The W
Views: 121084227
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.2.10 1145
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Time names their 2003 Man of the Year Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1427 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (32 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 223

Posts: 3447/17041
EXP: 165781586
For next: 2434972

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 22 hours
Last activity: 20 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 22.12.03 1319.49
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1320.16
Sorry, "person of the year." (rolling eyes)

http://www.time.com/time/ personoftheyear/2003/


Spoiler Below: Highlight text to read
It's "The American Soldier." Kind of a cop out pick if you ask me...
Promote this thread!
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 330/2742
EXP: 10036533
For next: 317899

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#2 Posted on 22.12.03 1324.40
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1325.11


CRZ, I agree. The soldiers are great and all but really the man of the year as much as I hate to say it is Saddam Hussein. Remember in the past they selected people like Hitler. This is supposed to reflect who had massive impact, etc, not give people the warm fuzzies. Although it's a safe choice, it's another example of how utterly nebulous big media is becoming.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 2633/4700
EXP: 23546385
For next: 180246

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2122 days
Last activity: 577 days
#3 Posted on 22.12.03 1419.20
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1419.20
Guiliani was a cop-out pick too because it was a feel good pick and not about the biggest newsmaker of the year.

Frankly, I don't think Saddam Hussein was a good choice either. He hid for eight months. Hardly something that could make him a great newsmaker.

You want a controversial pick: how about Howard Dean?
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 832/4750
EXP: 24344931
For next: 36835

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 394 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 22.12.03 1443.35
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1445.20
    Originally posted by Grimis
    You want a controversial pick: how about Howard Dean?


Or just go with W. Or did he win already?
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 566/3656
EXP: 16400047
For next: 411368

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 22.12.03 1527.08
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1529.01
I'd go with Tommy Franks or Bush or Bush/Blair.

Bush and Blair certainly were the ones that really influenced world news for most of the year, starting with the prep and then invasion of Iraq, and the followup to it. Then to grab the headlines again at the end with catching Saddam and putting Gaddafi on the sidelines.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 1854/3062
EXP: 12467268
For next: 204716

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 6 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 22.12.03 1536.19
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1536.21
I think Bush won twice - I know he won in 2000, who won last year?

As for Dean, maybe next year. Fact of the matter is - most of the year, no one except people like us even knew who he was. Next year, he's gonna be the President-elect.

EDIT: Oh, that's right - the corporate whistleblowers.

(edited by OlFuzzyBastard on 22.12.03 1638)
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 2634/4700
EXP: 23546385
For next: 180246

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2122 days
Last activity: 577 days
#7 Posted on 22.12.03 1545.46
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1546.23
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Next year, he's gonna be the President-elect.
When does "optimism" cross over to "delusion" :)
Barbwire Mike
Boudin rouge
Level: 48

Posts: 113/502
EXP: 783829
For next: 39719

Since: 6.11.03
From: Dudleyville

Since last post: 4153 days
Last activity: 4145 days
#8 Posted on 22.12.03 1552.56
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1553.21
If he runs again, they should give it to Jerry Brown next year. He'll be as responsible for Bush's two terms as anyone.
The Goon
Banger
Moderator
Level: 97

Posts: 621/2502
EXP: 9306709
For next: 10649

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 28 days
Last activity: 5 days
#9 Posted on 22.12.03 1636.22
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1639.59
Here in Canada, Time's Newsmakers of the Year are Michael Stark and Michael Leshner, the first gay couple to legally marry.

A bit different than the soldier, eh?
Nag
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 481/904
EXP: 1951921
For next: 32776

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3030 days
Last activity: 1085 days
Y!:
#10 Posted on 22.12.03 1736.51
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1738.29
A safe yet respectable pick, sure more commendable thzn a bunch of soccermom whistleblowers.
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 440/763
EXP: 1566332
For next: 11223

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 1434 days
Last activity: 139 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 22.12.03 1921.19
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1921.46
Well I think this is a GREAT pick. But then again I wore the uniform till May of this year so Im biased. ;-)

And I dont think they ever chose Hitler, there was a controversy in 1999 because some thought he should be picked as person of the century. Not because he was great but because he influenced almost all world events post 1939. the WWII itself, the Holocaust, the Cold War, the Nuclear age. etc, etc. And then there were some who said the American Soldier should be the person of the century then too.


