The W
Views: 98547379
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.8.07 1542
The 7 - Baseball - Honest Opinions
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(703 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (26 total)
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 499/1857
EXP: 5329623
For next: 102621

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 464 days
Last activity: 19 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 4.10.03 0157.26
Reposted on: 4.10.10 0157.42
Do the Red Sox have a chance? I have to say that I think they do. Derek Lowe has a real good shot at being the MVP of this series if he can win Saturday and then come in relief in Game 5. What I'd do is have John Burkett start Game 4 but have Tim Wakefield or Bronson Arroyo warming up in the bullpen with him. It's one thing to show confidence in Burkett by starting him in a must-win situation; it's quite another to throw him out there with no safety net. If he gets through the first few innings OK, he'll be fine for the rest of his outing. Then Wakefield, Arroyo and Lowe can be relief men for Pedro in Game 5. It's a long shot, but I think the Red Sox can do it. Opinions, comments?
Promote this thread!
pieman
As young as
he feels
Level: 111

Posts: 1105/3561
EXP: 14482727
For next: 385679

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 4.10.03 0654.15
Reposted on: 4.10.10 0654.32
Sure they have a chance. That's why they play the games. But realistically, the chances of the Sox winning three straight from the A's would have to be somewhere around 10%. But hey, it's not 0% until the A's have won three games and they've shown before they can lose decisive games!
Simba
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 622/809
EXP: 1527414
For next: 50141

Since: 7.8.02
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 2451 days
Last activity: 2059 days
#3 Posted on 4.10.03 1122.26
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1124.07
Or in a worse case scenario, Derek Lowe could take 2 losses in a 3-game series. I think the Sox can do it, but they can't let Oakland score the first run of the game tonight. That could totally deflate them.
Jakegnosis
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 524/645
EXP: 1088772
For next: 68354

Since: 26.7.02
From: Maine

Since last post: 2807 days
Last activity: 2791 days
#4 Posted on 4.10.03 1308.17
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1308.33
I think the Sox have a decent chance. D-Lowe kicks ass at Fenway, and the team plays well under the axe. Besides, after two uninspiring games, the bats have to start heating up sometime.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 145

Posts: 2225/6719
EXP: 37441444
For next: 162728

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 2 days
#5 Posted on 4.10.03 1401.30
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1401.34
I'd have to vote no, not because the BoSox lost the first two games, but how they lost them. That game 1 loss was just soul-sucking, and you could tell from how they performed in game 2. If Boston has their heads back on straight, they might have a shot, but I don't think that they have the pitching or the managing to get back into this series. A's in four at most.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 2931/7534
EXP: 43477112
For next: 824650

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 425 days
Last activity: 425 days
#6 Posted on 4.10.03 1827.45
Reposted on: 4.10.10 1829.02
All I ask for at this point is to get to the bottom of the 1st inning of Game 4 down less than 2-0. If they can avoid a Burkett first inning calamity, I think they can beat Hudson on 3 days, and I'll take my chances with Pedro in a Game 5 against Zito on 3 days rest.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 500/1857
EXP: 5329623
For next: 102621

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 464 days
Last activity: 19 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 4.10.03 2308.29
Reposted on: 4.10.10 2308.53
After the way we won this game, I can't see the A's rebounding to win Game 4. That having been said, Pedro on regular rest vs. Barry Zito on short rest, advantage Red Sox.

EDIT: My 500th post? Why do I still feel like a drifting moron who doesn't say anything of consequence?

(edited by gugs on 6.10.03 0220)
darkdragoon
Bockwurst
Level: 49

Posts: 422/537
EXP: 824204
For next: 59685

Since: 26.8.02

Since last post: 3642 days
Last activity: 3642 days
#8 Posted on 4.10.03 2336.15
Reposted on: 4.10.10 2337.57
sure, the A's seem to be falling into their usual pattern and the Sox CAN pull it out...

what was the thing with Kim, BTW, did he flip somebody off or something?
Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 1562/2805
EXP: 10096470
For next: 257962

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3536 days
Last activity: 1955 days
#9 Posted on 5.10.03 0234.04
Reposted on: 5.10.10 0237.40
With the umpires doing their best to take away runs from THe A's at any opportunity. There's no stopping the Red Sox... The Red Sox third baseman obstructed Tejada on his way home, was signaled as such but then Tajada still allowed to get tagged?

A's made 3 errors in one inning. That's like 6 outs for Boston and they still only mustard 1 run.

Oakland should have but Boston away tonight. Everything went BoSox way tonight.
The King of Keith
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 669/1572
EXP: 4095053
For next: 96095

Since: 4.11.02
From: Winchester, VA

Since last post: 260 days
Last activity: 219 days
AIM:  
#10 Posted on 5.10.03 0329.31
Reposted on: 5.10.10 0329.50
That was one of the sorriest innings of baseball I've ever seen. But, since it helped out the sleeper Sox, I have to cheer for it. Still, come on! 3 errors in one inning!
J.T. Dutch
Pickled pork
Level: 32

Posts: 145/197
EXP: 187991
For next: 18453

Since: 3.1.02
From: SoCal 4 Life

Since last post: 2618 days
Last activity: 879 days
Y!:
#11 Posted on 5.10.03 0422.15
Reposted on: 5.10.10 0425.50
... And it turns out that the Red Sox bullpen, Mike Timlin in particular, had a BIG hand in the Game 3 victory.

Surprise, surprise.
skorpio17
Morcilla
Level: 52

Posts: 421/618
EXP: 1022912
For next: 60936

Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 2355 days
Last activity: 2355 days
#12 Posted on 5.10.03 0816.11
Reposted on: 5.10.10 0817.00
    Originally posted by Net Hack Slasher
    With the umpires doing their best to take away runs from THe A's at any opportunity. There's no stopping the Red Sox... The Red Sox third baseman obstructed Tejada on his way home, was signaled as such but then Tajada still allowed to get tagged?

    A's made 3 errors in one inning. That's like 6 outs for Boston and they still only mustard 1 run.

    Oakland should have but Boston away tonight. Everything went BoSox way tonight.


Note to A's Baserunners: In order to score a run, you have to touch home plate.

In the second inning call when the A's 3rd baseman obstructed the Red Sox runner from getting to 3rd base, they should've just awarded the Sox just that 3rd base and not home plate as well. That run was a gift.

In the 6th, Byrnes collided with Varitek, catchers are allowed to obstruct the basepath. Yet Byrnes knocked the ball loose and never touched home. He instead chose to push Varitek and limp back to the dugout...cost them a run.

Again, when Tejada collided with the Mueller, the collision wasn't that serious and may not have been intentional. Tejada chose to stop running in between 3rd and home and argue with the umpires and point fingers. If he had continued the play, he would have scored anyway. He wanted to argue with the umps to give him a run instead of trying to score himself. Cost himself a run. Whatever happened to running the bases?

BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 141/1096
EXP: 2367724
For next: 94140

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 97 days
Last activity: 58 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#13 Posted on 5.10.03 1052.50
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1054.16
    Originally posted by skorpio17


    Note to A's Baserunners: In order to score a run, you have to touch home plate.



Somehow, that fact got lost on them.

    In the second inning call when the A's 3rd baseman obstructed the Red Sox runner from getting to 3rd base, they should've just awarded the Sox just that 3rd base and not home plate as well. That run was a gift.

You could argue that. I believe the rule is that if the runner is interfered with in a rundown like that, he gets awarded the next base. I could be wrong on that one though.



    In the 6th, Byrnes collided with Varitek, catchers are allowed to obstruct the basepath. Yet Byrnes knocked the ball loose and never touched home. He instead chose to push Varitek and limp back to the dugout...cost them a run.

And when Byrnes pusked Tek, he should've been automatically out and the A's runners would'nt have advanced. Instead they got the out but the runners got to 2nd and 3rd. The next batter was walked then the next batter after got the hit that started the Tejada incident.



    Again, when Tejada collided with the Mueller, the collision wasn't that serious and may not have been intentional. Tejada chose to stop running in between 3rd and home and argue with the umpires and point fingers. If he had continued the play, he would have scored anyway. He wanted to argue with the umps to give him a run instead of trying to score himself. Cost himself a run. Whatever happened to running the bases?



The judgement was that Mueller was going to cover 3rd for a possible force-out. The fielder also has the right to go over to cover the base for a possible play. And yes, Tejada should've kept running.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 2932/7534
EXP: 43477112
For next: 824650

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 425 days
Last activity: 425 days
#14 Posted on 5.10.03 1105.04
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1105.13
    Originally posted by darkdragoon
    sure, the A's seem to be falling into their usual pattern and the Sox CAN pull it out...

    what was the thing with Kim, BTW, did he flip somebody off or something?







Crowd boo'ed Kim during the introductions (much as they did to the bullpen at the home opener in April. My, nothing has changed), and he pulled a Blackjack McDowell and flipped off the crowd. For some reason, I don't believe Kim will still be in Boston come spring training.
BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 142/1096
EXP: 2367724
For next: 94140

Since: 2.1.03
From: MA

Since last post: 97 days
Last activity: 58 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#15 Posted on 5.10.03 1113.38
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1113.39
    Originally posted by redsoxnation
      Originally posted by darkdragoon
      sure, the A's seem to be falling into their usual pattern and the Sox CAN pull it out...

      what was the thing with Kim, BTW, did he flip somebody off or something?







    Crowd boo'ed Kim during the introductions (much as they did to the bullpen at the home opener in April. My, nothing has changed), and he pulled a Blackjack McDowell and flipped off the crowd. For some reason, I don't believe Kim will still be in Boston come spring training.


I doubt Theo will ship him out because of that. Kim just needs to develop his control more. He does have some good stuff when he's on, plus he is only 24 years old. I think next year he should go into the starting rotation and let Williamson be the closer.
BigVitoMark
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 433/1509
EXP: 3889843
For next: 116236

Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada

Since last post: 3324 days
Last activity: 3233 days
ICQ:  
#16 Posted on 5.10.03 1114.41
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1114.42
    Originally posted by gugs
    After the way we won this game, I can't see the A's rebounding to win Game 4. That having been said, Pedro on regular rest vs. Barry Zito on short rest, advantage Red Sox.


Barry Zito is only on about 12 hours less rest than Pedro, will be at home, and didn't have to throw 130 pitches in his last start. The A's have the advantage there BUT if it does get back to a game five, the Sox have all the momentum, I think that's the only advantage they have. And until the A's win 3, I'm not taking anything...it's only been two short years since my boys gave the Yankees the LDS right back after winning the first 2.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 502/1857
EXP: 5329623
For next: 102621

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 464 days
Last activity: 19 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#17 Posted on 5.10.03 1530.42
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1531.15
Let me say this: Pedro is Pedro. Has there ever been a playoff game, or any absolute must-have game where we've sent out Pedro to do anything and he hasn't? Meanwhile, the A's have three straight years of failure in this exact situation hanging over them. Even though it's in Oakland, I think the Sox will pull this one out.
Jakegnosis
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 527/645
EXP: 1088772
For next: 68354

Since: 26.7.02
From: Maine

Since last post: 2807 days
Last activity: 2791 days
#18 Posted on 5.10.03 1537.26
Reposted on: 5.10.10 1537.42
Thank you, David Ortiz. Thank you, Johnny Damon. Thank you, Todd Walker. Thank you, Scott Williamson. Thank you, John Burkett(!). Thank you, Boston Red Sox.

I'll take Pedro over Zito any day, and our bats over Oakland's. I'm looking for a Sox/Yankees AL Championship.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 505/1857
EXP: 5329623
For next: 102621

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 464 days
Last activity: 19 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#19 Posted on 6.10.03 0119.05
Reposted on: 6.10.10 0119.44
    Originally posted by Jakegnosis
    Thank you, David Ortiz. Thank you, Johnny Damon. Thank you, Todd Walker. Thank you, Scott Williamson. Thank you, John Burkett(!). Thank you, Boston Red Sox.

    I'll take Pedro over Zito any day, and our bats over Oakland's. I'm looking for a Sox/Yankees AL Championship.


Thank you Nomar Garciaparra for the wallball hit. Thank you Manny Ramirez for the 2-out hit. Thank you Mike Cubbage for not sending Nomar. Thank you to the entire Red Sox bullpen (and Tim Wakefield but not Derek Lowe) for 9 2/3 scoreless innings (except Derek Lowe). Big ups to John Burkett for giving us what we needed: at least five innings, keeping us in the game. This is gonna be nuts. Everybody except Burkett and maybe Wakefield is available tomorrow, Wakefield or Lowe can start Game 1 of the ALCS, the other in Game 2, Pedro in Game 3, then Burkett for Game 4 and we're rolling!
darkdragoon
Bockwurst
Level: 49

Posts: 425/537
EXP: 824204
For next: 59685

Since: 26.8.02

Since last post: 3642 days
Last activity: 3642 days
#20 Posted on 6.10.03 0205.19
Reposted on: 6.10.10 0206.26
    Originally posted by redsoxnation
      Originally posted by darkdragoon
      sure, the A's seem to be falling into their usual pattern and the Sox CAN pull it out...

      what was the thing with Kim, BTW, did he flip somebody off or something?







    Crowd boo'ed Kim during the introductions (much as they did to the bullpen at the home opener in April. My, nothing has changed), and he pulled a Blackjack McDowell and flipped off the crowd. For some reason, I don't believe Kim will still be in Boston come spring training.


Hey, they wanted him to show more emotion...and yeah i think he'll still in the "let some other team develop him" dept. Depending on if Villareal's arm falls off etc., we probably should not have dealt him so quickly...
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Fantasy Baseball #10: Year-End Awards
Next thread: next year: Here
Previous thread: Giants reeled in by Fish!
(703 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Oh, God - Red Sox playoff roster - Burkett or Suppan? - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Honest OpinionsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.209 seconds.