The W
Views: 128527946
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.10.10 0106
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Time names their 2003 Man of the Year Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1471 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (32 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 225

Posts: 3447/17179
EXP: 171335166
For next: 2197088

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 22.12.03 1319.49
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1320.16
Sorry, "person of the year." (rolling eyes)

http://www.time.com/time/ personoftheyear/2003/


Spoiler Below: Highlight text to read
It's "The American Soldier." Kind of a cop out pick if you ask me...
Promote this thread!
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 330/2742
EXP: 10276573
For next: 77859

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 252 days
Last activity: 19 hours
#2 Posted on 22.12.03 1324.40
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1325.11


CRZ, I agree. The soldiers are great and all but really the man of the year as much as I hate to say it is Saddam Hussein. Remember in the past they selected people like Hitler. This is supposed to reflect who had massive impact, etc, not give people the warm fuzzies. Although it's a safe choice, it's another example of how utterly nebulous big media is becoming.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 2633/4700
EXP: 24062167
For next: 319599

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2359 days
Last activity: 813 days
#3 Posted on 22.12.03 1419.20
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1419.20
Guiliani was a cop-out pick too because it was a feel good pick and not about the biggest newsmaker of the year.

Frankly, I don't think Saddam Hussein was a good choice either. He hid for eight months. Hardly something that could make him a great newsmaker.

You want a controversial pick: how about Howard Dean?
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 129

Posts: 832/4750
EXP: 24860075
For next: 189646

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 630 days
Last activity: 208 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 22.12.03 1443.35
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1445.20
    Originally posted by Grimis
    You want a controversial pick: how about Howard Dean?


Or just go with W. Or did he win already?
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 566/3716
EXP: 17162703
For next: 161442

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 22.12.03 1527.08
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1529.01
I'd go with Tommy Franks or Bush or Bush/Blair.

Bush and Blair certainly were the ones that really influenced world news for most of the year, starting with the prep and then invasion of Iraq, and the followup to it. Then to grab the headlines again at the end with catching Saddam and putting Gaddafi on the sidelines.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1854/3063
EXP: 12742912
For next: 348441

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 154 days
Last activity: 130 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 22.12.03 1536.19
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1536.21
I think Bush won twice - I know he won in 2000, who won last year?

As for Dean, maybe next year. Fact of the matter is - most of the year, no one except people like us even knew who he was. Next year, he's gonna be the President-elect.

EDIT: Oh, that's right - the corporate whistleblowers.

(edited by OlFuzzyBastard on 22.12.03 1638)
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 2634/4700
EXP: 24062167
For next: 319599

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2359 days
Last activity: 813 days
#7 Posted on 22.12.03 1545.46
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1546.23
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Next year, he's gonna be the President-elect.
When does "optimism" cross over to "delusion" :)
Barbwire Mike
Boudin rouge
Level: 48

Posts: 113/502
EXP: 802688
For next: 20860

Since: 6.11.03
From: Dudleyville

Since last post: 4389 days
Last activity: 4382 days
#8 Posted on 22.12.03 1552.56
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1553.21
If he runs again, they should give it to Jerry Brown next year. He'll be as responsible for Bush's two terms as anyone.
The Goon
Banger
Moderator
Level: 98

Posts: 621/2513
EXP: 9566386
For next: 88001

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 12 hours
#9 Posted on 22.12.03 1636.22
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1639.59
Here in Canada, Time's Newsmakers of the Year are Michael Stark and Michael Leshner, the first gay couple to legally marry.

A bit different than the soldier, eh?
Nag
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 481/904
EXP: 1996177
For next: 100986

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3267 days
Last activity: 1322 days
Y!:
#10 Posted on 22.12.03 1736.51
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1738.29
A safe yet respectable pick, sure more commendable thzn a bunch of soccermom whistleblowers.
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 59

Posts: 440/763
EXP: 1599517
For next: 73621

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 1671 days
Last activity: 41 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 22.12.03 1921.19
Reposted on: 22.12.10 1921.46
Well I think this is a GREAT pick. But then again I wore the uniform till May of this year so Im biased. ;-)

And I dont think they ever chose Hitler, there was a controversy in 1999 because some thought he should be picked as person of the century. Not because he was great but because he influenced almost all world events post 1939. the WWII itself, the Holocaust, the Cold War, the Nuclear age. etc, etc. And then there were some who said the American Soldier should be the person of the century then too.


