The W
Views: 129576972
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
10.12.10 2023
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Time names their 2003 Man of the Year Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1483 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (32 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 225

Posts: 3447/17200
EXP: 172460441
For next: 1071813

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 22.12.03 1319.49
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1320.16
Sorry, "person of the year." (rolling eyes)

http://www.time.com/time/ personoftheyear/2003/


Spoiler Below: Highlight text to read
It's "The American Soldier." Kind of a cop out pick if you ask me...
Promote this thread!
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 330/2743
EXP: 10337091
For next: 17341

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 46 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#2 Posted on 22.12.03 1324.40
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1325.11


CRZ, I agree. The soldiers are great and all but really the man of the year as much as I hate to say it is Saddam Hussein. Remember in the past they selected people like Hitler. This is supposed to reflect who had massive impact, etc, not give people the warm fuzzies. Although it's a safe choice, it's another example of how utterly nebulous big media is becoming.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 2633/4700
EXP: 24180200
For next: 201566

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2414 days
Last activity: 868 days
#3 Posted on 22.12.03 1419.20
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1419.20
Guiliani was a cop-out pick too because it was a feel good pick and not about the biggest newsmaker of the year.

Frankly, I don't think Saddam Hussein was a good choice either. He hid for eight months. Hardly something that could make him a great newsmaker.

You want a controversial pick: how about Howard Dean?
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 129

Posts: 832/4750
EXP: 24978015
For next: 71706

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 685 days
Last activity: 263 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 22.12.03 1443.35
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1445.20
    Originally posted by Grimis
    You want a controversial pick: how about Howard Dean?


Or just go with W. Or did he win already?
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 566/3719
EXP: 17265383
For next: 58762

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 23 days
Last activity: 5 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 22.12.03 1527.08
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1529.01
I'd go with Tommy Franks or Bush or Bush/Blair.

Bush and Blair certainly were the ones that really influenced world news for most of the year, starting with the prep and then invasion of Iraq, and the followup to it. Then to grab the headlines again at the end with catching Saddam and putting Gaddafi on the sidelines.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1854/3063
EXP: 12804605
For next: 286748

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 209 days
Last activity: 185 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 22.12.03 1536.19
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1536.21
I think Bush won twice - I know he won in 2000, who won last year?

As for Dean, maybe next year. Fact of the matter is - most of the year, no one except people like us even knew who he was. Next year, he's gonna be the President-elect.

EDIT: Oh, that's right - the corporate whistleblowers.

(edited by OlFuzzyBastard on 22.12.03 1638)
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 2634/4700
EXP: 24180200
For next: 201566

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2414 days
Last activity: 868 days
#7 Posted on 22.12.03 1545.46
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1546.23
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Next year, he's gonna be the President-elect.
When does "optimism" cross over to "delusion" :)
Barbwire Mike
Boudin rouge
Level: 48

Posts: 113/502
EXP: 806999
For next: 16549

Since: 6.11.03
From: Dudleyville

Since last post: 4444 days
Last activity: 4437 days
#8 Posted on 22.12.03 1552.56
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1553.21
If he runs again, they should give it to Jerry Brown next year. He'll be as responsible for Bush's two terms as anyone.
The Goon
Banger
Moderator
Level: 98

Posts: 621/2517
EXP: 9634729
For next: 19658

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 34 days
Last activity: 8 days
#9 Posted on 22.12.03 1636.22
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1639.59
Here in Canada, Time's Newsmakers of the Year are Michael Stark and Michael Leshner, the first gay couple to legally marry.

A bit different than the soldier, eh?
Nag
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 481/904
EXP: 2006300
For next: 90863

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3321 days
Last activity: 1376 days
Y!:
#10 Posted on 22.12.03 1736.51
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1738.29
A safe yet respectable pick, sure more commendable thzn a bunch of soccermom whistleblowers.
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 59

Posts: 440/763
EXP: 1607114
For next: 66024

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 1726 days
Last activity: 96 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 22.12.03 1921.19
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1921.46
Well I think this is a GREAT pick. But then again I wore the uniform till May of this year so Im biased. ;-)

And I dont think they ever chose Hitler, there was a controversy in 1999 because some thought he should be picked as person of the century. Not because he was great but because he influenced almost all world events post 1939. the WWII itself, the Holocaust, the Cold War, the Nuclear age. etc, etc. And then there were some who said the American Soldier should be the person of the century then too.


