The W
Views: 107441449
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
4.10.08 1846
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - How many wrestlers are enough?
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(10551 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (8 total)
Level: 32

Posts: 34/202
EXP: 203054
For next: 3390

Since: 23.1.02

Since last post: 4595 days
Last activity: 4570 days
#1 Posted on 6.3.02 1854.23
Reposted on: 6.3.09 1859.01

On the WWF's website they list 84 "superstars". Obviously Vince can't keep Austin, Rock, UT, Angle and HHH. They will be split up, but how?

Then there's the "midcard", the Edges and Booker T's and Kanes? I realize this may be a bit odd, but the math seems interesting to me: how many wrestlers do you actually NEED to have a sucessful promotion? Say...4 marquee, 8 middle talents (some of whom can be moved up if need be for variety), and an unknown number of jobbers/curtain jerkers/dark/Jakked workers?
Promote this thread!
Level: 20

Posts: 5/64
EXP: 36059
For next: 6380

Since: 6.3.02
From: Chi Town Baby

Since last post: 4689 days
Last activity: 4686 days
#2 Posted on 6.3.02 2243.44
Reposted on: 6.3.09 2245.57
I think it all depends on how they play out the feuds. If they are all 3 week build-ups with the payoff at the PPV, 4 marquee stars would never be enough. People would be sick of the same match-ups over and over again. But if they cleverly draw out feuds as we used to see, that would be enough big names. But Vince really needs to bring back some drama in the feuds. He tried with Edge-Regal, but the matches weren't up to par, although it was nice to see some continuity. No more of this... "Gee Taker, I hated you with a passion last month, but now you're my buddy so we can take out Angle." But I'm sure this point has been argued to death.....
Level: 44

Posts: 207/401
EXP: 569113
For next: 42176

Since: 2.1.02
From: Wilmington, NC

Since last post: 3924 days
Last activity: 3525 days
#3 Posted on 7.3.02 0129.37
Reposted on: 7.3.09 0133.59
I'd say you really only need 30.

Explanations are for pussies, leave it at 30 :)
Level: 42

Posts: 216/363
EXP: 489214
For next: 32152

Since: 22.1.02

Since last post: 4806 days
Last activity: 4806 days
#4 Posted on 7.3.02 0706.33
Reposted on: 7.3.09 0726.51
Probably however many they had before they brought in all the people from WCW.
Level: 134

Posts: 384/5409
EXP: 28193763
For next: 393285

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 93 days
Last activity: 2 days
#5 Posted on 7.3.02 1015.17
Reposted on: 7.3.09 1028.19
Really, hasn't the WWF gone with the same 4 or so marquee stars for the last 2-3 years already? I believe someone pointed out in a thread a while back that you have to go back to Dec. 1999 to find a WWF title match not involving Austin, Rock, HHH or Angle. And even at that card the main event was HHH vs. Vince. Outside of the very recent inclusion of Jericho into the topcard, it has mainly been a 5 man circle jerk for 3 or 4 years now between the aforementioned 4 and Undertaker.
Parts Unknown
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 105/1731
EXP: 5104331
For next: 104918

Since: 2.1.02
From: Darkenwood

Since last post: 62 days
Last activity: 2 days
#6 Posted on 7.3.02 1030.00
Reposted on: 7.3.09 1040.52
And Foley, though not on such a grand scale.
Level: 53

Posts: 32/631
EXP: 1122234
For next: 34892

Since: 12.1.02
From: BC, Canada

Since last post: 2398 days
Last activity: 1934 days
#7 Posted on 8.3.02 0014.26
Reposted on: 8.3.09 0029.03
I have been obcessed with the computer game EWD lately, so I have to say about 40. I have 48 on my active roster and, to be honest, I only use about 25-30 of them in any stretch (about two weeks or so). All the rest are bouncing inbetween the Raw/Smackdown card and Heat.
Level: 42

Posts: 172/375
EXP: 514438
For next: 6928

Since: 7.1.02
From: Sheffield, UK

Since last post: 3097 days
Last activity: 2359 days
#8 Posted on 8.3.02 0450.37
Reposted on: 8.3.09 0455.39

    Originally posted by StampedeFan23
    I have been obcessed with the computer game EWD lately, so I have to say about 40. I have 48 on my active roster and, to be honest, I only use about 25-30 of them in any stretch (about two weeks or so). All the rest are bouncing inbetween the Raw/Smackdown card and Heat.

That's really interesting. So, therefore, if they do split the roster right down the middle they'd have it about right to have a fair amount of wrestlers in rotation, with a few off TV injured or whatever.

I know it's not the same as running a real fed by any means, but that number was about the same for me when I played TNM7. There's only so many interesting things you can do with a standard 9 match card with two hours to run it in I guess.

So, yeah, anyway, if we ignore my sad wrestling RPG predeliction I say they might be successful with 40ish guys per show. Maybe this carzy split idea may lead to the crazy elevation of new guys into the main events too, you never know... .
Thread ahead: H-B-K
Next thread: More proof that Rock v. Hogan is the real WrestleMania Main Event
Previous thread: JR = Cocktease
(10551 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - How many wrestlers are enough?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.555 seconds.