The W
Views: 105452227
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
2.7.08 0755
The 7 - Movies & TV - Spiderman 3 villian Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1711 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (21 total)
brick
Bockwurst
Level: 49

Posts: 362/535
EXP: 867454
For next: 16435

Since: 17.1.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 791 days
Last activity: 787 days
#1 Posted on 22.3.05 0816.15
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0820.46
http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Movies/03/22/film.church.reut/index.html

Thomas Haden Church is the villian, but they aren't saying who he is playing. He resembles Willem Dafoe enough to be an Osbourn relative. I don't think he has the physical size to be Venom. Any thoughts on what other Spidy villians he could be?
Promote this thread!
Tenken347
Banger
Level: 96

Posts: 700/2600
EXP: 8901010
For next: 87809

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 3 hours
#2 Posted on 22.3.05 0817.21
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0820.46
How about Hobgoblin?
Jobberman
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 290/426
EXP: 617297
For next: 42872

Since: 2.1.02
From: West Palm Beach, FL

Since last post: 333 days
Last activity: 13 days
#3 Posted on 22.3.05 0830.34
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0834.31
I thought I read somwhere that Sam Raimi wanted The Lizard as the next villian...
SchippeWreck
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 719/2764
EXP: 9727098
For next: 272937

Since: 26.3.03
From: Glendale, CA

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 8 hours
#4 Posted on 22.3.05 0911.44
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0918.50
    Originally posted by Jobberman
    I thought I read somwhere that Sam Raimi wanted The Lizard as the next villian...

That makes sense. He looks enough like, but is more of a "name" than Dylan Baker (IMDB), who played Curt Connors in Spider-Man 2.

(edited by SchippeWreck on 22.3.05 0712)
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 111

Posts: 1779/3657
EXP: 14753833
For next: 114573

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 50 days
Last activity: 1 day
#5 Posted on 22.3.05 0913.16
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0921.00

There's also been internet talk of Black Widow as well. Maybe they're be going the 2 villan route a la Batman Returns.
jfkfc
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 546/1178
EXP: 2827412
For next: 42346

Since: 9.2.02

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 9 days
#6 Posted on 22.3.05 0921.33
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0921.40
Maybe the villian in #3 will be a slow airplane mechanic...
JoshMann
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 1515/2159
EXP: 6535986
For next: 114704

Since: 17.11.03
From: Tallahassee, FL

Since last post: 2544 days
Last activity: 2541 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 22.3.05 0928.11
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0928.40
    Originally posted by jfkfc
    Maybe the villian in #3 will be a slow airplane mechanic...


By that rationale, the villians in the first two movies should have been...

#1- Jesus
#2- Coked-up, wearing a silk bathrobe, armed to the teeth and obsessed over the song "Sister Christian" by Night Ranger.

Either of those movies I would have paid to see. :)
Von Maestro
Boudin rouge
Level: 47

Posts: 301/514
EXP: 754705
For next: 11504

Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 54 days
Last activity: 1 day
#8 Posted on 22.3.05 0958.39
Reposted on: 22.3.12 0959.03
    Originally posted by Blanket Jackson
    #2- Coked-up, wearing a silk bathrobe, armed to the teeth and obsessed over the song "Sister Christian" by Night Ranger.


I was actually picturing the villian in #2 as a Jew from Anatefka who was wishing he was rich, having seen Fiddler on the Roof with my then girlfriend a week before Spiderman 2 came out... :-)
Packman V2
Bratwurst
Level: 72

Posts: 257/1370
EXP: 3256756
For next: 67022

Since: 16.3.04
From: Albuquerque, NM

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 14 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 22.3.05 1101.58
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1102.20
    Originally posted by Mayhem

    There's also been internet talk of Black Widow as well. Maybe they're be going the 2 villan route a la Batman Returns.


I figured that would happen anyway...or are they gonna draw out Harry taking over as the Green Goblin again?

Tenken347
Banger
Level: 96

Posts: 701/2600
EXP: 8901010
For next: 87809

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 3 hours
#10 Posted on 22.3.05 1117.04
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1117.04
Considering McGuire, Dunst, and Raimi have all stated that they don't want to do more than three Spider-Man movies, I don't see them dragging out Harry's story any further.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 2784/3273
EXP: 13117608
For next: 402935

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 450 days
Last activity: 251 days
#11 Posted on 22.3.05 1135.50
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1135.51
I've only heard Dunst say she's done with Spider-Man. When did the other two say they wanted out?

-Jag
estragand
Summer sausage
Level: 45

Posts: 324/439
EXP: 634719
For next: 25450

Since: 18.6.02

Since last post: 2807 days
Last activity: 2807 days
AIM:  
#12 Posted on 22.3.05 1143.48
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1143.49
    Originally posted by Mayhem

    There's also been internet talk of Black Widow as well. Maybe they're be going the 2 villan route a la Batman Returns.

Small trivial point, but I believe it's actually the Black CAT. Both characters are hotsy totsy broads in black outfits, so the confusion is understandable. Black Cat is the Catwoman rip-off who used to fight Spidey, until she did a face turn and became his girlfriend for a bit. Black Widow is the former Iron Man communist/cold war villain who also did a face turn, messed with Hawkeye, shacked up with Daredevil and became an Avenger.

