The W
Views: 99950464
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.10.07 0658
The 7 - Baseball - Good For Baseball!! Register and log in to post!
(354 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (11 total)
Von Maestro
Boudin rouge
Level: 47

Posts: 291/512
EXP: 727412
For next: 38797

Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 224 days
Last activity: 17 hours
#1 Posted on 10.3.05 1511.19
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1516.21
In a rare display of unity (Hockey should take notes), the players & owners have agreed to ignore the government's subpeonas (story.news.yahoo.com) to appear before congress regarding the steroid controversy.

It's nice to see baseball telling the government to butt out of something that they don't have any business sticking their collective noses into.
Promote this thread!
BigSteve
Pepperoni
Level: 64

Posts: 434/1091
EXP: 2204816
For next: 9293

Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 2841 days
Last activity: 2569 days
#2 Posted on 10.3.05 1515.23
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1516.22
    Originally posted by Von Maestro
    In a rare display of unity (Hockey should take notes), the players & owners have agreed to ignore the government's subpeonas (story.news.yahoo.com) to appear before congress regarding the steroid controversy.

    It's nice to see baseball telling the government to butt out of something that they don't have any business sticking their collective noses into.


I've heard that said before. Why doesn't the government have the right to investigate allegations of rampant steriod use in a billion dollar industry when said steriod use is illegal?

I'm not trying to troll you or anyone else, I'm just wondering what your reasoning for that is.
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 115

Posts: 2385/3943
EXP: 16731635
For next: 79780

Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 10.3.05 1533.38
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1539.35
If you ask me, it's not the government's business to be THIS involved in baseball's steroids flappette. There are far more pressing concerns than what a few people are doing. Of course, since it is illegal, if there's enough evidence to prosecute, fine. But only if the case is pursued as if the players were just normal people.

Besides, look at the list. Curt Schilling? No Barry Bonds? What, exactly, ARE the feds trying to accomplish? (Although I understand the rationale for leaving Bonds off, he is the biggest active player in the BALCO case and if this does have anything to do with this case, not bringing him in would be simply ludacrisp.)
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Level: 109

Posts: 1658/3428
EXP: 13725908
For next: 233782

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 72 days
Last activity: 72 days
#4 Posted on 10.3.05 1600.24
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1601.33
    Originally posted by Von Maestro
    In a rare display of unity (Hockey should take notes), the players & owners have agreed to ignore the government's subpeonas (story.news.yahoo.com) to appear before congress regarding the steroid controversy.

    It's nice to see baseball telling the government to butt out of something that they don't have any business sticking their collective noses into.


If we need the government to protect children from the evils of television by regulating everything in that medium in ridiculous fashion, then it would make sense that we also need the government to protect our children from the evils of steroid-using heroes. If the federal government is going to continue to tell people how they are allowed to live their lives and who they can and cannot look up to, at least they're gonna be consistently invading and ignore any kind of right to privacy or responsibility on all fronts.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 4555/7534
EXP: 43740099
For next: 561663

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 479 days
Last activity: 479 days
#5 Posted on 10.3.05 1756.58
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1757.41
Congress has control over baseball due to the exemption MLB has had since 1922 to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act as well as the right to investigate due to Interstate Commerce being involved.
Schilling and Thomas are on the list to represent the 'clean players', as they have been outspoken about steroid use. Of course, Schilling and Congressmen fighting over camera time could be hilarious. Wonder if they'll rig his testimony around his call-ins to talk shows.
As for Congress having better things to do: By investigating steroids, Congress can't do anything that actually leads to money coming out of my pocket. Any day where Congress can't screw with my wallet or life is a good day.
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 141

Posts: 2337/6335
EXP: 33455994
For next: 664104

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 2 days
#6 Posted on 11.3.05 1736.01
Reposted on: 11.3.12 1736.08
Glad they got the budget balanced, the trade deficit taken care of, and social security saved, now they can focus on what the nation REALLY needs having fixed.
Nag
Landjager
Level: 61

Posts: 769/904
EXP: 1783158
For next: 93449

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2177 days
Last activity: 232 days
Y!:
#7 Posted on 13.3.05 1412.53
Reposted on: 13.3.12 1414.48
Hey, it's one day they aren't taking away our rights, one day they aren't devising ways to screw the middle class. That's not counterproduction in my book.

