awesomeyoungjedi
Pinkelwurst Level: 13
    Posts: 25/30 EXP: 9793 For next: 474
Since: 26.9.03 From: nottingham, england
Since last post: 3031 days Last activity: 3029 days
| #1 Posted on 16.9.04 1721.31 Reposted on: 16.9.11 1721.33 | just wondering who to put as running back for my fantasy squad this week. chiefs are home to carolina so it could be tough for holmes
however new england are at arizona which is supposedly easier but they play a passing game.
so which player will get more points? i am leaning towards dillon as this could be his breakout game what does the forum think?
(edited by awesomeyoungjedi on 16.9.04 2023) | Promote this thread! |  | DrDirt
Banger Level: 94
    Posts: 1234/2662 EXP: 8172473 For next: 184215
Since: 8.10.03 From: flyover country
Since last post: 25 days Last activity: 9 hours
| #2 Posted on 16.9.04 1733.29 Reposted on: 16.9.11 1733.29 | Originally posted by awesomeyoungjedi just wondering who to put as running back for my fantasy squad this week. chiefs are home to carolina so it could be tough for holmes
however new england are at arizona which is supposedly easier but they play a passing game.
so which player will get more points? i am leaning towards dillon as this could be his breakout game what does the forum think?
(edited by awesomeyoungjedi on 16.9.04 2023)
Priest scores and has scored a minimum of two td's per game forever. Plus carolina looks a little suspect on D. | Whitebacon
Boudin blanc Level: 93
    Posts: 1428/2450 EXP: 7835062 For next: 217778
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 10 hours
| AIM: | |
| | ICQ: | |
| |
| #3 Posted on 16.9.04 1737.36 Reposted on: 16.9.11 1738.41 |
First, I have a couple of questions...how many backs can you start? I'd start both if I could, but I'd still go with Holmes against Carolina. Ahman Green and the Packers did a pretty good job with the Carolina defense at Carolina(119 yds rushing, 3 TDs total), and I would think that since the Chiefs have one of the best offensive lines in football, and Priest Holmes is a top-2 back, plus the fact that they're playing at home, he should do well.
EDIT: Also...it's generally a good rule to never bench your studs. In this case...Holmes. I'd leave him in the lineup forever unless he was missing a leg or something.
(edited by Whitebacon on 16.9.04 1538) | JayJayDean
Scrapple Level: 122
    Posts: 1607/4599 EXP: 20175542 For next: 462530
Since: 2.1.02 From: Seattle, WA
Since last post: 7 days Last activity: 10 hours
| AIM: | |
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #4 Posted on 16.9.04 1941.26 Reposted on: 16.9.11 1942.10 | | FWIW, Hector & Victor at ESPN.com have Priest as their #1 player in their projections this week, with Dillon #19. | redsoxnation
Scrapple Level: 149
    Posts: 4167/7530 EXP: 41230869 For next: 104366
Since: 24.7.02
Since last post: 8 days Last activity: 4 hours
| #5 Posted on 16.9.04 2117.21 Reposted on: 16.9.11 2117.43 | | The Cardinals won't be an easy game for the Patriots this week. Remember, early last season the Packers went into the desert in hundred degree conditions and were knocked off by the Cardinals. Plus, Tillman Ceremonies Pre-Game mean if the Cardinals will ever have a home field advantage from the crowd, they will have it early Sunday. Thus, if New England keeps their winning streak going, it will probably be another Brady Drive late (17-1 career games decided by less than a touchdown). | dunkndollaz
Boudin blanc Level: 93
    Posts: 1346/2470 EXP: 7939929 For next: 112911
Since: 3.1.02 From: Northern NJ
Since last post: 4 days Last activity: 12 hours
| #6 Posted on 17.9.04 1057.33 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1059.01 | | Holmes should be a lock every week and like it was stated earlier, Ahman Green put up some nice #'s against the Panthers. Couple that with it being KC's home opener and a must win and Priest goes for 200+ combined rushing & receiving with a min. of 2 td's | awesomeyoungjedi
Pinkelwurst Level: 13
    Posts: 26/30 EXP: 9793 For next: 474
Since: 26.9.03 From: nottingham, england
Since last post: 3031 days Last activity: 3029 days
| #7 Posted on 17.9.04 1322.00 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1322.10 | | cheers for the help. i can choose only one running back so it looks like holmes to take the nod. thanks | spf
Scrapple Level: 130
    Posts: 2965/5354 EXP: 25340925 For next: 389721
Since: 2.1.02 From: The Las Vegas of Canada
Since last post: 12 hours Last activity: 8 hours
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #8 Posted on 17.9.04 1448.58 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1449.24 | Here's a really easy rule for Fantasy Football:
"Never bench Priest Holmes. Ever."
Priest Holmes is the only player who can singlehandedly drag a team to victory over the course of a season. | SlipperyPete
Bauerwurst Level: 23
    Posts: 32/102 EXP: 58551 For next: 9173
Since: 13.8.04
Since last post: 3108 days Last activity: 3108 days
| #9 Posted on 17.9.04 1753.44 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1754.27 | | How about when the Pats play the Chiefs, which one do you start then? | DrDirt
Banger Level: 94
    Posts: 1240/2662 EXP: 8172473 For next: 184215
Since: 8.10.03 From: flyover country
Since last post: 25 days Last activity: 9 hours
| #10 Posted on 17.9.04 1831.55 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1832.27 | Originally posted by SlipperyPete How about when the Pats play the Chiefs, which one do you start then?
