The W
Views: 101550097
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.12.07 1340
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(6368 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 657/1008
EXP: 2161405
For next: 52704

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 3966 days
Last activity: 3934 days
#1 Posted on 5.3.03 0932.50
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0934.46
Damn..... 4.7 second hour, 4.5 total.... let's hope with a good story Austin can keep this up!
Promote this thread!
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 60

Posts: 424/859
EXP: 1732820
For next: 39968

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 2295 days
Last activity: 1162 days
#2 Posted on 5.3.03 0947.19
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0949.17
You are discrediting the Rock carrying the show for the past two weeks leading up to now.

If the Austin hype was all that by itself, we would have *expected* to have seen a bump last week as well when he was "supposed" to show (maybe).

I think their collective star power will help becasue they are both good on the mic and in the ring.

Rock is on an awesome roll and I am interested to see if Austin can still bring it. Austin's emotional reaction was nice to see as well.

vacheroi
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 113/152
EXP: 126967
For next: 4373

Since: 29.5.02

Since last post: 3933 days
Last activity: 3929 days
#3 Posted on 5.3.03 1009.15
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1010.05
From the looks of him, it's 4.7 Big Mac Value Meals a day.
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 1026/2241
EXP: 7286076
For next: 182865

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1489 days
Last activity: 397 days
#4 Posted on 5.3.03 1023.43
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1029.04
Would he have drawn that same number without the teased confrontation with the Rock? Maybe, but I doubt it.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 2015/7534
EXP: 44033982
For next: 267780

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 539 days
Last activity: 539 days
#5 Posted on 5.3.03 1148.32
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1152.25
Now, comes the real important part for the WWF/E: Trying to maintain and even build upon this rating. Austin's not having his first time back again, so the novelty idea is now gone. Now, good matches and good angles are needed on a consistent basis because a segment of the audience has demonstrated a willingness to turn off the product if its deemed of poor quality.
SKLOKAZOID
Bratwurst
Level: 76

Posts: 290/1469
EXP: 3843536
For next: 162543

Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 46 min.
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 5.3.03 1308.18
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1309.21
I think the big rise can be more attributed to Austin than The Rock. Simply because we were finally guaranteed an appearance by him and the steadily rising rating on RAW seems to indicate that, as we drew closer to the moment, more people tuned in to see what Austin would do.

Without the Rock storyline, Austin's return was still strong, because there was also the curiosity factor about what he would say after everything that has happened over the last 9 months. That said, Austin and Rock always have a chemsitry together and they're sure to draw big numbers over the next few weeks together.
Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 965/2805
EXP: 10220260
For next: 134172

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3649 days
Last activity: 2069 days
#7 Posted on 6.3.03 0259.49
Reposted on: 6.3.10 0301.42
This is great news, the 4.5 (and 4.7 second hour) is the highest total show and hour in 10 months. On May 6 they got a total of 4.6 with hours of 4.2 & 4.8. Strangly enough that was the first show they had to "Got the F out" and went WWE... How's that for quality info


ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Angle injured: This can't be happening!
Next thread: RAW Rating
Previous thread: Wrestlemania Viewing?
(6368 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.324 seconds.