The W
Views: 100923083
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.11.07 1951
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Humane Society suing WWF!! Register and log in to post!
(10100 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (20 total)
cobrawolf
Weisswurst
Level: 11

Posts: 8/19
EXP: 5662
For next: 324

Since: 9.2.02
From: O'Fallon, MO

Since last post: 4620 days
Last activity: 4616 days
#1 Posted on 12.3.02 2137.38
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2147.33
Now, I don't know what all of you thought about the "Lucy" scene. But, I can tell you, that as a dog owner, I didn't think it was funny at all. But, there were other people who didn't appreciate the scene one bit: the Humane Society. The main thing involved is, of course, cruelty to animals. I can tell you this from experience. I used to have a beagle who had one of her hind legs run over, and she had to have an artificial leg that didn't even touch the ground. She died two years ago because she was too old. And, I'll say this. Watching that scene last night gave me flashbacks. I think the Humane Society is doing the right thing by filing this lawsuit immediately could be a big step. I think the WWF needs to think twice about using any more animals in future storylines.
Promote this thread!
Addy
Bauerwurst
Level: 24

Posts: 55/105
EXP: 73688
For next: 4438

Since: 24.1.02
From: Melbourne, Aussie Land

Since last post: 4615 days
Last activity: 4612 days
#2 Posted on 12.3.02 2140.27
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2147.48
you are damn right!
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 337/2109
EXP: 6645591
For next: 5099

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 18 min.
#3 Posted on 12.3.02 2142.00
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2148.17
Geez, I'm sure they didn't actually hurt the poor dog. How is this different from all those movies where at the end they have the "no animals were harmed in the making of this film" disclaimer. And what the heck grounds are they suing on? You got a link to a press release or something?
SamZim
Cotto
Level: 16

Posts: 4/39
EXP: 16715
For next: 3542

Since: 4.1.02
From: Outside Toledo, for now...

Since last post: 3429 days
Last activity: 3429 days
#4 Posted on 12.3.02 2143.48
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2148.17
Not that I don't partly agree, but come on... the dog wasn't REALLY hurt. Wrestling, need I remind, is a WORK. Besides, shouldn't they have come down on the Boss Man/Al Snow "I made you eat your chihuahua" skit if they were going to do anything?
Stinger
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 7/85
EXP: 53643
For next: 4708

Since: 29.1.02

Since last post: 4048 days
Last activity: 4047 days
#5 Posted on 12.3.02 2148.17
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2148.54
their filing a lawsuit?? cool!...as soon as i saw Lucy last night i knew shit was gonna hit the fan with the animal rights people...with good reason too, you don't know how bad i wanna take my ex girlfriends cat and run it over...thanks for the idea Y2J...just kidding by the way, actually i wanna tie my ex to the car and run her over a few times...ha again i'm just kidding geeze you gotta watch what you say or do these days
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 57/1494
EXP: 3961897
For next: 44182

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 80 days
Last activity: 1 day
#6 Posted on 12.3.02 2205.06
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2224.08
The lawsuit is silly. What they did was no different than what they do in movies such as "There's Something About Mary".

Of course, there was a difference. TSAM was funny, the RAW segments were not. And they did have to know that somebody would get their panties in a wad over this. Now if it was killer material, maybe it would be worth it. But this is going to a legal headache all for the sake of running sucky segments.
DirkLurker
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 31/84
EXP: 52847
For next: 5504

Since: 2.1.02
From: Syracuse, NY

Since last post: 4502 days
Last activity: 4420 days
#7 Posted on 12.3.02 2225.47
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2227.39
how about a link, Cobra Khan?!

Dirk
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 98/763
EXP: 1445751
For next: 40186

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 617 days
Last activity: 232 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 12.3.02 2233.36
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2240.43
Oh jesus, Give me a break. Are you serious? ITS TELEVISION!!!! The dog wasnt hurt. I hope this is a joke. If you are actually upset over the treatment of "lucy" then have your mom and dad explain to you the concept of TV.
BobHollySTILLRules
Bockwurst
Level: 50

Posts: 70/573
EXP: 941461
For next: 5863

Since: 3.1.02
From: C-Bus, Ohio

Since last post: 4419 days
Last activity: 4419 days
#9 Posted on 12.3.02 2311.48
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2311.56
"Well, I know we never actually saw the dog get run over, but we could hear her! She HAD to be under the car!"

Speaking of which, I STILL can't believe Rock wasn't really in the ambulance!

I was shocked when I read that!

SHOCKED!
Busyman14
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 40/89
EXP: 57309
For next: 1042

Since: 24.2.02
From: Weston, Florida

Since last post: 4458 days
Last activity: 4443 days
#10 Posted on 12.3.02 2315.41
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2315.46
OH PLEASE give me a break. If this is true, the Humane Society should also be told that Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy don't exist.

Somehow I think this type of publicity is what Vince wants though...

