The W
Views: 100804419
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.11.07 1029
The 7 - Basketball - NBA Realignment
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(737 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
dunkndollaz
Banger
Back to Back Survivor
Level: 96

Posts: 1000/2560
EXP: 8887427
For next: 101392

Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#1 Posted on 18.11.03 0731.22
Reposted on: 18.11.10 0732.01
The NBA Board of Governors have approved the new 6 Division Realignment that will take place when the Charlotte Bobcats join the league. Click Here (sports.espn.go.com)

New Orleans moves to the Southwest Division of the Western Conference and Minnesota looks like it gets hosed with the most divisional travel - another built in excuse for why they can't make it past the first round of the playoffs......

(and the Puck Pool King makes his 1000th overall post in the Hoops forum.......)

(edited by dunkndollaz on 18.11.03 0833)
Promote this thread!
Merc
Potato korv
Level: 54

Posts: 136/680
EXP: 1216730
For next: 17147

Since: 3.1.02
From: Brisbane, Australia

Since last post: 1321 days
Last activity: 1299 days
#2 Posted on 18.11.03 0843.44
Reposted on: 18.11.10 0843.59
From here


Under the new plan, teams will play divisional opponents four times each, conference opponents outside the division three or four times and opponents outside the conference twice each.
4 Divisional opponents = 16 Games
10 Non Divisional Conference opponents = 36 games (6x4 & 4x3)
15 Non Conference opponents = 30 games
Total 82 Games
Why not make it 4 games for ALL the teams in the conference for an 86 game season? Or even 3 each for a 76 game season? Why is 82 the magic number?

JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 763/4723
EXP: 22273854
For next: 180373

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 18.11.03 0925.40
Reposted on: 18.11.10 0929.03
    Originally posted by Merc
    Why is 82 the magic number?


Sports leagues in general seem loathe to change the number of games in a season because of the continuity of records kept.

The Northwest Division blows but I guess it gets the Sonics out of the Lakers' division.

(edited by JayJayDean on 18.11.03 0729)
TheCow
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 675/948
EXP: 2002711
For next: 94452

Since: 3.1.02
From: Knoxville, TN

Since last post: 2482 days
Last activity: 2481 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 18.11.03 1723.37
Reposted on: 18.11.10 1724.19
Dear God.

Memphis is in a division with Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and New Orleans? Who in the hell did we piss off to deserve this?

Yes, Minnesota gets hosed, but they have a shot in hell of, y'know, actually winning games in their division.
Merc
Potato korv
Level: 54

Posts: 137/680
EXP: 1216730
For next: 17147

Since: 3.1.02
From: Brisbane, Australia

Since last post: 1321 days
Last activity: 1299 days
#5 Posted on 18.11.03 1812.25
Reposted on: 18.11.10 1812.40
    Originally posted by JayJayDean
    Sports leagues in general seem loathe to change the number of games in a season because of the continuity of records kept.


So changing the number and allignment of teams and just about every rule/rule interpretation you can think of has no effect on the records? That and the fact it only became an 82 game schedule in 67-68.

JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 768/4723
EXP: 22273854
For next: 180373

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on 18.11.03 1857.15
Reposted on: 18.11.10 1857.48
    Originally posted by Merc
    So changing the number and allignment of teams and just about every rule/rule interpretation you can think of has no effect on the records? That and the fact it only became an 82 game schedule in 67-68.


Obviously there is some cause and effect there, but the number of games is the ONE thing that never seems to change. If the NBA changed to a, say 90-game schedule, over a 15-year career a player would play 120 more games with a longer schedule or about a season-and-a-half. That would significantly impact career records.

I wasn't saying it was right or wrong, I was just pointing it out.
TheCow
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 677/948
EXP: 2002711
For next: 94452

Since: 3.1.02
From: Knoxville, TN

Since last post: 2482 days
Last activity: 2481 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 18.11.03 2034.41
Reposted on: 18.11.10 2034.51
    Originally posted by Merc
    So changing the number and allignment of teams and just about every rule/rule interpretation you can think of has no effect on the records? That and the fact it only became an 82 game schedule in 67-68.


I'd say it breaks down like this: at the beginning of the season, everybody has 82 games to play, to set whatever records they want to set. They'll always play 82 games, unless the number of games changes. This is what caused the whole stir in '61 when Maris broke Ruth's HR record; that was the season where they changed from 154 games to 162.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 146

Posts: 2454/6749
EXP: 38040857
For next: 472529

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 47 min.
#8 Posted on 18.11.03 2334.59
Reposted on: 18.11.10 2339.24
The proposed Southeast division is going to be the NBA's answer to the AFC Central.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: David Aldridge: "Trade T-Mac for Kobe. Straight up."
Next thread: The Cousy auction: my winning (and losing) bids
Previous thread: Jamal Crawford. OUCH!
(737 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Opening Night - Kawshen's Proposed NBA Realignment - Possible Expansion Locations - More...
The 7 - Basketball - NBA RealignmentRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.162 seconds.