And why shouldnt they choose the American Soldier? Its not Bush or Blair that is really fighting the war on terror or bringing freedom to Iraq, its soldiers on the ground, in the ai and in those ships.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 85

Posts: 814/1857
EXP: 5849129
For next: 49435

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 1371 days
Last activity: 499 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#12 Posted on 22.12.03 2039.53
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2040.33
    Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
    And I dont think they ever chose Hitler...


Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Hitler Time's first Person of the Year? I know he was selected.
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 925/1495
EXP: 4296542
For next: 85703

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 685 days
Last activity: 609 days
#13 Posted on 22.12.03 2142.50
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2143.21
Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 1855/3062
EXP: 12467268
For next: 204716

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 6 days
AIM:  
#14 Posted on 22.12.03 2235.30
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2238.06
Well, they gave it to the planet Earth in 1988. Does that count?
Nag
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 484/904
EXP: 1951921
For next: 32776

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3030 days
Last activity: 1085 days
Y!:
#15 Posted on 22.12.03 2329.49
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2331.29
Wasn't TIME engulfed in controversy when they named Bin Laden a nominee in 2001?

I guess the same people who vote for this vote for the Baseball Hall.
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 92

Posts: 1555/2216
EXP: 7754383
For next: 2584

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 2 days
#16 Posted on 22.12.03 2332.24
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2334.45
"G.I. Joe" won the award in 1950, so this isn't unprecidented by any means.

I think it was a good pick. I was actually expecting Brazilian president Lula Da Silva as a sleeper.

Peter The Hegemon
Lap cheong




Since: 11.2.03
From: Hackettstown, NJ

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 7 hours
#17 Posted on 23.12.10 0033.56
    Originally posted by ges7184
    Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

    Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.


PROPHESY!!!

In 2006 they picked "You", which is pretty darn close to what ges was suggesting here.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 2591/7011
EXP: 43648795
For next: 652967

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 2 days
#18 Posted on 23.12.03 0107.53
Reposted on: 23.12.10 0108.11

    A safe yet respectable pick, sure more commendable thzn a bunch of soccermom whistleblowers.


What was wrong with this pick? Was speaking up against your company's massive, massive, MASSIVE fraud a bad thing?

Person of the century, if you're going by overall influence, should've been Gavrilo Princip.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator




Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 22 hours
Last activity: 20 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#19 Posted on 23.12.10 0145.55
    Originally posted by Peter The Hegemon
      Originally posted by ges7184
      Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

      Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.


    PROPHESY!!!

    In 2006 they picked "You", which is pretty darn close to what ges was suggesting here.
Damn, you beat me to it. :)
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 567/3656
EXP: 16400047
For next: 411368

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#20 Posted on 23.12.03 0828.32
Reposted on: 23.12.10 0829.02
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Person of the century, if you're going by overall influence, should've been Gavrilo Princip.


Princip was a punk, like all other assasins. Do you think he was really more influential than, say, Oswald. WW Uno would have eventually kicked off anyway. The Kaiser was anxious for a visit to France, the Balkens, as always, were just wishing for a war and there was mucho tension.

The person with the most influence in the 20th century (THIS is the 21st, BTW) is probably Ford for the assembly line or the Wright Bros for Flight or maybe Lenin/Trotsky/Stalin for Communism.

(edited by AWArulz on 23.12.03 0929)
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Watch Out for those Almanacs
Next thread: Is Dean a Wallace/TR in the making?
Previous thread: Just an interesting interview
(1427 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Time names their 2003 Man of the YearRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.303 seconds.