The W
Views: 101429248
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.12.07 0245
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Rock no more?? Register and log in to post!
(2098 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (6 total)
Level: 61

Posts: 785/888
EXP: 1786775
For next: 89832

Since: 25.6.02
From: Ottawa

Since last post: 878 days
Last activity: 491 days
#1 Posted on 10.3.05 0738.34
Reposted on: 10.3.12 0738.39

He was never even offered a contract extension??? That's insane!

Promote this thread!
Level: 127

Posts: 1157/4971
EXP: 23679385
For next: 47246

Since: 20.6.02
From: Kolob

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 3 days
#2 Posted on 10.3.05 0920.32
Reposted on: 10.3.12 0923.07
I disagree. I wouldn't pay a wrestler who doesn't show up on TV, outside of promos for a movie or commercials.
Level: 62

Posts: 917/938
EXP: 1976509
For next: 8188

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston Texas

Since last post: 3256 days
Last activity: 2961 days
#3 Posted on 10.3.05 1055.31
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1055.38
I can't blame WWE or Rock. WWE isn't going to pay someone premium dollars for 3 or 4 appearances a year and Rock has bigger fish to fry with his movie career. I think if anything, WWE should leave the door open if Rock wanted to make appearances, but leave it on a pay-by-appearance basis, not a formal contract.
Level: 132

Posts: 1243/5294
EXP: 26565574
For next: 566430

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
#4 Posted on 10.3.05 1310.01
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1310.03

    WWE isn't going to pay someone premium dollars for 3 or 4 appearances a year

Someone warn Hogan!
Level: 85

Posts: 1640/1962
EXP: 5703104
For next: 195460

Since: 5.3.03

Since last post: 602 days
Last activity: 601 days
#5 Posted on 10.3.05 1431.41
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1440.43
My opinion? I think they should have at least kept him on a retainer and then, as dskillz points out, pay him on a per-appearance basis going forward.

I wouldn't do this as anti-competitive measure (I mean, even IF he ended up on a TNA or Japan show down the road, who cares?), but more as a show of good faith. This way, if he wants to show up at Raw one time to plug his movie, or even wrestle a match, you don't to have start negotiations from scratch and worry about any possible bad blood between the two parties.

In fact, I think they should do that with a handful of other guys, too -- maybe Austin, Foley and Hogan. Again, just as a show of good faith.
Level: 25

Posts: 88/123
EXP: 85829
For next: 3792

Since: 16.2.04
From: UK

Since last post: 967 days
Last activity: 566 days
#6 Posted on 10.3.05 1440.33
Reposted on: 10.3.12 1440.47
Why not?

I mean Vince best known attribute is his tolerance of past employees.
Thread ahead: RAW 3/7/05
Next thread: The WrestleMania XXI Preview Thread
Previous thread: Christy Hemme Playboy pics
(2098 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Screwed: The Bret Hart Story - Stevie Injured by the Power of the Full Nelson - WWE signs Wisconsin indies' Kamikaze Ken Anderson - More...
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Rock no more??Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.359 seconds.