Why even bother killing twelve guys from Nepal? Nepal. We're talking about people from Nepal. I'm not saying that they should be doing this to Americans either, but what is the point in wasting a bunch of lowly workers? I guess it could be a way to scare off ...people, but then again those going over who aren't soliders have to know what they are getting into or are desperate for work.
Unedited versions of a video are around on the internet and it is just a stomach churning four minutes of one guy suffering a barbaric death and the eleven others being mass murdered. It's a scary scene of war at it's worst.
#2 Posted on 31.8.04 2009.19 Reposted on: 31.8.11 2012.27
That was SO not cool and the most graphic killing video yet. Part of me doesn't understand why they all just laid there to get slaughtered, but they could've been so scared and in shock that they were all paralyzed in fear. I'd have thought after five or six of them had been killed one guy might have tried SOMETHING.
I'm defintely thinking the only way to end this is with a nuke, but as many have said, terrorism is an idea so it can't be killed off. Why anyone would still be there who didn't absolutely have to be is beyond me because my ass would be the fuck outta there.
#3 Posted on 31.8.04 2042.02 Reposted on: 31.8.11 2043.28
Originally posted by JayJayDeanI'm defintely thinking the only way to end this is with a nuke, but as many have said, terrorism is an idea so it can't be killed off. Why anyone would still be there who didn't absolutely have to be is beyond me because my ass would be the fuck outta there.
For the money. The same reason a guy from our town went over to drive a semi. The Nepalese workers were likely making more in a month than in a year in Nepal.
Why kill lowly workers? They are necessary for the reconstruction and if you scare them off, it hinders the effort.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE