The W
Views: 103383160
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.3.08 1936
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Undisputed Title Defense
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(9877 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 130

Posts: 511/5112
EXP: 25406951
For next: 323695

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 24 min.
#1 Posted on 19.4.02 1448.20
Reposted on: 19.4.09 1449.18
So is this title going to be defended more than once a month? Will the winner of Austin/Taker fight the winner of H/H on Monday, or do we have to wait another month for a title match? Having the title defended once a month seems to make the number one contendership seem a lot more important, but that's really about it. Maybe this has already been addressed and I missed it, but everyone seems to be under the impression that the winner of Austin/Taker goes on to the next ppv.
Promote this thread!
AWArulz
Knackwurst
Level: 110

Posts: 8/3451
EXP: 14054594
For next: 354338

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 52 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 19.4.02 1453.15
Reposted on: 19.4.09 1453.34
    Originally posted by BigDaddyLoco
    So is this title going to be defended more than once a month?
    >>>>>>>>>

    I'm sure they're still figuring this deal out. I hope that's not going to be the case, because I want to see title matches, preferably on both Raw and Smackdown.

    It might be interesting to see HH win and see how long VKM keeps the strap on him after reactions at the houses. But I suspect we'll see HH talk and Austin talk and underbiker talk and RVD wrestle.

    (edited by AWArulz on 19.4.02 1554)
spf
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 644/5407
EXP: 27637286
For next: 215454

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 83 days
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 19.4.02 1531.51
Reposted on: 19.4.09 1559.01
I think they said it would be at the next PPV, but I could be wrong. And personally I like the whole few defenses thing. I could see myself very happy with one defense per month on each show, and one PPV defense.
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 510/5387
EXP: 27457783
For next: 394957

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 282 days
Last activity: 120 days
#4 Posted on 20.4.02 0455.27
Reposted on: 20.4.09 0459.01
My thoughts:

As long as the title's defended at least once a month, I've got no problem with it personally. And in the interim, the champ's out cutting promos, running the occasional non-title match or tag-team match, and staying in the spotlight. I've got no problem with that.

It's when the champ wins the belt and disappears for a few months, returning and still being champion, that I get pissed. That's why I used to loathe Hulk Hogan.
J. Kyle
Boudin blanc
Level: 94

Posts: 68/2392
EXP: 8090103
For next: 266585

Since: 21.2.02
From: The Land of Aloha

Since last post: 110 days
Last activity: 110 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 20.4.02 0501.55
Reposted on: 20.4.09 0523.58
Once a month is fine. Too many defenses was overkill. Maybe they ARE trying to make the title worth something again.
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 130

Posts: 513/5112
EXP: 25406951
For next: 323695

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 7 hours
Last activity: 24 min.
#6 Posted on 20.4.02 1413.29
Reposted on: 20.4.09 1424.23

    Once a month is fine. Too many defenses was overkill


I always prefered the fighting champion. I really enjoyed Triple H's title reign when he wanted to prove he was that damn good and fought all commers, Taz, TAKA, whoever.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Jericho PPV streak?
Next thread: Yet another wacked WWF poll
Previous thread: Jericho: The Voice of Reason
(9877 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Undisputed Title DefenseRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.385 seconds.