The W
Views: 102271041
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.1.08 0039
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(6411 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 657/1008
EXP: 2170026
For next: 44083

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 4002 days
Last activity: 3970 days
#1 Posted on 5.3.03 0932.50
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0934.46
Damn..... 4.7 second hour, 4.5 total.... let's hope with a good story Austin can keep this up!
Promote this thread!
DrOp
Frankfurter
Level: 60

Posts: 424/859
EXP: 1739476
For next: 33312

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 2331 days
Last activity: 1198 days
#2 Posted on 5.3.03 0947.19
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0949.17
You are discrediting the Rock carrying the show for the past two weeks leading up to now.

If the Austin hype was all that by itself, we would have *expected* to have seen a bump last week as well when he was "supposed" to show (maybe).

I think their collective star power will help becasue they are both good on the mic and in the ring.

Rock is on an awesome roll and I am interested to see if Austin can still bring it. Austin's emotional reaction was nice to see as well.

vacheroi
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 113/152
EXP: 127470
For next: 3870

Since: 29.5.02

Since last post: 3969 days
Last activity: 3966 days
#3 Posted on 5.3.03 1009.15
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1010.05
From the looks of him, it's 4.7 Big Mac Value Meals a day.
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 1026/2241
EXP: 7314179
For next: 154762

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1526 days
Last activity: 434 days
#4 Posted on 5.3.03 1023.43
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1029.04
Would he have drawn that same number without the teased confrontation with the Rock? Maybe, but I doubt it.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 2015/7534
EXP: 44210660
For next: 91102

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 576 days
Last activity: 576 days
#5 Posted on 5.3.03 1148.32
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1152.25
Now, comes the real important part for the WWF/E: Trying to maintain and even build upon this rating. Austin's not having his first time back again, so the novelty idea is now gone. Now, good matches and good angles are needed on a consistent basis because a segment of the audience has demonstrated a willingness to turn off the product if its deemed of poor quality.
SKLOKAZOID
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 290/1499
EXP: 3977342
For next: 28737

Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 6 hours
Last activity: 19 min.
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 5.3.03 1308.18
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1309.21
I think the big rise can be more attributed to Austin than The Rock. Simply because we were finally guaranteed an appearance by him and the steadily rising rating on RAW seems to indicate that, as we drew closer to the moment, more people tuned in to see what Austin would do.

Without the Rock storyline, Austin's return was still strong, because there was also the curiosity factor about what he would say after everything that has happened over the last 9 months. That said, Austin and Rock always have a chemsitry together and they're sure to draw big numbers over the next few weeks together.
Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 965/2805
EXP: 10259548
For next: 94884

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3686 days
Last activity: 2106 days
#7 Posted on 6.3.03 0259.49
Reposted on: 6.3.10 0301.42
This is great news, the 4.5 (and 4.7 second hour) is the highest total show and hour in 10 months. On May 6 they got a total of 4.6 with hours of 4.2 & 4.8. Strangly enough that was the first show they had to "Got the F out" and went WWE... How's that for quality info


ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Angle injured: This can't be happening!
Next thread: RAW Rating
Previous thread: Wrestlemania Viewing?
(6411 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - 4.7 for Austin!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.483 seconds.