User | Post (9 total) |

squiz
Salami Level: 34
Posts: 116/217 EXP: 233782 For next: 19872
Since: 5.1.02 From: Dover, NH
Since last post: 550 days Last activity: 182 days
AIM: | |
| | |
| #1 Posted on *26.3.02 1844.09* Reposted on: 26.3.09 1859.01 | |

May I just point out once again how cool these are. Love the detailed records on your website as well. Shane, you must put a lot of time into this, and let it be known that all the effort is appreciated. |

Promote this thread! | |

Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst Level: 85
Posts: 356/1839 EXP: 5769288 For next: 129276
Since: 2.1.02 From: Sector 7 Slums
Since last post: 2266 days Last activity: 2266 days
| #2 Posted on *26.3.02 2328.55* Reposted on: 26.3.09 2329.02 | |

Thanks a lot! I love it when people talk about me.
*cough* Here's your ten bucks... |

CajunMan
Boudin blanc No longer registered Level: 97
Posts: 346/2483 EXP: 9051015 For next: 266343
Since: 2.1.02 From: Give me a Title shot!
Since last post: 1774 days Last activity: 911 days
| #3 Posted on *27.3.02 0016.08* Reposted on: 27.3.09 0029.02 | |

HHH The Uni-Champ and he gets #2???
That is almost like Oklahoma defeating #1Kansas for the Big12 Basketball Champ. and O.K. getting a #2 seed for the tourney. |

Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst Level: 85
Posts: 357/1839 EXP: 5769288 For next: 129276
Since: 2.1.02 From: Sector 7 Slums
Since last post: 2266 days Last activity: 2266 days
| #4 Posted on *27.3.02 0113.56* Reposted on: 27.3.09 0116.02 | |

No, it's almost like the fact that Rob Van Dam has a MUCH better winning percentage and quality wins quota. If you read the analysis, you'll see that the top two were very close, and far away from the rest of the pack. |

BrewGuy
Kolbasz Level: 47
Posts: 248/456 EXP: 712357 For next: 53852
Since: 2.1.02 From: Pickering, Ontario
Since last post: 1220 days Last activity: 234 days
AIM: | |
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #5 Posted on *27.3.02 0140.26* Reposted on: 27.3.09 0143.18 | |

SSS, these numbers get better every week. The analysis is great. And yes, Test got the shaft in the draft (and I'm a poet, and don't know it) ;) |

CEMfromMD
Tocino Level: 19
Posts: 1/58 EXP: 32053 For next: 3724
Since: 29.3.02 From: Frederick, Maryland, USA
Since last post: 4981 days Last activity: 4695 days
AIM: | |
| | |
| #6 Posted on *29.3.02 1149.15* Reposted on: 29.3.09 1152.31 | |

SSS - any way that we can see the numbers for say the top 5 so we can see how truly close they are in the rankings when taking everything into account? |

Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
**Administrator** Level: 143
Posts: 557/6111 EXP: 35024940 For next: 806955
Since: 9.12.01 From: Bay City, OR
Since last post: 54 days Last activity: 3 days
| #7 Posted on *29.3.02 1410.11* Reposted on: 29.3.09 1412.55 | |

Hey SSS -
Send me an e-mail at some point (or put it here) explaining how you set this up... I've been thinking about this system and the Ortega Lines, and I think there is potential in integrating them into some sort of system... but I haven't figured out how I would go about it yet.
Don't waste any time on it, though. Just give me the 5 second version if you could |

CajunMan
Boudin blanc No longer registered Level: 97
Posts: 352/2483 EXP: 9051015 For next: 266343
Since: 2.1.02 From: Give me a Title shot!
Since last post: 1774 days Last activity: 911 days
| #8 Posted on *29.3.02 1757.31* Reposted on: 29.3.09 1759.01 | |

*Originally posted by CEMfromMD* SSS - any way that we can see the numbers for say the top 5 so we can see how truly close they are in the rankings when taking everything into account?
I'm still trying to figure out how RVD broke the "Glass Ceiling".
Hang in there S.S.S. |

Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst Level: 85
Posts: 371/1839 EXP: 5769288 For next: 129276
Since: 2.1.02 From: Sector 7 Slums
Since last post: 2266 days Last activity: 2266 days
| #9 Posted on *30.3.02 0500.56* Reposted on: 30.3.09 0512.40 | |

The basic rankings are divided into 5 categories
Number 1: Straight up Win-Loss Records. (25%)
Since not all wrestlers will have the same number of matches, this is settled by the number of wins over .500
Example: Triple H is 8-4. Steve Austin is 7-3. They are both four wins over .500 so they are equal in this section. Say somebody was 84-80. They too would be equal.
Number 2: Quality Points (25%)
For every singles win, the wrestler picks up one point. For every tag win, the wrestler gets a half-point. For every title defense, a wrestler gets one point. For every title loss (this includes if a champion loses by countout or DQ,) the wrestler loses a point.
Number 3: Strength of Schedule (25%)
The wrestlers at this point are ranked in order using only the first two categories. This is the strangth list. Then you take the list of whom said wrestler has fought this year. The average of all the opponents is the SoS.
Number 4: Fan Votes (20%)
A number (usually around ten) of fans, both mark and smart, and from various means of polling (website, real life, etc) are asked to list off their top ten wrestlers so far in 2002. Top votes gets ten points and so on.
Number 5: Championship Advantage (5%)
The champions get a quick boost ranked by the order of championship value.
Current value: Triple H (World); Rob Van Dam (Ic); Billy n Chuck (Tag); William Regal (Euro); Tajiri (Crusier); Jazz (Women's)
As for Robert, we've actually tried to put it together a few times. He's actually been quite a help, even making me a few PDFs to try out. I, sadly, am too stupid to make them myself. But there are a few issues we do not always agree on in regards to win-loss (he counts the Royal Rumble a loss, I ignore nWo run-ins, etc..) So we've decided to have differing view and sort of be like the AP and USA TODAY of wrestling stats.
I'll put out an extra detailed version next week so you can see all the numbers and how they fit. Plus, since I'm doing that, I may as well make it the first edition of the rankings with all 65 current roster members. |

ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |