The W
Views: 98926677
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
16.9.07 0226
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Humane Society suing WWF!! Register and log in to post!
(10003 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (20 total)
cobrawolf
Weisswurst
Level: 11

Posts: 8/19
EXP: 5618
For next: 368

Since: 9.2.02
From: O'Fallon, MO

Since last post: 4547 days
Last activity: 4543 days
#1 Posted on 12.3.02 2137.38
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2147.33
Now, I don't know what all of you thought about the "Lucy" scene. But, I can tell you, that as a dog owner, I didn't think it was funny at all. But, there were other people who didn't appreciate the scene one bit: the Humane Society. The main thing involved is, of course, cruelty to animals. I can tell you this from experience. I used to have a beagle who had one of her hind legs run over, and she had to have an artificial leg that didn't even touch the ground. She died two years ago because she was too old. And, I'll say this. Watching that scene last night gave me flashbacks. I think the Humane Society is doing the right thing by filing this lawsuit immediately could be a big step. I think the WWF needs to think twice about using any more animals in future storylines.
Promote this thread!
Addy
Bauerwurst
Level: 24

Posts: 55/105
EXP: 73114
For next: 5012

Since: 24.1.02
From: Melbourne, Aussie Land

Since last post: 4543 days
Last activity: 4539 days
#2 Posted on 12.3.02 2140.27
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2147.48
you are damn right!
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 337/2104
EXP: 6570598
For next: 80092

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 27 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#3 Posted on 12.3.02 2142.00
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2148.17
Geez, I'm sure they didn't actually hurt the poor dog. How is this different from all those movies where at the end they have the "no animals were harmed in the making of this film" disclaimer. And what the heck grounds are they suing on? You got a link to a press release or something?
SamZim
Cotto
Level: 16

Posts: 4/39
EXP: 16586
For next: 3671

Since: 4.1.02
From: Outside Toledo, for now...

Since last post: 3356 days
Last activity: 3356 days
#4 Posted on 12.3.02 2143.48
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2148.17
Not that I don't partly agree, but come on... the dog wasn't REALLY hurt. Wrestling, need I remind, is a WORK. Besides, shouldn't they have come down on the Boss Man/Al Snow "I made you eat your chihuahua" skit if they were going to do anything?
Stinger
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 7/85
EXP: 53225
For next: 5126

Since: 29.1.02

Since last post: 3975 days
Last activity: 3974 days
#5 Posted on 12.3.02 2148.17
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2148.54
their filing a lawsuit?? cool!...as soon as i saw Lucy last night i knew shit was gonna hit the fan with the animal rights people...with good reason too, you don't know how bad i wanna take my ex girlfriends cat and run it over...thanks for the idea Y2J...just kidding by the way, actually i wanna tie my ex to the car and run her over a few times...ha again i'm just kidding geeze you gotta watch what you say or do these days
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 57/1494
EXP: 3931154
For next: 74925

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#6 Posted on 12.3.02 2205.06
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2224.08
The lawsuit is silly. What they did was no different than what they do in movies such as "There's Something About Mary".

Of course, there was a difference. TSAM was funny, the RAW segments were not. And they did have to know that somebody would get their panties in a wad over this. Now if it was killer material, maybe it would be worth it. But this is going to a legal headache all for the sake of running sucky segments.
DirkLurker
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 31/84
EXP: 52438
For next: 5913

Since: 2.1.02
From: Syracuse, NY

Since last post: 4430 days
Last activity: 4347 days
#7 Posted on 12.3.02 2225.47
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2227.39
how about a link, Cobra Khan?!

Dirk
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 98/763
EXP: 1434528
For next: 51409

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 544 days
Last activity: 159 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 12.3.02 2233.36
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2240.43
Oh jesus, Give me a break. Are you serious? ITS TELEVISION!!!! The dog wasnt hurt. I hope this is a joke. If you are actually upset over the treatment of "lucy" then have your mom and dad explain to you the concept of TV.
BobHollySTILLRules
Bockwurst
Level: 50

Posts: 70/573
EXP: 934162
For next: 13162

Since: 3.1.02
From: C-Bus, Ohio

Since last post: 4346 days
Last activity: 4346 days
#9 Posted on 12.3.02 2311.48
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2311.56
"Well, I know we never actually saw the dog get run over, but we could hear her! She HAD to be under the car!"

Speaking of which, I STILL can't believe Rock wasn't really in the ambulance!

I was shocked when I read that!

SHOCKED!
Busyman14
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 40/89
EXP: 56860
For next: 1491

Since: 24.2.02
From: Weston, Florida

Since last post: 4385 days
Last activity: 4370 days
#10 Posted on 12.3.02 2315.41
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2315.46
OH PLEASE give me a break. If this is true, the Humane Society should also be told that Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy don't exist.

Somehow I think this type of publicity is what Vince wants though...

