The W
Views: 99037734
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.9.07 1054
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Rep. vs. Dem. beliefs about the supernatural Register and log in to post!
(1275 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (16 total)
DMC
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 1077/1180
EXP: 2760048
For next: 109710

Since: 8.1.02
From: Modesto, CA

Since last post: 3441 days
Last activity: 3435 days
#1 Posted on 14.10.03 1237.04
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1237.04
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99945,00.html


Most interesting to me is that Democrats are more likely to believe in the reality of things such as UFOs and ghosts than Republicans. The more mainstream religion questions don't surprise me.

DMC
Promote this thread!
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 2306/4700
EXP: 21501936
For next: 334726

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1235 days
Last activity: 1032 days
#2 Posted on 14.10.03 1325.36
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1325.44
It's amzazing that so many people believe in God but so few people believe in other things considering that there is as much realistic, concrete proof of one as there is of the other.
Nag
Landjager
Level: 61

Posts: 415/904
EXP: 1776135
For next: 100472

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2143 days
Last activity: 198 days
Y!:
#3 Posted on 14.10.03 1342.16
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1343.58
Well, when a large portion of a particular group formulates their arguments on a simple phrase "It's all a conspiracy dude" I don't really find it groundbreaking information that they are more inclined to believe in UFO's. Like yeah, if I were an Alien, my destination on earth would be near an airforce base of the most advanced airforce on earth.

What I did find surprising that a quarter of the population believe in witches and over a quarter in astrology. That may be in part to growth of the wiccan/goth movement that was so popular with "Disenfranchised" teens of the late 90's. But shit, this 2003 not 1603; and while I can understand and respect societies inherent need to believe in many of the mentioned institutions and concepts, astrology and witches is a bit stretching it.
spf
Scrapple
Level: 132

Posts: 2447/5402
EXP: 27052757
For next: 79247

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 51 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
#4 Posted on 14.10.03 1401.05
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1408.52
Of course Democrats profess to more belief in UFO's...we gotta find *some* reason to explain where the hell Dubya and his people came from.

Okay, that sucked. I'm sorry. Let me try to redeem this post by saying my flaw with the questioning on witches is that many people do self-proclaim themselves to be witches these days, and perform "magick" (when you hang around the Tori Amos fan boards long enough, you learn WAY too much about these people). So I believe in "witches", but not in people who can fly broomsticks and give the evil eye to cause death or anything.
ThreepMe
2-time W of the Day!
Level: 53

Posts: 287/641
EXP: 1100542
For next: 56584

Since: 15.2.02
From: Dallas

Since last post: 3667 days
Last activity: 3326 days
#5 Posted on 14.10.03 1414.02
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1415.11
    Originally posted by spf2119
    Of course Democrats profess to more belief in UFO's...we gotta find *some* reason to explain where the hell Dubya and his people came from.

    Okay, that sucked. I'm sorry. Let me try to redeem this post by saying my flaw with the questioning on witches is that many people do self-proclaim themselves to be witches these days, and perform "magick" (when you hang around the Tori Amos fan boards long enough, you learn WAY too much about these people). So I believe in "witches", but not in people who can fly broomsticks and give the evil eye to cause death or anything.


I just ask if they weigh the same as a duck.
DMC
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 1078/1180
EXP: 2760048
For next: 109710

Since: 8.1.02
From: Modesto, CA

Since last post: 3441 days
Last activity: 3435 days
#6 Posted on 14.10.03 1508.07
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1511.36
I think spf is hitting on a possible key problem with this survey, if those really are the only questions people were asked. There should probably be more detailed questions, such as "Do you believe in the existence of 'witches,' defined as a person who has or is endowed with an ability to *actually* manipulate natural/supernatural forces?" That may give you a more accurate answer, although you may be able to assume that when someone hears the question "Do you believe in witches?" they are assuming you are referring to that type of definition, and *not* the question of whether or not there actually are people who claim to be witches today (which everyone knows, or should know, to be true).

Also, more detailed questions may violate some type of rule about keeping survey questions short and simple. ::Sigh:: No wonder I hate quantitative research.

DMC

vsp
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 1465/2042
EXP: 6286847
For next: 105952

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 2999 days
Last activity: 213 days
#7 Posted on 14.10.03 1538.06
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1538.23
The poll is one thing, but the linked page describing its results is a typical example of misleading writing.

"Fully 92% of Americans say they believe in God, 85% in heaven and 82% in miracles, according to the latest FOX News poll."

No, 92%, 85% and 82% of Americans WHO PARTICIPATED IN THIS POLL (as in, were there to take the call, didn't screen the call, picked up the phone, gave presumably honest answers and didn't hang up when they found out it was a pollster asking about religion) said that.

92% of Americans is in the hundreds of millions of people. This poll has a sample size of 900. There's just a _wee_ difference between those numbers -- the latter being small enough and skewable enough that I wouldn't exactly call it a meaningful representative sample with which to discuss how "the country thinks."

(edited by vsp on 14.10.03 1339)
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 125

Posts: 667/4719
EXP: 22089065
For next: 365162

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 18 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#8 Posted on 14.10.03 1609.12
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1609.59
I feel compelled to try to work in a snide "Do you believe Bill O'Reilly thinks HE's God?" comment, but I can't figure out a witty way to work it in.
Leroy
Boudin blanc
Level: 91

Posts: 200/2263
EXP: 7306925
For next: 162016

Since: 7.2.02

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#9 Posted on 14.10.03 1609.14
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1610.11
    Originally posted by vsp
    The poll is one thing, but the linked page describing its results is a typical example of misleading writing.

    "Fully 92% of Americans say they believe in God, 85% in heaven and 82% in miracles, according to the latest FOX News poll."


