The W
Views: 100934218
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.11.07 0353
The 7 - Movies & TV - Spiderman 3 villian Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1418 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (21 total)
brick
Bockwurst
Level: 49

Posts: 362/535
EXP: 848163
For next: 35726

Since: 17.1.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 575 days
Last activity: 571 days
#1 Posted on 22.3.05 0816.15
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0820.46
http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Movies/03/22/film.church.reut/index.html

Thomas Haden Church is the villian, but they aren't saying who he is playing. He resembles Willem Dafoe enough to be an Osbourn relative. I don't think he has the physical size to be Venom. Any thoughts on what other Spidy villians he could be?
Promote this thread!
Tenken347
Boudin blanc
Level: 93

Posts: 700/2457
EXP: 7978438
For next: 74402

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#2 Posted on 22.3.05 0817.21
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0820.46
How about Hobgoblin?
Jobberman
Kishke
Level: 44

Posts: 290/426
EXP: 603611
For next: 7678

Since: 2.1.02
From: West Palm Beach, FL

Since last post: 117 days
Last activity: 79 days
#3 Posted on 22.3.05 0830.34
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0834.31
I thought I read somwhere that Sam Raimi wanted The Lizard as the next villian...
SchippeWreck
Banger
Level: 97

Posts: 719/2666
EXP: 8989417
For next: 327941

Since: 26.3.03
From: Glendale, CA

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 2 days
#4 Posted on 22.3.05 0911.44
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0918.50
    Originally posted by Jobberman
    I thought I read somwhere that Sam Raimi wanted The Lizard as the next villian...

That makes sense. He looks enough like, but is more of a "name" than Dylan Baker (IMDB), who played Curt Connors in Spider-Man 2.

(edited by SchippeWreck on 22.3.05 0712)
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 110

Posts: 1779/3648
EXP: 14338065
For next: 70867

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 30 days
Last activity: 2 days
#5 Posted on 22.3.05 0913.16
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0921.00

There's also been internet talk of Black Widow as well. Maybe they're be going the 2 villan route a la Batman Returns.
jfkfc
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 546/1177
EXP: 2760710
For next: 109048

Since: 9.2.02

Since last post: 134 days
Last activity: 9 days
#6 Posted on 22.3.05 0921.33
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0921.40
Maybe the villian in #3 will be a slow airplane mechanic...
JoshMann
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 1515/2159
EXP: 6367424
For next: 25375

Since: 17.11.03
From: Tallahassee, FL

Since last post: 2328 days
Last activity: 2325 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 22.3.05 0928.11
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0928.40
    Originally posted by jfkfc
    Maybe the villian in #3 will be a slow airplane mechanic...


By that rationale, the villians in the first two movies should have been...

#1- Jesus
#2- Coked-up, wearing a silk bathrobe, armed to the teeth and obsessed over the song "Sister Christian" by Night Ranger.

Either of those movies I would have paid to see. :)
Von Maestro
Boudin rouge
Level: 47

Posts: 301/512
EXP: 730718
For next: 35491

Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 260 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#8 Posted on 22.3.05 0958.39
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0959.03
    Originally posted by Blanket Jackson
    #2- Coked-up, wearing a silk bathrobe, armed to the teeth and obsessed over the song "Sister Christian" by Night Ranger.


I was actually picturing the villian in #2 as a Jew from Anatefka who was wishing he was rich, having seen Fiddler on the Roof with my then girlfriend a week before Spiderman 2 came out... :-)
Packman V2
Bratwurst
Level: 71

Posts: 257/1331
EXP: 3035882
For next: 131247

Since: 16.3.04
From: Albuquerque, NM

Since last post: 84 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 22.3.05 1101.58
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1102.20
    Originally posted by Mayhem

    There's also been internet talk of Black Widow as well. Maybe they're be going the 2 villan route a la Batman Returns.


I figured that would happen anyway...or are they gonna draw out Harry taking over as the Green Goblin again?

Tenken347
Boudin blanc
Level: 93

Posts: 701/2457
EXP: 7978438
For next: 74402

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#10 Posted on 22.3.05 1117.04
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1117.04
Considering McGuire, Dunst, and Raimi have all stated that they don't want to do more than three Spider-Man movies, I don't see them dragging out Harry's story any further.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 2784/3273
EXP: 12825513
For next: 265840

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 234 days
Last activity: 35 days
#11 Posted on 22.3.05 1135.50
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1135.51
I've only heard Dunst say she's done with Spider-Man. When did the other two say they wanted out?

-Jag
estragand
Summer sausage
Level: 45

Posts: 324/439
EXP: 620147
For next: 40022

Since: 18.6.02

Since last post: 2591 days
Last activity: 2591 days
AIM:  
#12 Posted on 22.3.05 1143.48
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1143.49
    Originally posted by Mayhem

    There's also been internet talk of Black Widow as well. Maybe they're be going the 2 villan route a la Batman Returns.

Small trivial point, but I believe it's actually the Black CAT. Both characters are hotsy totsy broads in black outfits, so the confusion is understandable. Black Cat is the Catwoman rip-off who used to fight Spidey, until she did a face turn and became his girlfriend for a bit. Black Widow is the former Iron Man communist/cold war villain who also did a face turn, messed with Hawkeye, shacked up with Daredevil and became an Avenger.

