The W
Views: 134729363
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.7.11 0742
The 7 - Football - Revisiting Bailey for Portis Register and log in to post!
(1297 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
beefncheddar
Linguica
Level: 20

Posts: 36/64
EXP: 37159
For next: 5280

Since: 16.2.04
From: Mt. Pleasant, SC

Since last post: 1560 days
Last activity: 1385 days
#1 Posted on 12.9.04 2328.33
Reposted on: 12.9.11 2329.01
As a Broncos fan, I've got to say I've finally come around on the Bailey-Portis deal.

Both guys were incredible today, and Quentin Griffin came up HUGE -- though, admittedly, it was the KC defense they were facing.

I guess I may have to take back all the horrible things I said about Shanahan after the deal became public.
Promote this thread!
SlipperyPete
Bauerwurst
Level: 24

Posts: 25/102
EXP: 73486
For next: 4640

Since: 13.8.04

Since last post: 4966 days
Last activity: 4966 days
#2 Posted on 13.9.04 0041.32
Reposted on: 13.9.11 0042.15
You don't have to take it back, it could still be a bad trade. Griffin will probably be solid, but he hasn't been tested against a decent defense yet. He's only played the Chiefs and Colts. John Madden could get 100 yards against them.

But the glaring thing that stuck out to me was how Denver talked about bring able to bring guys up to stop the run because of what Bailey would bring to pass coverage. Where was the run stopping? Granted, it was Priest Holmes, but Denver has held him to much less than that in the past. If there's no signifigant improvement in the D then I think trading Portis will end up being looked at as a bad move.
estragand
Summer sausage
Level: 46

Posts: 215/439
EXP: 705065
For next: 6714

Since: 18.6.02

Since last post: 3921 days
Last activity: 3921 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 13.9.04 0108.34
Reposted on: 13.9.11 0108.37
At first I was upset with the deal...but then realized that in 2003 the Broncos had roughly 2 or 3 games that they might have won if they had employed a decent corner. I'm looking at the Monday nighter against New England as the prime example. In those games, I feel Champ would have made a difference...and a basic 100 yard perfomance from any back would have sufficed.

Portis had some unreal video game-type stats last year. Especially against Kansas City in December. But did they really need 200+ yards to beat the Chiefs that day?
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Miami-Tennessee moved to Saturday
Next thread: BEST. FIRST. WEEKEND. EVER.
Previous thread: Shaun Alexander DOWN, Seahawks UP
(1297 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Broncos fans, please explain something... - Garrison Hearst signs with Denver - Easy Eddie McCaffrey hangs em up - More...
The 7 - Football - Revisiting Bailey for PortisRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.921 seconds.