.
Dahak
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 610/772
EXP: 1536078
For next: 41477

Since: 12.5.02
From: Junction City OR.

Since last post: 2607 days
Last activity: 2260 days
#14 Posted on 21.7.05 0738.32
Reposted on: 21.7.12 0739.32
WB has a lot of crap shows. However at least WB seems to have a theme. Good looking alleged teens doing things. Sure you get total crap like One Tree Hill but at least the shows seem to sort of fit together.
UPN's theme if it has one is crappy black comedy shows. But then the shows that are actually successful are not black comedy shows. Smackdown, Voyager, and Enterprise were as much as anything on UPN successful. If UPN would fix it's lazy mistakes like only having 3 bumpers for it's show and not changing them for years that might be a big help.
What is sad is that IMO at least is that a lot of cable channels are run far better than UPN and WB. Those cable channels that seem to be doing fairly well have a theme like MTV, SciFi, Nickelodean, and History Channel. Channels that seem to have no clue what they are doing like Spike and UPN.
StingArmy
Andouille
Level: 89

Posts: 215/2118
EXP: 6733758
For next: 182170

Since: 3.5.03
From: Georgia bred, you can tell by my Hawk jersey

Since last post: 94 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#15 Posted on 21.7.05 2112.06
Reposted on: 21.7.12 2112.25
    Originally posted by Battlezone
    (The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer? Homeboys in Outer Space?)

Hey, Homeboys wasn't all that bad! Hehe.

As for UPN and ratings issues, perhaps they continue to air various unpopular black comedy shows because they want something for the black community to enjoy and/or relate to. Or at the very least, if you don't buy that philanthropic angle, perhaps they want to make sure that they can always have somewhat of a stranglehold on at least ONE demographic, even if it isn't very large.

- StingArmy
Oliver
Scrapple
Level: 130

Posts: 1431/5007
EXP: 25275364
For next: 455282

Since: 20.6.02

Since last post: 452 days
Last activity: 446 days
#16 Posted on 21.7.05 2327.47
Reposted on: 21.7.12 2328.04
I'm still wondering why, after all these years, FOX canned IN LIVING COLOUR after two seasons.

-S
Wolfram J. Paulovich
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 644/742
EXP: 1421337
For next: 64600

Since: 11.11.02
From: Fat City, Baby

Since last post: 3537 days
Last activity: 2908 days
AIM:  
#17 Posted on 22.7.05 0011.19
Reposted on: 22.7.12 0012.21
I think everyone in this thread is overlooking a brilliant piece of television called Shasta McNasty. For shame.




Seriously, though, the "brought us 100 hours of quality TV" comment is a pretty low estimate. I don't disagree that the ratio of good TV to bad TV on those networks is appallingly small. But critical and fan favorites like Gilmore Girls, Buffy and Angel on their own probably triple the 100-hour figure. Like I said, I'll still admit that even that tripling added to the other arguably good shows is statistically insignificant when compared to the hours upon hours of other shows that have been justifiably forgotten.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 220

Posts: 6568/16878
EXP: 159361455
For next: 1101078

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#18 Posted on 22.7.05 0024.08
Reposted on: 22.7.12 0026.10
    Originally posted by SOK
    I'm still wondering why, after all these years, FOX canned IN LIVING COLOUR after two seasons.

    -S
Well, it was five, and all the Wayanses kinda left.

MY LIST: UPN: Voyager, 7 Days, Dilbert (always the lowest rated yet it stuck around for a couple seasons' worth of episodes), Home Movies (okay - only like four episodes), I'm pretty sure that Top Model show is doing pretty well, Gary & Mike,

WB: Sorry, can't help ya. (Although I DID watch most of the first season of Felicity as Kim was doing some hilarious recaps for a now long-gone site and I wanted to get the jokes - and Kim now reminds me that I was forced to sit through a few episodes of "Dawson's Creek" before I met her) - seriously, the best thing about our WB affiliate was they were the ones who aired WXO those three times, and they were one of the two stations that aired WOW. Oh! I watched "The PJs" after FOX booted them. (I did NOT watch any of the [adult swim] stuff when it originally aired...although I *do* have some "Mission Hill" tchochkes that were left at my local CD Warehouse one time.) Wow, this is longer than the network I *did* watch. Oh well. Now, when it comes to the soon-to-disappear-on-the-weekdays KIDS' WB...

(edited by CRZ on 22.7.05 0025)
arnoldrimmer
Linguica
Level: 20

Posts: 65/71
EXP: 39783
For next: 2656

Since: 17.4.04
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 3083 days
Last activity: 3083 days
#19 Posted on 22.7.05 1355.05
Reposted on: 22.7.12 1358.40
Someone else mentioned Oblongs, but, I'm happy somebody mentioned GaryAndMike, HomeMovies, Dilbert and MissionHill.

Did anybody mention BabyBlues ?

These would be the only shows on UPN/WB (other than Smackdown or occassionaly Enterprise) that I ever watched.

And, those shows are great..just great.
Tribal Prophet
Andouille
Level: 89

Posts: 1070/2072
EXP: 6834447
For next: 81481

Since: 9.1.02
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Since last post: 73 days
Last activity: 17 days
#20 Posted on 24.7.05 1705.47
Reposted on: 24.7.12 1707.33
Buffy, Angel, and What I Like About You are about it for me. Smackdown's carried on The Score in Canada an hour earlier and in MUCH better quality than the "mayonnaise on the screen" look I get from the UPN station that's carried here.


Tribal Prophet
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: End of ESPN era
Next thread: For Those Of Ya'll With OnDemand....
Previous thread: Family Guy 07/17/2005 - "Breaking Out Is Hard to Do"
(1940 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: UPN Up-Fronts - The show we were born to watch - www.Saveenterprise.com - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - 10 Years of UPN and WBRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.55 seconds.