The W
Views: 98476157
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.8.07 2225
The 7 - Random - Controversy over Nicole Kidman's next film "BIRTH"...
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(927 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (18 total)
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 566/1694
EXP: 4611696
For next: 171293

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 1956 days
Last activity: 1688 days
#1 Posted on 14.6.04 1908.35
Reposted on: 14.6.11 1908.36
Nicole Kidman and a 10 year old lad (thesun.co.uk)

This story really reminds me of Michael Jackson for some reason...dunno why...The latest I've heard is that the questionable scenes are being removed from the film. But still I guess a film like this wouldn't play very well here in the US huh ? The kid in the film is Cameron Bright who played the little boy in Godsend.

But still I don't think Nicole Kidman should be fooling around with an underage kid, simulated or otherwise. I won't bash the movie without having seen, but it probably won't end up being one I want to see.

FYI, Birth was directed by Jonathan Glazer who did SEXY BEAST.
Promote this thread!
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 132

Posts: 2024/5387
EXP: 26847836
For next: 284168

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 70 days
Last activity: 15 days
#2 Posted on 15.6.04 0000.05
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0000.52
I wonder where, precisely, the line is between "acceptable" and "child pornography". I think this movie's gonna be in danger of going waaaay over that line.
SeVen â„¢
Kishke
Level: 44

Posts: 300/422
EXP: 588695
For next: 22594

Since: 11.1.02
From: Japan

Since last post: 2394 days
Last activity: 2225 days
#3 Posted on 15.6.04 0058.34
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0059.01
Other "acclaimed" films have done worse. Only thing is, it was always a young girl. If the parents didn't object and no one forced the kid, then that is it. All you can do is judge them in the mental courts.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 145

Posts: 3102/6719
EXP: 37430423
For next: 173749

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 10 hours
#4 Posted on 15.6.04 0226.14
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0229.01
Keep in mind that this is the Sun reporting the story, so it might have to be taken with a grain of salt.

But if it is true, you'd think that after her marriage, Kidman would've had enough of making out with guys that are so much shorter than she is.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 3298/4700
EXP: 21447496
For next: 389166

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1213 days
Last activity: 1010 days
#5 Posted on 15.6.04 0656.20
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0657.27
If it is true, I fully expect Hollywood to rally around the liberal flag and protect the film's "creativity."

I think that this blurs the line between edgy and snuff...leaning snuff.
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 567/1694
EXP: 4611696
For next: 171293

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 1956 days
Last activity: 1688 days
#6 Posted on 15.6.04 0911.04
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0914.16
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Keep in mind that this is the Sun reporting the story, so it might have to be taken with a grain of salt.

    But if it is true, you'd think that after her marriage, Kidman would've had enough of making out with guys that are so much shorter than she is.


Well I originally heard the story reported on Glenn Beck so I assume there is some truth to it. Though maybe some of the descriptions are being blown out of proportion.
Roy.
Pepperoni
Level: 63

Posts: 205/1040
EXP: 2077278
For next: 19885

Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 2301 days
Last activity: 770 days
#7 Posted on 15.6.04 1103.14
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1104.01
    Originally posted by Grimis
    If it is true, I fully expect Hollywood to rally around the liberal flag and protect the film's "creativity."

    I think that this blurs the line between edgy and snuff...leaning snuff.


Well, not snuff, because a snuff film is a pornographic or exploitative film where one of the participants is murdered, but I understand your point.

If it gets defended I think that it will be a knee jerk reaction to a lot of what is going on today in the entertainment industry. With tv-networks and movie studios on guard more than ever due to reactionaries from both the left and the right, as well as parent groups, I think that a lot of Hollywood lately is circling the wagons, so to speak. I'm going to reserve judgement until I see the movie and until credible sources report on it.

That said, while Hollywood might honor and protect pedopiles (Roman Polanski, anyone?), if this movie is nothing but cheap exploitation for the sake of exploitation, I'd be surprised if the majority of Hollywood defends it.
Tenken347
Boudin blanc
Level: 92

Posts: 560/2407
EXP: 7652524
For next: 104443

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 hours
#8 Posted on 15.6.04 1139.22
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1140.10
It's really impossible to make a call on this one without seeing the film in its entirety. While I understand the sort of objections that people have against it, a film has a right to an artistic point of view, even if that point of view is objectionable to some, or even most. Art, according to some, is supposed to hold a mirror up to reality, and sick shit like this happens all the time. A film has the right to address that. Of course, there are always the lines of good taste and exploitation, and again, if you haven't seen the film, you can't really make that call. Of course, if you object to the subject matter in general, you are under no impetus to see the film. No one's going to make you.

As for the issue of child pornography, I imagine that would be judged under the standards of obscenity, which are that it would have to be (1) work appealing predominantly to "prurient" interest; (2) that it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. All according to an average member of the community in question, and therefore community standards.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 2048/3024
EXP: 11160832
For next: 310613

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 23 hours
AIM:  
#9 Posted on 15.6.04 1326.29
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1326.52
Dammit, now I have to be jealous of a ten year old kid too?
vsp
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 1753/2042
EXP: 6271578
For next: 121221

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 2977 days
Last activity: 191 days
#10 Posted on 15.6.04 1404.30
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1405.55
    Originally posted by Tenken347
    As for the issue of child pornography, I imagine that would be judged under the standards of obscenity, which are that it would have to be (1) work appealing predominantly to "prurient" interest; (2) that it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. All according to an average member of the community in question, and therefore community standards.


