The W
Views: 95796310
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.4.07 0015
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - About MSNBC's Dick Cheney/Iraq/9/11 "Meet the Press" clip Register and log in to post!
(592 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (4 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 210

Posts: 5164/15944
EXP: 135340797
For next: 1114159

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 6.10.04 0033.53
Reposted on: 6.10.11 0034.01
The MSNBC guys seemed pretty impressed when Brian Williams, as part of his "Truth Squad" segment, dug up a "Meet the Press" clip from September 14, 2003:

"...we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11."

The problem with playing a ten second clip is it lacks some context. Fortunately, there's a complete transcript of the episode in question at http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3080244/ - let's take a look at an extended version of that soundbite and I'll unfairly add MY own emphasis:


    MR. RUSSERT: The Congressional Budget Office said that: That the Army lacks sufficient active-duty forces to maintain its current level of nearly 150,000 troops in Iraq beyond next spring. In a report that underscores the stress being place on the military by the occupation of Iraq, the CBO said the Armys goals of keeping the same number of troops in Iraq and limiting tours of duty there to a year while maintaining its current presence elsewhere in the world were impossible to sustain without activating more National Guard or Reserve units.

    Can we keep 150,000 troops beyond next spring without, in effect, breaking the Army?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: Tim, we can do what we have to do to prevail in this conflict. Failures not an option. And go back again and think about whats involved here. This is not just about Iraq or just about the difficulties we might encounter in any one part of the country in terms of restoring security and stability. This is about a continuing operation on the war on terror. And its very, very important we get it right. If were successful in Iraq, if we can stand up a good representative government in Iraq, that secures the region so that it never again becomes a threat to its neighbors or to the United States, so its not pursuing weapons of mass destruction, so that its not a safe haven for terrorists, now we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11. They understand whats at stake here. Thats one of the reasons theyre putting up as much of a struggle as they have, is because they know if we succeed here, that thats going to strike a major blow at their capabilities.

    MR. RUSSERT: So the resistance in Iraq is coming from those who were responsible for 9/11?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: No, I was careful not to say that.
    With respect to 9/11, 9/11, as I said at the beginning of the show, changed everything. And one of the things it changed is we recognized that time was not on our side, that in this part of the world, in particular, given the problems weve encountered in Afghanistan, which forced us to go in and take action there, as well as in Iraq, that we, in fact, had to move on it. The relevance for 9/11 is that what 9/11 marked was the beginning of a struggle in which the terrorists come at us and strike us here on our home territory. And its a global operation. It doesnt know national boundaries or national borders. And the commitment of the United States going into Afghanistan and take down the Taliban and stand up a new government, to go into Iraq and take down the Saddam Hussein regime and stand up a new government is a vital part of our long-term strategy to win the war on terror. Americas going to be safer and more secure in the years ahead when we complete the task in Iraq successfully, and we will complete it successfully. And whatever the cost is, in terms of casualties or financial resources, its a whale of a lot less than trying to recover from the next attack in the United States. So what we do on the ground in Iraq, our capabilities here are being tested in no small measure, but this is the place where we want to take on the terrorists. This is the place where we want to take on those elements that have come against the United States, and its far more appropriate for us to do it there and far better for us to do it there than it is here at home.

    We talk about $87 billion. Yeah, thats a significant expense. No question about it. But its going to be much more expensive down the road if we wait. And itll be uch more expensiveits less money, frankly, than the events of 9/11 imposed on us here in the United States.


So what does that prove? Well....nothing. I just thought it was...interesting.

I emailed my "soundbite" version of this to MSNBC on a larf since their phone was busy. I also decided to mail it to the cablenewser blog dude. Why not?


(edited by CRZ on 6.10.04 0044)
Promote this thread!
Teppan-Yaki
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 800/1083
EXP: 2342171
For next: 119693

Since: 28.6.02

Since last post: 756 days
Last activity: 726 days
#2 Posted on 6.10.04 0247.20
Reposted on: 6.10.11 0249.23
    Originally posted by CRZ, who quoted NBC and Dick Cheney
    Americas going to be safer and more secure in the years ahead when we complete the task in Iraq successfully, and we will complete it successfully.


Not that your passage isn't interesting, but will the U.S. be safer and more secure in the years ahead if Saddam Hussein isn't the main enemy and OBL/Al Qaida is?
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 123

Posts: 4050/4700
EXP: 21142969
For next: 88357

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1088 days
Last activity: 885 days
#3 Posted on 6.10.04 0644.46
Reposted on: 6.10.11 0646.20
I do think that the context shows a problem with the Kedwards strategy. They insist that Cheney said there was a connection, and insist that the administration insists theat Saddam Hussein was responsibile for 9/11 when there is really no proof of such statement.

Of course, it is a deceit.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 210

Posts: 5174/15944
EXP: 135340797
For next: 1114159

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 7.10.04 0309.16
Reposted on: 7.10.11 0309.27
Well, after the GOP released a press release pretty much saying what I said in post #1 (and how scary is it that I ended up on the same page as the RNC), Chris Matthews led off tonight's "Hardball" by playing the entire "Meet the Press" clip, so good for him...even if it played more like a CYA move while I was watching it on my TV. (My opinion)

See also: http://www.gop.com/RNCResearch/Read.aspx?ID=4807
For a WMV: http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/matthewsresponsefinal.wmv
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Weapons Rules Eased At Dulles and National Airports. Gun ban is "overly restrictive."
Next thread: Michael Moore tries to buy votes with underwear and noodles
Previous thread: Latest SurveyUSA statewide polls
(592 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - About MSNBC's Dick Cheney/Iraq/9/11 "Meet the Press" clipRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.162 seconds.