The W
Views: 122975130
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.4.10 1456
The 7 - Movies & TV - Fantastic 4 pics
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(2950 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 114

Posts: 1240/3691
EXP: 16040811
For next: 268806

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 85 days
Last activity: 3 days
#1 Posted on 24.9.04 1027.27
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1028.25


I must say I am impressed with these initial shots of the cast in their Fantastic 4 attire. The Thing looks waaaay cooler than I thought he would.

http://filmforce.ign.com/ff/articles/550/550083p1.html
Promote this thread!
Jobberman
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 273/426
EXP: 657697
For next: 2472

Since: 2.1.02
From: West Palm Beach, FL

Since last post: 1000 days
Last activity: 318 days
#2 Posted on 24.9.04 1139.25
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1140.20
Jessica Alba looks great.

Is The Thing's hand broken?
evilwaldo
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 1554/1597
EXP: 4758464
For next: 24525

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 4326 days
Last activity: 4106 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 24.9.04 1146.11
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1149.04
    Originally posted by Jobberman
    Jessica Alba looks great.

    Is The Thing's hand broken?


Looks like there was a tear in the costume. They all look cool but The Thing looks small.
dwaters
Lap cheong
Level: 84

Posts: 263/1783
EXP: 5485212
For next: 176764

Since: 16.10.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 25 days
Last activity: 19 days
#4 Posted on 24.9.04 1213.36
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1215.47
I thought Sue Storm would be Sue Richards--she married Reed in the comics, right?
I thought the Reed Richards guy was Jon Stewart at first.

Was hoping The Thing would be a little closer to the comic version....we'll see how it plays in the film...

oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 1906/3059
EXP: 12655512
For next: 16472

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2905 days
Last activity: 2839 days
#5 Posted on 24.9.04 1219.50
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1221.47
Thing just looks like Michael Chiklis chiselled out of rock. I know we don't want the guy totally disguised, but he's supposed to be pretty fucking big 'n' bouldery, ya know? Where's his uber-pronounced brow, for instance?
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 760/1694
EXP: 5099594
For next: 109655

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2931 days
Last activity: 2662 days
#6 Posted on 24.9.04 1355.03
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1355.45
    Originally posted by dwaters
    I thought Sue Storm would be Sue Richards--she married Reed in the comics, right?
    I thought the Reed Richards guy was Jon Stewart at first.

    Was hoping The Thing would be a little closer to the comic version....we'll see how it plays in the film...




Yeah, but I don't think that came on until later. At the start of the movie she's Dr. Doom's plaything.
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 62

Posts: 680/859
EXP: 1883218
For next: 101479

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3153 days
Last activity: 2020 days
#7 Posted on 24.9.04 1407.59
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1410.54
I like the Thing changes. Makes him a little more humanized.
I do want to see the Torch on fire.
Alessandro
Lap cheong
Level: 83

Posts: 683/1728
EXP: 5373094
For next: 59150

Since: 2.1.02
From: Worcester MA

Since last post: 108 days
Last activity: 18 days
#8 Posted on 24.9.04 1527.38
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1529.01
The Thing supposedly looks more like the original Jack Kirby design now (don't know if that's what the producers were going for or if it just made for an easier costume) ... And that Jessica Alba pic REALLY makes me pine for some "Dark Angel" reruns.

Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 110

Posts: 2480/3282
EXP: 14037446
For next: 371486

Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 85 days
Last activity: 64 days
#9 Posted on 24.9.04 1609.44
Reposted on: 24.9.11 1609.58
Am I the only one disturbed by the fact that Johnny Storm looks older than Reed Richards?

-Jag
JST
Toulouse
Level: 72

Posts: 685/1238
EXP: 3252865
For next: 70913

Since: 20.1.02
From: Quebec City, CAN

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 22 hours
#10 Posted on 24.9.04 2042.19
Reposted on: 24.9.11 2043.49
The non-blonde Johnny Storm and Thing's small brow are just fanboy details. I myself can't wait to see Torch flame on.

Think he'll actually say 'Flame on!' ? :P
lagboyz_jfk
Cotechino
Level: 23

Posts: 45/92
EXP: 65379
For next: 2345

Since: 18.4.02
From: Chicago

Since last post: 743 days
Last activity: 743 days
#11 Posted on 24.9.04 2133.36
Reposted on: 24.9.11 2136.50
    Originally posted by oldschoolhero
    Thing just looks like Michael Chiklis chiselled out of rock. I know we don't want the guy totally disguised, but he's supposed to be pretty fucking big 'n' bouldery, ya know? Where's his uber-pronounced brow, for instance?
From comicscontinuum.com:
[Chiklis] did not want the role if The Thing was going to be a CG character.

"I felt that I would be wasted," he said. "I was assured from the get-go that that wasn't going to be the case, and I was thrilled. They would use some CGI enhancements in creating nuances"

I'm guessing the brow would be one of those nuances.
KaneRobot
Morcilla
Level: 54

Posts: 373/631
EXP: 1180043
For next: 53834

Since: 24.2.02
From: Bowels

Since last post: 3343 days
Last activity: 2636 days
#12 Posted on 25.9.04 2354.11
Reposted on: 25.9.11 2356.17

    "I felt that I would be wasted," he said.


Arrogant prick alert.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 110

Posts: 2482/3282
EXP: 14037446
For next: 371486

Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 85 days
Last activity: 64 days
#13 Posted on 26.9.04 0031.14
Reposted on: 26.9.11 0031.16
Would you want *your* name attached to a potential bomb and then end up having almost nothing to do with the portrayal of your character? If they did it like the CGI Hulk there'd be almost nothing for him to do except voice-over. And there are plenty of good voice actors they could hire instead.

-Jag
chill
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 466/930
EXP: 2095560
For next: 1603

Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 3605 days
Last activity: 3605 days
#14 Posted on 26.9.04 1345.20
Reposted on: 26.9.11 1346.45
Exactly. Chiklis is one helluva fantastic actor. One of the best bad asses right now. He was most likely chosen for this reason - so why would the producers NOT want to use his strengths in the film? I'm not a comic book fan, but because of Chiklis and the cool look to the costumes, I'm looking forward to this.
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 895/3668
EXP: 16578025
For next: 233390

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
Y!:
#15 Posted on 26.9.04 1517.32
Reposted on: 26.9.11 1524.39
    Originally posted by chill
    Exactly. Chiklis is one helluva fantastic actor. One of the best bad asses right now. He was most likely chosen for this reason - so why would the producers NOT want to use his strengths in the film? I'm not a comic book fan, but because of Chiklis and the cool look to the costumes, I'm looking forward to this.


Here's another link to another pic of chiklis as the Thing (warning: pop-ups)
http://www.hollywoodnorthreport.com/cgi-bin/ImageFolio31/imageFolio.cgi?action=view&link=Fantastic_Four/Behind_the_Scene_Photos&image=earlythethingcloseup.jpg&img=&tt=
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Why isnt Iron Chef available on DVD?
Next thread: Hu$tle
Previous thread: Lost
(2950 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Jessica Alba confirmed for Fantastic Four - Fantastic Four casting news - Story to direct Fantastic Four - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - Fantastic 4 picsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.27 seconds.