This will have one out of two outcomes, either it becomes a made-for-TV version of Jose Cannes's book, or it forces the baseball brass to implement an even tougher steroid policy. More than likely a combination of the two. Remember in 1992, WWF, guys magically became smaller for about 5 years. Call it tough love, but if getting dragged through the mud is what it takes for all of baseball to clean up it's act, then I'm all for it.



(edited by Nag on 13.3.05 1514)
vsp
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 1928/2042
EXP: 6309718
For next: 83081

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3033 days
Last activity: 247 days
#8 Posted on 14.3.05 0610.34
Reposted on: 14.3.12 0613.07
    Originally posted by drjayphd
    Besides, look at the list. Curt Schilling? No Barry Bonds? What, exactly, ARE the feds trying to accomplish?


SCHILLING: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure what I'm doing here, as I'm adamantly against the use of steroids.

CHAIRMAN: Yes, we know. We were just wondering if you'd show us that bloody sock one more time.
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 618/1097
EXP: 2385851
For next: 76013

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 48 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 14.3.05 1409.29
Reposted on: 14.3.12 1409.30
    Originally posted by vsp
      Originally posted by drjayphd
      Besides, look at the list. Curt Schilling? No Barry Bonds? What, exactly, ARE the feds trying to accomplish?


    SCHILLING: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure what I'm doing here, as I'm adamantly against the use of steroids.

    CHAIRMAN: Yes, we know. We were just wondering if you'd show us that bloody sock one more time.


I get the feeling some of those congressmen will be acting like Chris Farley in that sketch he used to do on SNL, where he'd interview famous people and act like a complete dork.

"Hey Curt, remember when you beat the Yanks in game 6 with your ankle messed up? That was AWESOME!!!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 115

Posts: 2393/3943
EXP: 16731635
For next: 79780

Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#10 Posted on 14.3.05 2342.19
Reposted on: 14.3.12 2343.42
    Originally posted by BOSsportsfan34
      Originally posted by vsp
        Originally posted by drjayphd
        Besides, look at the list. Curt Schilling? No Barry Bonds? What, exactly, ARE the feds trying to accomplish?


      SCHILLING: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure what I'm doing here, as I'm adamantly against the use of steroids.

      CHAIRMAN: Yes, we know. We were just wondering if you'd show us that bloody sock one more time.


    I get the feeling some of those congressmen will be acting like Chris Farley in that sketch he used to do on SNL, where he'd interview famous people and act like a complete dork.

    "Hey Curt, remember when you beat the Yanks in game 6 with your ankle messed up? That was AWESOME!!!


Although I think if anyone's invoking Chris Farley characters, it would've been even better to bring in, oh, a motivational speaker:

Now, you kids are probably asking yourself, "Hey, Matt, how can we get back on the right track?!" Well, as I see it, there is only one solution! And that is for me to get my gear, move it on into here, 'cause I'm gonna bunk with you, buddy! We're gonna be buddies! We're gonna be pals!
King Of Crap
Goetta
Level: 38

Posts: 295/309
EXP: 345837
For next: 24613

Since: 17.9.03
From: Holley, New York

Since last post: 3477 days
Last activity: 3408 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 17.3.05 1855.29
Reposted on: 17.3.12 1856.37
    Originally posted by TheBucsFan
    If we need the government to protect children from the evils of television by regulating everything in that medium in ridiculous fashion, then it would make sense that we also need the government to protect our children from the evils of steroid-using heroes. If the federal government is going to continue to tell people how they are allowed to live their lives and who they can and cannot look up to, at least they're gonna be consistently invading and ignore any kind of right to privacy or responsibility on all fronts.


Me personally, I don't see it as a hero-worship deal, I see at as trying to protect up-and-coming players from feeling like they HAVE to take steroids to compete.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Roberto Alomar hangs it up
Next thread: 3/17 Congressional Hearings
Previous thread: Ankiel to become full-time OF
(354 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Listening to games part 2 - Listening to Games - MLB gets TOUGH(er) on steroids - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Good For Baseball!!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.201 seconds.