Skeptic magazine had a recent issue detailing the current trends these types of beliefs - I would consider them I much more reliable source than Fox News. I'd have to dig up the issue to see if they break it down politically or not, but they are much more based in general demographic, and less interested in ripping on Democrats (who do deserve it for better reasons than a belief in ESP and UFOs).

As a side note - I highly recommend Michel Shermer's book, "Why People Believe Weird Things". It's a great description of some of these new-agey types of beliefs, and where the logic breaks down. And, unless you are an Ayn Rand fan, it's pretty apolitical. James Randi's books are good as well

(edited by Leroy on 14.10.03 1410)
DMC
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 1079/1180
EXP: 2760048
For next: 109710

Since: 8.1.02
From: Modesto, CA

Since last post: 3441 days
Last activity: 3435 days
#10 Posted on 14.10.03 1628.51
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1629.02
The stat guys will have to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe a sample of 900 is of sufficient size to accurately represent the American population. (How feasible would a survey be if you set 100,000 respondents as your goal?)

Also, survey researchers have various ways of dealing with people who did not respond, and checking it see if their answers were significantly different from the main population which took part in the survey.

DMC
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 96

Posts: 10/2698
EXP: 8862199
For next: 126620

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 4 hours
#11 Posted on 14.10.03 1729.28
Reposted on: 14.10.10 1729.46
    Originally posted by Nag
    Well, when a large portion of a particular group formulates their arguments on a simple phrase "It's all a conspiracy dude" I don't really find it groundbreaking information that they are more inclined to believe in UFO's. Like yeah, if I were an Alien, my destination on earth would be near an airforce base of the most advanced airforce on earth.

    What I did find surprising that a quarter of the population believe in witches and over a quarter in astrology. That may be in part to growth of the wiccan/goth movement that was so popular with "Disenfranchised" teens of the late 90's. But shit, this 2003 not 1603; and while I can understand and respect societies inherent need to believe in many of the mentioned institutions and concepts, astrology and witches is a bit stretching it.


Actually, I'm surprised it isn't higher. As Girnis and others have pointed out more than a few times, we as a society don't wnat to take responsibilty for our lives and choices. Believing in the stars or witches or whatever is a way of saying "Look it wasn't my fault. It was "X". Scientific truths are not very comforting to most people. Neither is having to say that you are responsible for your own life and decisions.

edit typo

(edited by DrDirt on 14.10.03 1730)
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 1469/2104
EXP: 6572974
For next: 77716

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 30 days
Last activity: 1 day
#12 Posted on 14.10.03 2214.38
Reposted on: 14.10.10 2214.38
900 gives a +/- error rate of 4% for the nation I think. Meaning, essentially, that there is a 95% certainty that the actual number lies somewhere between 4% higher and 4% lower than the polled number.

The thing is, this assumes a perfect representation of the larger group. If Fox News called, for instance, only called Manhattan and Cobb County, GA for this poll, you'd probably see a lower instance of Democrats believing in angles and a higher instance of Republicans believing in angels than in actuality. If, on the other hand, Fox news called only Greenwich, CA and Birmingham, you'd probably get a much higher instance of Democrats believing in angels and Republicans not believing in angels. In skill to polling - why any idiot can't just call people, jot down the answers, and type a formula into a computer - lies in trying to get this representative sample. Or, of course, to skew this representative sample to make the poll come out how the client wants it to.

For more info about margin of error

Click Here (amstat.org)

It's a .pdf. How I got this great info? Typed "margin of error" into google!
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst
Level: 68

Posts: 755/1136
EXP: 2606897
For next: 121917

Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 3714 days
Last activity: 3184 days
AIM:  
#13 Posted on 15.10.03 0101.26
Reposted on: 15.10.10 0104.14
The big problem I have with polls like this is the inability to cover grey areas. Like DMC touched on, "witch" can mean a whole truckload of things to a lot of different people, as can God, magic, extra-terrestrial life, ghosts, and damn near anything that gets lumped into the category of "the unknown".

The idea that a poll like that lumps a person who believes that Casper is living in his underwear drawer together with people who believe in an afterlife and that souls can get "lost" or whatever makes it very difficult to take it seriously.
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 96

Posts: 12/2698
EXP: 8862199
For next: 126620

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 4 hours
#14 Posted on 15.10.03 0928.26
Reposted on: 15.10.10 0929.01
The numbers they got are accurate. Statistically they are valid. The problem may be with the questions, if there is a problem. If we are honest, how many of us believe in superstitions, jinxes, curses, or whatever.

If you want to take the time to understand this issue, read Carl Sagan's "Demon Haunted World." It's only a couple of hundred pages, easy to read and explains the dangers inherent in refusing to accept reality in favor of things that go bump in the night and the stars guiding your destiny.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 145

Posts: 2297/6725
EXP: 37571834
For next: 32338

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 23 hours
#15 Posted on 16.10.03 0000.04
Reposted on: 16.10.10 0000.26
Given how much we've heard in the last month about two professional sports teams having their success determined by a goat and an 85-year-old player transaction, this poll doesn't exactly surprise me.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 2313/4700
EXP: 21501936
For next: 334726

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1235 days
Last activity: 1032 days
#16 Posted on 16.10.03 0616.08
Reposted on: 16.10.10 0616.44
    Originally posted by Big Bad
    Given how much we've heard in the last month about two professional sports teams having their success determined by a goat and an 85-year-old player transaction, this poll doesn't exactly surprise me.

HA!
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Granite State/UNH Poll: Dean Lead Bigger
Next thread: It worked in California.....
Previous thread: 2004 Irony
(1275 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Rep. vs. Dem. beliefs about the supernaturalRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.234 seconds.