The W
Views: 121177447
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.2.10 1805
The 7 - Random - Controversy over Nicole Kidman's next film "BIRTH"...
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1124 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (18 total)
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 566/1694
EXP: 5069561
For next: 139688

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2868 days
Last activity: 2600 days
#1 Posted on 14.6.04 1908.35
Reposted on: 14.6.11 1908.36
Nicole Kidman and a 10 year old lad (thesun.co.uk)

This story really reminds me of Michael Jackson for some reason...dunno why...The latest I've heard is that the questionable scenes are being removed from the film. But still I guess a film like this wouldn't play very well here in the US huh ? The kid in the film is Cameron Bright who played the little boy in Godsend.

But still I don't think Nicole Kidman should be fooling around with an underage kid, simulated or otherwise. I won't bash the movie without having seen, but it probably won't end up being one I want to see.

FYI, Birth was directed by Jonathan Glazer who did SEXY BEAST.
Promote this thread!
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 2024/5564
EXP: 30842918
For next: 30015

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#2 Posted on 15.6.04 0000.05
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0000.52
I wonder where, precisely, the line is between "acceptable" and "child pornography". I think this movie's gonna be in danger of going waaaay over that line.
SeVen â„¢
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 300/422
EXP: 644275
For next: 15894

Since: 11.1.02
From: Japan

Since last post: 3306 days
Last activity: 3137 days
#3 Posted on 15.6.04 0058.34
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0059.01
Other "acclaimed" films have done worse. Only thing is, it was always a young girl. If the parents didn't object and no one forced the kid, then that is it. All you can do is judge them in the mental courts.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 3102/7011
EXP: 43657730
For next: 644032

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 7 hours
#4 Posted on 15.6.04 0226.14
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0229.01
Keep in mind that this is the Sun reporting the story, so it might have to be taken with a grain of salt.

But if it is true, you'd think that after her marriage, Kidman would've had enough of making out with guys that are so much shorter than she is.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 3298/4700
EXP: 23551375
For next: 175256

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2125 days
Last activity: 579 days
#5 Posted on 15.6.04 0656.20
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0657.27
If it is true, I fully expect Hollywood to rally around the liberal flag and protect the film's "creativity."

I think that this blurs the line between edgy and snuff...leaning snuff.
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 567/1694
EXP: 5069561
For next: 139688

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2868 days
Last activity: 2600 days
#6 Posted on 15.6.04 0911.04
Reposted on: 15.6.11 0914.16
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Keep in mind that this is the Sun reporting the story, so it might have to be taken with a grain of salt.

    But if it is true, you'd think that after her marriage, Kidman would've had enough of making out with guys that are so much shorter than she is.


Well I originally heard the story reported on Glenn Beck so I assume there is some truth to it. Though maybe some of the descriptions are being blown out of proportion.
Roy.
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 205/1040
EXP: 2311018
For next: 24622

Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 3213 days
Last activity: 1682 days
#7 Posted on 15.6.04 1103.14
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1104.01
    Originally posted by Grimis
    If it is true, I fully expect Hollywood to rally around the liberal flag and protect the film's "creativity."

    I think that this blurs the line between edgy and snuff...leaning snuff.


Well, not snuff, because a snuff film is a pornographic or exploitative film where one of the participants is murdered, but I understand your point.

If it gets defended I think that it will be a knee jerk reaction to a lot of what is going on today in the entertainment industry. With tv-networks and movie studios on guard more than ever due to reactionaries from both the left and the right, as well as parent groups, I think that a lot of Hollywood lately is circling the wagons, so to speak. I'm going to reserve judgement until I see the movie and until credible sources report on it.

That said, while Hollywood might honor and protect pedopiles (Roman Polanski, anyone?), if this movie is nothing but cheap exploitation for the sake of exploitation, I'd be surprised if the majority of Hollywood defends it.
Tenken347
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 560/2922
EXP: 11292285
For next: 179160

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
#8 Posted on 15.6.04 1139.22
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1140.10
It's really impossible to make a call on this one without seeing the film in its entirety. While I understand the sort of objections that people have against it, a film has a right to an artistic point of view, even if that point of view is objectionable to some, or even most. Art, according to some, is supposed to hold a mirror up to reality, and sick shit like this happens all the time. A film has the right to address that. Of course, there are always the lines of good taste and exploitation, and again, if you haven't seen the film, you can't really make that call. Of course, if you object to the subject matter in general, you are under no impetus to see the film. No one's going to make you.

As for the issue of child pornography, I imagine that would be judged under the standards of obscenity, which are that it would have to be (1) work appealing predominantly to "prurient" interest; (2) that it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. All according to an average member of the community in question, and therefore community standards.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 2048/3062
EXP: 12469874
For next: 202110

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 days
AIM:  
#9 Posted on 15.6.04 1326.29
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1326.52
Dammit, now I have to be jealous of a ten year old kid too?
vsp
Andouille
Level: 89

Posts: 1753/2042
EXP: 6862716
For next: 53212

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3889 days
Last activity: 144 days
#10 Posted on 15.6.04 1404.30
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1405.55
    Originally posted by Tenken347
    As for the issue of child pornography, I imagine that would be judged under the standards of obscenity, which are that it would have to be (1) work appealing predominantly to "prurient" interest; (2) that it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. All according to an average member of the community in question, and therefore community standards.


