The W
Views: 114530034
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.7.09 0430
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Kerry stands alone after Super Tuesday Register and log in to post!
(1273 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (14 total)
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 472/763
EXP: 1535639
For next: 41916

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 1220 days
Last activity: 150 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 2.3.04 2319.01
Reposted on: 2.3.11 2319.31
Kerry wins 9, Edwards to bow out (cnn.com)


The whole primary process amazes me. In early January, it looked like Dean would walk away win the nomination. with Clark as his VP. I remember watching Edwards offically joining the race on the Daily Show, and thinking this guys has NO shot. and I remember being hopeful that somehow the Dems could win. Now Im convinced we can pull this off. I though Bush was unbeatable. No more.


Promote this thread!
eviljonhunt81
Pepperoni
Level: 68

Posts: 830/1084
EXP: 2601035
For next: 127779

Since: 6.1.02
From: not Japan

Since last post: 3626 days
Last activity: 3623 days
#2 Posted on 2.3.04 2350.54
Reposted on: 2.3.11 2352.18
Can't say this was terribly suprising. The Party fell in behind Kerry pretty fast. It's been apparent the whole time that the Party wanted the nomination process wrapped up fast, but I think this was a huge mistake on their part. The process was not destroying any of the serious candidates' (with the possible exception of Dean) chances of winning in November, so why would they want the nominee chosen so fast? This only gives Bush's team more time to attack them, and with Bush having about 3 times as much money as Kerry, I imagine we will see that happening very soon. As long as the nomination process went on, the Bush campaign couldn't directly attack any one candidate.
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 511/2730
EXP: 9749570
For next: 250465

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#3 Posted on 3.3.04 0839.19
Reposted on: 3.3.11 0839.20
    Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
    Kerry wins 9, Edwards to bow out (cnn.com)


    The whole primary process amazes me. In early January, it looked like Dean would walk away win the nomination. with Clark as his VP. I remember watching Edwards offically joining the race on the Daily Show, and thinking this guys has NO shot. and I remember being hopeful that somehow the Dems could win. Now Im convinced we can pull this off. I though Bush was unbeatable. No more.





I don't agree, unless the economy doesn't generate more jobs by fall and Iraq goes to Hell. Kerry is the perfect candidate for Bush. Edwards was much more electable IMO.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 155

Posts: 3404/7534
EXP: 46759097
For next: 658230

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 1118 days
Last activity: 1118 days
#4 Posted on 3.3.04 2140.48
Reposted on: 3.3.11 2142.04
    Originally posted by DrDirt
      Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
      Kerry wins 9, Edwards to bow out (cnn.com)


      The whole primary process amazes me. In early January, it looked like Dean would walk away win the nomination. with Clark as his VP. I remember watching Edwards offically joining the race on the Daily Show, and thinking this guys has NO shot. and I remember being hopeful that somehow the Dems could win. Now Im convinced we can pull this off. I though Bush was unbeatable. No more.





    I don't agree, unless the economy doesn't generate more jobs by fall and Iraq goes to Hell. Kerry is the perfect candidate for Bush. Edwards was much more electable IMO.






Well, I guess the mini-sequel to 1988 starts: George Bush's Son vs. Mike Dukakis's Lt. Governor.
I agree with Dr. Dirt about Edwards being more of a danger than Kerry. Much as I thought heading into the New Year (fake)Dean wouldn't get the nomination. Sure, I thought it would be Gephardt, but I did pick against the chalk. And remember, in the past century the only two Democrats born in the North (Wilson was born in the South) to win the Presidency are Roosevelt and Kennedy. And, despite Kerry's attempts to pretend he's Kennedy, he won't be able to pull it off. Of course, with a few months still until the convention, an Al Gore endorsement of Kerry could turn the tide and open the door for either Kusinich or Sharpton.

(edited by redsoxnation on 3.3.04 2243)
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 151

Posts: 2832/6977
EXP: 42483357
For next: 813219

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 hours
#5 Posted on 3.3.04 2349.41
Reposted on: 3.3.11 2350.05

    This only gives Bush's team more time to attack them, and with Bush having about 3 times as much money as Kerry, I imagine we will see that happening very soon.


Everyone keeps harping on the $100 million war chest, but now that he's confirmed as the nominee this early, it gives Democratic benefactors plenty of time to commit money to him rather than send cash in the direction of other candidates in a protracted primary race.
It's False
Scrapple
Level: 142

Posts: 1067/6152
EXP: 34616146
For next: 352369

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 164 days
Last activity: 3 days
#6 Posted on 4.3.04 0225.47
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0226.06
    Originally posted by DrDirt
      Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
      Kerry wins 9, Edwards to bow out (cnn.com)


      The whole primary process amazes me. In early January, it looked like Dean would walk away win the nomination. with Clark as his VP. I remember watching Edwards offically joining the race on the Daily Show, and thinking this guys has NO shot. and I remember being hopeful that somehow the Dems could win. Now Im convinced we can pull this off. I though Bush was unbeatable. No more.





    I don't agree, unless the economy doesn't generate more jobs by fall and Iraq goes to Hell.


