The W
Views: 100847190
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.11.07 1948
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - GOP's Selective Faith in People Register and log in to post!
(380 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
spf
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 3135/5404
EXP: 27263592
For next: 589148

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 23 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 2.3.05 1238.23
Reposted on: 2.3.12 1238.51
Well, the GOP trusts us to be better able to spend the money that goes to the government in taxes, and to be better able to invest our money than the government to protect our retirement. I'm glad they have faith in the American people to look out for their own well-being and not need the protective hand of government. Why, just look at this story about the GOP wanting to have the FCC regulate basic cable decency. (suntimes.com)

    Originally posted by Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK)
    Most viewers don't differentiate between traditional TV and cable so they don't know when they might be exposed to objectionable programming


So we trust Americans to invest a trillion dollars in private accounts and not screw that up, but figuring out how to use the parental lock on their tv, how to tell the difference between MTV and CBS, or how to not order cable if they don't want their kids to see "Room Raiders"...now that's asking too much of the public?

(edited by spf on 2.3.05 1238)
Promote this thread!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 116

Posts: 2373/3946
EXP: 16812200
For next: 511945

Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 19 days
Last activity: 18 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 2.3.05 1301.57
Reposted on: 2.3.12 1304.49
Eh, more hypocrisy in politics. There's a total shocker. Wake me when they can draw a line and be consistent (as in pro-life, but anti-capital punishment).
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 4538/7534
EXP: 43903925
For next: 397837

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 512 days
Last activity: 512 days
#3 Posted on 2.3.05 1330.42
Reposted on: 2.3.12 1330.45
I'm really starting to miss the days when one of the tenets of the Grand Old Party was LESS government bureaucracy. Should the FCC(middle C stands for Communist, not Communication) be strengthened, that means either more federal money to pay for extra bureaucrats, extra money charged for cable, or, the most likely occurrance, both. More bureaucracy being created, the Department of Education still in existance, whatever became of our Glorious Revolution in 1994?
King Of Crap
Goetta
Level: 38

Posts: 289/309
EXP: 347266
For next: 23184

Since: 17.9.03
From: Holley, New York

Since last post: 3510 days
Last activity: 3442 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on 2.3.05 1738.05
Reposted on: 2.3.12 1738.08
It was pretty funny seeing the guy who sponsored the bill pn FOXNews trying to justify the action.
AWArulz
Knackwurst
Level: 109

Posts: 1058/3408
EXP: 13616621
For next: 343069

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 2.3.05 1751.40
Reposted on: 2.3.12 1751.43
    Originally posted by drjayphd
    Eh, more hypocrisy in politics. There's a total shocker. Wake me when they can draw a line and be consistent (as in pro-life, but anti-capital punishment).


#1, as soon as a baby kills someone while in the womb, I am all about executing him or her. Until then, the two subjects have nothing to do with one another. Unless all death is equal to you. I consider the life of a baby (no matter how old) much more important than a murderer or rapist who has dedicated his or her life to the destruction of society.

I do agree that there's no good reason to "rate" or censor basic cable. If you don't want it, slap up an antenna.
Corajudo
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 364/810
EXP: 1529354
For next: 48201

Since: 7.11.02
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 140 days
Last activity: 11 days
#6 Posted on 2.3.05 2219.28
Reposted on: 2.3.12 2220.46
#1, as soon as a baby kills someone while in the womb, I am all about executing him or her. Until then, the two subjects have nothing to do with one another. Unless all death is equal to you. I consider the life of a baby (no matter how old) much more important than a murderer or rapist who has dedicated his or her life to the destruction of society.

I would argue that all life is equal. And, no man has the right right to take the gift of life from anyone; be they innocent baby, unfaithful spouse, someone in the wrong place at the wrong time, or even someone who has committed the most heinous of crimes. If someone is committed to the destruction of society, remove them from society but let them live. Just because someone else has no respect for life does not mean their life loses its value. IMHO, life is the relevant issue, not death.
AWArulz
Knackwurst
Level: 109

Posts: 1059/3408
EXP: 13616621
For next: 343069

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 3.3.05 0512.47
Reposted on: 3.3.12 0512.52
    Originally posted by Corajudo
    #1, as soon as a baby kills someone while in the womb, I am all about executing him or her. Until then, the two subjects have nothing to do with one another. Unless all death is equal to you. I consider the life of a baby (no matter how old) much more important than a murderer or rapist who has dedicated his or her life to the destruction of society.

    I would argue that all life is equal. And, no man has the right right to take the gift of life from anyone; be they innocent baby, unfaithful spouse, someone in the wrong place at the wrong time, or even someone who has committed the most heinous of crimes. If someone is committed to the destruction of society, remove them from society but let them live. Just because someone else has no respect for life does not mean their life loses its value. IMHO, life is the relevant issue, not death.



And I can respect that opinion. I don't agree with it, but respect it. I'm of the opinion that governments are established for the express purpose of establishing society and one of those functions is removing those who break societal rules. I think that a serious infringment of those rules (and, in our society we have defined those serious infringments as murder and a few other serious crimes) can warrent execution. I see a serious difference between accidental death, a personal murder by a person and an execution by a goverment. The first is an accident, the second is wrong and the third is right.

I understand that some folks do not agree that the goverment has that right. It's a difference we'll have to agree to disagree on.
Teppan-Yaki
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 928/1083
EXP: 2399725
For next: 62139

Since: 28.6.02

Since last post: 971 days
Last activity: 941 days
#8 Posted on 6.3.05 1901.43
Reposted on: 6.3.12 1901.49
FWIW, Powell has already said that he's against trying to extend the current indecency regulations to cable/satellite TV.

When Mike Powell knows it's going to be an uphill battle, good luck to the GOP.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Anyone want to help me out on my essay?
Next thread: McCain: Do as I say, not as a do
Previous thread: Does this go here?
(380 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - GOP's Selective Faith in PeopleRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.351 seconds.