Some of the Black Cat rumors are based on speculation over the landlord's daughter in Spider-Man 2. There was also a rumor two years ago that Eliza Dushku was connected to the role.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 111

Posts: 2739/3504
EXP: 14559783
For next: 308623

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 557 days
Last activity: 244 days
#13 Posted on 22.3.05 1232.43
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1233.32
CONFIRMED (or all but) AS RETURNING: Tobey Maguire [Peter Parker/Spider-Man], James Franco [Harry Osborn], Kirsten Dunst [Mary Jane Watson], Bruce Campbell, J.K. Simmons [J. Jonah Jameson], Thomas Haden Church [villain (Sandman, Venom or Hobgoblin)],
PROBABLY RETURNING: Dylan Baker [Curt Connors], Rosemary Harris [May Parker], Daniel Gillies [John Jameson], Bill Nunn [Joe Robertson], Ted Raimi [Hoffman] & Elizabeth Banks [Betty Brant]

CREW: Sam Raimi [Director], Alvin Sargent [Writer], Scott Stokdyk & Anthony LaMolinara [Visual Effects]

NOTES:
-"I'd probably make as many Spider-Man movies as they would ask me." - Sam Raimi (Feb 1, 2005) on how many sequels he's going to make.
-"If I have the same passion after this (Spider-Man 3), I would love to direct (No. 4) and hope they would ask me." - Sam Raimi (Dec 1, 2004) on sequels.
-Tobey Maguire has said that he's not signed beyond #3, but if the script and money was right he'd stick around. Kirsten Dunst has said she's gone as soon as #3's done.
-Villainous speculation has settled between The Hobgoblin, The Sandman & Venom. Raimi says he likes the Sandman, everyone wants Venom, and Hobgoblin makes sense (in that he's not an Osborn).

(edited by Freeway420 on 22.3.05 1149)
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 2037/3059
EXP: 11878117
For next: 384183

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2239 days
Last activity: 2173 days
#14 Posted on 22.3.05 1241.18
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1241.21
Sandman seems to be the road they're taking. Venom's just out-THC is far too old for the role, there's a shitload of backstory tht'd have to be covered, and Raimi doesn't like the character. Hobgoblin's possibility, but if they were gonna go the second-goblin route they'd have stuck with Harry, and besides, I don't think they're keen on going back to the problems they had with the costume design on part one. Sandman seems the next logical choice-it's the character Church most resembles, it's a potential CGI orgy, and Maguire's gone on record as lobbying for the concept to be used.

EDIT: Holy crap, you know who else THC kinda looks like? Cletus Kasady. Would Raimi possibly go for Carnage?

(edited by oldschoolhero on 22.3.05 1103)
Tenken347
Banger
Level: 96

Posts: 702/2600
EXP: 8901010
For next: 87809

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 3 hours
#15 Posted on 22.3.05 1347.03
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1347.31
I guess I have to eat my words on Raimi, but I could have sworn I saw an interview where he said he was gone after three.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 2785/3273
EXP: 13117608
For next: 402935

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 450 days
Last activity: 251 days
#16 Posted on 22.3.05 1645.52
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1646.59
Raimi doesn't like Venom. I don't see how anyone who doesn't like Venom could even *stand* Carnage. After the first two films, are we really ready to jump to the "Super powered mass murderer" stage just yet?

-Jag
Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst
Level: 84

Posts: 1008/1839
EXP: 5536655
For next: 125321

Since: 2.1.02
From: Sector 7 Slums

Since last post: 1843 days
Last activity: 1843 days
#17 Posted on 22.3.05 1744.43
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1745.21
If Larry David actually shows up for a cameo as the Vulture, this will automatically be the best movie of all time.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 111

Posts: 2742/3504
EXP: 14559783
For next: 308623

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 557 days
Last activity: 244 days
#18 Posted on 22.3.05 1754.28
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1755.26
SPIDER-MAN [Released May 3, 2002]
-Cost $139 million (plus $50 million for marketing)
-Made $403 million domestically (plus $418 million overseas)
-Green Goblin as villain, Bruce Campbell as ring announcer
-6th highest grossing film of all-time (domestically)
-Highest opening weekend of all-time

SPIDER-MAN 2 [Released June 30, 2004]
-Cost $200 million (plus $50 million for marketing)
-Made $373 million domestically (plus 410 million overseas)
-Doctor Octopus as villain, Bruce Campbell as snooty usher
-8th highest grossing film of all-time (domestically)
-7th highest opening weekend of all-time

SPIDER-MAN 3 [Release scheduled for May 4, 2007]
-Probably will end up costing around $210 million
-Will probably end up making around $350 million domestically
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 148

Posts: 3560/6849
EXP: 39787226
For next: 591532

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 15 hours
#19 Posted on 22.3.05 1958.01
Reposted on: 22.3.12 1958.01
David's alleged cameo as Vulture makes me think....what if the villains for Spidey 3 are actually the Sinister Six, except with Goblin Harry taking over Doc Ock's role as the organizer? Vulture (David), Sandman (Church), and then you can have loads of fun with Electro, Kraven and Mysterio.
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 2039/3059
EXP: 11878117
For next: 384183

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2239 days
Last activity: 2173 days
#20 Posted on 23.3.05 0125.34
Reposted on: 23.3.12 0127.52
Nah, Sinister Six would be too complex to pull off. Raimi seems to like the more simplistic approch. Here's something that came to me earlier: With David rumored for a cameo as the Vulture....maybe THC's playing the younger Vulture? They'd need two actors to pull that off, right?
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Fast forwarding through ads
Next thread: Tru Calling's returning
Previous thread: Scrubs - Is it iver?
(1711 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Sam Raimi takes Venom 101 - Spiderman 3 Official - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - Spiderman 3 villianRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.229 seconds.