The W
Views: 121069647
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.2.10 0236
The 7 - Random - Fahrenheit 9/11 Reactions
This thread has 14 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Next(1058 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (79 total)
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 113

Posts: 2094/3504
EXP: 15421928
For next: 396681

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 1157 days
Last activity: 845 days
#1 Posted on 24.6.04 0307.10
Reposted on: 24.6.11 0307.59
I just got back from seeing Fahrenheit 9/11. It's still sinking in, but it was amazingly unsettling. The first hour could be subtitled "Bush Does The Darndest Things". It showcases the insanely moronic things Dubya has done, then shows the continued relationship between the Bushes and the Bin Ladens. And then that segues into probably the most gripping part of the film: Iraq. We see tons of troops talking about what's going on, tons of troops talking about wanting to go home, and tons of shots of maimed Iraqi civilians. Amazingly well done. The only piece I felt detracted from the whole was a confrontation between a woman who'd lost a son in Iraq and a pro-war protester. It seemed very staged. Everything else fit, largely because 95% of everything is news footage, interviews with Congressmen or Senators or former military or FBI folks.

Keep in mind that the film is not so much anti-Republican as much as it's anti-corruption. Moore's managed once again to craft a film that's at once gripping, frightening and humourous. It angers up the blood, then allows laughter as an outlet for the anger. It shows the stark contrasts between the rich & the poor on this continent and then says "Let's do something about it." Do what? Moore leaves that to the viewer.

Highest recommendation.
Promote this thread!
KaneRobot
Morcilla
Level: 54

Posts: 194/631
EXP: 1173053
For next: 60824

Since: 24.2.02
From: Bowels

Since last post: 3278 days
Last activity: 2570 days
#2 Posted on 25.6.04 0301.59
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0302.18
    Originally posted by Freeway420
    It shows the stark contrasts between the rich & the poor on this continent and then says "Let's do something about it." Do what? Moore leaves that to the viewer.


Moore wouldn't like that if it actually happened, since he is VERY much in the "rich" group, as much has he pretends he's still some regular guy living in Flint.
SeVen ™
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 303/422
EXP: 644120
For next: 16049

Since: 11.1.02
From: Japan

Since last post: 3303 days
Last activity: 3134 days
#3 Posted on 25.6.04 0341.06
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0343.09
It isn't saying being rich is wrong. Just the rich always getting away with doing wrong. For ref. see O.J., Ken Lay, Marc Rich, etc...
meatcurtains
Haggis
Level: 18

Posts: 30/53
EXP: 26364
For next: 3534

Since: 12.5.04

Since last post: 4509 days
Last activity: 3906 days
#4 Posted on 25.6.04 0449.24
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0449.59
    Originally posted by SeVen
    It isn't saying being rich is wrong. Just the rich always getting away with doing wrong. For ref. see O.J., Ken Lay, Marc Rich, etc...

For every rich guy getting away with something, there are a bunch of poor people who let them get off.
dwaters
Lap cheong
Level: 84

Posts: 217/1780
EXP: 5437525
For next: 224451

Since: 16.10.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 20 days
Last activity: 4 days
#5 Posted on 25.6.04 0632.25
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0632.35
I'd see it if the cinemas in town were actually showing it.
Sure they've got room for "Garfield" on five screens, but do you think they could squeeze in a movie that might actually make you think??? There are two cinemas like five miles apart that show the exact same list of movies. Frustrating.
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 61

Posts: 617/859
EXP: 1872167
For next: 4440

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3087 days
Last activity: 1954 days
#6 Posted on 25.6.04 0653.33
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0654.28
meatcurtains said:

    For every rich guy getting away with something, there are a bunch of poor people who let them get off.



The whole concept of "jury of your peers" precludes that happening in most cases. People with wealth *usually* get tried by people in their zip code area, who are also usually wealthy (unless there is some weird change of venue).