Holmes, he's money in the bank. | SlipperyPete
Bauerwurst Level: 23
    Posts: 33/102 EXP: 58551 For next: 9173
Since: 13.8.04
Since last post: 3108 days Last activity: 3108 days
| #11 Posted on 17.9.04 1912.30 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1913.08 | | I agree, but I thought it might be tricker in that case since Dillon would have the benefit of going against the Chiefs D. | Jaguar
Knackwurst Level: 105
    Posts: 2463/3272 EXP: 12076500 For next: 185800
Since: 23.1.02 From: Phoenix, AZ
Since last post: 622 days Last activity: 622 days
| #12 Posted on 17.9.04 1951.48 Reposted on: 17.9.11 1953.41 | Until they prove otherwise, the Pats are the Tom Brady Show (not the Brady Tom Show). But hey, there's a chance they might start to rely on Dillon.
-Jag | Whitebacon
Boudin blanc Level: 93
    Posts: 1433/2450 EXP: 7835062 For next: 217778
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 10 hours
| AIM: | |
| | ICQ: | |
| |
| #13 Posted on 18.9.04 0222.59 Reposted on: 18.9.11 0223.19 | Originally posted by DrDirt
Originally posted by SlipperyPete How about when the Pats play the Chiefs, which one do you start then?
Holmes, he's money in the bank.
Like I said earlier...I wouldn't bench Holmes unless he was missing a leg. | Net Hack Slasher
Banger Level: 98
    Posts: 2561/2805 EXP: 9605144 For next: 49243
Since: 6.1.02 From: Outer reaches of your mind
Since last post: 3097 days Last activity: 1517 days
| #14 Posted on 20.9.04 0224.50 Reposted on: 20.9.11 0228.17 | Holmes: 66 yards rushing. 16 yards receiving. 1 Rushing TD
Dillon: 157 yards rusing. -1 yard receiving. 0 TD
So Dillon won the rushing game but Holmes got TD. Not in a fantasy league this year but IIRC it's 1 point for every 20 yeard rushing or receiving and 6 points for a Touchdown... If that's the case Holmes beat out Dillon 9-7. | Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit Moderator Level: 127
    Posts: 2271/5074 EXP: 23379880 For next: 346751
Since: 2.1.02 From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.
Since last post: 7 days Last activity: 20 hours
| #15 Posted on 20.9.04 0745.17 Reposted on: 20.9.11 0746.14 | Originally posted by Net Hack Slasher Holmes: 66 yards rushing. 16 yards receiving. 1 Rushing TD
Dillon: 157 yards rusing. -1 yard receiving. 0 TD
So Dillon won the rushing game but Holmes got TD. Not in a fantasy league this year but IIRC it's 1 point for every 20 yeard rushing or receiving and 6 points for a Touchdown... If that's the case Holmes beat out Dillon 9-7.
In the W League I it's 1 pt for every 10 yards, so if he were in a league like that at Yahoo! it would be:
Holes: 8.2 total yards + 6 pts = 14.2 Dillon: 15.6 total yards = 15.6
Advantage (slightly) Dillon. | awesomeyoungjedi
Pinkelwurst Level: 13
    Posts: 27/30 EXP: 9793 For next: 474
Since: 26.9.03 From: nottingham, england
Since last post: 3031 days Last activity: 3029 days
| #16 Posted on 21.9.04 0306.22 Reposted on: 21.9.11 0308.47 | hi, cheers for the help guys. in the end it worked out that holmes got 13 points
its 7pts for a td and 1pt for every 10 rushing dillon would have got me 15 pts
not that much difference really i am more disapointed with others in my teams performance.
jets score a bagfull yet no TD for carter. Green bay defence goes awol against chicago.
but did have money in the bank with tom brady and testiverdi though.
overall an average week. just have to play a blinder next week, cheers
| Whitebacon
Boudin blanc Level: 93
    Posts: 1438/2450 EXP: 7835062 For next: 217778
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 6 days Last activity: 10 hours
| AIM: | |
| | ICQ: | |
| |
| #17 Posted on 21.9.04 1004.39 Reposted on: 21.9.11 1005.18 | | I wouldn't bank on Carter doing much on a weekly basis for the Jets. Martin, Moss, Mcariens, and probably Jordan and Becht are all ahead of him in the pecking order there. | The Thrill
Banger Level: 97
    Posts: 1359/2760 EXP: 9262945 For next: 54413
Since: 16.4.02 From: Green Bay, WI
Since last post: 7 days Last activity: 10 hours
| #18 Posted on 23.9.04 0801.09 Reposted on: 23.9.11 0801.46 | Originally posted by Jaguar Until they prove otherwise, the Pats are the Tom Brady Show (not the Brady Tom Show). But hey, there's a chance they might start to rely on Dillon.
This thread illustrates the problem I have w/ my fantasy football team...with the point-production goodness of having both Donovan McNabb and Terrell Owens on my squad, I'm forced to keep Brady, my other QB, benched.
Of course, there's always my Priest Holmes running attack. 1st overall picks rule. | | ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |