The W
Views: 101456393
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.12.07 2154
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - The Royal Rumble was pointless!
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(10504 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
CajunMan
Boudin blanc
No longer registered
Level: 95

Posts: 103/2483
EXP: 8513015
For next: 155623

Since: 2.1.02
From: Give me a Title shot!

Since last post: 1157 days
Last activity: 294 days
#1 Posted on 5.2.02 1239.26
Reposted on: 5.2.09 1240.21
J.R. even mentioned on RAW last night that with the HHH/Angle match and the Jericho/Austin match at No Way Out that the Royal Rumble was pointless.

So if you paid money to watch RR, the WWF ripped you off!

Straight from the Bishoff Days!

Promote this thread!
dMp
Banger
Level: 99

Posts: 283/2743
EXP: 9882858
For next: 117177

Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 2 days
#2 Posted on 5.2.02 1244.24
Reposted on: 5.2.09 1254.10
    Originally posted by CajunMan
    J.R. even mentioned on RAW last night that with the HHH/Angle match and the Jericho/Austin match at No Way Out that the Royal Rumble was pointless.



    So if you paid money to watch RR, the WWF ripped you off!



    Straight from the Bishoff Days!






You got a good show right? Isn't that what matters..
If you only watch it for finding out who the #1 contender at WM will be then you get ripped off no matter what as about two and a half months of hyping his name are in between those matches..

If I recall correctly 2 out of 3 (if including HHH 3 out of 4) had some sort of #1 contenders match following their win..

Bischoff days? I know what you mean by it, but what is THAT supposed to mean?!
CajunMan
Boudin blanc
No longer registered
Level: 95

Posts: 105/2483
EXP: 8513015
For next: 155623

Since: 2.1.02
From: Give me a Title shot!

Since last post: 1157 days
Last activity: 294 days
#3 Posted on 5.2.02 1252.36
Reposted on: 5.2.09 1256.17
Maven still deservs his shot with HHH
shotgun_russ
Linguica
Level: 21

Posts: 31/78
EXP: 47269
For next: 2675

Since: 28.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN

Since last post: 4441 days
Last activity: 4401 days
#4 Posted on 5.2.02 1459.01
Reposted on: 5.2.09 1459.02
    Originally posted by dMp
    If I recall correctly 2 out of 3 (if including HHH 3 out of 4) had some sort of #1 contenders match following their win.


And, at least they're coming up with decent reasons for why they're doing it. I recall a Shawn Michaels/Owen Hart #1 Contender match at In Your House before Wrestlemania XII that was basically concocted on a dare.

Kurt Angle looks like an asshole for running to Vince (especially since there's probable cause for Vince to hate Triple H right now with the stuff he's said about him). Triple H looks like he's been backed into a corner. Add the fact that his shrieky wife is knocked up and she and Angle had romantic tension awhile back that most fans bought, I think that's one of the more thorough and interesting feuds they've put together in some time.
jimimium
Chorizo
Level: 27

Posts: 53/142
EXP: 116148
For next: 12

Since: 25.1.02
From: Kirksville, MO

Since last post: 1497 days
Last activity: 1483 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 5.2.02 1852.53
Reposted on: 5.2.09 1859.06
I'd personally say that the Rumble kicked my ass htis year.. a number of pretty damned good matches and the Rumble itself, while predictable, was fun.. and thats all I ask for out of a PPV.. as for it being negated at No Way Out.. its not like wrestling is.. booked.. anyway
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Does Bischoff come with the NWO package?
Next thread: Rollerball
Previous thread: X-Pac Interview from WWF.com
(10504 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Royal Rumble 1989-2002: The Total Stats - Post-Rumble thoughts - Is Maven still alive? - More...
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - The Royal Rumble was pointless!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.491 seconds.