-Alex
Marx_of_Death23
Linguica
Level: 19

Posts: 28/64
EXP: 34910
For next: 867

Since: 6.3.02
From: Chi Town Baby

Since last post: 4378 days
Last activity: 4375 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 12.3.02 2329.38
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2329.59
heh. maybe it'll boost ratings. all those humane society people watching RAW each week to spot the next lawsuit target. good thinkin' Vinnie! :)
MarchOfThePigs
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 141/209
EXP: 206564
For next: 22618

Since: 10.2.02
From: Sudbury, Ontario

Since last post: 4511 days
Last activity: 4442 days
ICQ:  
#12 Posted on 12.3.02 2358.59
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2359.02
Seems kinda funny that the Humane Society would take such offence. Maybe next some organization against violence against women can chime in with a law suit. I'm sure there are people out there who find people fighting each other to solve their problems offensive too, so maybe they can cash in at the WWF's expense too. I think the Humane Society is just trying make a name for themselves at the WWF's expense. It's a fricken tv show. If anyone was that offended by the Lucy incident, they probably shouldn't have been watching a show where grown men kick each other's asses.
Notorious F.A.B.
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 186/1052
EXP: 2334148
For next: 1492

Since: 4.2.02
From: Dudleyville's Gay Ghetto

Since last post: 4061 days
Last activity: 4047 days
AIM:  
#13 Posted on 13.3.02 0017.30
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0019.12
i'm highly skeptical of this.
dskillz
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 220/938
EXP: 1972060
For next: 12637

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston Texas

Since last post: 3235 days
Last activity: 2940 days
#14 Posted on 13.3.02 0030.46
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0031.34
This is a lie. There is nothing to sue about. If that were the case, the people who made"Something About Mary" would have been sued too. This is someone wanting to get some responses to his post.
Leroy
Boudin blanc
Level: 91

Posts: 9/2278
EXP: 7435083
For next: 33858

Since: 7.2.02

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#15 Posted on 13.3.02 0037.36
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0038.49
I think they should have had Jericho feed Lucy to a snake... now THAT would be a GREAT angle.

Ahem....
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Level: 109

Posts: 417/3428
EXP: 13778018
For next: 181672

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 108 days
Last activity: 108 days
#16 Posted on 13.3.02 0525.10
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0529.01
If they can get sued for this, then every wrestler on the roster should get arrested for assault and battery charges. It's just as real and potentially offensive.
evilwaldo
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 60/1597
EXP: 4364346
For next: 17899

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3443 days
Last activity: 3223 days
AIM:  
#17 Posted on 13.3.02 0843.14
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0859.01
I smell bull****. If it offended you or you didn't like it then turn the channel. I did and found out that USA was showing Casino.
Challer
Tocino
Level: 19

Posts: 51/58
EXP: 30162
For next: 5615

Since: 20.2.02
From: Djibouti

Since last post: 4614 days
Last activity: 4411 days
#18 Posted on 13.3.02 1057.53
Reposted on: 13.3.09 1059.13
Heh. I posted a reply about this in the Recap forum before i saw this thread. But anyway. The Humane society can sue because the WWF didn't but a disclamer saying that no animals were hurt. If they did then they wouldn't get sued. If you remember when WCW had two dogs attack Sting, at the end of the show they put up the disclaimer. Watching the show i half expected it to be at the end, but when it wasn't I was shocked. I sorta hope that they do sue the WWF. Maybe they'll realize that their story lines SUCK ASS right now.
Swordsman Yen
Frankfurter
Level: 56

Posts: 77/745
EXP: 1389164
For next: 9021

Since: 16.2.02
From: Shaolin

Since last post: 3972 days
Last activity: 3956 days
#19 Posted on 13.3.02 1108.10
Reposted on: 13.3.09 1125.49

    Originally posted by Challer
    Heh. I posted a reply about this in the Recap forum before i saw this thread. But anyway. The Humane society can sue because the WWF didn't but a disclamer saying that no animals were hurt. If they did then they wouldn't get sued. If you remember when WCW had two dogs attack Sting, at the end of the show they put up the disclaimer. Watching the show i half expected it to be at the end, but when it wasn't I was shocked. I sorta hope that they do sue the WWF. Maybe they'll realize that their story lines SUCK ASS right now.


And what proof would the Humane Society have that any animal was actually hurt? Any judge who's worth his or her bench would dismiss the suit as nothing more than just another special interest group trying to perform a shakedown on a profitable corporation. As much as the storylines in the WWF stink right now, I wouldn't wish that type of corruption to be thrusted on them.
Alessandro
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 64/1715
EXP: 4875517
For next: 117353

Since: 2.1.02
From: Worcester MA

Since last post: 119 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#20 Posted on 13.3.02 1142.36
Reposted on: 13.3.09 1156.02
If the WWF had run a disclaimer at the end of the show saying that the dog wasn't really hurt, wouldn't that have negated the whole point of the angle? I mean, there wasn't much point to the angle in the first place, but (even though 99 percent of the audience knows it's all a work) that still would have just looked stupid ...

Next thing you'll tell me is that they should've run another disclaimer after RAW saying that Triple H's leg is fine and that Jericho didn't REALLY hit him with a sledgehammer ("No humans were harmed in the filming of this episode") ...

ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: I just don't get it, or why are people so down on Wrestlemania?
Next thread: Vote Of NO Confidence
Previous thread: Being Smart. It's not a bad thing...
(10100 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Humane Society suing WWF!!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.375 seconds.