The W
Views: 178598480
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.3.17 0441
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Whoopi Fired by Slim-Fast
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1290 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (20 total)
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 792/3909
EXP: 21976273
For next: 477954

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 90 days
Last activity: 90 days
Y!:
#1 Posted on 14.7.04 2214.34
Reposted on: 14.7.11 2215.01
As a former Slim-Fast user, I can now use their product again. I dig the capitalist system. We have free speech - both Whoopi and the people who use the slim-fast product. Neither will go to prison, but Whoopi will have to pay for her choice in insulting the President because the company that employs her received complaints from their users.

That is how capitalism works, folks. Now, if we were in the dictatorship that some on this board suggest we are in, Whoopi would be in jail or worse. She only has to tell funny jokes or act again. But I am sure she'll make plenty of day-pay at the union rate from likeminded talkshow hosts and others during her unemployment. Maybe Senator Kerry will use her in his ads.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/07/14/slimfast.whoopi/index.html
Promote this thread!
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst
Level: 73

Posts: 1129/1136
EXP: 3446897
For next: 38988

Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 7183 days
Last activity: 6653 days
#2 Posted on 15.7.04 0046.44
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0046.45
    Originally posted by AWArulz
    Now, if we were in the dictatorship that some on this board suggest we are in, Whoopi would be in jail or worse.


Yes, thank god that in this great country of ours people don't get arrested for being openly anti-Bush.

Oh, wait. (wvgazettemail.com)
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 161

Posts: 1641/7105
EXP: 53019387
For next: 1093846

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 928 days
Last activity: 928 days
#3 Posted on 15.7.04 0142.46
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0143.35
I have no problem with them being seperated because they dont support the President. You have freedom of speech, true, but nowhere does it say you have the right to see the person you are protesting against in person.

BTW, how funny would it be if the two people and thier pets were arrested again for violating health codes by keeping thier pets in hotels? THAT would rule!

(edited by StaggerLee on 14.7.04 2344)
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst
Level: 73

Posts: 1130/1136
EXP: 3446897
For next: 38988

Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 7183 days
Last activity: 6653 days
#4 Posted on 15.7.04 0208.20
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0209.13
    Originally posted by StaggerLee
    I have no problem with them being seperated because they dont support the President. You have freedom of speech, true, but nowhere does it say you have the right to see the person you are protesting against in person.


They were in a public place where the President was making an appearance, wearing shirts that said "Love America, Hate Bush". They weren't "protesting", they were standing on the Capitol steps like all the people with pro-Bush shirts. There were no blatantly unconstitutional "free speech zones" being enforced, but somehow those two still got arrested. Apparently they just didn't meet the dress code.

It was a blatant violation of people's civil rights when this garbage was happening months ago, and it still is.
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 161

Posts: 1643/7105
EXP: 53019387
For next: 1093846

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 928 days
Last activity: 928 days
#5 Posted on 15.7.04 0346.47
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0347.36
So, they were in Public. So, they were on the steps of the capitol. What else was going on? Were there any other people with them singing the National Anthem? Anybody else talking to them? Anybody telling them to shut up? The article doesnt suggest so, but it also doesnt have any accounts from anybody except these two.

Like I said, thier rights to Assemble PEACEFULLY and thier right to free speech do not say that they have the right to become a disturbance (as the singing, probably very loudly would indicate) and does not reserve thier right to an audience with thier target of protest.

AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 794/3909
EXP: 21976273
For next: 477954

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 90 days
Last activity: 90 days
Y!:
#6 Posted on 15.7.04 0531.52
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0532.00
    Originally posted by Nate The Snake
      Originally posted by AWArulz
      Now, if we were in the dictatorship that some on this board suggest we are in, Whoopi would be in jail or worse.


    Yes, thank god that in this great country of ours people don't get arrested for being openly anti-Bush.