And why shouldnt they choose the American Soldier? Its not Bush or Blair that is really fighting the war on terror or bringing freedom to Iraq, its soldiers on the ground, in the ai and in those ships.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 86

Posts: 814/1857
EXP: 6006506
For next: 135625

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 1662 days
Last activity: 791 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#12 Posted on 22.12.03 2039.53
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2040.33
    Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
    And I dont think they ever chose Hitler...


Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Hitler Time's first Person of the Year? I know he was selected.
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 79

Posts: 925/1496
EXP: 4412804
For next: 166683

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 253 days
Last activity: 225 days
#13 Posted on 22.12.03 2142.50
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2143.21
Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1855/3063
EXP: 12804605
For next: 286748

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 209 days
Last activity: 185 days
AIM:  
#14 Posted on 22.12.03 2235.30
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2238.06
Well, they gave it to the planet Earth in 1988. Does that count?
Nag
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 484/904
EXP: 2006300
For next: 90863

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3321 days
Last activity: 1376 days
Y!:
#15 Posted on 22.12.03 2329.49
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2331.29
Wasn't TIME engulfed in controversy when they named Bin Laden a nominee in 2001?

I guess the same people who vote for this vote for the Baseball Hall.
MoeGates
Boudin blanc
Level: 94

Posts: 1555/2262
EXP: 8205210
For next: 151478

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 25 days
Last activity: 23 hours
#16 Posted on 22.12.03 2332.24
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2334.45
"G.I. Joe" won the award in 1950, so this isn't unprecidented by any means.

I think it was a good pick. I was actually expecting Brazilian president Lula Da Silva as a sleeper.

Peter The Hegemon
Lap cheong




Since: 11.2.03
From: Hackettstown, NJ

Since last post: 33 days
Last activity: 22 hours
#17 Posted on 23.12.10 0033.56
    Originally posted by ges7184
    Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

    Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.


PROPHESY!!!

In 2006 they picked "You", which is pretty darn close to what ges was suggesting here.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 153

Posts: 2591/7034
EXP: 45004767
For next: 318740

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 32 days
Last activity: 7 hours
#18 Posted on 23.12.03 0107.53
Reposted on: 23.12.10 0108.11

    A safe yet respectable pick, sure more commendable thzn a bunch of soccermom whistleblowers.


What was wrong with this pick? Was speaking up against your company's massive, massive, MASSIVE fraud a bad thing?

Person of the century, if you're going by overall influence, should've been Gavrilo Princip.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator




Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#19 Posted on 23.12.10 0145.55
    Originally posted by Peter The Hegemon
      Originally posted by ges7184
      Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

      Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.


    PROPHESY!!!

    In 2006 they picked "You", which is pretty darn close to what ges was suggesting here.
Damn, you beat me to it. :)
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 567/3719
EXP: 17265383
For next: 58762

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 23 days
Last activity: 5 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#20 Posted on 23.12.03 0828.32
Reposted on: 23.12.10 0829.02
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Person of the century, if you're going by overall influence, should've been Gavrilo Princip.


Princip was a punk, like all other assasins. Do you think he was really more influential than, say, Oswald. WW Uno would have eventually kicked off anyway. The Kaiser was anxious for a visit to France, the Balkens, as always, were just wishing for a war and there was mucho tension.

The person with the most influence in the 20th century (THIS is the 21st, BTW) is probably Ford for the assembly line or the Wright Bros for Flight or maybe Lenin/Trotsky/Stalin for Communism.

(edited by AWArulz on 23.12.03 0929)
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Watch Out for those Almanacs
Next thread: Is Dean a Wallace/TR in the making?
Previous thread: Just an interesting interview
(1483 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Time names their 2003 Man of the YearRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.273 seconds.