The W
Views: 100721791
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.11.07 0726
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(6335 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 657/1008
EXP: 2154224
For next: 59885

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 3935 days
Last activity: 3904 days
#1 Posted on 5.3.03 0932.50
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0934.46
Damn..... 4.7 second hour, 4.5 total.... let's hope with a good story Austin can keep this up!
Promote this thread!
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 60

Posts: 424/859
EXP: 1727277
For next: 45511

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 2264 days
Last activity: 1131 days
#2 Posted on 5.3.03 0947.19
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0949.17
You are discrediting the Rock carrying the show for the past two weeks leading up to now.

If the Austin hype was all that by itself, we would have *expected* to have seen a bump last week as well when he was "supposed" to show (maybe).

I think their collective star power will help becasue they are both good on the mic and in the ring.

Rock is on an awesome roll and I am interested to see if Austin can still bring it. Austin's emotional reaction was nice to see as well.

vacheroi
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 113/152
EXP: 126548
For next: 4792

Since: 29.5.02

Since last post: 3903 days
Last activity: 3899 days
#3 Posted on 5.3.03 1009.15
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1010.05
From the looks of him, it's 4.7 Big Mac Value Meals a day.
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 1026/2241
EXP: 7262668
For next: 206273

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1459 days
Last activity: 367 days
#4 Posted on 5.3.03 1023.43
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1029.04
Would he have drawn that same number without the teased confrontation with the Rock? Maybe, but I doubt it.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 2015/7534
EXP: 43886801
For next: 414961

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 509 days
Last activity: 509 days
#5 Posted on 5.3.03 1148.32
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1152.25
Now, comes the real important part for the WWF/E: Trying to maintain and even build upon this rating. Austin's not having his first time back again, so the novelty idea is now gone. Now, good matches and good angles are needed on a consistent basis because a segment of the audience has demonstrated a willingness to turn off the product if its deemed of poor quality.
SKLOKAZOID
Bratwurst
Level: 75

Posts: 290/1446
EXP: 3741416
For next: 85505

Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 9 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 5.3.03 1308.18
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1309.21
I think the big rise can be more attributed to Austin than The Rock. Simply because we were finally guaranteed an appearance by him and the steadily rising rating on RAW seems to indicate that, as we drew closer to the moment, more people tuned in to see what Austin would do.

Without the Rock storyline, Austin's return was still strong, because there was also the curiosity factor about what he would say after everything that has happened over the last 9 months. That said, Austin and Rock always have a chemsitry together and they're sure to draw big numbers over the next few weeks together.
Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 965/2805
EXP: 10187536
For next: 166896

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3619 days
Last activity: 2039 days
#7 Posted on 6.3.03 0259.49
Reposted on: 6.3.10 0301.42
This is great news, the 4.5 (and 4.7 second hour) is the highest total show and hour in 10 months. On May 6 they got a total of 4.6 with hours of 4.2 & 4.8. Strangly enough that was the first show they had to "Got the F out" and went WWE... How's that for quality info


ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Angle injured: This can't be happening!
Next thread: RAW Rating
Previous thread: Wrestlemania Viewing?
(6335 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.532 seconds.