The W
Views: 132069974
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.4.11 1436
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - US troops in Iraq authorized to shoot looters
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1944 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
godking
Chourico
Level: 38

Posts: 109/274
EXP: 341329
For next: 29121

Since: 20.10.02
From: Toronto

Since last post: 5183 days
Last activity: 5129 days
#1 Posted on 14.5.03 1308.11
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1308.13
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/14/international/worldspecial/14IRAQ.html

United States military forces in Iraq will have the authority to shoot looters on sight under a tough new security setup that will include hiring more police officers and banning ranking members of the Baath Party from public service, American officials said today.

I'm not going to get into the moral aspect of shooting looters in Iraq one way or another - I just can't help but think this is a very, very bad decision. A large percentage of the Iraqi public already views the American troops as an occupation force - if they turn hostile, things could get very, very ugly, both in Iraq and elsewhere.
Promote this thread!
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 94

Posts: 1368/2241
EXP: 8172811
For next: 183877

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 2707 days
Last activity: 1615 days
#2 Posted on 14.5.03 1324.09
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1329.02
The first woman or child looter that they pop is gonna escalate into a riot.

We need to get the hell out of there.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 84

Posts: 1251/1759
EXP: 5591141
For next: 70835

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 2594 days
Last activity: 13 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 14.5.03 1421.33
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1421.39
I dont have a link, but I heard a report on the radio this morning that said that the NYtimes story was totally exaggerated.

I am beginning to think people like "an official" and "inside" or "Unnamed sources" are getting to be about as credible as "Many Backstage." Not a single quote in that entire article was credited to a NAMED person.

According to what I heard, they DO have the authority to shoot if the situation demands it (same as domestic police officers!) but they are NOT to shoot to kill.

Aw, hell- we all know the NY Times makes up most of its stories anyway....

And while I agree that we do need to leave Iraq- that time is far from now. If we up and left that country now, choas would result. The Kurds may vie for an independant state, bringing in Turkey. Iran may attempt a power play. Hell- Saddaams old friends may try to resieze power.

Leaving now would be completely irresponsible and wrong. When the new Iraqi government is on its feet and firmly in control, THEN we leave.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 129

Posts: 1467/4700
EXP: 24465588
For next: 584133

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 2547 days
Last activity: 1002 days
#4 Posted on 14.5.03 1423.08
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1423.53

    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    I dont have a link, but I heard a report on the radio this morning that said that the NYtimes story was totally exaggerated.

SHOCK! GASP! From the reputable paper that allowed Jayson Blair on their staff?!?! I am SHOCKED!!!!! (/dripping sarcasm)
Bizzle Izzle
Bockwurst
Level: 52

Posts: 397/564
EXP: 1018326
For next: 65522

Since: 26.6.02
From: New Jersey, USA

Since last post: 762 days
Last activity: 762 days
#5 Posted on 14.5.03 1500.20
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1500.29
We roll into Iraq, chaos rules the day in Bahgdad, the poor museums and hospitals get looted and the leftists pin 100% of the blame on our troops and say we should have done something.

Now, reports come in that say our troops have been given clearance to actually do something about the looting and you lefties say it's a bad idea.

I just don't get it. What the hell do you guys want?
messenoir
Summer sausage
Level: 47

Posts: 70/449
EXP: 731145
For next: 35064

Since: 20.2.02
From: Columbia, MO

Since last post: 1824 days
Last activity: 1690 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 14.5.03 1541.51
Reposted on: 14.5.10 1545.17
Well, never to have attacked in the first place and created this mess.

But since we're there, how about working with the UN to get more troops and peacekeepers there, so our soldiers aren't overworked, on edge, and likely to shoot anyone they imagine is threatening?

I opposed the war because I oppose violence and oppose killing in all forms. And I completely oppose the idea of killing to stop killing.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 226

Posts: 2228/17255
EXP: 175259238
For next: 975359

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 14.5.03 2034.16
Reposted on: 14.5.10 2034.42

    Originally posted by Grimis

      Originally posted by Pool-Boy
      I dont have a link, but I heard a report on the radio this morning that said that the NYtimes story was totally exaggerated.

    SHOCK! GASP! From the reputable paper that allowed Jayson Blair on their staff?!?! I am SHOCKED!!!!! (/dripping sarcasm)

Let's try to refrain, shall we.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Gephardt: 16 % representative
Next thread: so, what DID the white house know about 9/11 before it happened?
Previous thread: Man, I can't figure out Iran.
(1944 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - US troops in Iraq authorized to shoot lootersRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.363 seconds.