Ever heard of "The Tin Drum"?

Anything can be targeted if those who dislike it are fanatical enough.




Tenken347
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 562/2922
EXP: 11292285
For next: 179160

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
#11 Posted on 15.6.04 1730.50
Reposted on: 15.6.11 1731.02
Well, you may have noticed how vaguely the obscenity standards are. There's enough room to have anything even vaguely sexual classified as obscenity, if you can prove (or at least fake prove) that it violates the community standards. It's really not the best law, but I've never been able to come up with a better way to judge what is or is not obscene. It really just boils down to "we'll know it if we see it."
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 113

Posts: 2069/3504
EXP: 15425617
For next: 392992

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 1160 days
Last activity: 848 days
#12 Posted on 15.6.04 2021.36
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2029.01
Roman Polanski is a decorated filmmaker. Roman Polanski was also convicted with statutory rape. The two facts, while related, have really nothing to do with each other.
bubblesthechimp
Boudin rouge
Level: 49

Posts: 356/521
EXP: 878164
For next: 5725

Since: 22.3.02
From: Weymouth, Ma

Since last post: 590 days
Last activity: 464 days
#13 Posted on 15.6.04 2044.00
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2044.29
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Dammit, now I have to be jealous of a ten year old kid too?


I remember a war movie starring Monica Belluci with something like this in it. She did it with a fairly young kid before they was all blown up or some stupid shit. Don't remember the name though.
Eddie Famous
Andouille
Level: 93

Posts: 967/2221
EXP: 7800450
For next: 252390

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 11 days
#14 Posted on 15.6.04 2048.12
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2049.42
    Originally posted by Freeway420
    Roman Polanski is a decorated filmmaker. Roman Polanski was also convicted with statutory rape. The two facts, while related, have really nothing to do with each other.


You can't get any more related than being the SAME PERSON.

Of course using the word "person" to describe a rapist that fled prosecution is probably insulting to most people, but there you go.

He's a piece of garbage, and anyone willing to work with him, well, smells...

(edited by Eddie Famous on 15.6.04 1848)
Roy.
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 206/1040
EXP: 2311018
For next: 24622

Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 3213 days
Last activity: 1682 days
#15 Posted on 15.6.04 2100.19
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2103.06
    Originally posted by Eddie Famous
      Originally posted by Freeway420
      Roman Polanski is a decorated filmmaker. Roman Polanski was also convicted with statutory rape. The two facts, while related, have really nothing to do with each other.


    You can't get any more related than being the SAME PERSON.

    Of course using the word "person" to describe a rapist that fled prosecution is probably insulting to most people, but there you go.

    He's a piece of garbage, and anyone willing to work with him, well, smells...

    (edited by Eddie Famous on 15.6.04 1848)


Exactly. You know what, I admire his movies. Rosemary's Baby is extraordinarily creepy and good, and Chinatown is genius. That doesn't change the fact that he's still a convicted criminal.

I'm uncomfortable with the fact that critics and hollywood-types flock to work for and honor this man. He is an amazing filmmaker, but I'll remember him as being a criminal and a child molester. That stinks.

If you want to read news excerpts of the case, click here: http://www.vachss.com/ mission/roman_polanski.html
Nenz
Fifty Millionth Hit
Level: 29

Posts: 68/158
EXP: 141021
For next: 6865

Since: 7.5.03

Since last post: 1879 days
Last activity: 4 hours
#16 Posted on 15.6.04 2142.13
Reposted on: 15.6.11 2143.00
    Originally posted by bubblesthechimp
      Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
      Dammit, now I have to be jealous of a ten year old kid too?


    I remember a war movie starring Monica Belluci with something like this in it. She did it with a fairly young kid before they was all blown up or some stupid shit. Don't remember the name though.


Maybe it was Malèna (imdb.com).
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 570/1694
EXP: 5069561
For next: 139688

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2868 days
Last activity: 2600 days
#17 Posted on 16.6.04 2333.29
Reposted on: 16.6.11 2334.30
It is pretty funny that most of the reactions toward this story is that people are jealous of the kid.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 109

Posts: 2318/3282
EXP: 13958109
For next: 1581

Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 23 days
Last activity: 1 day
#18 Posted on 17.6.04 1658.47
Reposted on: 17.6.11 1659.01
"Parents don't care about violence if there's any kind of sex involved."

-Paraphrased from South Park



In my mind this doesn't come anywhere near pushing the boundry of good taste that "The Passion" did. Mel Gibson should make "The Passion of Adam and Eve" so we can just finally get over this sex/violence thing.

-Jag
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Rebound Headache - Nothing to do with dating
Next thread: SCTV and Polynesiantown Comes To DVD
Previous thread: Glad I don't live in Virginia
(1124 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: The Aviator Trailer Hits The Web - Troy - The Vile1 does VAN HELSING - More...
The 7 - Random - Controversy over Nicole Kidman's next film "BIRTH"...Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.295 seconds.