The W
Views: 100920810
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.11.07 1836
The 7 - Baseball - Mondesi's playing ball again Register and log in to post!
(559 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
Roy.
Pepperoni
Level: 64

Posts: 170/1040
EXP: 2102008
For next: 112101

Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 2393 days
Last activity: 862 days
#1 Posted on 28.5.04 2050.19
Reposted on: 28.5.11 2050.32
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ news?tmpl=story&cid=514& e=11&u=/ap/20040529/ap_on_sp_ba_ne/ bba_angels_mondesi

So just weeks after leaving the Pirates for personal reasons, and just a few days after they grant him a relase, Raul is going to play for the first place Angels?

I really hope that he had some personal problems, and that they cleared up quickly, because, if this is just a greedy player not wanting to play on a losing team, it stinks. He left the Pirates in a lurch when he left, and they had to scramble to find a power hitting outfielder.

I know he says that he's more comfortable on the Angels, but why not request a trade, rather than sitting out? The Pirates treated him with good faith, and I'm not sure that he returned the favor.
Promote this thread!
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 3846/7534
EXP: 43913423
For next: 388339

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 514 days
Last activity: 514 days
#2 Posted on 28.5.04 2214.36
Reposted on: 28.5.11 2215.15
Pirates are better off without Mondesi. He's been a proven malcontent, why put a team struggling to play around .500 with that sort of problem. As for Mondesi with the Angels: If he plays center while Anderson is out, no one is going to run on any of the outfielders. However, how much does Mondesi sulk once the Angels get healthy and he's riding the bench 6 days a week?

(edited by redsoxnation on 28.5.04 2315)
BigVitoMark
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 1053/1509
EXP: 3929027
For next: 77052

Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada

Since last post: 3413 days
Last activity: 3322 days
ICQ:  
#3 Posted on 28.5.04 2322.19
Reposted on: 28.5.11 2323.01
Very true. Despite the injury problems, I don't know if I'm in a big hurry to bring in El Canon. Things are going well so far this year, and Mondesi's a risk to mess up the chemistry even when he doesn't have legal problems and bills to pay. Perhaps if they're prepared to cut him loose once the regulars are healthy...
Torchslasher
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1338/3276
EXP: 12851059
For next: 240294

Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 26 days
Last activity: 7 days
#4 Posted on 28.5.04 2344.19
Reposted on: 28.5.11 2344.36
    Originally posted by BigVitoMark
    Very true. Despite the injury problems, I don't know if I'm in a big hurry to bring in El Canon. Things are going well so far this year, and Mondesi's a risk to mess up the chemistry even when he doesn't have legal problems and bills to pay. Perhaps if they're prepared to cut him loose once the regulars are healthy...


I'm worried as well. If he is content to pick up a ring while being a benchwarmer, then I have no problem. As a huge Angels fan, I don't even like how this looks. As a blinded backer though, I won't complain when and if Mondesi helps the team win.

I'll just hope that, like Roy said, this is really a case of his personal problems being put behind him. Because if he brings down my AL team like he underperformed for the Dodgers (my NL team), I'll be more than willing to give him back to Pittsburgh.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 1088/1528
EXP: 4100063
For next: 91085

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2865 days
Last activity: 2708 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 29.5.04 0342.03
Reposted on: 29.5.11 0342.29
His "personal problems" revolved around a lawsuit filed in the Dominican by former major-leaguer Mario Guerrero. He demanded compensation for helping Mondesi reach the big leagues, or improving his game, something of that nature. He won the lawsuit, the DR froze Mondesi's accounts... and now Mondesi is back.

Don't see as the Angels really need him, though. Their backup OFs are fine till Anderson comes back, IMO.
avonhun
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 16/91
EXP: 54019
For next: 4332

Since: 21.4.04

Since last post: 3333 days
Last activity: 3296 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 29.5.04 0939.38
Reposted on: 29.5.11 0939.57
with the angels injuries starting to catch up(losing 4 in a row) any kind of boost is nice. the article in on espn said he was personal friends with Jose Guillen and the team has a large group of latin players not to mention the owner. i think it could turn out nice for both sides.

Go Angels!!!
SC
Potato korv
Level: 54

Posts: 311/683
EXP: 1228196
For next: 5681

Since: 11.12.01
From: Valparaiso, IN

Since last post: 1363 days
Last activity: 697 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 29.5.04 1025.26
Reposted on: 29.5.11 1025.29
    Originally posted by avonhun
    the article in on espn said he was personal friends with Jose Guillen and the team has a large group of latin players not to mention the owner. i think it could turn out nice for both sides.


He also gets along well with Mike Scioscia, from what I've read. And I agree, it could be a nice move. For $1.75 million, which is really nothing, you know exactly what you're getting from Mondesi and can rely on him to deliver just that. And really, who knows how screwed up Garret Anderson thanks to his mattress.

    Originally posted by Torchslasher
    Because if he brings down my AL team like he underperformed for the Dodgers (my NL team), I'll be more than willing to give him back to Pittsburgh.


The overstated "underperformance" in Los Angeles always ignores that those were the very best years of his career, and by a fair amount. In an extreme pitchers' park, no less. Mondesi did not underperform for the Dodgers, Dodger fans just expected him to be better than he is. And so has everyone else since. Mondesi has gotten kind of a bum rap over the years for being an underachiever when I think it's fair to say after all this time that this is really the best he can be.
estragand
Summer sausage
Level: 45

Posts: 140/439
EXP: 620121
For next: 40048

Since: 18.6.02

Since last post: 2591 days
Last activity: 2591 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 30.5.04 0157.42
Reposted on: 30.5.11 0158.44
Pirates really didn't have to scramble to find a power hitting replacement. Daryle Ward signed with the team before Mondesi did, and was down in Triple A. As soon as Ward came up (May 18), the Pirates became a different team. Plus, Jason Bay was due to come off the DL to play the outfield. It's not like Mondesi was providing "power" anyways. He hadn't homered in several weeks.

But the whole thing smells fishy. The problems with Guerrero were the main reasons for Mondesi leaving. After arriving home, he said that he wanted to take the year off and stated how nice it was to take his kids to school. So nice that he was sick of it within two weeks. In short, I'm glad he's someone else's problem, now. Add him to the list of worthless Pirates signings-- up there with Derek Bell, Pat Meares, Terry Mulholland and Reggie Jefferson.
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 116

Posts: 2067/3946
EXP: 16815764
For next: 508381

Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 30.5.04 0219.00
Reposted on: 30.5.11 0220.56
Yeah, but at least he didn't curse the team by sticking around. And they had to know Mondesi's rep as a turd... probably didn't think it'd be THAT bad.

Only reason I don't flay him alive? He's on my fantasy team. Benched, of course, in favor of Ryan Freel.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: San Diego Padres are for real (AKA - How I jinxed the Padres 2004 season)
Next thread: Was that umpire wearing JEANS?
Previous thread: Start your own fan website
(559 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Vlad Guerrero to the Mets? - Disney sells Angels - What's with the Monkey - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Mondesi's playing ball againRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.203 seconds.