The W
Views: 128040488
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.9.10 0839
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - How many wrestlers are enough?
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(11493 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
Punkinhed
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 34/202
EXP: 217092
For next: 12090

Since: 23.1.02

Since last post: 5310 days
Last activity: 5286 days
#1 Posted on 6.3.02 1854.23
Reposted on: 6.3.09 1859.01



On the WWF's website they list 84 "superstars". Obviously Vince can't keep Austin, Rock, UT, Angle and HHH. They will be split up, but how?

Then there's the "midcard", the Edges and Booker T's and Kanes? I realize this may be a bit odd, but the math seems interesting to me: how many wrestlers do you actually NEED to have a sucessful promotion? Say...4 marquee, 8 middle talents (some of whom can be moved up if need be for variety), and an unknown number of jobbers/curtain jerkers/dark/Jakked workers?
Promote this thread!
Marx_of_Death23
Linguica
Level: 20

Posts: 5/64
EXP: 38572
For next: 3867

Since: 6.3.02
From: Chi Town Baby

Since last post: 5404 days
Last activity: 5401 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on 6.3.02 2243.44
Reposted on: 6.3.09 2245.57
I think it all depends on how they play out the feuds. If they are all 3 week build-ups with the payoff at the PPV, 4 marquee stars would never be enough. People would be sick of the same match-ups over and over again. But if they cleverly draw out feuds as we used to see, that would be enough big names. But Vince really needs to bring back some drama in the feuds. He tried with Edge-Regal, but the matches weren't up to par, although it was nice to see some continuity. No more of this... "Gee Taker, I hated you with a passion last month, but now you're my buddy so we can take out Angle." But I'm sure this point has been argued to death.....
Fazzle
Kishke
Level: 44

Posts: 207/401
EXP: 608302
For next: 2987

Since: 2.1.02
From: Wilmington, NC

Since last post: 4640 days
Last activity: 4241 days
#3 Posted on 7.3.02 0129.37
Reposted on: 7.3.09 0133.59
I'd say you really only need 30.

Explanations are for pussies, leave it at 30 :)
WTF13
Boerewors
Level: 43

Posts: 216/363
EXP: 523028
For next: 42023

Since: 22.1.02

Since last post: 5522 days
Last activity: 5522 days
#4 Posted on 7.3.02 0706.33
Reposted on: 7.3.09 0726.51
Probably however many they had before they brought in all the people from WCW.
spf
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 384/5410
EXP: 30143560
For next: 729373

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 687 days
Last activity: 107 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 7.3.02 1015.17
Reposted on: 7.3.09 1028.19
Really, hasn't the WWF gone with the same 4 or so marquee stars for the last 2-3 years already? I believe someone pointed out in a thread a while back that you have to go back to Dec. 1999 to find a WWF title match not involving Austin, Rock, HHH or Angle. And even at that card the main event was HHH vs. Vince. Outside of the very recent inclusion of Jericho into the topcard, it has mainly been a 5 man circle jerk for 3 or 4 years now between the aforementioned 4 and Undertaker.
Parts Unknown
Lap cheong
Level: 84

Posts: 105/1732
EXP: 5460522
For next: 201454

Since: 2.1.02
From: Darkenwood

Since last post: 705 days
Last activity: 142 days
#6 Posted on 7.3.02 1030.00
Reposted on: 7.3.09 1040.52
And Foley, though not on such a grand scale.
StampedeFan23
Morcilla
Level: 54

Posts: 32/631
EXP: 1199663
For next: 34214

Since: 12.1.02
From: BC, Canada

Since last post: 3114 days
Last activity: 2650 days
#7 Posted on 8.3.02 0014.26
Reposted on: 8.3.09 0029.03
I have been obcessed with the computer game EWD lately, so I have to say about 40. I have 48 on my active roster and, to be honest, I only use about 25-30 of them in any stretch (about two weeks or so). All the rest are bouncing inbetween the Raw/Smackdown card and Heat.
Qubber
Boerewors
Level: 43

Posts: 172/375
EXP: 549893
For next: 15158

Since: 7.1.02
From: Sheffield, UK

Since last post: 3812 days
Last activity: 3075 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 8.3.02 0450.37
Reposted on: 8.3.09 0455.39

    Originally posted by StampedeFan23
    I have been obcessed with the computer game EWD lately, so I have to say about 40. I have 48 on my active roster and, to be honest, I only use about 25-30 of them in any stretch (about two weeks or so). All the rest are bouncing inbetween the Raw/Smackdown card and Heat.


That's really interesting. So, therefore, if they do split the roster right down the middle they'd have it about right to have a fair amount of wrestlers in rotation, with a few off TV injured or whatever.

I know it's not the same as running a real fed by any means, but that number was about the same for me when I played TNM7. There's only so many interesting things you can do with a standard 9 match card with two hours to run it in I guess.

So, yeah, anyway, if we ignore my sad wrestling RPG predeliction I say they might be successful with 40ish guys per show. Maybe this carzy split idea may lead to the crazy elevation of new guys into the main events too, you never know... .
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: H-B-K
Next thread: More proof that Rock v. Hogan is the real WrestleMania Main Event
Previous thread: JR = Cocktease
(11493 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - How many wrestlers are enough?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.46 seconds.