The W
Views: 121321418
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.2.10 2333
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Moveon.org opposes Arnold Register and log in to post!
(1561 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 83

Posts: 1399/1759
EXP: 5383054
For next: 49190

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 2174 days
Last activity: 940 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 4.10.03 1626.46
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1629.01
Article here

Wait.. wasn't this the group that was FOUNDED by defending Clinton for his various sexual harrassment/adultery charges, because that was his "personal life, and has nothing to do with being president?" But they seem ok with assaulting Arnold for similar behavior, with far less substantial evidence?

Why hasn't anyone in the media pointed this out?
Promote this thread!
eviljonhunt81
Pepperoni
Level: 68

Posts: 667/1084
EXP: 2654317
For next: 74497

Since: 6.1.02
From: not Japan

Since last post: 3846 days
Last activity: 3843 days
#2 Posted on 4.10.03 1754.34
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1755.16
    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    Why hasn't anyone in the media pointed this out?


Why would they care? Scandal sells.
kazhayashi81
Potato korv
Level: 55

Posts: 498/677
EXP: 1290758
For next: 23440

Since: 17.6.02
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Since last post: 3560 days
Last activity: 3510 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 4.10.03 1805.52
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1806.56
    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    Wait.. wasn't this the group that was FOUNDED by defending Clinton for his various sexual harrassment/adultery charges, because that was his "personal life, and has nothing to do with being president?" But they seem ok with assaulting Arnold for similar behavior, with far less substantial evidence?


Because Arnold has that scary R next to his name.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 1697/3062
EXP: 12473589
For next: 198395

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 15 days
Last activity: 11 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on 4.10.03 2037.03
Reposted on: 4.10.10 2040.55
Well, I don't want to get into this conversation again, but the whole Clinton fiasco centered around a consentual sex act that, by all accounts, was initiated by Monica Lewinski. These stories are, well, little different.

But, you know what - I really don't care that much about the sex stuff either, but I sure as hell think the people who felt that Bill Clinton cheating on his wife was the most horrible thing in the history of time and was spiraling this country into a sinful babylon of moral degredation sure as fuck should care. But I guess it was just that scary D after Bill Clinton's name.

(Oh, and is Maria Shriver a lesbian who's only staying alongside Arnold to further her own media career, or is that another meaningless double standard here?)
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 66

Posts: 939/1008
EXP: 2342947
For next: 118917

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 4764 days
Last activity: 4732 days
#5 Posted on 5.10.03 1214.58
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1214.58
I'm surprised no one in the media--and I'll admit I'm right-wing but I think all sides would find this interesting/ironic/poetic, etc. etc. A lot of the flack and attacks from Arnold come from Pumping Iron. So one could say if he doesn't get in office that Pumping Iron hurt him, and ruined his public image and the like. The great, huge irony is that Pumping Iron is what started Arnold's Hollywood career, as he came of VERY charismatic and in a movie about multiple body builders came out to be the chief star. The movie wasn't about just him, it was about bodybuilding in general (and actually the movie did a lot of good for the sport and weight lifters), but if it wasn't for Pumping Iron, Arnold would never have gotten to Hollywood in the same fashion, and also wouldn't have given his enemies ammunition to blast him with. Double-edged sword indeed.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 156

Posts: 2934/7534
EXP: 47753778
For next: 735950

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 1338 days
Last activity: 1338 days
#6 Posted on 5.10.03 1724.25
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1725.20
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    >(Oh, and is Maria Shriver a lesbian who's only staying alongside Arnold to further her own media career, or is that another meaningless double standard here?)







She is a Kennedy woman, so its a family tradition.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 2259/4700
EXP: 23558488
For next: 168143

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2128 days
Last activity: 582 days
#7 Posted on 6.10.03 0604.50
Reposted on: 6.10.10 0608.04
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Well, I don't want to get into this conversation again, but the whole Clinton fiasco centered around a consentual sex act that, by all accounts, was initiated by Monica Lewinski.

Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick will argue that point...
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 79

Posts: 879/1528
EXP: 4443798
For next: 135689

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 3688 days
Last activity: 3531 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 6.10.03 1158.09
Reposted on: 6.10.10 1158.31
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Well, I don't want to get into this conversation again, but the whole Clinton fiasco centered around a consentual sex act that, by all accounts, was initiated by Monica Lewinski. These stories are, well, little different.

    But, you know what - I really don't care that much about the sex stuff either, but I sure as hell think the people who felt that Bill Clinton cheating on his wife was the most horrible thing in the history of time and was spiraling this country into a sinful babylon of moral degredation sure as fuck should care. But I guess it was just that scary D after Bill Clinton's name.

    (Oh, and is Maria Shriver a lesbian who's only staying alongside Arnold to further her own media career, or is that another meaningless double standard here?)


Clinton was the President of the United States or Governor of Arkansas at the time of his alleged misconducts. Arnold was... a bodybuilder and an actor.

As for your Shriver comment, Arnold hasn't admitted to anything while being married to her. The group sex, etc., occurred during his rowdy youth.

And lastly, there's no proof, here. Just a bunch of unnamed sources and allegations from a media that's dying to bury Schwarzenegger. There's no jizz-stained dress, there are no state troopers who arranged sex for Arnold. We can name all of Clinton's accusers. The only Arnold accuser I can name is Peter Jennings.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 2274/4700
EXP: 23558488
For next: 168143

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2128 days
Last activity: 582 days
#9 Posted on 7.10.03 0714.43
Reposted on: 7.10.10 0714.56
Incidentally, LA Weekly has accused the LA Times of giving Davis an illegal donation thanks to their coverage, which is an interesting argument.
godking
Chourico
Level: 37

Posts: 225/274
EXP: 328443
For next: 9813

Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 4764 days
Last activity: 4709 days
#10 Posted on 7.10.03 1508.24
Reposted on: 7.10.10 1514.22
Grimis:

Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick will argue that point...

Both were investigated and both were found to be rather impressively full of shit. It's not like serious lefties actually bother bringing up whatsername in Texas who claimed George Bush raped her, because she's pretty obviously full of it too.

Palpatine:

Clinton was the President of the United States or Governor of Arkansas at the time of his alleged misconducts. Arnold was... a bodybuilder and an actor.

Oh, don't try to pull that. Arnold is the frontrunner for the leadership of the largest and richest state in the entire union. If Clinton fucking around is bad, Arnold groping around is bad. It's one or the other.
Michrome
Head cheese
Level: 40

Posts: 253/330
EXP: 431040
For next: 10273

Since: 2.1.03

Since last post: 4691 days
Last activity: 3757 days
#11 Posted on 7.10.03 1827.32
Reposted on: 7.10.10 1827.59

    Both were investigated and both were found to be rather impressively full of shit.


This is utter horseshit, they looked for ways to discredit broderick and couldn't find a thing. Every single person she told the story to repeated the exact same thing, her story has been airtight since she put it out. And when it comes to Paula Jones, how much did the Clintons end up paying her again?

And what about Kathleen Willy?

I love how everyone still pretends it was all about sex, as if perjury and obstruction of justice never happened.
DMC
Liverwurst
Level: 70

Posts: 1073/1180
EXP: 3014031
For next: 1795

Since: 8.1.02
From: Modesto, CA

Since last post: 4334 days
Last activity: 4328 days
#12 Posted on 7.10.03 1936.16
Reposted on: 7.10.10 1936.54
I think the stuff that has been coming out on Davis is rather interesting. I haven't dug into any of it yet, but it says that he's basically a maniac who can't control his emotions. He bursts out in angry tirades of obscenities for virtually no reason. McClintock himself said last night on Fox News that he has seen Davis act like this.

Hopefully none of this crap will matter after the votes are in.

DMC

godking
Chourico
Level: 37

Posts: 226/274
EXP: 328443
For next: 9813

Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 4764 days
Last activity: 4709 days
#13 Posted on 7.10.03 2305.58
Reposted on: 7.10.10 2306.23
This is utter horseshit, they looked for ways to discredit broderick and couldn't find a thing.

That's because there was nothing worth mentioning to discredit. Juanita Broaddrick swore in an affadavit in 1992 that Bill Clinton didn't rape her and reaffirmed that in 1994 during the initial Paula Jones flurry. NBC News interviewed her and then declined to run the interview - this at the same time as they ran interviews of Katherine Willey, whose testimonies had already been discredited by the FBI. (I mention this last as a rebuttal in advance for the inevitable "liberal media" comment.)

Bear in mind that the Wall Street Journal's news division - which has the highest standards in the business - refused to touch the Broaddrick case, saying it lacked "credibility."

Which was why the WSJ's opinion section, with no standards worth mentioning, had to trumpet it.
spf
Scrapple
Level: 136

Posts: 2441/5410
EXP: 29604690
For next: 492302

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 484 days
Last activity: 33 days
AIM:  
#14 Posted on 8.10.03 1202.09
Reposted on: 8.10.10 1203.50
I did see some coverage last night which talked about the whole Arnie groping and how women were supporting him anyway thing, and I kind of thought it was serendipitous. In a race where both parties showed absolute pragmatism (Cruz throwing Davis overboard, the GOP latching onto ANYONE who could get them back in power, even if he's a social liberal and morally bankrupt seemingly) it seems fitting that a PAC would be just as blind to the flaws of their allies. The whole thing just reeked of dirtiness and getting in bed with your enemies.
DMC
Liverwurst
Level: 70

Posts: 1074/1180
EXP: 3014031
For next: 1795

Since: 8.1.02
From: Modesto, CA

Since last post: 4334 days
Last activity: 4328 days
#15 Posted on 8.10.03 1749.20
Reposted on: 8.10.10 1749.21
I agree with SPF, but I think for the social conservative base of the party this is an exception to the rule situation. Normally there is no way the base would give a candidate like Arnold any support. But he IS "Arnold," and it WAS a chance to get Davis out of office. However, I said this last night to my family: If Arnold does anything screwy or seemingly goes out of his way to strongly support some type of liberal social agenda, I and many other social conservatives will turn our back on him and even the whole Republican party in CA. I won't have any trouble with "throwing away" my vote to someone like McClintock or a third party next time if it's Arnold's head on the chopper and he's not understanding the party he says he's a part of.

It sure is an interesting time for Republicans. Let's see what direction they take.

DMC
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: I guess this is good-bye...
Next thread: 100% of precincts reporting
Previous thread: Arnold Supporters
(1561 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: New CA Field Poll - Sources: Bustamante to Drop Out(?) - California Recall Prediction Thread - More...
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Moveon.org opposes ArnoldRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.267 seconds.