And why shouldnt they choose the American Soldier? Its not Bush or Blair that is really fighting the war on terror or bringing freedom to Iraq, its soldiers on the ground, in the ai and in those ships.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 86

Posts: 814/1857
EXP: 5977198
For next: 164933

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 1607 days
Last activity: 736 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#12 Posted on 22.12.03 2039.53
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2040.33
    Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
    And I dont think they ever chose Hitler...


Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Hitler Time's first Person of the Year? I know he was selected.
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 79

Posts: 925/1496
EXP: 4391949
For next: 187538

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 198 days
Last activity: 170 days
#13 Posted on 22.12.03 2142.50
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2143.21
Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1855/3063
EXP: 12742912
For next: 348441

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 154 days
Last activity: 130 days
AIM:  
#14 Posted on 22.12.03 2235.30
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2238.06
Well, they gave it to the planet Earth in 1988. Does that count?
Nag
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 484/904
EXP: 1996177
For next: 100986

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3267 days
Last activity: 1322 days
Y!:
#15 Posted on 22.12.03 2329.49
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2331.29
Wasn't TIME engulfed in controversy when they named Bin Laden a nominee in 2001?

I guess the same people who vote for this vote for the Baseball Hall.
MoeGates
Boudin blanc
Level: 94

Posts: 1555/2259
EXP: 8150196
For next: 206492

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 1 day
#16 Posted on 22.12.03 2332.24
Reposted on: 22.12.10 2334.45
"G.I. Joe" won the award in 1950, so this isn't unprecidented by any means.

I think it was a good pick. I was actually expecting Brazilian president Lula Da Silva as a sleeper.

Peter The Hegemon
Lap cheong




Since: 11.2.03
From: Hackettstown, NJ

Since last post: 57 days
Last activity: 2 days
#17 Posted on 23.12.10 0033.56
    Originally posted by ges7184
    Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

    Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.


PROPHESY!!!

In 2006 they picked "You", which is pretty darn close to what ges was suggesting here.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 153

Posts: 2591/7033
EXP: 44782654
For next: 540853

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 6 min.
#18 Posted on 23.12.03 0107.53
Reposted on: 23.12.10 0108.11

    A safe yet respectable pick, sure more commendable thzn a bunch of soccermom whistleblowers.


What was wrong with this pick? Was speaking up against your company's massive, massive, MASSIVE fraud a bad thing?

Person of the century, if you're going by overall influence, should've been Gavrilo Princip.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator




Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#19 Posted on 23.12.10 0145.55
    Originally posted by Peter The Hegemon
      Originally posted by ges7184
      Hitler was Time's Man of the Year of 1938. He was not the first, as this dates back to 1927.

      Let's see, corporate whistleblowers, now American soldiers, they are moving away from individuals and toward groups and entities. I figure before the end of the decade, the award will go to "All the people of the world", in an effort to be as non-controversial as possible.


    PROPHESY!!!

    In 2006 they picked "You", which is pretty darn close to what ges was suggesting here.
Damn, you beat me to it. :)
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 567/3716
EXP: 17162703
For next: 161442

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
Y!:
#20 Posted on 23.12.03 0828.32
Reposted on: 23.12.10 0829.02
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Person of the century, if you're going by overall influence, should've been Gavrilo Princip.


Princip was a punk, like all other assasins. Do you think he was really more influential than, say, Oswald. WW Uno would have eventually kicked off anyway. The Kaiser was anxious for a visit to France, the Balkens, as always, were just wishing for a war and there was mucho tension.

The person with the most influence in the 20th century (THIS is the 21st, BTW) is probably Ford for the assembly line or the Wright Bros for Flight or maybe Lenin/Trotsky/Stalin for Communism.

(edited by AWArulz on 23.12.03 0929)
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Watch Out for those Almanacs
Next thread: Is Dean a Wallace/TR in the making?
Previous thread: Just an interesting interview
(1471 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Time names their 2003 Man of the YearRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.276 seconds.