Ever heard of "The Tin Drum"?

Anything can be targeted if those who dislike it are fanatical enough.




Tenken347
Boudin blanc
Level: 92

Posts: 562/2407
EXP: 7652524
For next: 104443

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 hours
#11 Posted on 15.6.04 1730.50
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1731.02
Well, you may have noticed how vaguely the obscenity standards are. There's enough room to have anything even vaguely sexual classified as obscenity, if you can prove (or at least fake prove) that it violates the community standards. It's really not the best law, but I've never been able to come up with a better way to judge what is or is not obscene. It really just boils down to "we'll know it if we see it."
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 110

Posts: 2069/3504
EXP: 14096787
For next: 312145

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 248 days
Last activity: 2 days
#12 Posted on 15.6.04 2021.36
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2029.01
Roman Polanski is a decorated filmmaker. Roman Polanski was also convicted with statutory rape. The two facts, while related, have really nothing to do with each other.
bubblesthechimp
Boudin rouge
Level: 48

Posts: 356/517
EXP: 792173
For next: 31375

Since: 22.3.02
From: Weymouth, Ma

Since last post: 94 days
Last activity: 12 hours
#13 Posted on 15.6.04 2044.00
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2044.29
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Dammit, now I have to be jealous of a ten year old kid too?


I remember a war movie starring Monica Belluci with something like this in it. She did it with a fairly young kid before they was all blown up or some stupid shit. Don't remember the name though.
Eddie Famous
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 967/2182
EXP: 6944386
For next: 244250

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 277 days
Last activity: 271 days
#14 Posted on 15.6.04 2048.12
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2049.42
    Originally posted by Freeway420
    Roman Polanski is a decorated filmmaker. Roman Polanski was also convicted with statutory rape. The two facts, while related, have really nothing to do with each other.


You can't get any more related than being the SAME PERSON.

Of course using the word "person" to describe a rapist that fled prosecution is probably insulting to most people, but there you go.

He's a piece of garbage, and anyone willing to work with him, well, smells...

(edited by Eddie Famous on 15.6.04 1848)
Roy.
Pepperoni
Level: 63

Posts: 206/1040
EXP: 2077278
For next: 19885

Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 2301 days
Last activity: 770 days
#15 Posted on 15.6.04 2100.19
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2103.06
    Originally posted by Eddie Famous
      Originally posted by Freeway420
      Roman Polanski is a decorated filmmaker. Roman Polanski was also convicted with statutory rape. The two facts, while related, have really nothing to do with each other.


    You can't get any more related than being the SAME PERSON.

    Of course using the word "person" to describe a rapist that fled prosecution is probably insulting to most people, but there you go.

    He's a piece of garbage, and anyone willing to work with him, well, smells...

    (edited by Eddie Famous on 15.6.04 1848)


Exactly. You know what, I admire his movies. Rosemary's Baby is extraordinarily creepy and good, and Chinatown is genius. That doesn't change the fact that he's still a convicted criminal.

I'm uncomfortable with the fact that critics and hollywood-types flock to work for and honor this man. He is an amazing filmmaker, but I'll remember him as being a criminal and a child molester. That stinks.

If you want to read news excerpts of the case, click here: http://www.vachss.com/ mission/roman_polanski.html
Nenz
Fifty Millionth Hit
Level: 28

Posts: 68/158
EXP: 127633
For next: 3707

Since: 7.5.03

Since last post: 967 days
Last activity: 8 days
#16 Posted on 15.6.04 2142.13
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2143.00
    Originally posted by bubblesthechimp
      Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
      Dammit, now I have to be jealous of a ten year old kid too?


    I remember a war movie starring Monica Belluci with something like this in it. She did it with a fairly young kid before they was all blown up or some stupid shit. Don't remember the name though.


Maybe it was Malèna (imdb.com).
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 570/1694
EXP: 4611696
For next: 171293

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 1956 days
Last activity: 1688 days
#17 Posted on 16.6.04 2333.29
Reposted on: 16.6.11 2334.30
It is pretty funny that most of the reactions toward this story is that people are jealous of the kid.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 2318/3273
EXP: 12698765
For next: 392588

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 142 days
Last activity: 142 days
#18 Posted on 17.6.04 1658.47
Reposted on: 17.6.11 1659.01
"Parents don't care about violence if there's any kind of sex involved."

-Paraphrased from South Park



In my mind this doesn't come anywhere near pushing the boundry of good taste that "The Passion" did. Mel Gibson should make "The Passion of Adam and Eve" so we can just finally get over this sex/violence thing.

-Jag
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Rebound Headache - Nothing to do with dating
Next thread: SCTV and Polynesiantown Comes To DVD
Previous thread: Glad I don't live in Virginia
(927 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: The Aviator Trailer Hits The Web - Troy - The Vile1 does VAN HELSING - More...
The 7 - Random - Controversy over Nicole Kidman's next film "BIRTH"...Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.227 seconds.