Some of the Black Cat rumors are based on speculation over the landlord's daughter in Spider-Man 2. There was also a rumor two years ago that Eliza Dushku was connected to the role.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 110

Posts: 2739/3504
EXP: 14236891
For next: 172041

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 341 days
Last activity: 28 days
#13 Posted on 22.3.05 1232.43
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1233.32
CONFIRMED (or all but) AS RETURNING: Tobey Maguire [Peter Parker/Spider-Man], James Franco [Harry Osborn], Kirsten Dunst [Mary Jane Watson], Bruce Campbell, J.K. Simmons [J. Jonah Jameson], Thomas Haden Church [villain (Sandman, Venom or Hobgoblin)],
PROBABLY RETURNING: Dylan Baker [Curt Connors], Rosemary Harris [May Parker], Daniel Gillies [John Jameson], Bill Nunn [Joe Robertson], Ted Raimi [Hoffman] & Elizabeth Banks [Betty Brant]

CREW: Sam Raimi [Director], Alvin Sargent [Writer], Scott Stokdyk & Anthony LaMolinara [Visual Effects]

NOTES:
-"I'd probably make as many Spider-Man movies as they would ask me." - Sam Raimi (Feb 1, 2005) on how many sequels he's going to make.
-"If I have the same passion after this (Spider-Man 3), I would love to direct (No. 4) and hope they would ask me." - Sam Raimi (Dec 1, 2004) on sequels.
-Tobey Maguire has said that he's not signed beyond #3, but if the script and money was right he'd stick around. Kirsten Dunst has said she's gone as soon as #3's done.
-Villainous speculation has settled between The Hobgoblin, The Sandman & Venom. Raimi says he likes the Sandman, everyone wants Venom, and Hobgoblin makes sense (in that he's not an Osborn).

(edited by Freeway420 on 22.3.05 1149)
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 104

Posts: 2037/3059
EXP: 11614781
For next: 247384

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2023 days
Last activity: 1957 days
#14 Posted on 22.3.05 1241.18
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1241.21
Sandman seems to be the road they're taking. Venom's just out-THC is far too old for the role, there's a shitload of backstory tht'd have to be covered, and Raimi doesn't like the character. Hobgoblin's possibility, but if they were gonna go the second-goblin route they'd have stuck with Harry, and besides, I don't think they're keen on going back to the problems they had with the costume design on part one. Sandman seems the next logical choice-it's the character Church most resembles, it's a potential CGI orgy, and Maguire's gone on record as lobbying for the concept to be used.

EDIT: Holy crap, you know who else THC kinda looks like? Cletus Kasady. Would Raimi possibly go for Carnage?

(edited by oldschoolhero on 22.3.05 1103)
Tenken347
Boudin blanc
Level: 93

Posts: 702/2457
EXP: 7978438
For next: 74402

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#15 Posted on 22.3.05 1347.03
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1347.31
I guess I have to eat my words on Raimi, but I could have sworn I saw an interview where he said he was gone after three.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 2785/3273
EXP: 12825513
For next: 265840

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 234 days
Last activity: 35 days
#16 Posted on 22.3.05 1645.52
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1646.59
Raimi doesn't like Venom. I don't see how anyone who doesn't like Venom could even *stand* Carnage. After the first two films, are we really ready to jump to the "Super powered mass murderer" stage just yet?

-Jag
Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 1008/1839
EXP: 5413906
For next: 18338

Since: 2.1.02
From: Sector 7 Slums

Since last post: 1627 days
Last activity: 1627 days
#17 Posted on 22.3.05 1744.43
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1745.21
If Larry David actually shows up for a cameo as the Vulture, this will automatically be the best movie of all time.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 110

Posts: 2742/3504
EXP: 14236891
For next: 172041

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 341 days
Last activity: 28 days
#18 Posted on 22.3.05 1754.28
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1755.26
SPIDER-MAN [Released May 3, 2002]
-Cost $139 million (plus $50 million for marketing)
-Made $403 million domestically (plus $418 million overseas)
-Green Goblin as villain, Bruce Campbell as ring announcer
-6th highest grossing film of all-time (domestically)
-Highest opening weekend of all-time

SPIDER-MAN 2 [Released June 30, 2004]
-Cost $200 million (plus $50 million for marketing)
-Made $373 million domestically (plus 410 million overseas)
-Doctor Octopus as villain, Bruce Campbell as snooty usher
-8th highest grossing film of all-time (domestically)
-7th highest opening weekend of all-time

SPIDER-MAN 3 [Release scheduled for May 4, 2007]
-Probably will end up costing around $210 million
-Will probably end up making around $350 million domestically
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 146

Posts: 3560/6752
EXP: 38081281
For next: 432105

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#19 Posted on 22.3.05 1958.01
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1958.01
David's alleged cameo as Vulture makes me think....what if the villains for Spidey 3 are actually the Sinister Six, except with Goblin Harry taking over Doc Ock's role as the organizer? Vulture (David), Sandman (Church), and then you can have loads of fun with Electro, Kraven and Mysterio.
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 104

Posts: 2039/3059
EXP: 11614781
For next: 247384

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2023 days
Last activity: 1957 days
#20 Posted on 23.3.05 0125.34
Reposted on: 23.3.12 0127.52
Nah, Sinister Six would be too complex to pull off. Raimi seems to like the more simplistic approch. Here's something that came to me earlier: With David rumored for a cameo as the Vulture....maybe THC's playing the younger Vulture? They'd need two actors to pull that off, right?
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Fast forwarding through ads
Next thread: Tru Calling's returning
Previous thread: Scrubs - Is it iver?
(1418 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Sam Raimi takes Venom 101 - Spiderman 3 Official - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - Spiderman 3 villianRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.221 seconds.