The W
Views: 130810300
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.2.11 1513
The 7 - Baseball - Schilling vs LOU Register and log in to post!
(664 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 140

Posts: 1612/5646
EXP: 32569680
For next: 716807

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 9 days
#1 Posted on 27.4.05 2146.59
Reposted on: 27.4.12 2149.24
Schilling has a knack for running his mouth without thinking, but does he really think that Pinella ordered his pitchers to throw back at Red Sox batters? Maybe, maybe not. You just don't dis on Lou though.

Click Here (sports.espn.go.com)
Promote this thread!
Brian P. Dermody
Liverwurst
Moderator
Level: 71

Posts: 707/1205
EXP: 3139432
For next: 27697

Since: 20.9.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 2154 days
Last activity: 1577 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 27.4.05 2252.18
Reposted on: 27.4.12 2253.22
Geez, and here I thought we were talking about Lou Merloni, who, evidently is from Framingham.
PeterStork
Sujuk
Level: 66

Posts: 350/1009
EXP: 2455920
For next: 5944

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 1064 days
Last activity: 826 days
#3 Posted on 28.4.05 0003.05
Reposted on: 28.4.12 0005.38
Half of me says, "Here goes Schilling, running off at the mouth again," reminding me why I don't like the guy all that much (dating back to Philly when he liked to talk bad about ex-teammates.) The other half says, "Well, it IS Lou Pinella we're talking about, not the reincarnated Jim Leyland. I wouldn't put it past him."

All of me says, "This is outstanding theatre, and distracting us from the fact that the Orioles are leading the division right now."
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 68

Posts: 646/1103
EXP: 2723936
For next: 4878

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 698 days
Last activity: 29 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 28.4.05 2210.35
Reposted on: 28.4.12 2213.06
    Originally posted by PeterStork
    Half of me says, "Here goes Schilling, running off at the mouth again," reminding me why I don't like the guy all that much (dating back to Philly when he liked to talk bad about ex-teammates.) The other half says, "Well, it IS Lou Pinella we're talking about, not the reincarnated Jim Leyland. I wouldn't put it past him."

    All of me says, "This is outstanding theatre, and distracting us from the fact that the Orioles are leading the division right now."


Umm, weren't the Oriols leading the division this time last year too?
PeterStork
Sujuk
Level: 66

Posts: 352/1009
EXP: 2455920
For next: 5944

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 1064 days
Last activity: 826 days
#5 Posted on 28.4.05 2226.55
Reposted on: 28.4.12 2229.03
    Originally posted by BOSsportsfan34
      Originally posted by PeterStork
      Half of me says, "Here goes Schilling, running off at the mouth again," reminding me why I don't like the guy all that much (dating back to Philly when he liked to talk bad about ex-teammates.) The other half says, "Well, it IS Lou Pinella we're talking about, not the reincarnated Jim Leyland. I wouldn't put it past him."

      All of me says, "This is outstanding theatre, and distracting us from the fact that the Orioles are leading the division right now."


    Umm, weren't the Oriols leading the division this time last year too?


Oh, I'm not saying it means anything, just pointing it out for the hell of it. Didn't think the Nats stay in first would last long, either.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Eyes of the Tiger
Next thread: Selig proposes tougher Roids policy
Previous thread: Marlins Get Final OK on New Stadium
(664 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: "Sluggers" way out ahead in AL home run race - Santana wins AL Cy Young - Pre-Spring Training American League Regular Season Prediction Thread - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Schilling vs LOURegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.307 seconds.