The W
Views: 103997381
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.4.08 1951
The 7 - Baseball - Nationals take Guillen off Anaheim's hands
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(450 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
It's False
Scrapple
Level: 140

Posts: 1248/6089
EXP: 32553301
For next: 733186

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#1 Posted on 19.11.04 1524.53
Reposted on: 19.11.11 1528.19
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1926838

Well, you knew Jose Guillen wouldn't remain in Anaheim after his temper tantrum. At this point, I'm glad the Angels got ANY sort of return for him, even if it's just a bench player (maybe potential lead-off man?) in Juan Rivera. Here's hoping Guillen can stay on his best behavior this time.
Promote this thread!
BigSteve
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 267/1091
EXP: 2259082
For next: 76558

Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 3028 days
Last activity: 2756 days
#2 Posted on 19.11.04 1624.14
Reposted on: 19.11.11 1626.13
So this team without any owners is really spending the big bucks now. I don't think Guillen's good enough to pick up a large contract and his personal problems, but since when did attitude problems become a reason not to have a guy on your team. Of course, it doesn't look like they gave much up for him, so maybe it is a good move.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 153

Posts: 4335/7534
EXP: 44642653
For next: 680854

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 665 days
Last activity: 665 days
#3 Posted on 19.11.04 1738.27
Reposted on: 19.11.11 1739.01
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    So this team without any owners is really spending the big bucks now. I don't think Guillen's good enough to pick up a large contract and his personal problems, but since when did attitude problems become a reason not to have a guy on your team. Of course, it doesn't look like they gave much up for him, so maybe it is a good move.







Guillen only had a 2 year/$6 million dollar deal with Anaheim, so the Expos/Nationals/Vegas Showgirls only have to pay him $3 million for 1 year. Guillen did put up good numbers this past season, and he'll probably be .275/25/90 at worst. Right now, the Expos might be able to at least provide the delusion to their fan base that they will play meaningful games in August, as they look to be a 78-84 win team, which, in the NL East, will at least keep them on the fringe of contention after the All-Star break. Plus, if the team goes into the tank, some contending team that desperately needs an outfield bat will probably overpay in terms of prospects at the deadline.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 4329/4700
EXP: 22027551
For next: 426676

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1456 days
Last activity: 5 days
#4 Posted on 20.11.04 1331.47
Reposted on: 20.11.11 1335.40
Bowden also acquired Guillen when he was with the Reds, so he must think that he'll be something more resmebling a model citizen for the Nats...
BigSteve
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 271/1091
EXP: 2259082
For next: 76558

Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 3028 days
Last activity: 2756 days
#5 Posted on 21.11.04 1748.35
Reposted on: 21.11.11 1749.42
    Originally posted by redsoxnation
      Originally posted by BigSteve
      So this team without any owners is really spending the big bucks now. I don't think Guillen's good enough to pick up a large contract and his personal problems, but since when did attitude problems become a reason not to have a guy on your team. Of course, it doesn't look like they gave much up for him, so maybe it is a good move.







    Guillen only had a 2 year/$6 million dollar deal with Anaheim, so the Expos/Nationals/Vegas Showgirls only have to pay him $3 million for 1 year. Guillen did put up good numbers this past season, and he'll probably be .275/25/90 at worst. Right now, the Expos might be able to at least provide the delusion to their fan base that they will play meaningful games in August, as they look to be a 78-84 win team, which, in the NL East, will at least keep them on the fringe of contention after the All-Star break. Plus, if the team goes into the tank, some contending team that desperately needs an outfield bat will probably overpay in terms of prospects at the deadline.


Yeah, I just assumed that since he signed a new contract before 2004 and he had a pretty good end of 2003 that he would be making more than 3.5 mil a year. So I retract my first statement; he's worth the investment (for all my stamp of approval means to the Nats).
Abmulabmu
Cotto
Level: 17

Posts: 33/44
EXP: 20402
For next: 4341

Since: 10.12.01

Since last post: 33 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#6 Posted on 22.11.04 2025.49
Reposted on: 22.11.11 2026.14
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    but since when did attitude problems become a reason not to have a guy on your team.



I'd guess around the time Anaheim decided to trade Guillen due to attitude problems
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: SOX WIN!
Next thread: It's Official: They're the Nationals
Previous thread: Cardinals new Stadium construction halted
(450 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Nationals sign Castilla, Guzman - Goodbye, Montreal Expos. Hello, Washington Nationals. - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Nationals take Guillen off Anaheim's handsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.247 seconds.