|User||Post (4 total)|
For next: 319406
From: Seattle, WA
Since last post: 570 days
Last activity: 148 days
|AIM: || |
|Y!: ||#1 Posted on 18.2.02 0955.07 |
Reposted on: 18.2.09 0959.06
| Thanks to the Seattle Supersonics! Yeah!
No Vin Baker = Sonics wins. I think I may try to run over Vin Baker if I see him.
|Promote this thread!|| |
For next: 36229
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 1 hour
|#2 Posted on 19.2.02 1315.38 |
Reposted on: 19.2.09 1329.01
| I'm assuming you mean no all time best home record for the Kings now? Because this season they still have the best home record by a good number. |
For next: 12243
From: Dover, NH
Since last post: 905 days
Last activity: 537 days
|AIM: || ||#3 Posted on 19.2.02 1319.40 |
Reposted on: 19.2.09 1329.03
| True, but 27-2 is still a damn fine home record.|
But, as a fan on the '86 Celtics, I am glad that the Kings didn't do it. Just the same way Dolphins fans are glad when the last undefeated football team loses.
For next: 37871
Since last post: 4209 days
Last activity: 2597 days
|#4 Posted on 19.2.02 1436.32 |
Reposted on: 19.2.09 1459.02
| But, as a fan on the '86 Celtics, I am glad that the Kings didn't do it.|
40-1 at home...not to shabby. I still say that's the best team of all time. I'm sure the LA and Chicago fans have some beef with that remark, but I stand by it!
|ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
|The 7 - Basketball - No best home record for Kings||Register and log in to post!|
The W message board - 7 year recycle
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.222 seconds.