Back on topic:
I know Moore can be erratic and maniacal. Nonetheless, I have a special place for a guy who shows that a convicted con who is white will get a cab before a black businessman most of the time. And if Bush let himself be recorded being simple, why should that be anyone else's problem?
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 3332/4700
EXP: 23545544
For next: 181087

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2122 days
Last activity: 576 days
#7 Posted on 25.6.04 0726.36
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0727.47
    Originally posted by dwaters
    Sure they've got room for "Garfield" on five screens, but do you think they could squeeze in a movie that might actually make you think???
Garfield is probably more factual....
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 61

Posts: 619/859
EXP: 1872167
For next: 4440

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3087 days
Last activity: 1954 days
#8 Posted on 25.6.04 0846.19
Reposted on: 25.6.11 0846.51
http://www.cnn.com/ 2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/ 24/review.fahrenheit/ index.html


    Documentarians always have their own points of view, but Moore takes his positions and then guards them with pitbull-like intensity (though with humor as well). That tendency was plain in such past efforts as "Roger and Me" and the Academy Award-winning "Bowling For Columbine." "Fahrenheit 9/11" takes his burning passion to new heights; the heat is downright tangible.

    But the question isn't whether "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a fair and balanced look at its subject matter. Of course it isn't. Rather, is it good filmmaking?

    The answer is yes.



Is this not factual? (not including he writer's opinion):

    Perhaps the most damaging footage shows Bush on September 11, sitting in a Florida classroom for a full seven minutes after he had been told that the second tower had been struck, and that it was clear the horrific events in New York were a terrorist attack, not a tragic accident. Moore lets this moment go on and on: The president of the United States, stone-faced in front of dozens of schoolchildren, doing absolutely nothing, as our nation comes under attack.


AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 776/3656
EXP: 16399479
For next: 411936

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 25.6.04 1234.40
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1235.10
    Originally posted by DrOp
    http://www.cnn.com/ 2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/ 24/review.fahrenheit/ index.html


      Documentarians always have their own points of view, but Moore takes his positions and then guards them with pitbull-like intensity (though with humor as well). That tendency was plain in such past efforts as "Roger and Me" and the Academy Award-winning "Bowling For Columbine." "Fahrenheit 9/11" takes his burning passion to new heights; the heat is downright tangible.

      But the question isn't whether "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a fair and balanced look at its subject matter. Of course it isn't. Rather, is it good filmmaking?

      The answer is yes.



    Is this not factual? (not including he writer's opinion):

      Perhaps the most damaging footage shows Bush on September 11, sitting in a Florida classroom for a full seven minutes after he had been told that the second tower had been struck, and that it was clear the horrific events in New York were a terrorist attack, not a tragic accident. Moore lets this moment go on and on: The president of the United States, stone-faced in front of dozens of schoolchildren, doing absolutely nothing, as our nation comes under attack.





So Dubya should have gotten up, scared the bejezus out of the kids and left. Like - do you think that everything that could have gone on wasn't going on and do you think an executive could have changed was was going on in 7 minutes. Dubya already knew that Tower 1 had been hit and he already dealt with the situation as best as a guy who is in an executive role can - he delegated authority - to people who scrambled jets and did other stuff - wrongly it seems, but those 7 minutes of Dubya wouldn't have changed that.

oldschoolhero
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 1799/3059
EXP: 12581251
For next: 90733

Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 2840 days
Last activity: 2774 days
#10 Posted on 25.6.04 1246.33
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1246.33
Oh come the fuck on. How is him excusing himself and getting himself into the role he's supposed to be filling scaring the bejesus out of a roomful of kids. A quick smile, a "sorry, I'm needed"....nope, just sit there, THAT'LL help.

I mean, I'm not saying that there's a whole lot he could've DONE in that time, but I sure do find it indicative of the man's mental capacity for the job that he's in that he feels the need to just sit there for seven minutes after being told his country's under attack.

(edited by oldschoolhero on 25.6.04 1046)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 223

Posts: 4843/17041
EXP: 165775896
For next: 2440662

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 13 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#11 Posted on 25.6.04 1325.59
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1329.01
    Originally posted by oldschoolhero
    Oh come the fuck on. How is him excusing himself and getting himself into the role he's supposed to be filling scaring the bejesus out of a roomful of kids. A quick smile, a "sorry, I'm needed"....nope, just sit there, THAT'LL help.

    I mean, I'm not saying that there's a whole lot he could've DONE in that time, but I sure do find it indicative of the man's mental capacity for the job that he's in that he feels the need to just sit there for seven minutes after being told his country's under attack.

    (edited by oldschoolhero on 25.6.04 1046)
We're retreading old ground here. I STILL would rather have this discussion take place in Politics (if at all).
krakken2000
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 322/416
EXP: 613462
For next: 46707

Since: 31.10.02
From: seattle

Since last post: 2853 days
Last activity: 2580 days
#12 Posted on 25.6.04 1356.57
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1357.14
I decided since it was a slow work day I would go take a long lunch and catch a matinee of "Fahrenheit 9/11"

Imagine my surprise when I arrive at the downtown Seattle multiplex and not only is there a line practiclaly out the door but almost all showings for the entire day are sold out.

So with my plans thwarted I decided to come back to work and goof off on the internet.

Oddly enough though there are plenty of seats for "White Chicks."
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 777/3656
EXP: 16399479
For next: 411936

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#13 Posted on 25.6.04 1410.30
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1410.45
    Originally posted by CRZ
      Originally posted by oldschoolhero
      Oh come the **** on. How is him excusing himself and getting himself into the role he's supposed to be filling scaring the bejesus out of a roomful of kids. A quick smile, a "sorry, I'm needed"....nope, just sit there, THAT'LL help.

      I mean, I'm not saying that there's a whole lot he could've DONE in that time, but I sure do find it indicative of the man's mental capacity for the job that he's in that he feels the need to just sit there for seven minutes after being told his country's under attack.

      (edited by oldschoolhero on 25.6.04 1046)
    We're retreading old ground here. I STILL would rather have this discussion take place in Politics (if at all).


Zed, it's a political movie. I have to admit I didn't even realize we were in Random and not politics. But, if we were talking dodgeball, we'd be talking sports. If it was New York Minute, it might be anorexia -

Michael Moore's whole reason for making this film (I'm sorry, A documentary (a non-fiction film which usually, although not always, has a particular point of view regarding its subject matter;)is true and Moore has made untrue statements and sliced out-of contect film bits together in his so-called documentories before, especially in Bowling for Columbine, so I refuse to call this film one until I see it and determine if it really is one) is to hurt the president, not to present facts. It kind of meets this definition:

A way of presenting a belief that seeks to generate acceptance without regard to facts or the right of others to be heard. Propaganda often presents the same argument repeatedly, in the simplest terms and ignores all rebuttal or counter-argument.

Since Al Gore accused the president of using the Gestapo to undermine the free press (The administration works closely with a network of "rapid response" digital Brown Shirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors for "undermining support for our troops." at http://www.alternet.org/election04/19047/ ), I think I'll award Michael Moore the Leni Riefenstahl award.

and I'll copy this in politics and not respond again here.

Quezzy
Knackwurst
Level: 111

Posts: 1557/3399
EXP: 14730093
For next: 138313

Since: 6.1.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
#14 Posted on 25.6.04 1526.44
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1528.30
    Originally posted by Freeway420
    It angers up the blood, then allows laughter as an outlet for the anger. It shows the stark contrasts between the rich & the poor on this continent and then says "Let's do something about it." Do what? Moore leaves that to the viewer.


It might be a great movie, and it might be factual or not, I don't know for sure. But I don't see what point it proves, if he just leaves it to the viewer. I mean what's the point of attacking someone with a hateful documentary unless you have some kind of solution from the problem. Did George W. do some things that weren't good? Sure, he's not perfect, but how do we fix that, give us a solution to this problem you've revealed. Instead of making a movie that is only going to bash George W. and get yourself praise, why don't you find a better candidate and use your money to support is campaign. It's not enough to just point a problem, think of a way to fix it then I'll listen.
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 564/763
EXP: 1566278
For next: 11277

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 1434 days
Last activity: 138 days
AIM:  
#15 Posted on 25.6.04 1600.24
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1603.29
    Originally posted by Quezzy
      Originally posted by Freeway420
      It angers up the blood, then allows laughter as an outlet for the anger. It shows the stark contrasts between the rich & the poor on this continent and then says "Let's do something about it." Do what? Moore leaves that to the viewer.


    It might be a great movie, and it might be factual or not, I don't know for sure. But I don't see what point it proves, if he just leaves it to the viewer. I mean what's the point of attacking someone with a hateful documentary unless you have some kind of solution from the problem. Did George W. do some things that weren't good? Sure, he's not perfect, but how do we fix that, give us a solution to this problem you've revealed. Instead of making a movie that is only going to bash George W. and get yourself praise, why don't you find a better candidate and use your money to support is campaign. It's not enough to just point a problem, think of a way to fix it then I'll listen.



But what do you think would happen if Moore made this film as an explicit endorsement of John Kerry?. Jesus, The GOP would go absolutely batshit on a level extreme for even them. Im a Kerry supporter and I dont think I would want Moore trumpeting electing Kery in this movie.
avonhun
Cotechino
Level: 23

Posts: 26/91
EXP: 59447
For next: 8277

Since: 21.4.04

Since last post: 4150 days
Last activity: 4113 days
AIM:  
#16 Posted on 25.6.04 1746.42
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1746.44
although i dont agree with all the things said in this movie, it is a good condensed source of information for a number of events that transpired in this country in the last four years. the unconstitutional 2000 presidential election, the war in iraq, the patriot act... my major problem with moore in the past is that he presented information without a direct message. this film has a clear message: to rid the white house of george bush. go see this movie and make up your own mind because it is unlikely you will find an unbiased view of the film, including this one.
Eddie Famous
Andouille
Level: 93

Posts: 973/2221
EXP: 7798592
For next: 254248

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 29 days
Last activity: 8 days
#17 Posted on 25.6.04 1752.49
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1752.50
    Originally posted by avonhun
    the unconstitutional 2000 presidential election


When did that happen? Don't recall any ruling on that...
fuelinjected
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 2246/2679
EXP: 10044326
For next: 310106

Since: 12.10.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 4115 days
Last activity: 4115 days
#18 Posted on 25.6.04 1906.15
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1906.30
Re: The Seven Minutes

Wouldn't you want your President to be Type A? Regardless of his politics, a Type A person would not have just sat there.
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 1035/1495
EXP: 4296394
For next: 85851

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 685 days
Last activity: 609 days
#19 Posted on 25.6.04 1934.26
Reposted on: 25.6.11 1936.36
Regardless, nothing that Bush done in those seven minutes would have changed a damn thing. It's not significant (his explanation was that he was waiting for more information, which isn't that unreasonable. As far as looking dumbfounded, he ALWAYS looks dumbfounded.).

I fear that there will be more emphasis and debate placed on this meaningless seven minutes than the hours, days, months, and now years of Bush actions since then that deserve more scrutiny than what happened in that school.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 223

Posts: 4845/17041
EXP: 165775896
For next: 2440662

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 13 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#20 Posted on 25.6.04 2055.58
Reposted on: 25.6.11 2056.01
In case you don't watch the News Hour, NY and LA Times film critics Jonathan Foreman and Kenneth Turan engaged in discussion and PBS is good enough to provide RealAudio:

http://audio.pbs.org:8080/ ramgen/newshour/expansion/ 2004/06/25/moore28.rm? altplay=moore28.rm

Pages: 1 2 3 4 NextThread ahead: Depp to play Willy Wonka
Next thread: ALF's back...
Previous thread: Napoleon Dynamite...anyone seen it?
(1058 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Dodgeball (cameo spoilers) - Saved! - So, Who's Gonna See Fahrenheit 9/11? - More...
The 7 - Random - Fahrenheit 9/11 ReactionsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.346 seconds.