The W
Views: 102931454
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
1.3.08 2317
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(6464 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 657/1008
EXP: 2177786
For next: 36323

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 4035 days
Last activity: 4003 days
#1 Posted on 5.3.03 0932.50
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0934.46
Damn..... 4.7 second hour, 4.5 total.... let's hope with a good story Austin can keep this up!
Promote this thread!
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 60

Posts: 424/859
EXP: 1745467
For next: 27321

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 2364 days
Last activity: 1231 days
#2 Posted on 5.3.03 0947.19
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0949.17
You are discrediting the Rock carrying the show for the past two weeks leading up to now.

If the Austin hype was all that by itself, we would have *expected* to have seen a bump last week as well when he was "supposed" to show (maybe).

I think their collective star power will help becasue they are both good on the mic and in the ring.

Rock is on an awesome roll and I am interested to see if Austin can still bring it. Austin's emotional reaction was nice to see as well.

vacheroi
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 113/152
EXP: 127923
For next: 3417

Since: 29.5.02

Since last post: 4002 days
Last activity: 3999 days
#3 Posted on 5.3.03 1009.15
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1010.05
From the looks of him, it's 4.7 Big Mac Value Meals a day.
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 1026/2241
EXP: 7339481
For next: 129460

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1559 days
Last activity: 467 days
#4 Posted on 5.3.03 1023.43
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1029.04
Would he have drawn that same number without the teased confrontation with the Rock? Maybe, but I doubt it.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 153

Posts: 2015/7534
EXP: 44369697
For next: 953810

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 609 days
Last activity: 609 days
#5 Posted on 5.3.03 1148.32
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1152.25
Now, comes the real important part for the WWF/E: Trying to maintain and even build upon this rating. Austin's not having his first time back again, so the novelty idea is now gone. Now, good matches and good angles are needed on a consistent basis because a segment of the audience has demonstrated a willingness to turn off the product if its deemed of poor quality.
SKLOKAZOID
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 290/1512
EXP: 4043300
For next: 147848

Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 5.3.03 1308.18
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1309.21
I think the big rise can be more attributed to Austin than The Rock. Simply because we were finally guaranteed an appearance by him and the steadily rising rating on RAW seems to indicate that, as we drew closer to the moment, more people tuned in to see what Austin would do.

Without the Rock storyline, Austin's return was still strong, because there was also the curiosity factor about what he would say after everything that has happened over the last 9 months. That said, Austin and Rock always have a chemsitry together and they're sure to draw big numbers over the next few weeks together.
Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 965/2805
EXP: 10294920
For next: 59512

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3719 days
Last activity: 2139 days
#7 Posted on 6.3.03 0259.49
Reposted on: 6.3.10 0301.42
This is great news, the 4.5 (and 4.7 second hour) is the highest total show and hour in 10 months. On May 6 they got a total of 4.6 with hours of 4.2 & 4.8. Strangly enough that was the first show they had to "Got the F out" and went WWE... How's that for quality info


ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Angle injured: This can't be happening!
Next thread: RAW Rating
Previous thread: Wrestlemania Viewing?
(6464 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.365 seconds.