Don't forget that there's one wild card. If Osama's caught between now and November, you might as well hand Bush his second term.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 112

Posts: 1761/3504
EXP: 15120540
For next: 217713

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 944 days
Last activity: 631 days
#7 Posted on 4.3.04 0411.53
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0412.15
I hate to sound like a paranoid jerk here...but how do we know that they didn't already catch Osama? We only heard about Saddam getting caught because the US Government told us.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 155

Posts: 3406/7534
EXP: 46759097
For next: 658230

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 1118 days
Last activity: 1118 days
#8 Posted on 4.3.04 0653.49
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0659.01
    Originally posted by Freeway420
    I hate to sound like a paranoid jerk here...but how do we know that they didn't already catch Osama? We only heard about Saddam getting caught because the US Government told us.







The simplest reason not to believe the always credible Iranians on Bin Laden being caught: Someone would have shot off their mouth by now and Washington would be flooded with leaks.
JoshMann
Andouille
Level: 89

Posts: 448/2159
EXP: 6827323
For next: 88605

Since: 17.11.03
From: Tallahassee, FL

Since last post: 2931 days
Last activity: 2928 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 4.3.04 0800.26
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0800.48
    Originally posted by redsoxnation
      Originally posted by Freeway420
      I hate to sound like a paranoid jerk here...but how do we know that they didn't already catch Osama? We only heard about Saddam getting caught because the US Government told us.







    The simplest reason not to believe the always credible Iranians on Bin Laden being caught: Someone would have shot off their mouth by now and Washington would be flooded with leaks.


Fair enough, BUT if he's conveneiently paraded out during the dinner hour the weekend before election day, it's not being so paranoid, is it?
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 517/2730
EXP: 9749570
For next: 250465

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#10 Posted on 4.3.04 0822.10
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0823.13
    Originally posted by Big Bad

      This only gives Bush's team more time to attack them, and with Bush having about 3 times as much money as Kerry, I imagine we will see that happening very soon.


    Everyone keeps harping on the $100 million war chest, but now that he's confirmed as the nominee this early, it gives Democratic benefactors plenty of time to commit money to him rather than send cash in the direction of other candidates in a protracted primary race.


The media pretty much has given Kerry a pass that Dean didn't enjoy. Bush's minions are already starting the campaign. There is so much to nail Kerry on between now and November that his old bosses campaign may look stellar by comparison.
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 114

Posts: 697/3619
EXP: 15834087
For next: 475530

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 8 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#11 Posted on 4.3.04 0913.18
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0914.30
    Originally posted by DrDirt

    The media pretty much has given Kerry a pass that Dean didn't enjoy. Bush's minions are already starting the campaign. There is so much to nail Kerry on between now and November that his old bosses campaign may look stellar by comparison.


Dean got a pass for a looooong time. John F'n is still getting the pass and will for awhile. Dubya's starting up, now that he knows who his opponent is going to be. That's the right course. Kerry, and the rest of them, have been out there with the News organizations telling their stories every day for the last 3-4 months for free. Sure, they spent a little money fighting it out among themselves, but it paid for itself.

Kerry's name recognition is way up there, compared to December (over 70% of people polled didn't know what state he was senator in). It's time for Dubya to get HIS message out. And then we let the great people of the United States decide. I love our country. We whine and moan and complain, but then the people do the right thing. And if they elect Kerry, then he's my president. And if they elect Bush, he's my president.

and if it's close, either way, I'm not going to spend the rest of my life whining about it, like some people I could mention. Not you, Doc - but some others I could name.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 1952/3059
EXP: 12200035
For next: 62265

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 61 days
Last activity: 61 days
AIM:  
#12 Posted on 4.3.04 0921.16
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0922.02
    Originally posted by It's False
      Originally posted by DrDirt
        Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
        Kerry wins 9, Edwards to bow out (cnn.com)


        The whole primary process amazes me. In early January, it looked like Dean would walk away win the nomination. with Clark as his VP. I remember watching Edwards offically joining the race on the Daily Show, and thinking this guys has NO shot. and I remember being hopeful that somehow the Dems could win. Now Im convinced we can pull this off. I though Bush was unbeatable. No more.





      I don't agree, unless the economy doesn't generate more jobs by fall and Iraq goes to Hell.


    Don't forget that there's one wild card. If Osama's caught between now and November, you might as well hand Bush his second term.


Theoretically, but Hussein's capture gave Bush something like a five point boost for about a week, then it was right back to his old levels. If it happens too early, it'll almost be a nonfactor. If it happens too close to the election, I don't know how many people will buy it as a coincidence.

(edited by OlFuzzyBastard on 4.3.04 1021)
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 519/2730
EXP: 9749570
For next: 250465

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#13 Posted on 4.3.04 0953.22
Reposted on: 4.3.11 0956.40
AWA, I agree. The diference I see between myself and other liberals is the simple fact that the President, of whatever party, is my president. I may dislike policies or actions but you must respect the office. The only way to have a coherent government is because the people allow it. Bush won in 2000 and it's over. What bothers me is the lack of repect people from both sides show to the other when in office. You don't have to make your point with disrepect.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator
Level: 142

Posts: 2178/6111
EXP: 34907335
For next: 61180

Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#14 Posted on 4.3.04 2028.06
Reposted on: 4.3.11 2028.12
(deleted by Guru Zim on 4.3.04 1834)
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Kerry - What's he all about?
Next thread: Greenspan
Previous thread: Bush = smart ass?
(1273 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Kerry stands alone after Super TuesdayRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.253 seconds.