CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 226
   
Posts: 5065/17254
EXP: 175216924
For next: 1017673
Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス
Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
|  #1 Posted on 14.9.04 1526.43
Reposted on: 14.9.11 1529.01 | SurveyUSA were the ONLY ones to get it right with the California recall at the time it was happening, so they've always gotten high credibility from me. They updated their statewide polls yesterday; if you don't want to Click Here (surveyusa.com), here's some cutting and pasting of the newly updated polls:
| President, MO | 9/10/2004 | | Bush (R) | 48% | | Kerry (D) | 46% | | Other/Undecided | 5% | | Data Collected | 9/7/04 - 9/9/04 | | Geography | State of Missouri | | Sample Population | 660 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 3.9% | | Client | KSDK-TV St. Louis | | KOMU-TV Columbia |
| President, PA | 9/10/2004 | | Kerry (D) | 49% | | Bush (R) | 47% | | Other/Undecided | 5% | | Data Collected | 9/7/04 - 9/9/04 | | Geography | State of Pennsylvania | | Sample Population | 697 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 3.8% | | Client | WCAU-TV Philadelphia | | WNEP-TV Wilkes-Barre | | KDKA-TV Pittsburgh |
| President, IN | 9/10/2004 | | Bush (R) | 60% | | Kerry (D) | 36% | | Other/Undecided | 4% | | Data Collected | 9/7/04 - 9/9/04 | | Geography | State of Indiana | | Sample Population | 692 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 3.8% | | Client | WXIN-TV Indianapolis |
| President, KS | 9/10/2004 | | Bush (R) | 60% | | Kerry (D) | 35% | | Other/Undecided | 5% | | Data Collected | 9/7/04 - 9/9/04 | | Geography | State of Kansas | | Sample Population | 604 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 4.0% | | Client | KWCH-TV Wichita |
| President, KY | 9/10/2004 | | Bush (R) | 56% | | Kerry (D) | 39% | | Other/Undecided | 5% | | Data Collected | 9/7/04 - 9/9/04 | | Geography | State of Kentucky | | Sample Population | 665 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 3.9% | | Client | WHAS-TV Louisville | | WLEX-TV Lexington |
| President, OH | 9/9/2004 | | Bush (R) | 50% | | Kerry (D) | 47% | | Other/Undecided | 4% | | Data Collected | 9/6/04 - 9/8/04 | | Geography | State of Ohio | | Sample Population | 709 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 3.8% | | Client | WCPO-TV Cincinnati | | WKYC-TV Cleveland |
| President, NC | 9/9/2004 | | Bush (R) | 50% | | Kerry (D) | 46% | | Other/Undecided | 5% | | Data Collected | 9/6/04 - 9/8/04 | | Geography | State of North Carolina | | Sample Population | 587 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 4.2% | | Client | WBTV-TV Charlotte | | WTVD-TV Raleigh-Durham |
| President, CA | 9/9/2004 | | Kerry-Edwards (D) | 52% | | Bush-Cheney (R) | 42% | | Other/Undecided | 5% | | Data Collected | 9/6/04 - 9/8/04 | | Geography | State of California | | Sample Population | 598 Likely Voters | | Margin of Error | 4.1% | | Client | KABC-TV Los Angeles | | KPIX-TV San Francisco | | KXTV-TV Sacramento | | KGTV-TV San Diego |
If you're into older polls, there are 17 other states at that page going back to May. Also, lots of PDF press releases going into greater detail for each of their current polls (and probabl some links in the tables up above). | Promote this thread! |             | DrDirt
Banger
Level: 101
Posts: 1224/2743
EXP: 10467905
For next: 249807
Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country
Since last post: 178 days
Last activity: 80 days
| #2 Posted on 14.9.04 1635.31
Reposted on: 14.9.11 1637.04 | | Why in the world would anyone bother polling Kansas. We last went Dem in 1964. | spf
Scrapple
Level: 137
Posts: 2958/5410
EXP: 30701506
For next: 171427
Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada
Since last post: 902 days
Last activity: 322 days
| AIM: |  |
| | |
| #3 Posted on 14.9.04 1649.58
Reposted on: 14.9.11 1651.35 | | CRZ, when they were getting CA accurate, do you recall if they had one source from CA who was getting it right, or if they had a bevy of different ones? Because I worry if maybe they had just one good CA station/paper who called it right that they might not be as dependable nationally/outside of CA. | StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 153
Posts: 1906/7048
EXP: 44589951
For next: 733556
Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks
Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
| #4 Posted on 14.9.04 1803.23
Reposted on: 14.9.11 1803.25 | | WEll, if this poll is accurate, and the numbers remain much the same, its W in '04! Everybody who has won Ohio has won the election since about the turn of the century. the 1800s - 1900's that is. (or some other long away time like that) | It's False
Scrapple
Level: 145
Posts: 1203/6155
EXP: 36724629
For next: 879543
Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!
Since last post: 31 days
Last activity: 31 days
|  #5 Posted on 14.9.04 1825.41
Reposted on: 14.9.11 1828.00 | Originally posted by DrDirt
Why in the world would anyone bother polling Kansas. We last went Dem in 1964.
Ditto a similar notion in California. It's been years since California's gone to the Republicans and Gray Davis ineptitude aside, this state isn't about to turn to Bush anytime soon.
