The W
Views: 110061312
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
8.2.09 0831
The 7 - Site Bashing - Scott Keith is confusing...
This thread has 13 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(63 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
Mild Mannered Madman
Toulouse
Level: 72

Posts: 1148/1274
EXP: 3244851
For next: 78927

Since: 1.3.02
From: Westminster, CA

Since last post: 942 days
Last activity: 660 days
#1 Posted on 14.10.04 0249.42
Reposted on: 14.10.11 0250.57
I was reading Scott Keith's review of the Eddy DVD, when something caught my eye.

"- WCW Cruiserweight title: Chris Jericho v. Eddie Guerrero. This is from Fall Brawl '97, and an odd choice because it's not that great of a match or anything... "


At the end of the match review, he gives it 4 stars.


Huh?

Promote this thread!
SeVen ™
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 378/422
EXP: 621572
For next: 38597

Since: 11.1.02
From: Japan

Since last post: 2923 days
Last activity: 2755 days
#2 Posted on 14.10.04 0301.37
Reposted on: 14.10.11 0301.37
Maybe he means, it's not as great of a match that they are CAPABLE of performing. But then again it is Scott Keith so I don't know.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 219

Posts: 5199/16770
EXP: 156205819
For next: 1729795

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 14.10.04 0426.00
Reposted on: 14.10.11 0426.12
    Originally posted by Mild Mannered Madman
    I was reading Scott Keith
I believe you have diagnosed your own problem!
rspwfaq
Cotechino
Level: 23

Posts: 84/93
EXP: 63359
For next: 4365

Since: 10.6.02
From: Saskatoon

Since last post: 118 days
Last activity: 3 days
#4 Posted on 14.10.04 1110.03
Reposted on: 14.10.11 1110.40
Eddie had way better matches during his WCW period, such as the Mysterio one that followed the Jericho one on the DVD. It just struck me as a really odd choice, given the near-total lack of significance.

(edited by rspwfaq on 14.10.04 1012)
SC
Potato korv
Level: 55

Posts: 555/683
EXP: 1283699
For next: 30499

Since: 11.12.01
From: Valparaiso, IN

Since last post: 1800 days
Last activity: 1134 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 14.10.04 1159.25
Reposted on: 14.10.11 1159.26
    Originally posted by rspwfaq
    Eddie had way better matches during his WCW period, such as the Mysterio one that followed the Jericho one on the DVD. It just struck me as a really odd choice, given the near-total lack of significance.


I would wager a guess that it was just because it was WWE Superstar Eddie Guerrero v. WWE Superstar Chris Jericho, and you get to see their humble beginnings in humble WCW, and look at how much cooler they are now! Assclown! Holmes!

(edited by ScottChrist on 14.10.04 1534)
CANADIAN BULLDOG
Andouille
Level: 86

Posts: 1481/1962
EXP: 5972361
For next: 169770

Since: 5.3.03
From: TORONTO

Since last post: 1019 days
Last activity: 1017 days
ICQ:  
#6 Posted on 14.10.04 1402.27
Reposted on: 14.10.11 1402.27
Now that I've actually seen the match, I've got to agree. It was good, but it wasn't "Eddie Guerrero vs. Chris Jericho" good.
Mild Mannered Madman
Toulouse
Level: 72

Posts: 1150/1274
EXP: 3244851
For next: 78927

Since: 1.3.02
From: Westminster, CA

Since last post: 942 days
Last activity: 660 days
#7 Posted on 14.10.04 1859.11
Reposted on: 14.10.11 1900.30
    Originally posted by CANADIAN BULLDOG
    Now that I've actually seen the match, I've got to agree. It was good, but it wasn't "Eddie Guerrero vs. Chris Jericho" good.


Which would mean it's not really deserving of 4 stars.
DJ FrostyFreeze
Knackwurst
Level: 111

Posts: 1692/3457
EXP: 14586441
For next: 281965

Since: 2.1.02
From: Hawthorne, CA

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 16 hours
#8 Posted on 15.10.04 2000.32
Reposted on: 15.10.11 2000.59
Judged based on a scale of only their own matches with each other, prolly not. But maybe it deserves the 4 stars when compared with everyone elses matches?

I dont know what I'm talking about.
rspwfaq
Cotechino
Level: 23

Posts: 85/93
EXP: 63359
For next: 4365

Since: 10.6.02
From: Saskatoon

Since last post: 118 days
Last activity: 3 days
#9 Posted on 16.10.04 0122.21
Reposted on: 16.10.11 0125.46
    Originally posted by Mild Mannered Madman
    Which would mean it's not really deserving of 4 stars.



I just want to add that arguing star ratings or any other subjective system of analysis is really quite pointless and stupid.

That being said, one more time, it was a very good match, but Eddie has had much better.

CANADIAN BULLDOG
Andouille
Level: 86

Posts: 1483/1962
EXP: 5972361
For next: 169770

Since: 5.3.03
From: TORONTO

Since last post: 1019 days
Last activity: 1017 days
ICQ:  
#10 Posted on 16.10.04 0937.38
Reposted on: 16.10.11 0938.08
    Originally posted by Mild Mannered Madman
      Originally posted by CANADIAN BULLDOG
      Now that I've actually seen the match, I've got to agree. It was good, but it wasn't "Eddie Guerrero vs. Chris Jericho" good.


    Which would mean it's not really deserving of 4 stars.



I don't know - isn't it all subjective? They put on a match in 1997 or whenever it was, and you could enjoy it a helluva lot, but perhaps you know that today, the two of them can do ever better. But that shouldn't necessarily detract from your opinion of the first match....
Loss
Medisterpoelse
Level: 3

Posts: 1/1
EXP: 64
For next: 64

Since: 17.10.04
From: Little Rock, AR

Since last post: 4131 days
Last activity: 4130 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 17.10.04 0117.56
Reposted on: 17.10.11 0127.33
All that's wanted is for you to explain yourself, Scott. "****" means "excellent". If it's "not great" or "very good", why didn't you give it a lower star rating?
Jim Smith
Goetta
Level: 38

Posts: 1/303
EXP: 339007
For next: 31443

Since: 17.10.04
From: Bloomington, IL

Since last post: 2772 days
Last activity: 2203 days
#12 Posted on 17.10.04 0141.49
Reposted on: 17.10.11 0143.36
For pete's sake...

What he's saying is a four-star Eddie vs. Jericho is "not great" in comparison to all the five-star Eddie matches that could have been put on the DVD, but weren't.

The "not great" comment is judging it in terms of Eddie Guerrero matches. The star rating is judging it against all wrestling matches Scott's ever seen. There's no reason to expect the judgements to be the same when the criteria for each one is different.
JustinShapiro
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 135

Posts: 714/5433
EXP: 28795405
For next: 539676

Since: 12.12.01
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#13 Posted on 17.10.04 0147.05
Reposted on: 17.10.11 0148.07
ANALOGY: Steve Austin and Kurt Angle had a **** match at Unforgiven '01. It was an excellent match, but nowhere near the match they had the month before and nowhere near the level of Austin's best matches. Soooo if it was included on a Steve Austin DVD, that would be an odd choice, even though as a standalone match it's plenty good in its own right.

However, I'd say the other Scott, Christ, provided the exact reason it was on the DVD, which was because a match between Eddie Guerrero and Chris Jericho from WCW would have a lot more relevance to the WWE DVD Buyer than a hypothetical equivalently-good match between Eddie and, I dunno, Juventud Guerrera.

(edited by JustinShapiro on 17.10.04 0249)
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 1073/1495
EXP: 4146095
For next: 45053

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 305 days
Last activity: 229 days
#14 Posted on 17.10.04 1125.07
Reposted on: 17.10.11 1127.00
    Originally posted by rspwfaq
      Originally posted by Mild Mannered Madman
      Which would mean it's not really deserving of 4 stars.



    I just want to add that arguing star ratings or any other subjective system of analysis is really quite pointless and stupid.

    That being said, one more time, it was a very good match, but Eddie has had much better.




Am I the only one who feels that if you removed "arguing" from the above statement, it would still pretty much be true?
BigSteve
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 135/1091
EXP: 2339998
For next: 121866

Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 3314 days
Last activity: 3042 days
#15 Posted on 17.10.04 1326.14
Reposted on: 17.10.11 1326.56
    Originally posted by ges7184
      Originally posted by rspwfaq
        Originally posted by Mild Mannered Madman
        Which would mean it's not really deserving of 4 stars.



      I just want to add that arguing star ratings or any other subjective system of analysis is really quite pointless and stupid.

      That being said, one more time, it was a very good match, but Eddie has had much better.




    Am I the only one who feels that if you removed "arguing" from the above statement, it would still pretty much be true?


I disagree with that. I think that there are flaws with some subjective ratings, especially if there are clear biases involved with some systems, but, in general, ratings can be helpful in a lot of things. After all, in the case of star ratings, I think they give you a general picture of how good the match is. I don't see many matches that are rated 4 and a quarter by on person being rated two and a half by another.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Dichotomy of the Day
Next thread: Me vs. Dave Scherer
Previous thread: 411's new look sucks.
(63 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Site Bashing - Scott Keith is confusing...Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.222 seconds.