The W
Views: 114773911
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
29.7.09 1446
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Why does Rhea County exist? Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1243 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (28 total)
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 118

Posts: 1935/4006
EXP: 18304885
For next: 78083

Since: 22.4.02
From: Outside of Boston

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 4 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 18.3.04 1702.13
Reposted on: 18.3.11 1702.43
Tennessee county wants to ban gays... from existing there (cnn.com)

The county commissioners passed a request to the state legislature to amend state law so they can charge gays with crimes against nature. Actual quote, from commissioner J.C. Fugate: "We need to keep them out of here."

Where in the BLUE HELL did they ever think they could do this? They... uhm... can't, right?

(Oh, and some context as to where this county leans: This is where the Scopes monkey trial was held.)

(edited by drjayphd on 18.3.04 1803)
Promote this thread!
Gavintzu
Summer sausage
Level: 46

Posts: 396/443
EXP: 680216
For next: 31563

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary ... Alberta Canada

Since last post: 3511 days
Last activity: 3511 days
#2 Posted on 18.3.04 2058.13
Reposted on: 18.3.11 2058.48
When I saw this story, I thought to myself "this is just a county being the real life equivalent of a troll."

Take an unreasonable position and blow it completely out of proportion just to see the reaction it brings. The story has gone national, and if the gay rights movement bites, it should be good for a week or two of headlines and controversy.

I imagine the county commissioners are a group of bible-thumpin' good ol' boys who are chuckling about the ruckus they be raising. Assholes.


redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 155

Posts: 3502/7534
EXP: 46788482
For next: 628845

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 1124 days
Last activity: 1124 days
#3 Posted on 18.3.04 2112.52
Reposted on: 18.3.11 2112.52
If you need another reason to dislike Lincoln: He fought a War to keep this region in the Union.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 85

Posts: 1034/1857
EXP: 5734184
For next: 164380

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 1163 days
Last activity: 291 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 18.3.04 2157.52
Reposted on: 18.3.11 2157.58
    Originally posted by drjayphd
    This is where the Scopes monkey trial was held.


It wasn't just held there; they hold an annual festival in commemoration of it.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 151

Posts: 2892/6978
EXP: 42518183
For next: 778393

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 16 hours
#5 Posted on 19.3.04 0154.35
Reposted on: 19.3.11 0155.04
Homosexuality has been observed in animal species as well, so it's ignorant to say that being gay isn't at least somewhat "natural."

Then again, I don't expect these idiots to be able to read anything other than bumper stickers, annual Tennessee Vols football guides and The Dummies' Guide To The Bible anyway.
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 148

Posts: 1142/6769
EXP: 39567871
For next: 810887

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 4 days
#6 Posted on 19.3.04 1537.17
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1537.20
Not that I am defending thier proposed ban on gays, BUT...

Isnt it up to the people who actually live there to determine what laws are passed in thier own community? No matter how retarded they may seem, if the majority of the community supports this, isnt that thier right?
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Level: 111

Posts: 1506/3428
EXP: 14642275
For next: 226131

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 717 days
Last activity: 717 days
#7 Posted on 19.3.04 1625.47
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1625.58
    Originally posted by StaggerLee
    Not that I am defending thier proposed ban on gays, BUT...

    Isnt it up to the people who actually live there to determine what laws are passed in thier own community? No matter how retarded they may seem, if the majority of the community supports this, isnt that thier right?



Constitutionality has nothing to do with public opinion. If a majority of the county's population thinks murder should be legal, that doesn't make it any less in violation of constituional rights.

(edited by TheBucsFan on 19.3.04 1725)
calvinh0560
Boudin rouge
Level: 49

Posts: 483/518
EXP: 859986
For next: 23903

Since: 3.1.02
From: People's Republic of Massachusetts

Since last post: 1205 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#8 Posted on 19.3.04 1709.23
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1709.37
Constitutionality a town has every right to pass a law that makes murder legal. It is then up to the courts to decided if that law is legal under the constitution. While murder and baning gays are extreme cases will never become law. A town has every right to pass any law it see fit until a court has said that it is unconstitutional.
beefncheddar
Linguica
Level: 19

Posts: 6/64
EXP: 34523
For next: 1254

Since: 16.2.04
From: Mt. Pleasant, SC

Since last post: 839 days
Last activity: 664 days
#9 Posted on 19.3.04 1742.33
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1746.39
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Homosexuality has been observed in animal species as well, so it's ignorant to say that being gay isn't at least somewhat "natural."

    Then again, I don't expect these idiots to be able to read anything other than bumper stickers, annual Tennessee Vols football guides and The Dummies' Guide To The Bible anyway.



