The W
Views: 97828315
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.7.07 2242
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Rumsfeld: Dirty, Dirty Liar!
This thread has 4 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1017 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
ThreepMe
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 526/641
EXP: 1094482
For next: 62644

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 3617 days
Last activity: 3276 days
#1 Posted on 19.3.04 0655.00
Reposted on: 19.3.11 0657.45
http://www.moveon.org/ censure/caughtonvideo/

I wonder how good it must have felt to be sitting there waiting for the B.S., then BLAMO!

Poor Rummy, he had that proverbial "hand in the cookie jar" look on his face.

HA!
Promote this thread!
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 2937/4700
EXP: 21379647
For next: 457015

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1185 days
Last activity: 982 days
#2 Posted on 19.3.04 0910.11
Reposted on: 19.3.11 0911.42
You're going to have to come up with something a little more credible than the Bank of George Soros(and incidentally a group that is being investigated for 527 violations) to pass the smell test.
ThreepMe
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 527/641
EXP: 1094482
For next: 62644

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 3617 days
Last activity: 3276 days
#3 Posted on 19.3.04 0957.25
Reposted on: 19.3.11 0958.14
    Originally posted by Grimis
    You're going to have to come up with something a little more credible than the Bank of George Soros(and incidentally a group that is being investigated for 527 violations) to pass the smell test.


I thought video footage of catching him in a flat out lie was plenty credible enough. All the violations in the world doesn't change what happened in that video.

And if by "smell test" you mean "blind faith," then you are absolutely correct.

A picture is worth a 1000 words...Video is worth a million.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 1047/1528
EXP: 4047575
For next: 143573

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2745 days
Last activity: 2588 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on 19.3.04 1752.39
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1752.53
The neat thing is that nowhere in that video does Rumsfeld say Iraq is an imminent threat.
ThreepMe
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 530/641
EXP: 1094482
For next: 62644

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 3617 days
Last activity: 3276 days
#5 Posted on 19.3.04 1824.02
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1824.37
    Originally posted by PalpatineW
    The neat thing is that nowhere in that video does Rumsfeld say Iraq is an imminent threat.


But he did say that he NEVER said Iraq was an imminent threat.

And he did. And was called out on it.

Nice try.

Next.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 1048/1528
EXP: 4047575
For next: 143573

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2745 days
Last activity: 2588 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 21.3.04 0157.02
Reposted on: 21.3.11 0157.09
I can't play the video at the moment, for fear of waking folks up, but I will guarantee he never said Iraq was an imminent threat. More imminent != imminent.

If event X is going to happen in ten years, and event Y in nine years, is it proper to say that event Y is "more imminent" than evenet X, though neither event by itself would be termed imminent?
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 490/763
EXP: 1427209
For next: 58728

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 497 days
Last activity: 112 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 21.3.04 0328.31
Reposted on: 21.3.11 0329.01
    Originally posted by PalpatineW
    I can't play the video at the moment, for fear of waking folks up, but I will guarantee he never said Iraq was an imminent threat. More imminent != imminent.

    If event X is going to happen in ten years, and event Y in nine years, is it proper to say that event Y is "more imminent" than evenet X, though neither event by itself would be termed imminent?




He claimed to never have said that Iraq was an "IMMEDIATE" threat. After which a quote from him was read back to him where he did in fact call Iraq an immediate threat.


Dont be mad because the Bullshit in Washington is starting to smell.
Leroy
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 318/2250
EXP: 7204233
For next: 264708

Since: 7.2.02
From: Huntington, NY

Since last post: 12 hours
Last activity: 9 min.
#8 Posted on 21.3.04 1819.23
Reposted on: 21.3.11 1819.27
    Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
    He claimed to never have said that Iraq was an "IMMEDIATE" threat. After which a quote from him was read back to him where he did in fact call Iraq an immediate threat.


    Dont be mad because the Bullshit in Washington is starting to smell.


It's splitting hairs, really. They knew exactly how to spin it, without actually using the word "imminent". So they can say, "We never said 'imminent'".

Then, they go on and on about what a danger he is/was to the rest of the world - how he had all these weapons, and was plotting to do all this stuff, but he was never an "imminent" threat. You should be scared shitless of him, but he's not an "imminent" threat.

It wouldn't suprise me at all if they start a comparison between an "immediate threat" and an "imminent threat".

They painted such a picture of Hussein that I expected his sons to look like Seth Green and a mini-Hussein to be at his side.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Al-Qaida has nukes? Oh, joy...
Next thread: Democrats in Idaho fumble
Previous thread: McCain says Kerry, "not weak on defense."
(1017 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Rumsfeld: Dirty, Dirty Liar!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.158 seconds.