    Oh, wait. (wvgazettemail.com)


a couple of alternate version of the story
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1994&dept_id=226374&newsid=12213373&PAG=461&rfi=9

http://www.news8austin.com/content/election_2004/election_stories/default.asp?ArID=111986

Now, I don't always agree with the so-called free speech zones, but they are currently the law. It seems like the couple was given a chance toleave (in the same way that a disruptive patron at a theatre might be asked to leave) and didn't. And just like the patron at the theatre who is asked to leave and doesn't and could be charged with tresspassing, these two were.

As I said, I don't neccesarily agree with free speech zones, but I understand the need for safety and security that the police need to maintain. I note that I don't see anything associated with the Feds - just the local cops.
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 106

Posts: 976/2743
EXP: 12414662
For next: 257322

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 2336 days
Last activity: 2238 days
#7 Posted on 15.7.04 0733.10
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0733.12
Back to the original purpose of this post. I am glad they canned her. She had the right to say what she did as well as reap the rewards. I am ashamed as a Democrat that this was tolerated, no matter the setting. It is incumbent on both sides to show a little class and respect. This kind of crap borders on hubris.

Edit to add: poking fun and satire are fine, lewdness isn't. Our President is OUR President whether you like him or not.

(edited by DrDirt on 15.7.04 0734)
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 112

Posts: 2079/3066
EXP: 15180584
For next: 157669

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 1809 days
Last activity: 986 days
#8 Posted on 15.7.04 0752.42
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0753.23
Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - disgraceful scandal~!

John Kerry saying he didn't expect Bush to fuck up Iraq as bad as he did in Rolling Stone magazine - this dangerous mental defective is not fit to govern~!

Dick Cheney telling Senator Pat Leahy to "go fuck himself" on the floor of the US Senate - why do you liberals have to go and make a big deal out of everything?
Reverend J Shaft
Toulouse
Level: 75

Posts: 180/1235
EXP: 3776831
For next: 50090

Since: 25.6.03
From: Home of The Big House

Since last post: 1429 days
Last activity: 12 days
#9 Posted on 15.7.04 0812.11
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0813.20
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - disgraceful scandal~!

    John Kerry saying he didn't expect Bush to fuck up Iraq as bad as he did in Rolling Stone magazine - this dangerous mental defective is not fit to govern~!

    Dick Cheney telling Senator Pat Leahy to "go fuck himself" on the floor of the US Senate - why do you liberals have to go and make a big deal out of everything?


Yeah, like there's no one on the other side of the fence spinning it the exact opposite way. This is neat. Lemme try.

Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - she was just exercising her right to free speech

John Kerry saying he didn't expect Bush to fuck up Iraq as bad as he did in Rolling Stone magazine - Yeah, you tell 'em JFK!!

Dick Cheney telling Senator Pat Leahy to "go fuck himself" on the floor of the US Senate - What a filthy-mouthed bastard.

When will the right-wing conspiracy to kill free speech end?!?!?!?

Just for the record, I think all three of those were offensive.

(edited by Reverend J Shaft on 15.7.04 0921)
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 161

Posts: 1646/7105
EXP: 53019387
For next: 1093846

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 928 days
Last activity: 928 days
#10 Posted on 15.7.04 0816.09
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0816.23
But the difference is, none of the political figures are being paid by a private company to advertise.

Thus, if bad publicity effects the companies bottom line, the company should not do business with the person creating the bad publicity. Why is that so hard to grasp?
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 135

Posts: 3494/4700
EXP: 28678709
For next: 656372

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 4704 days
Last activity: 3158 days
#11 Posted on 15.7.04 0841.07
Reposted on: 15.7.11 0841.09
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - disgraceful scandal~!
The problem with all of this is the fact that John Kerry indicated that she(amongst the others) were the heart and soul of America.

Whoops.

(edited by Grimis on 15.7.04 0941)
spf
Scrapple
Level: 144

Posts: 2801/5410
EXP: 35837828
For next: 872566

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 3060 days
Last activity: 395 days
#12 Posted on 15.7.04 1105.12
Reposted on: 15.7.11 1106.52
    Originally posted by Grimis
      Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
      Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - disgraceful scandal~!
    The problem with all of this is the fact that John Kerry indicated that she(amongst the others) were the heart and soul of America.