Uh, some animals eat their young. Does that mean I can cook my 2-year-old and claim that it's "at least somewhat natural?"
ThreepMe
Morcilla
Level: 54

Posts: 529/641
EXP: 1179011
For next: 54866

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 4346 days
Last activity: 4005 days
#10 Posted on 19.3.04 1745.40
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1747.12
    Originally posted by beefncheddar
      Originally posted by Big Bad
      Homosexuality has been observed in animal species as well, so it's ignorant to say that being gay isn't at least somewhat "natural."

      Then again, I don't expect these idiots to be able to read anything other than bumper stickers, annual Tennessee Vols football guides and The Dummies' Guide To The Bible anyway.



    Uh, some animals eat their young. Does that mean I can cook my 2-year-old and claim that it's "at least somewhat natural?"


Oh yeah, because that makes so much sense.

When mixed with 2 ounces of common sense (that people conveniently forget when they want to blast something they don't agree with)

You get:

Gays don't hurt other people or anythign else for that matter...

Eating a child hurts the child...

It's not rocket science.
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 584/2730
EXP: 9756275
For next: 243760

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 39 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#11 Posted on 19.3.04 1807.07
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1807.39
    Originally posted by calvinh0560
    Constitutionality a town has every right to pass a law that makes murder legal. It is then up to the courts to decided if that law is legal under the constitution. While murder and baning gays are extreme cases will never become law. A town has every right to pass any law it see fit until a court has said that it is unconstitutional.


No governmental body, under the constitution, may enact legislation superceeding or contradicting federal law. Yes it will head to the courts but your county attorney has the responsibilty to say, "People, you can't do that." Unless you want to grandstand and tie up already overworked, understaffed courts.
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 118

Posts: 1941/4006
EXP: 18304885
For next: 78083

Since: 22.4.02
From: Outside of Boston

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 4 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#12 Posted on 19.3.04 1949.48
Reposted on: 19.3.11 1951.16
Well, they unanimously voted to say never mind (contracostatimes.com). Oh, and that it was all about same-sex marriage.

Anyone who had "county equivalent of a troll" in the pool, please report to the pay windah.
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 114

Posts: 722/3619
EXP: 15843705
For next: 465912

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 17 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#13 Posted on 19.3.04 2216.41
Reposted on: 19.3.11 2216.59
    Originally posted by StaggerLee
    Not that I am defending thier proposed ban on gays, BUT...

    Isnt it up to the people who actually live there to determine what laws are passed in thier own community? No matter how retarded they may seem, if the majority of the community supports this, isnt that thier right?



Stagger, I think this goes right along with the gay marriage thing. I don't think we can have a local authority abridge a state or federal law. Obviously, as I learned on Seinfeld, there's nothing wrong with being all happy and to "kick 'em out" or whatever the guy said, would abridge their civil rights. And that's a federal deal, so the state can't overwrite it. Kind of like the same thing the president is proposing for the sanctity of marriage amendment - and if it passes, it will have the same rule of law. But I wouldn't hold yer breath or anything on that one.
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 981/1495
EXP: 4214920
For next: 167325

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 477 days
Last activity: 401 days
#14 Posted on 19.3.04 2258.56
Reposted on: 19.3.11 2259.01
    Originally posted by redsoxnation
    If you need another reason to dislike Lincoln: He fought a War to keep this region in the Union.


Let's see, take the view of about 12 people and transcend that view upon a whole region. Yep, that there shor is fair! I shor wished weez could be more like you'uns in them there Yankee states, all sofisticated and stuff!

Nag
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 584/904
EXP: 1912170
For next: 72527

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2822 days
Last activity: 877 days
Y!:
#15 Posted on 20.3.04 2004.38
Reposted on: 20.3.11 2005.10
    Originally posted by ThreepMe
      Originally posted by beefncheddar
        Originally posted by Big Bad
        Homosexuality has been observed in animal species as well, so it's ignorant to say that being gay isn't at least somewhat "natural."

        Then again, I don't expect these idiots to be able to read anything other than bumper stickers, annual Tennessee Vols football guides and The Dummies' Guide To The Bible anyway.



      Uh, some animals eat their young. Does that mean I can cook my 2-year-old and claim that it's "at least somewhat natural?"


    Oh yeah, because that makes so much sense.

    When mixed with 2 ounces of common sense (that people conveniently forget when they want to blast something they don't agree with)

    You get:

    Gays don't hurt other people or anythign else for that matter...

    Eating a child hurts the child...

    It's not rocket science.


Buuuuut, if you are going to use the argument that there are gay pigeons, therefore homosexuality is acceptable in human society, then sorry, common sense is on the side of BeefNChedder. There are no rules in the animal kingdom now. Nor can you use a line item veto in nature for political purposes. It is as it is, black and white.
Nenz
Fifty Millionth Hit
Level: 29

Posts: 48/158
EXP: 138050
For next: 9836

Since: 7.5.03

Since last post: 1668 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#16 Posted on 20.3.04 2031.09
Reposted on: 20.3.11 2032.36
I think the point is that the county wants to ban gays from living there as it is a crime against nature. But homosexuality exists in the animal kingdom, so to say it against nature is wrong.

