The W
Views: 105544201
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
6.7.08 0243
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Rock no more?? Register and log in to post!
(2348 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
Socks
Landjager
Level: 61

Posts: 785/888
EXP: 1825344
For next: 51263

Since: 25.6.02
From: Ottawa

Since last post: 1077 days
Last activity: 690 days
#1 Posted on 10.3.05 0738.34
Reposted on: 10.3.12 0738.39
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/OttawaSun/Today/2005/03/10/956021-sun.html


He was never even offered a contract extension??? That's insane!

Promote this thread!
Oliver
Scrapple
Level: 129

Posts: 1157/5007
EXP: 24453179
For next: 596542

Since: 20.6.02

Since last post: 126 days
Last activity: 120 days
#2 Posted on 10.3.05 0920.32
Reposted on: 10.3.12 0923.07
I disagree. I wouldn't pay a wrestler who doesn't show up on TV, outside of promos for a movie or commercials.
dskillz
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 917/938
EXP: 2017619
For next: 79544

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston Texas

Since last post: 3455 days
Last activity: 3160 days
#3 Posted on 10.3.05 1055.31
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1055.38
I can't blame WWE or Rock. WWE isn't going to pay someone premium dollars for 3 or 4 appearances a year and Rock has bigger fish to fry with his movie career. I think if anything, WWE should leave the door open if Rock wanted to make appearances, but leave it on a pay-by-appearance basis, not a formal contract.
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 135

Posts: 1243/5534
EXP: 28980118
For next: 354963

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#4 Posted on 10.3.05 1310.01
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1310.03

    WWE isn't going to pay someone premium dollars for 3 or 4 appearances a year


Someone warn Hogan!
CANADIAN BULLDOG
Andouille
Level: 85

Posts: 1640/1962
EXP: 5833355
For next: 65209

Since: 5.3.03
From: TORONTO

Since last post: 801 days
Last activity: 800 days
ICQ:  
#5 Posted on 10.3.05 1431.41
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1440.43
My opinion? I think they should have at least kept him on a retainer and then, as dskillz points out, pay him on a per-appearance basis going forward.

I wouldn't do this as anti-competitive measure (I mean, even IF he ended up on a TNA or Japan show down the road, who cares?), but more as a show of good faith. This way, if he wants to show up at Raw one time to plug his movie, or even wrestle a match, you don't to have start negotiations from scratch and worry about any possible bad blood between the two parties.

In fact, I think they should do that with a handful of other guys, too -- maybe Austin, Foley and Hogan. Again, just as a show of good faith.
devineman
Chipolata
Level: 25

Posts: 88/123
EXP: 87960
For next: 1661

Since: 16.2.04
From: UK

Since last post: 1166 days
Last activity: 765 days
#6 Posted on 10.3.05 1440.33
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1440.47
Why not?

I mean Vince best known attribute is his tolerance of past employees.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: RAW 3/7/05
Next thread: The WrestleMania XXI Preview Thread
Previous thread: Christy Hemme Playboy pics
(2348 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Screwed: The Bret Hart Story - Stevie Injured by the Power of the Full Nelson - WWE signs Wisconsin indies' Kamikaze Ken Anderson - More...
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Rock no more??Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.318 seconds.