    Whoops.

    (edited by Grimis on 15.7.04 0941)

Considering some of the things I hear people saying about W, I don't know that this statement is all that far from accurate ;)

(edited by spf2119 on 15.7.04 1105)
The Lurk
Cotechino
Level: 23

Posts: 47/83
EXP: 64273
For next: 3451

Since: 7.6.04

Since last post: 7172 days
Last activity: 7172 days
#13 Posted on 15.7.04 1117.07
Reposted on: 15.7.11 1117.19
I can understand Slim-Fast doing what they did...especially if their leadership leans Republican. But I don't understand the outcry from anyone else, really.

Goldberg, and other comedians, have been doing bits about politicians for years now. And some of them are distasteful. There is nothing unusual about this.

And I know, the argument will be, "But she said it at a political function." Yep, a very partisan political function for the opposing party. So she wasn't so tongue-in-cheek-PC as most people are at these things. Was she really saying anything all that different? I don't think so.

Personally, I think Bush joking about not being able to find the WMDs at a political function while Americans died in Iraq was MUCH more distasteful and out of place.
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst
Level: 73

Posts: 1131/1136
EXP: 3446897
For next: 38988

Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 7183 days
Last activity: 6653 days
#14 Posted on 15.7.04 1831.44
Reposted on: 15.7.11 1831.46
    Originally posted by StaggerLee
    So, they were in Public. So, they were on the steps of the capitol. What else was going on? Were there any other people with them singing the National Anthem? Anybody else talking to them? Anybody telling them to shut up? The article doesnt suggest so, but it also doesnt have any accounts from anybody except these two.


And in response to that, I direct you to the two links AWArulz posted, indicating that the only thing the two of them did was take off their first layer of clothing to reveal a *gasp* Forbidden Message. They didn't start to make a scene until their civil rights were violated.

    Originally posted by AWArulz
    Now, I don't always agree with the so-called free speech zones, but they are currently the law.


The only problem with that is they're blatantly unconstitutional and always have been. And, of course, segregating protesters like that is against Secret Service (the agency responsible for the original free speech zones, and who I'd say is a pretty good candidate for the new batch that've been popping up as well) policy, and actually ADDS risk to a situation - they're wasting time dragging off anyone who dares to naysay the current administration while anyone with a gun, a grudge, and enough working brain cells to buy a "Bush/Cheney in '04" shirt could easily get close enough to cause some real trouble.
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 161

Posts: 1650/7105
EXP: 53019387
For next: 1093846

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 928 days
Last activity: 928 days
#15 Posted on 15.7.04 2113.14
Reposted on: 15.7.11 2114.42
Thats all well and good Nate, but the article stated it was local law enforcement who arrested them, not the Secret Service.
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst
Level: 73

Posts: 1133/1136
EXP: 3446897
For next: 38988

Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 7183 days
Last activity: 6653 days
#16 Posted on 16.7.04 0010.25
Reposted on: 16.7.11 0010.26
    Originally posted by StaggerLee
    Thats all well and good Nate, but the article stated it was local law enforcement who arrested them, not the Secret Service.


It wasn't the Secret Service doing the actual arresting last time, either. However, they were the ones who pressured the local law into herding people into the free speech zones (according to several statements made by the officers involved in several of the incidents) which is why they were named in the ACLU's suit.
Barbwire Mike
Boudin rouge
Level: 51

Posts: 350/502
EXP: 970043
For next: 43902

Since: 6.11.03
From: Dudleyville

Since last post: 6734 days
Last activity: 6727 days
#17 Posted on 16.7.04 0956.31
Reposted on: 16.7.11 0958.20
Heh, back to Whoopi. Looks like Kerry and Edwards were quick to distance themselves from her.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/212784p-183225c.html


    Kerry, who is trying to woo swing voters, did not stand by his celeb supporters. On the defensive, he distanced himself from Goldberg and said through spokesmen that he thought her comments were inappropriate.