That is not so say that because it exists in nature it is necessarily right (ie because some animals eat their young doesn't mean it is right for humans to do so). But the county's argument is not valid.
Nag
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 585/904
EXP: 1912170
For next: 72527

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2822 days
Last activity: 877 days
Y!:
#17 Posted on 21.3.04 0708.02
Reposted on: 21.3.11 0708.51
They are not saying it is a crime against nature, they are saying it's a crime against religion. Which serves the function of making us feel guilt about what is in our nature.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 1966/3059
EXP: 12207574
For next: 54726

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 68 days
Last activity: 68 days
AIM:  
#18 Posted on 21.3.04 1055.06
Reposted on: 21.3.11 1056.15
    Originally posted by Nag
    They are not saying it is a crime against nature, they are saying it's a crime against religion. Which serves the function of making us feel guilt about what is in our nature.


    Originally posted by CNN.com
    Rhea County commissioners took about three minutes to retreat from a request to amend state law so the county can charge homosexuals with crimes against nature. The Tuesday measure passed 8-0.
Nag
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 586/904
EXP: 1912170
For next: 72527

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2822 days
Last activity: 877 days
Y!:
#19 Posted on 21.3.04 1119.06
Reposted on: 21.3.11 1121.15
Good one, usually I'm sharper then that. Yeah so you got me on a technicality, that technicality that I didn't read the first paragraph carefully. Yet, I think we all know what THEY mean by 'nature', at least I interpret it as something a little different than Darwinism, so you haven't quite killed me yet.
ThreepMe
Morcilla
Level: 54

Posts: 531/641
EXP: 1179011
For next: 54866

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 4346 days
Last activity: 4005 days
#20 Posted on 21.3.04 1226.50
Reposted on: 21.3.11 1226.52
    Originally posted by Nag
      Originally posted by ThreepMe
        Originally posted by beefncheddar
          Originally posted by Big Bad
          Homosexuality has been observed in animal species as well, so it's ignorant to say that being gay isn't at least somewhat "natural."

          Then again, I don't expect these idiots to be able to read anything other than bumper stickers, annual Tennessee Vols football guides and The Dummies' Guide To The Bible anyway.



        Uh, some animals eat their young. Does that mean I can cook my 2-year-old and claim that it's "at least somewhat natural?"


      Oh yeah, because that makes so much sense.

      When mixed with 2 ounces of common sense (that people conveniently forget when they want to blast something they don't agree with)

      You get:

      Gays don't hurt other people or anythign else for that matter...

      Eating a child hurts the child...

      It's not rocket science.


    Buuuuut, if you are going to use the argument that there are gay pigeons, therefore homosexuality is acceptable in human society, then sorry, common sense is on the side of BeefNChedder. There are no rules in the animal kingdom now. Nor can you use a line item veto in nature for political purposes. It is as it is, black and white.


You're misleading the flow of this discussion...

Let's take it down the path that it is actually taking...

You say:"...if you are going to use the argument that there are gay pigeons, therefore homosexuality is acceptable in human society..."

First off, no one said anything about:

Homosexuality exists in nature = acceptability in human society

Acceptability in human nature is a huge brush you're painting with there. It is not justified with one simple statement such as "exists in nature."

Here is the context of the debate that was taken to illogical extremes to misguide the actual flow of logic...

It was started as: Homosexuality is unnatural

Then it went to: Not necessarily, homosexuality is present in nature.

Then, and here's the illogical extreme, it went to: well, baby eating happens in nature, can I do that then?

First off, no one said that just because it happens in nature means that we get to do something. The second point in the debate was only to do debunk, through a direct illustration, the first point (which it actually accomplishes)

The third point does not even address the first point at all. It just tries to debunk the second point by bringing in an extreme situation that had very little to do with the context of the debate at hand. The only connection was "examples through nature." NOT "Is homosexuality natural or present in nature."

This is what is known as an illogical extreme. It is used by people to misguide the topic to some slightly connected tangent without actually discussing the topic.

Bad debaters and shady lawyers uses this technique all the time when they wish to use smokescreens and to divert a losing battle into the realm of silliness.

And you are taking the tangent to another level by saying, "...if you are going to use the argument that there are gay pigeons, therefore homosexuality is acceptable in human society..."

It looks similar to the original debate, but it is not the same discussion.
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: HAwks and Doves?
Next thread: AP: Israel Kills Hamas Founder
Previous thread: Canadian Conservatives Get Leader
(1243 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Why does Rhea County exist?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.289 seconds.