-Alex
Marx_of_Death23
Linguica
Level: 19

Posts: 28/64
EXP: 34636
For next: 1141

Since: 6.3.02
From: Chi Town Baby

Since last post: 4305 days
Last activity: 4302 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 12.3.02 2329.38
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2329.59
heh. maybe it'll boost ratings. all those humane society people watching RAW each week to spot the next lawsuit target. good thinkin' Vinnie! :)
MarchOfThePigs
Salami
Level: 32

Posts: 141/209
EXP: 204949
For next: 1495

Since: 10.2.02
From: Sudbury, Ontario

Since last post: 4439 days
Last activity: 4370 days
ICQ:  
#12 Posted on 12.3.02 2358.59
Reposted on: 12.3.09 2359.02
Seems kinda funny that the Humane Society would take such offence. Maybe next some organization against violence against women can chime in with a law suit. I'm sure there are people out there who find people fighting each other to solve their problems offensive too, so maybe they can cash in at the WWF's expense too. I think the Humane Society is just trying make a name for themselves at the WWF's expense. It's a fricken tv show. If anyone was that offended by the Lucy incident, they probably shouldn't have been watching a show where grown men kick each other's asses.
Notorious F.A.B.
Pepperoni
Level: 65

Posts: 186/1052
EXP: 2315929
For next: 19711

Since: 4.2.02
From: Dudleyville's Gay Ghetto

Since last post: 3988 days
Last activity: 3975 days
AIM:  
#13 Posted on 13.3.02 0017.30
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0019.12
i'm highly skeptical of this.
dskillz
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 220/938
EXP: 1956774
For next: 27923

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston Texas

Since last post: 3162 days
Last activity: 2867 days
#14 Posted on 13.3.02 0030.46
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0031.34
This is a lie. There is nothing to sue about. If that were the case, the people who made"Something About Mary" would have been sued too. This is someone wanting to get some responses to his post.
Leroy
Boudin blanc
Level: 91

Posts: 9/2263
EXP: 7304265
For next: 164676

Since: 7.2.02
From: Huntington, NY

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
#15 Posted on 13.3.02 0037.36
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0038.49
I think they should have had Jericho feed Lucy to a snake... now THAT would be a GREAT angle.

Ahem....
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Level: 109

Posts: 417/3428
EXP: 13671227
For next: 288463

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 35 days
Last activity: 35 days
#16 Posted on 13.3.02 0525.10
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0529.01
If they can get sued for this, then every wrestler on the roster should get arrested for assault and battery charges. It's just as real and potentially offensive.
evilwaldo
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 60/1597
EXP: 4330258
For next: 51987

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3370 days
Last activity: 3151 days
AIM:  
#17 Posted on 13.3.02 0843.14
Reposted on: 13.3.09 0859.01
I smell bull****. If it offended you or you didn't like it then turn the channel. I did and found out that USA was showing Casino.
Challer
Tocino
Level: 19

Posts: 51/58
EXP: 29926
For next: 5851

Since: 20.2.02
From: Djibouti

Since last post: 4541 days
Last activity: 4339 days
#18 Posted on 13.3.02 1057.53
Reposted on: 13.3.09 1059.13
Heh. I posted a reply about this in the Recap forum before i saw this thread. But anyway. The Humane society can sue because the WWF didn't but a disclamer saying that no animals were hurt. If they did then they wouldn't get sued. If you remember when WCW had two dogs attack Sting, at the end of the show they put up the disclaimer. Watching the show i half expected it to be at the end, but when it wasn't I was shocked. I sorta hope that they do sue the WWF. Maybe they'll realize that their story lines SUCK ASS right now.
Swordsman Yen
Frankfurter
Level: 56

Posts: 77/745
EXP: 1378291
For next: 19894

Since: 16.2.02
From: Shaolin

Since last post: 3900 days
Last activity: 3883 days
#19 Posted on 13.3.02 1108.10
Reposted on: 13.3.09 1125.49

    Originally posted by Challer
    Heh. I posted a reply about this in the Recap forum before i saw this thread. But anyway. The Humane society can sue because the WWF didn't but a disclamer saying that no animals were hurt. If they did then they wouldn't get sued. If you remember when WCW had two dogs attack Sting, at the end of the show they put up the disclaimer. Watching the show i half expected it to be at the end, but when it wasn't I was shocked. I sorta hope that they do sue the WWF. Maybe they'll realize that their story lines SUCK ASS right now.


And what proof would the Humane Society have that any animal was actually hurt? Any judge who's worth his or her bench would dismiss the suit as nothing more than just another special interest group trying to perform a shakedown on a profitable corporation. As much as the storylines in the WWF stink right now, I wouldn't wish that type of corruption to be thrusted on them.
Alessandro
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 64/1715
EXP: 4837727
For next: 155143

Since: 2.1.02
From: Worcester MA

Since last post: 46 days
Last activity: 2 days
#20 Posted on 13.3.02 1142.36
Reposted on: 13.3.09 1156.02
If the WWF had run a disclaimer at the end of the show saying that the dog wasn't really hurt, wouldn't that have negated the whole point of the angle? I mean, there wasn't much point to the angle in the first place, but (even though 99 percent of the audience knows it's all a work) that still would have just looked stupid ...

Next thing you'll tell me is that they should've run another disclaimer after RAW saying that Triple H's leg is fine and that Jericho didn't REALLY hit him with a sledgehammer ("No humans were harmed in the filming of this episode") ...

ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: I just don't get it, or why are people so down on Wrestlemania?
Next thread: Vote Of NO Confidence
Previous thread: Being Smart. It's not a bad thing...
(10003 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Humane Society suing WWF!!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.393 seconds.