The W
Views: 103992679
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.4.08 1548
The 7 - Movies & TV - Fantastic 4 pics
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1927 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 111

Posts: 1240/3655
EXP: 14632570
For next: 235836

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 20 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#1 Posted on 24.9.04 1027.27
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1028.25


I must say I am impressed with these initial shots of the cast in their Fantastic 4 attire. The Thing looks waaaay cooler than I thought he would.

http://filmforce.ign.com/ff/articles/550/550083p1.html
Promote this thread!
Jobberman
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 273/426
EXP: 613171
For next: 46998

Since: 2.1.02
From: West Palm Beach, FL

Since last post: 268 days
Last activity: 229 days
#2 Posted on 24.9.04 1139.25
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1140.20
Jessica Alba looks great.

Is The Thing's hand broken?
evilwaldo
Lap cheong
Level: 79

Posts: 1554/1597
EXP: 4434150
For next: 145337

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3594 days
Last activity: 3374 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 24.9.04 1146.11
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1149.04
    Originally posted by Jobberman
    Jessica Alba looks great.

    Is The Thing's hand broken?


Looks like there was a tear in the costume. They all look cool but The Thing looks small.
dwaters
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 263/1665
EXP: 4595864
For next: 187125

Since: 16.10.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 7 hours
#4 Posted on 24.9.04 1213.36
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1215.47
I thought Sue Storm would be Sue Richards--she married Reed in the comics, right?
I thought the Reed Richards guy was Jon Stewart at first.

Was hoping The Thing would be a little closer to the comic version....we'll see how it plays in the film...

oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 104

Posts: 1906/3059
EXP: 11798722
For next: 63443

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2173 days
Last activity: 2107 days
#5 Posted on 24.9.04 1219.50
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1221.47
Thing just looks like Michael Chiklis chiselled out of rock. I know we don't want the guy totally disguised, but he's supposed to be pretty fucking big 'n' bouldery, ya know? Where's his uber-pronounced brow, for instance?
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 760/1694
EXP: 4737897
For next: 45092

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2199 days
Last activity: 1930 days
#6 Posted on 24.9.04 1355.03
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1355.45
    Originally posted by dwaters
    I thought Sue Storm would be Sue Richards--she married Reed in the comics, right?
    I thought the Reed Richards guy was Jon Stewart at first.

    Was hoping The Thing would be a little closer to the comic version....we'll see how it plays in the film...




Yeah, but I don't think that came on until later. At the start of the movie she's Dr. Doom's plaything.
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 60

Posts: 680/859
EXP: 1755722
For next: 17066

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 2421 days
Last activity: 1288 days
#7 Posted on 24.9.04 1407.59
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1410.54
I like the Thing changes. Makes him a little more humanized.
I do want to see the Torch on fire.
Alessandro
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 683/1717
EXP: 4961572
For next: 31298

Since: 2.1.02
From: Worcester MA

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 8 days
#8 Posted on 24.9.04 1527.38
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1529.01
The Thing supposedly looks more like the original Jack Kirby design now (don't know if that's what the producers were going for or if it just made for an easier costume) ... And that Jessica Alba pic REALLY makes me pine for some "Dark Angel" reruns.

Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 2480/3273
EXP: 13029545
For next: 61808

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 385 days
Last activity: 186 days
#9 Posted on 24.9.04 1609.44
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1609.58
Am I the only one disturbed by the fact that Johnny Storm looks older than Reed Richards?

-Jag
JST
Toulouse
Level: 70

Posts: 685/1218
EXP: 2958706
For next: 57120

Since: 20.1.02
From: Quebec City, CAN

Since last post: 41 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#10 Posted on 24.9.04 2042.19
Reposted on: 24.9.11 2043.49
The non-blonde Johnny Storm and Thing's small brow are just fanboy details. I myself can't wait to see Torch flame on.

Think he'll actually say 'Flame on!' ? :P
lagboyz_jfk
Cotechino
Level: 23

Posts: 45/92
EXP: 60864
For next: 6860

Since: 18.4.02
From: Chicago

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 11 days
#11 Posted on 24.9.04 2133.36
Reposted on: 24.9.11 2136.50
    Originally posted by oldschoolhero
    Thing just looks like Michael Chiklis chiselled out of rock. I know we don't want the guy totally disguised, but he's supposed to be pretty fucking big 'n' bouldery, ya know? Where's his uber-pronounced brow, for instance?
From comicscontinuum.com:
[Chiklis] did not want the role if The Thing was going to be a CG character.

"I felt that I would be wasted," he said. "I was assured from the get-go that that wasn't going to be the case, and I was thrilled. They would use some CGI enhancements in creating nuances"

I'm guessing the brow would be one of those nuances.
KaneRobot
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 373/631
EXP: 1099365
For next: 57761

Since: 24.2.02
From: Bowels

Since last post: 2611 days
Last activity: 1904 days
#12 Posted on 25.9.04 2354.11
Reposted on: 25.9.11 2356.17

    "I felt that I would be wasted," he said.


Arrogant prick alert.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 2482/3273
EXP: 13029545
For next: 61808

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 385 days
Last activity: 186 days
#13 Posted on 26.9.04 0031.14
Reposted on: 26.9.11 0031.16
Would you want *your* name attached to a potential bomb and then end up having almost nothing to do with the portrayal of your character? If they did it like the CGI Hulk there'd be almost nothing for him to do except voice-over. And there are plenty of good voice actors they could hire instead.

-Jag
chill
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 466/930
EXP: 1950028
For next: 34669

Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 2873 days
Last activity: 2873 days
#14 Posted on 26.9.04 1345.20
Reposted on: 26.9.11 1346.45
Exactly. Chiklis is one helluva fantastic actor. One of the best bad asses right now. He was most likely chosen for this reason - so why would the producers NOT want to use his strengths in the film? I'm not a comic book fan, but because of Chiklis and the cool look to the costumes, I'm looking forward to this.
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 110

Posts: 895/3468
EXP: 14203929
For next: 205003

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 9 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#15 Posted on 26.9.04 1517.32
Reposted on: 26.9.11 1524.39
    Originally posted by chill
    Exactly. Chiklis is one helluva fantastic actor. One of the best bad asses right now. He was most likely chosen for this reason - so why would the producers NOT want to use his strengths in the film? I'm not a comic book fan, but because of Chiklis and the cool look to the costumes, I'm looking forward to this.


Here's another link to another pic of chiklis as the Thing (warning: pop-ups)
http://www.hollywoodnorthreport.com/cgi-bin/ImageFolio31/imageFolio.cgi?action=view&link=Fantastic_Four/Behind_the_Scene_Photos&image=earlythethingcloseup.jpg&img=&tt=
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Why isnt Iron Chef available on DVD?
Next thread: Hu$tle
Previous thread: Lost
(1927 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Jessica Alba confirmed for Fantastic Four - Fantastic Four casting news - Story to direct Fantastic Four - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - Fantastic 4 picsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.349 seconds.