    Running mate John Edwards was asked about the flap yesterday by Fox News. "They weren't speaking for me, and they weren't speaking for John Kerry," he said, adding the ticket is "focused on our positive, optimistic vision of hope."
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 795/3909
EXP: 21976273
For next: 477954

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 90 days
Last activity: 90 days
Y!:
#18 Posted on 17.7.04 0530.26
Reposted on: 17.7.11 0531.12
    Originally posted by Nate The Snake
      Originally posted by StaggerLee
      Thats all well and good Nate, but the article stated it was local law enforcement who arrested them, not the Secret Service.


    It wasn't the Secret Service doing the actual arresting last time, either. However, they were the ones who pressured the local law into herding people into the free speech zones (according to several statements made by the officers involved in several of the incidents) which is why they were named in the ACLU's suit.


I guess Stagger's point - and mine- is that it's the law. The cops don't really have a choice in this, especially if the Feds are around. Once again, I am certain we don't have all the data, but the seeming facts are:

1. The people entered the area looking normal - ie: no protest material, because there was a free speech zone for protestors across the street.

2. They removed part of their clothing to reveal their protest material - proving that they knew they would be asked to enter the protest area if they hadn't.

3. They may or may not have made an audible protest by "singing the Anthem" either normally or very loudly.

4. They were asked to leave and enter the protest zone by the cops.

5. They refused and sat on their hands.

6. They were arrested for tresspassing and removed.

As civil disobediants, I salute them. If their goal is to protest the free-speech zones, then it seems like they are part way to success. They challenged the law and were arrested, which means they can, eventually challenge the constituionality of the laws.

But they were not removed unlawfully, nor was there somevast right-wing conspiracy to silence them, and the liberal blogs suggest. They broke the law.

And if that law is unconstitutional, their conviction, if it happens, will be overturned. But that's where they go now. And I wish them Godspeed, if that is their intention.

That being said, I bet they are the tools of the vast left-wing conspiracy! (didn't want to let the Doc think I had totally turned or anything).
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 106

Posts: 992/2743
EXP: 12414662
For next: 257322

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 2336 days
Last activity: 2238 days
#19 Posted on 17.7.04 0914.39
Reposted on: 17.7.11 0917.32
    Originally posted by AWArulz
    That being said, I bet they are the tools of the vast left-wing conspiracy! (didn't want to let the Doc think I had totally turned or anything).



Thanks, I was begining to worry about you AWA.
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 72

Posts: 448/1104
EXP: 3228601
For next: 95177

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 1381 days
Last activity: 1380 days
Y!:
#20 Posted on 18.7.04 1845.36
Reposted on: 18.7.11 1849.52
    Originally posted by Reverend J Shaft
      Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
      Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - disgraceful scandal~!

      John Kerry saying he didn't expect Bush to fuck up Iraq as bad as he did in Rolling Stone magazine - this dangerous mental defective is not fit to govern~!

      Dick Cheney telling Senator Pat Leahy to "go fuck himself" on the floor of the US Senate - why do you liberals have to go and make a big deal out of everything?


    Yeah, like there's no one on the other side of the fence spinning it the exact opposite way. This is neat. Lemme try.

    Remember: Comedian Whoopi Goldberg making jokes on the basis that the President's last name is also a slang term for the vagina - she was just exercising her right to free speech

    John Kerry saying he didn't expect Bush to fuck up Iraq as bad as he did in Rolling Stone magazine - Yeah, you tell 'em JFK!!

    Dick Cheney telling Senator Pat Leahy to "go fuck himself" on the floor of the US Senate - What a filthy-mouthed bastard.

    When will the right-wing conspiracy to kill free speech end?!?!?!?

    Just for the record, I think all three of those were offensive.

    (edited by Reverend J Shaft on 15.7.04 0921)


I guess the lesson we all should learn is this; swearing and hyperole is to be used by democrats and liberals only.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Bush & Kerry related??
Next thread: Book Burning thwarted by fire codes....
Previous thread: On the Lighter Side of Politics
(1290 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Whoopi Fired by Slim-FastRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.2 seconds.