The W
Views: 118519351
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
9.12.09 2123
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - US troops in Iraq authorized to shoot looters
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1847 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
godking
Chourico
Level: 37

Posts: 109/274
EXP: 325925
For next: 12331

Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 4684 days
Last activity: 4629 days
#1 Posted on 14.5.03 1308.11
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1308.13
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/14/international/worldspecial/14IRAQ.html

United States military forces in Iraq will have the authority to shoot looters on sight under a tough new security setup that will include hiring more police officers and banning ranking members of the Baath Party from public service, American officials said today.

I'm not going to get into the moral aspect of shooting looters in Iraq one way or another - I just can't help but think this is a very, very bad decision. A large percentage of the Iraqi public already views the American troops as an occupation force - if they turn hostile, things could get very, very ugly, both in Iraq and elsewhere.
Promote this thread!
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 93

Posts: 1368/2241
EXP: 7821205
For next: 231635

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 2208 days
Last activity: 1116 days
#2 Posted on 14.5.03 1324.09
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1329.02
The first woman or child looter that they pop is gonna escalate into a riot.

We need to get the hell out of there.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 83

Posts: 1251/1759
EXP: 5342413
For next: 89831

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 2094 days
Last activity: 860 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 14.5.03 1421.33
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1421.39
I dont have a link, but I heard a report on the radio this morning that said that the NYtimes story was totally exaggerated.

I am beginning to think people like "an official" and "inside" or "Unnamed sources" are getting to be about as credible as "Many Backstage." Not a single quote in that entire article was credited to a NAMED person.

According to what I heard, they DO have the authority to shoot if the situation demands it (same as domestic police officers!) but they are NOT to shoot to kill.

Aw, hell- we all know the NY Times makes up most of its stories anyway....

And while I agree that we do need to leave Iraq- that time is far from now. If we up and left that country now, choas would result. The Kurds may vie for an independant state, bringing in Turkey. Iran may attempt a power play. Hell- Saddaams old friends may try to resieze power.

Leaving now would be completely irresponsible and wrong. When the new Iraqi government is on its feet and firmly in control, THEN we leave.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 1467/4700
EXP: 23381343
For next: 345288

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2048 days
Last activity: 502 days
#4 Posted on 14.5.03 1423.08
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1423.53

    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    I dont have a link, but I heard a report on the radio this morning that said that the NYtimes story was totally exaggerated.

SHOCK! GASP! From the reputable paper that allowed Jayson Blair on their staff?!?! I am SHOCKED!!!!! (/dripping sarcasm)
Bizzle Izzle
Bockwurst
Level: 51

Posts: 397/564
EXP: 973316
For next: 40629

Since: 26.6.02
From: New Jersey, USA

Since last post: 262 days
Last activity: 262 days
#5 Posted on 14.5.03 1500.20
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1500.29
We roll into Iraq, chaos rules the day in Bahgdad, the poor museums and hospitals get looted and the leftists pin 100% of the blame on our troops and say we should have done something.

Now, reports come in that say our troops have been given clearance to actually do something about the looting and you lefties say it's a bad idea.

I just don't get it. What the hell do you guys want?
messenoir
Summer sausage
Level: 46

Posts: 70/449
EXP: 699530
For next: 12249

Since: 20.2.02
From: Columbia, MO

Since last post: 1324 days
Last activity: 1191 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 14.5.03 1541.51
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1545.17
Well, never to have attacked in the first place and created this mess.

But since we're there, how about working with the UN to get more troops and peacekeepers there, so our soldiers aren't overworked, on edge, and likely to shoot anyone they imagine is threatening?

I opposed the war because I oppose violence and oppose killing in all forms. And I completely oppose the idea of killing to stop killing.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 222

Posts: 2228/17003
EXP: 164113952
For next: 1488858

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 14.5.03 2034.16
Reposted on: 14.5.10 2034.42

    Originally posted by Grimis

      Originally posted by Pool-Boy
      I dont have a link, but I heard a report on the radio this morning that said that the NYtimes story was totally exaggerated.

    SHOCK! GASP! From the reputable paper that allowed Jayson Blair on their staff?!?! I am SHOCKED!!!!! (/dripping sarcasm)

Let's try to refrain, shall we.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Gephardt: 16 % representative
Next thread: so, what DID the white house know about 9/11 before it happened?
Previous thread: Man, I can't figure out Iran.
(1847 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - US troops in Iraq authorized to shoot lootersRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.341 seconds.