The W
Views: 132095879
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.4.11 0318
The 7 - Random - Family Guy to return? Register and log in to post!
(1973 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
geemoney
Scrapple
Level: 118

Posts: 413/3883
EXP: 18052623
For next: 330345

Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 19.11.03 1050.24
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1051.07
http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/ news/2003-11-18-family-guy_x.htm

Sounds cool....just a shame it took people so long to realize how funny this show was.
Promote this thread!
ThreepMe
Morcilla
Level: 55

Posts: 347/641
EXP: 1247766
For next: 66432

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 4980 days
Last activity: 4639 days
#2 Posted on 19.11.03 1121.43
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1121.59
That would soo rule...

Didn't they cancel it once after the first season, but strong viewer support convinced the network to bring it back for a 2nd and 3rd season?
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 111

Posts: 1892/3282
EXP: 14484297
For next: 384109

Since: 23.1.02
From: In a Blue State finally

Since last post: 446 days
Last activity: 248 days
#3 Posted on 19.11.03 1313.19
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1317.43
It also costs an unholy amount of money to produce each episode. Which is the only reason I can see to cancel it. Fox had a good show on their hands.

-Jag
XPacArmy
Frankfurter
Level: 61

Posts: 301/848
EXP: 1824700
For next: 51907

Since: 13.5.03
From: Woodbridge, VA

Since last post: 1630 days
Last activity: 1627 days
#4 Posted on 19.11.03 1349.15
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1349.35
    Originally posted by ThreepMe
    That would soo rule...

    Didn't they cancel it once after the first season, but strong viewer support convinced the network to bring it back for a 2nd and 3rd season?


Yea but after it was cancelled the first time (and wasn't it cancelled a 2nd time before it was brought back before the final big ax?), didn't FOX fire all the writers and bring in a whole new set? You could tell the writers had changed cause Stewie stopped trying to kill his mother and only kept talking trash to her.
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 305/3693
EXP: 16609751
For next: 201664

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 273 days
Last activity: 158 days
#5 Posted on 19.11.03 1350.05
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1350.38

That makes my nipples hard.

I think the show should be included in the Sunday night lineup should it return.
It's False
Scrapple
Level: 145

Posts: 970/6155
EXP: 36732173
For next: 871999

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 34 days
Last activity: 1 day
#6 Posted on 19.11.03 1419.16
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1419.49
Let's just hope Fox isn't stupid enough to put it on the Thursday Night Timeslot of Death again.
Mr Shh
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 175/1523
EXP: 4584120
For next: 198869

Since: 9.1.02
From: Monmouth County, NJ

Since last post: 55 days
Last activity: 55 days
#7 Posted on 19.11.03 1420.44
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1421.21
    Originally posted by XPacArmy
    You could tell the writers had changed cause Stewie stopped trying to kill his mother and only kept talking trash to her.


Well, if you listen to Seth MacFarlane, Stewie's character changed directions because the whole "world domination" thing was kinda played out. Stewie always wanted to kill Lois, all the way up to the last season. The writers started developing his character in different directions, including toying around with his sexuality. I think Seth even said that there was an episode written in which Stewie realizes he's gay.

There *are* a couple good things said in the otherwise unimpressive DVD commentary.
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 83

Posts: 373/1694
EXP: 5268623
For next: 163621

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 3291 days
Last activity: 3023 days
#8 Posted on 19.11.03 1533.00
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1533.18
Now, if I remember correctly this subject came up before not too long ago. I also remember Seth MacFarlane saying there wouldn't be any new episodes on tv, but a direct to video and DVD Family Guy movie was in the works at Fox. I wonder what's changed since then and now? This USA Today article doesn't even mention the development of the movie or have any quotes from MacFarlane, so color me a little cynical/skeptical for now.
J. Kyle
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 1086/2548
EXP: 9883868
For next: 116167

Since: 21.2.02
From: The Land of Aloha

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 54 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 19.11.03 1628.51
Reposted on: 19.11.10 1629.02
That article got one thing wrong. The ratings weren't a problem... playing "where the fuck did they schedule it?" was the problem. Even DLing (in the days BEFORE it came to Adult Swim/DVD) and watching religiously, at least 20 of the eps I saw on Cartoon Network were new to me.

That being said... THANK CHRIST. Now if only the Critic or Duckman had been cancelled shortly before the DVD era too.
Tenken347
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 295/3067
EXP: 12636058
For next: 35926

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 8 hours
#10 Posted on 19.11.03 2103.30
Reposted on: 19.11.10 2104.40
Eh, they brought back The Critic on Fox, remember? That was maybe the steepest drop-off in quality I've ever seen between seasons.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1802/3063
EXP: 12954371
For next: 136982

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 343 days
Last activity: 319 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 19.11.03 2108.28
Reposted on: 19.11.10 2109.16
    Originally posted by The Vile1
    Now, if I remember correctly this subject came up before not too long ago. I also remember Seth MacFarlane saying there wouldn't be any new episodes on tv, but a direct to video and DVD Family Guy movie was in the works at Fox. I wonder what's changed since then and now?


What's changed is that Volume II is selling even better than Volume I on DVD, so Fox is expressing interest in bringing the show back. MacFarlane never wanted to stop making episodes in the first place - Fox didn't want them anymore. And the show was too costly to realistically make a whole new season on Cartoon Network, so he had to settle for a straight-to-DVD feature.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 154

Posts: 2457/7053
EXP: 45705435
For next: 656539

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 day
#12 Posted on 19.11.03 2247.56
Reposted on: 19.11.10 2248.03

    It also costs an unholy amount of money to produce each episode. Which is the only reason I can see to cancel it. Fox had a good show on their hands.


Really? I thought animation was cheaper than your average live-action show. I know Simpsons costs a fortune, but that's because the voice actors all get paid a bunch.
geemoney
Scrapple
Level: 118

Posts: 418/3883
EXP: 18052623
For next: 330345

Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
#13 Posted on 19.11.03 2301.07
Reposted on: 19.11.10 2301.42
    Originally posted by Big Bad

      It also costs an unholy amount of money to produce each episode. Which is the only reason I can see to cancel it. Fox had a good show on their hands.


    Really? I thought animation was cheaper than your average live-action show. I know Simpsons costs a fortune, but that's because the voice actors all get paid a bunch.


According to MacFarlane in this interview- it costs nearly $1 million per episode.http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/429/ 429628p1.html
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 154

Posts: 2460/7053
EXP: 45705435
For next: 656539

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 day
#14 Posted on 20.11.03 0037.19
Reposted on: 20.11.10 0037.25
$1 million per show? That's surprising...Buffy cost roughly as much per show (at least in its early years) and they had sets to build, decent special effects, etc.
geemoney
Scrapple
Level: 118

Posts: 419/3883
EXP: 18052623
For next: 330345

Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
#15 Posted on 20.11.03 0941.27
Reposted on: 20.11.10 0942.07
By the way....the interview with MacFarlane that I mentioned is a very interesting read. It's a bit long, but worth it. I linked it on my last post.

ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Yes, A BOOZE REVIEW~!
Next thread: SNL 11/15 - Alec Baldwin
Previous thread: You can't sue me for providing a link
(1973 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Update on "When You Wish Upon A Weinstein" - The lost episode of Family Guy to air in 2 weeks? - Adult Swimming with Peter - More...
The 7 - Random - Family Guy to return?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.297 seconds.