The W
Views: 100277991
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
31.10.07 1435
The 7 - Baseball - Schilling vs LOU Register and log in to post!
(342 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 1612/4975
EXP: 24018044
For next: 363722

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 7 min.
#1 Posted on 27.4.05 2146.59
Reposted on: 27.4.12 2149.24
Schilling has a knack for running his mouth without thinking, but does he really think that Pinella ordered his pitchers to throw back at Red Sox batters? Maybe, maybe not. You just don't dis on Lou though.

Click Here (sports.espn.go.com)
Promote this thread!
Brian P. Dermody
Liverwurst
Moderator
Level: 69

Posts: 707/1205
EXP: 2782183
For next: 87575

Since: 20.9.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 945 days
Last activity: 368 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 27.4.05 2252.18
Reposted on: 27.4.12 2253.22
Geez, and here I thought we were talking about Lou Merloni, who, evidently is from Framingham.
PeterStork
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 350/1007
EXP: 2181997
For next: 32112

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 49 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#3 Posted on 28.4.05 0003.05
Reposted on: 28.4.12 0005.38
Half of me says, "Here goes Schilling, running off at the mouth again," reminding me why I don't like the guy all that much (dating back to Philly when he liked to talk bad about ex-teammates.) The other half says, "Well, it IS Lou Pinella we're talking about, not the reincarnated Jim Leyland. I wouldn't put it past him."

All of me says, "This is outstanding theatre, and distracting us from the fact that the Orioles are leading the division right now."
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 646/1097
EXP: 2388151
For next: 73713

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 56 days
Last activity: 11 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 28.4.05 2210.35
Reposted on: 28.4.12 2213.06
    Originally posted by PeterStork
    Half of me says, "Here goes Schilling, running off at the mouth again," reminding me why I don't like the guy all that much (dating back to Philly when he liked to talk bad about ex-teammates.) The other half says, "Well, it IS Lou Pinella we're talking about, not the reincarnated Jim Leyland. I wouldn't put it past him."

    All of me says, "This is outstanding theatre, and distracting us from the fact that the Orioles are leading the division right now."


Umm, weren't the Oriols leading the division this time last year too?
PeterStork
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 352/1007
EXP: 2181997
For next: 32112

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 49 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#5 Posted on 28.4.05 2226.55
Reposted on: 28.4.12 2229.03
    Originally posted by BOSsportsfan34
      Originally posted by PeterStork
      Half of me says, "Here goes Schilling, running off at the mouth again," reminding me why I don't like the guy all that much (dating back to Philly when he liked to talk bad about ex-teammates.) The other half says, "Well, it IS Lou Pinella we're talking about, not the reincarnated Jim Leyland. I wouldn't put it past him."

      All of me says, "This is outstanding theatre, and distracting us from the fact that the Orioles are leading the division right now."


    Umm, weren't the Oriols leading the division this time last year too?


Oh, I'm not saying it means anything, just pointing it out for the hell of it. Didn't think the Nats stay in first would last long, either.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Eyes of the Tiger
Next thread: Selig proposes tougher Roids policy
Previous thread: Marlins Get Final OK on New Stadium
(342 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: "Sluggers" way out ahead in AL home run race - Santana wins AL Cy Young - Pre-Spring Training American League Regular Season Prediction Thread - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Schilling vs LOURegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.184 seconds.