Besides that, I like to think that Arnold was elected based on his celebrity status rather than because of his party affiliation. | Crimedog
Boerewors
Level: 43
Posts: 68/374
EXP: 554044
For next: 11007
Since: 28.3.02
From: Ohio
Since last post: 3986 days
Last activity: 3976 days
| #6 Posted on 14.9.04 2346.32
Reposted on: 14.9.11 2347.31 | Originally posted by It's False
Ditto a similar notion in California. It's been years since California's gone to the Republicans and Gray Davis ineptitude aside, this state isn't about to turn to Bush anytime soon.
Besides that, I like to think that Arnold was elected based on his celebrity status rather than because of his party affiliation.
Yeah, but California's actually a possible win for Bush this year. A 10-percent gap right now has to have Karl Rove licking his chops. If Kerry keeps shooting himself in the foot and the Governator can deliver California, look out.
As for Ohio, no Republican has ever won the election without winning Ohio. I can't, off the top of my head, think of the last time a Democrat won without winning the state. Besides having a goodly number of electoral votes, Ohio's pretty representative of "America" in general, so it's usually a pretty good predictor of the mood of the nation.
(edited by Crimedog on 15.9.04 0047) | Nag
Landjager
Level: 63
Posts: 690/904
EXP: 2030434
For next: 66729
Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here
Since last post: 3453 days
Last activity: 1508 days
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #7 Posted on 15.9.04 0003.46
Reposted on: 15.9.11 0003.53 | "Besides having a goodly number of electoral votes, Ohio's pretty representative of "America" in general, so it's usually a pretty good predictor of the mood of the nation."
Yes, therefore everyone on this board should take my words as gospel  We should enjoy the attention we are getting because with my age group packing up and moving west, and the old hardhats dying off, we will have the electoral power, of say, South Carolina by 2020.
I wonder though, why Indiana leans so far towards Bush in this poll, while it's counterparts in Pennsylvania and Ohio are both comfy within the margin of error. Any Hoosiers care to shed some light?
(edited by Nag on 15.9.04 0106) | DrDirt
Banger
Level: 101
Posts: 1228/2743
EXP: 10467905
For next: 249807
Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country
Since last post: 178 days
Last activity: 80 days
| #8 Posted on 15.9.04 0815.53
Reposted on: 15.9.11 0817.10 | Originally posted by Nag
I wonder though, why Indiana leans so far towards Bush in this poll, while it's counterparts in Pennsylvania and Ohio are both comfy within the margin of error. Any Hoosiers care to shed some light?
(edited by Nag on 15.9.04 0106)
I am not a Hoosier but anyone who looks at Ind. sees it is a rural, conservative state. And much of PA and Ohio are the same way. The difference is the large urban centers in those states. Much of Ohio is very, very conservative but there aren't a lot of voters there. | A Fan
Liverwurst
Level: 71
Posts: 809/1164
EXP: 3063813
For next: 103316
Since: 3.1.02
Since last post: 4833 days
Last activity: 4833 days
| #9 Posted on 15.9.04 0905.33
Reposted on: 15.9.11 0911.02 | | After going to the website of these polls, I have to say that this thing is way too close to call. Pa, Mo, OH and NC are both well within the margin of error and have enough undecided votes to turn it either way. I kinda wish everyone would stop the Bush is going to win by a landslide when in all actuality, its way to close to call. Even our friend with the electoral vote counter is bit off since, he didn't put Pa in Kerry's column and decided to put a new vote poll that had Bush winning Ohio by nine points instead of one in which it was tied. It also doesn't have Maine in Kerry's column which SurveyUSA has. I am thinking these polls are going to get blown out of portion by the media and everyone here as usual. | AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 117
Posts: 873/3730
EXP: 17538238
For next: 309710
Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY
Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 8 hours
| AIM: |  |
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #10 Posted on 15.9.04 0958.20
Reposted on: 15.9.11 0959.01 | Originally posted by DrDirt
Originally posted by Nag
I wonder though, why Indiana leans so far towards Bush in this poll, while it's counterparts in Pennsylvania and Ohio are both comfy within the margin of error. Any Hoosiers care to shed some light?
(edited by Nag on 15.9.04 0106)
I am not a Hoosier but anyone who looks at Ind. sees it is a rural, conservative state. And much of PA and Ohio are the same way. The difference is the large urban centers in those states. Much of Ohio is very, very conservative but there aren't a lot of voters there.
A fair assessment, Doc. Other than Indianapolis and Gary Metro, I suspect we don't have any other cities over 250,000 metro. South Bend might be close, as is Ft. Wayne and Terre Haute. There's a lot of folks where I live too, close to Louisville.
It interesting though. Our Governor is democrat. But the one we elected (he died) was a Zell Miller conservative dem. (the one running isn't so much). One of our Senators is a fairly conservative Dem (Evan Bayh) and one is a somewhat moderate Republican (Richard Lugar). The fairly moderate US Rep running where I am located is having some trouble against a wild-eyed very conservative republican. Looks like the moderate republican is neck and neck against the Governor (the Lt. Governor who stepped in when O'Bannon died) in their race.
Rural people (and I used to was one) want the government OUT of their business, so traditionally, they have voted for Republicans. That's one reason. There is a limited number of minorities here (outside of the areas I mentioned), so that traditional block is gone. (in fact, I was talking the other day to a pal from high school who still lives in the same small town and he told me that, as far as he knows, there are still no blacks or hispanics living in the county I grew up in. (all farm country).
Our base is not manufacturing (other than a few places like Gary or Anderson/Kokomo), but Agricultural. | | ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | | | | | | | | |
