The W
Views: 97644306
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.7.07 1509
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Update on the Galloway scandal
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1577 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
godking
Chourico
Level: 36

Posts: 116/274
EXP: 297229
For next: 10884

Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 3814 days
Last activity: 3760 days
#1 Posted on 19.5.03 1638.42
Reposted on: 19.5.10 1640.40
Click here

Short summary for those not inclined to click: the documents that indicated that Labor MP George Galloway was taking bribes from Saddam Hussein have been proven to be pretty blatant forgeries - multiple misspellings of crucial official names (including Saddam's son Qusay) and Galloway's signature bears no resemblance to his real signature.

Ironically, under British libel laws, Galloway stands to get a shitload of money out of this when he sues the British and American papers who dubbed him a traitor.
Promote this thread!
Whitebacon
Boudin blanc
Level: 94

Posts: 445/2466
EXP: 8283776
For next: 72912

Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 69 days
Last activity: 16 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#2 Posted on 19.5.03 1649.39
Reposted on: 19.5.10 1650.28
I don't mean to sound like a dick or a troll, this is a legitimate question. How exactly would the British libel laws apply to the American papers?
godking
Chourico
Level: 36

Posts: 117/274
EXP: 297229
For next: 10884

Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 3814 days
Last activity: 3760 days
#3 Posted on 19.5.03 1652.45
Reposted on: 19.5.10 1653.18
Because the American papers distribute and sell their product in Britain. Same as any other business, really.
Whitebacon
Boudin blanc
Level: 94

Posts: 446/2466
EXP: 8283776
For next: 72912

Since: 12.1.02
From: Fresno, CA

Since last post: 69 days
Last activity: 16 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#4 Posted on 19.5.03 2039.08
Reposted on: 19.5.10 2040.29
I see, makes more sense now.
A-MOL
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 481/777
EXP: 1438533
For next: 47404

Since: 26.6.02
From: York, England

Since last post: 3783 days
Last activity: 3725 days
#5 Posted on 20.5.03 0558.33
Reposted on: 20.5.10 0559.01
The whole newspaper industry over has a real problem in that they are forgetting to use words like 'alleged' and presume guilt. At the moment, a lot of papers are going to be out of pocket thanks to the Galloway allegations and the case of John Leslie - a TV presenter accused of rape who has just been told he will face no charges. This follows a case two years ago when a trial of two footballers collapsed due to a newspaper printing a story accusing the 'attackers' of racist intent in the assault. The problem is also extending to our politicians, with the Home Secretary, David Blunkett in potential trouble over the trail of a 'terrorist cell'. The day of the arrest, he appeared on radio and basically said that these mean were definitely Al-Qaeda and now they may escape trail due to the prejudiced nature of his comments.

I would like a few cases of this nature to make the media pay attention to this so that justice can be delivered by the courts and not the opinion of a few editors and/or a old Aussie racist.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 211

Posts: 2259/16100
EXP: 138702029
For next: 29837

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on 20.5.03 0724.01
Reposted on: 20.5.10 0725.07
I don't think I'm going out on a limb by saying "barely anybody outside the UK sees this story on their radar...especially anybody on this board."

Still, there was this from the Christian Science Monitor:

The Mail said its investigation "cast serious doubts" over the Monitor's April 25 report that it had official Iraqi documents authorizing more than $10 million in payments to Mr. Galloway between 1992 and 2003.

...

The Mail has apparently purchased a different set of documents from the ones used in the Monitor story. The Monitor documents do not contain Galloway's signature. The Monitor did not pay for any of the Iraqi documents in its possession, nor was any payment ever discussed. The Monitor is continuing to examine the documents and has found nothing yet to cast doubt on their authenticity.


http://search.csmonitor.com/search_content/0516/p06s02-wogn.html

Of course, they want me to pay to look up their 25 April story, and I'm too cheap to do THAT.

Not that I'd ever stick up for the Christian Science Monitor, either...I'm just throwing this out there.

EDIT: Hey, I found a free copy of that story anyway - go me! Click Here (csmonitor.com)

(edited by CRZ on 20.5.03 0527)
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Saudi Arabia KNEW! And they did NOTHING!
Next thread: Wag the Dog II: "Ok, Jessica, you're motivation is you are a hurt POW...
Previous thread: Fun with electronic voting machines
(1577 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Update on the Galloway scandalRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.196 seconds.