Moralman Weisswurst No longer registered Level: 12
Posts: 18/22 EXP: 7234 For next: 687
Since last post: 4091 days Last activity: 3547 days
#1 Posted on 17.7.04 0946.24 Reposted on: 17.7.11 0948.28
Dear Friends kind regards I thought that I make my return today. I have been watching WWE and lately its been awful. I think that perhaps one of the worst things to happen is to see Billy Kidman and Paul London win the tag titles. Heres a great list of reasons........... 1. Billy Kidman couldn't headline a flea market. Yes Hogan was right-and to think that this man was being billed as WCW's saviour what a joke. 2. Billy Kidman and Paul London are too small to be wrestlers unless you are watching AAA. 3. Paul London has the same homosexual ways and looks of his fellow queer Brian Kendrick. 4. Billy Kidman is married to Torrie Wilson-a female parasite hogging TV airtime. She is a useless waste of space and in my opinion WWE should use the time spent on WWE diva's to advertise for charity. What are your opinions on Kidman and London? They should be sacked and banned from wrestling permanently. Billy Kidman is a nobody and it looks like Fin Martins hopes of him being a headliner is a dunce. I await your views. yours thankfully John
Since last post: 2854 days Last activity: 460 days
#2 Posted on 17.7.04 1024.35 Reposted on: 17.7.11 1025.00
1. Billy Kidman couldn't headline a flea market.
ANYONE can HEADLINE a flea market. It's selling out a flea market that counts. Now, I don't know if Billy Kidman could sell out a flea market. However, I don't know if Barry Darsow could sell out a flea market either, but I thought Demolition were great Tag Team Champions.
2. Billy Kidman and Paul London are too small to be wrestlers unless you are watching AAA.
It's not 1985 anymore. Fans generally don't care about size. They care about action, and Kidman & London can provide exciting action.
3. Paul London has the same homosexual ways and looks of his fellow queer Brian Kendrick.
Well, that's nice.
4. Billy Kidman is married to Torrie Wilson-a female parasite hogging TV airtime.
That's great, but I see no reason why that affects his Tag Title reign?
Since last post: 3766 days Last activity: 3589 days
#7 Posted on 17.7.04 1329.15 Reposted on: 17.7.11 1331.36
I have no beef with Kidman and London being tag champs...godspeed to them, I hope this gets both of the guys the push they deserve (and I'm no great fan of the cruiser-weights). I DO have two beefs though.
1) The lamentable state of tag wrestling in WWE at the moment. The belts have no relevance seeing as their are virtually NO full time tag teams to compete for them (Dudleys, Bashams, Les Res....who else??);
2) Jackasses making stupid homophobic comments with no grounding/rationale.
#8 Posted on 17.7.04 1345.09 Reposted on: 17.7.11 1345.50
Dear Friends kind regards I love this guy. But it seems like this is what must happen. London and Kidman *do* use doubleteam maneuvers behind the referee's back. As well as stole the Dudley Boys' wazzup. Is that moral? & Brian Kendrick's girlfriend is a bit of a babe if you ask me. Sadly I cannot await your views. yours thankfully Justin
(edited by JMShapiro on 17.7.04 1154)
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE