The W
Views: 99983363
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.10.07 0704
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - I know some people here despise anti-war protestors Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1723 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (21 total)
spf
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 1791/5403
EXP: 27161616
For next: 691124

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 2.4.03 2049.19
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2050.53
but I am hoping that even they think that this is a bit of overkill. Oregon law would make anti-war protests which block streets a terrorist act, carry a 25 year jail sentence (washingtonpost.com)
Promote this thread!
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 604/1494
EXP: 3947320
For next: 58759

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 45 days
Last activity: 12 hours
#2 Posted on 2.4.03 2109.36
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2109.45
It's overkill. Enforce the laws already on the books!

I hate redundant laws.
ManiacalClown
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 782/932
EXP: 1945944
For next: 38753

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston, TX

Since last post: 546 days
Last activity: 546 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 2.4.03 2122.59
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2127.00
I'm pretty sure that would violate the 8th Amendment.
Eddie Famous
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 546/2182
EXP: 6987160
For next: 201476

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 335 days
Last activity: 329 days
#4 Posted on 2.4.03 2129.20
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2139.43

    Originally posted by ManiacalClown
    I'm pretty sure that would violate the 8th Amendment.


Thats the amendment that insures the right to travel even if a bunch of protesters block my way, i.e. the Illinois Nazis in "Blues Brothers"?

25 years? Another knee-jerk reaction. Just cuff 'em, cart 'em, fine 'em like they've always done....
calvinh0560
Boudin rouge
Level: 48

Posts: 310/518
EXP: 806238
For next: 17310

Since: 3.1.02
From: People's Republic of Massachusetts

Since last post: 561 days
Last activity: 21 hours
#5 Posted on 2.4.03 2142.44
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2150.09
They talked about this on O'Reilly last week. Even Bill said 25 years was over the top. I would like to see the fines jacked up for people who shut down streets. Pay for the extra cops that are need for them.
ManiacalClown
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 785/932
EXP: 1945944
For next: 38753

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston, TX

Since last post: 546 days
Last activity: 546 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 2.4.03 2218.40
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2221.24
8th Amendment is protection from cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail.

25 years is a bit too much for playing a massive game of speedbump, one would think.
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 163/1694
EXP: 4641830
For next: 141159

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2013 days
Last activity: 1745 days
#7 Posted on 2.4.03 2233.40
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2234.23
Is this more overkill than the anti-war protestors that are calling Bush Hitler and the antichrist? Just checking.
ManiacalClown
Landjager
Level: 62

Posts: 786/932
EXP: 1945944
For next: 38753

Since: 2.1.02
From: Houston, TX

Since last post: 546 days
Last activity: 546 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 2.4.03 2301.54
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2302.17
Since they have every right to form comparisons between two people, either historical or mythological, I'd say yes, it's a bit more overkill.
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst
Level: 68

Posts: 392/1136
EXP: 2616675
For next: 112139

Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 3749 days
Last activity: 3219 days
AIM:  
#9 Posted on 2.4.03 2313.05
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2319.47

    Originally posted by The Vile1
    Is this more overkill than the anti-war protestors that are calling Bush Hitler and the antichrist? Just checking.


Apples and friggin' oranges. Engaging in hyperbole, even wildly inaccurate and foolish hyperbole like that is a HUGELY different situation than calling people who block traffic TERRORISTS. That's damn close to just saying they're committing TREASON, and that's just ridiculous.

Fuck, if blocking traffic is a form of terrorist activity, I can think of thousands of blue-haired old ladies who are in very, very big trouble.
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 164/1694
EXP: 4641830
For next: 141159

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2013 days
Last activity: 1745 days
#10 Posted on 2.4.03 2329.00
Reposted on: 2.4.10 2329.02
if you're blocking traffic, you're breaking the law. And if these large amount of protestors think this war will just cause more terrorist attacks, then get the hell out of the street and stop distracting our domestic security.
Michrome
Head cheese
Level: 39

Posts: 81/330
EXP: 393664
For next: 11111

Since: 2.1.03

Since last post: 3833 days
Last activity: 2900 days
#11 Posted on 3.4.03 0040.16
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0041.23
The people that block streets are taking police away from real situations that they need to be attending to. If there is a terrorist attack that occurs because our forces are worrying about hippies blocking streets, i would consider that aiding and abetting terrorism. I think they should just fine them.
Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 1040/2805
EXP: 10156013
For next: 198419

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3590 days
Last activity: 2010 days
#12 Posted on 3.4.03 0055.43
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0056.28
With that logic, I guess I could say if the military wasn't at Iraq, these "hippies" wouldn't be on the street protesting and the police would be able to go back fighting terrorism of every waking moment of the day and night, 24/7


Oh no George W. aiding and abetting terrorism



(edited by Net Hack Slasher on 3.4.03 0158)
The Vile1
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 165/1694
EXP: 4641830
For next: 141159

Since: 4.9.02
From: California

Since last post: 2013 days
Last activity: 1745 days
#13 Posted on 3.4.03 0100.44
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0103.32
Net Hack Slasher, but I was going on the logic of the protestors. Many protestors against this war have said that it will only breed and cause more terrorism, so by THEIR logic, they are distracting domestic security from these attacks that this war will cause.
Lexus
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 225/1835
EXP: 5376296
For next: 55948

Since: 2.1.02
From: Stafford, VA

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 7 min.
AIM:  
#14 Posted on 3.4.03 0116.32
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0120.24
Luckily, I live in DC, where there are many good blocked off streets where people can get their protests one. Pennsylvania Ave. is blocked off in front of the White House, there's no road directly in front of the Capitol, so most all the protesting gets done in these locations.

The thing I don't get, however, is how blocking traffic will get their message across. Rather, I would think that it would create a sense of revile to anybody in a car who can't get by. After all, if NOW is against Bladdablah, and protests Bladdablah in the middle of the road, and I can't get to where I'm going because some protestors are in my way, it tells me that A. NOW is against Bladdablah, B. NOW is against me making it home quickly, C. NOW is in effect against me, D. Bladdablah is not against me getting home, IE, what I want, and E. Bladdablah is on my side.

Maybe they could catch their flies with honey.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 1220/4700
EXP: 21585885
For next: 250777

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1270 days
Last activity: 1067 days
#15 Posted on 3.4.03 0614.49
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0616.16
25 years is too much.....BUT I want to make sure that if, for example, these clowns block an ambulance on the way to pick up a patient or on the way to the hopsital and the patient dies, that every last one of them get charged with involuntary manslaughter.
Bizzle Izzle
Bockwurst
Level: 50

Posts: 362/561
EXP: 891632
For next: 55692

Since: 26.6.02
From: New Jersey, USA

Since last post: 83 days
Last activity: 83 days
#16 Posted on 3.4.03 0804.21
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0808.31


25 years is so harsh. I'm sure I'll be crying them a river of tears. I'm glad that someone is FINALLY trying to do something to deal with these assholes that do nothing but disrupt the lives of everyone around them. How many thousands of people are affected and how many millions of dollars are lost when these clowns block major roadways in major cities?

"They talked about this on O'Reilly last week. Even Bill said 25 years was over the top."

Another example of why Bill is the Moderate he claims to be.
vsp
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 956/2042
EXP: 6310395
For next: 82404

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3034 days
Last activity: 248 days
#17 Posted on 3.4.03 0845.56
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0847.26

    Originally posted by Bizzle Izzle
    I'm glad that someone is FINALLY trying to do something to deal with these assholes that do nothing but disrupt the lives of everyone around them.


Oddly, that's what the protestors are trying to do -- do something to deal with Bush and the assholes in his inner circle that do nothing but disrupt the lives of anyone they choose to.



    Another example of why Bill is the Moderate he claims to be.


If O'Reilly is "moderate," then the "center" has moved so far to the right that it can't even _see_ the old location from there.
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 606/1494
EXP: 3947320
For next: 58759

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 45 days
Last activity: 12 hours
#18 Posted on 3.4.03 0945.19
Reposted on: 3.4.10 0951.10
As I said, there are already laws that deal with these situations, if they have the guts to enforce them. This new law is unneccesary (and probably an replacement for actually doing something about the protestors who are breaking the law).

vsp, I didn't agree with this war, but I fail to see what these unlawful protests will accomplish. Do you really think this is the "something" that will deal with Bush in anyway? Or do these tactics (the street blocking and city disruption) simply just piss off the people who are trying to go to work and live their own lives, many of who I suppose that the protestors are trying to convince to see things there way? I guess I fail to see the logic of how this is suppose to work.
vsp
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 959/2042
EXP: 6310395
For next: 82404

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3034 days
Last activity: 248 days
#19 Posted on 3.4.03 1014.05
Reposted on: 3.4.10 1017.46

    Originally posted by ges7184
    vsp, I didn't agree with this war, but I fail to see what these unlawful protests will accomplish. Do you really think this is the "something" that will deal with Bush in anyway? Or do these tactics (the street blocking and city disruption) simply just piss off the people who are trying to go to work and live their own lives, many of who I suppose that the protestors are trying to convince to see things there way? I guess I fail to see the logic of how this is suppose to work.


Hey, I'm not saying that aggressive street protests are the BEST way of handling the situation. Like going out on a ledge and threatening to jump, it's a crude but often-effective way of gaining media attention and attempting to get the urgency of their message across. It's not exactly a "wait until 2004 and vote Bush out peacefully" situation when the war is happening _now_; it's more of a "this isn't perfect, but we have to do SOMETHING" motivation, from my perspective. If they had a better way, they'd probably be doing it instead.

If protestors break existing laws, they should be willing to abide by the consequences. (Keyword == EXISTING laws.) That's how civil disobedience is supposed to work.

ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 607/1494
EXP: 3947320
For next: 58759

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 45 days
Last activity: 12 hours
#20 Posted on 3.4.03 2215.32
Reposted on: 3.4.10 2217.20
Well if the goal is to get "media attention", then yes, it is effective. But since the goal is supposedly to stop the war, then I just don't see how this works. Media attention alone is not going to accomplish anything. And since this would generally be regarded as a negative thing, I just don't see anybody changing their mind due to protestor actions, or if they do, it will be against the protestors. (it's not like people don't know the messages, the oil thing and the like)

But I believe the true goal IS media attention. Which makes these guys nothing more than media whores, no better than the people who appear on reality TV.

IF they really wanted to change public opinion, they would attempt to do just that, and make a grass roots campaign. Then they could attract media attention the other way, the more meaningful way, with large numbers.

The "we've got to do something" is not a very sound basis for action.(Let's all jump off a bridge, we have to do something!) Quite frankly, I look at this option and the "Do Nothing" option, and find the "Do Nothing" option more appealing on a risk and reward basis. I think it's much more likely to turn opinion PRO-war, which is exactly the opposite reaction they want to achieve. Best case, you go to jail and are otherwise ignored.

Anyway, they are going to do what they are going to do. The reality is the only thing that will end the war at this point is the defeat of Iraq. But I guess I'm a realist.
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: On politicians and wars
Next thread: I think this is what I think
Previous thread: Is Geraldo Brain damaged?
(1723 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - I know some people here despise anti-war protestorsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.194 seconds.