The W
Views: 97587539
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.7.07 2246
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Estrada "Filibuster"
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1811 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 518/1528
EXP: 4044049
For next: 147099

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2737 days
Last activity: 2580 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 4.3.03 1745.36
Reposted on: 4.3.10 1754.22
What a sham this is. Given the chance, not a single Democrat submitted a question in writing to Estrada.

They have no grounds for their opposition here, other than "Bush nominated him." Absolutely ridiculous. Is it going to take 60 votes to get a judge through from now on, as opposed to the "simple majority" it's supposed to take?
Promote this thread!
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 1041/1759
EXP: 4878633
For next: 114237

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1223 days
Last activity: 22 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 4.3.03 1754.01
Reposted on: 4.3.10 1754.24
That's what it looks like. Pretty sad if you ask me...

I still have yet to hear anyone reading from the Yellow Pages... Fillabusters today are so pathetic....
Downtown Bookie
Morcilla
Level: 53

Posts: 152/647
EXP: 1102648
For next: 54478

Since: 7.4.02
From: The Inner City, Now Living In The Country

Since last post: 42 days
Last activity: 11 days
#3 Posted on 4.3.03 1850.42
Reposted on: 4.3.10 1854.50
If you're Sen. Leahy, Boxer, Lincoln, et al, which is more embarrassing: Being exposed as a liar and a fraud, or being out-smarted by the Bush White House?
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 1036/4700
EXP: 21360220
For next: 476442

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1177 days
Last activity: 974 days
#4 Posted on 4.3.03 1858.01
Reposted on: 4.3.10 1858.09
Enh....same ol shit from the Democratic senators. The only reason that they are blocking his nomination is that the DC Court of Appeals is a stepping stone to the Supreme Court and the Democratics don't want the first Hispanic justice to be appointed by a Republican.
messenoir
Summer sausage
Level: 45

Posts: 15/449
EXP: 640704
For next: 19465

Since: 20.2.02
From: Columbia, MO

Since last post: 453 days
Last activity: 320 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 5.3.03 0219.33
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0220.31

Note especially that both the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund are opposed to Estrada’s confirmation. So much for racism.

And when your own superviser doesn't support you, well, no right boss in their mind should hire you.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 1041/4700
EXP: 21360220
For next: 476442

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1177 days
Last activity: 974 days
#6 Posted on 5.3.03 0631.02
Reposted on: 5.3.10 0635.12

    Originally posted by messenoir

    Note especially that both the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund are opposed to Estrada’s confirmation. So much for racism.

Yeah....the Hispanic Caucus is all Democratic. The Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education fund is a left-wing organizaton. Both are associated with....Democrats.

Nice try,

(edited by Grimis on 5.3.03 1636)
eviljonhunt81
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 546/1084
EXP: 2415359
For next: 46505

Since: 6.1.02
From: not Japan

Since last post: 2895 days
Last activity: 2892 days
#7 Posted on 5.3.03 1855.30
Reposted on: 5.3.10 1855.31
No, I think he successfully argued that it's not because "Democratics don't want the first Hispanic justice to be appointed by a Republican" but because they don't like appointing conservatives. Everything isn't racism on the part of the Democrats.

Nice try.
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 1052/4700
EXP: 21360220
For next: 476442

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1177 days
Last activity: 974 days
#8 Posted on 5.3.03 2000.12
Reposted on: 5.3.10 2003.39

    Originally posted by eviljonhunt81
    but because they don't like appointing conservatives.

So what if he is? REpublican approved lots of Clinton's judges and there was no harm no foul, even if they were liberals and they met all of the other criteria. Just like Estrada does. So what's the holdup?

    Originally posted by eviljonhunt81
    Everything isn't racism on the part of the Democrats

Remember, we are talking about the party that supports affirmative action; the most racist policy in America.
eviljonhunt81
Pepperoni
Level: 66

Posts: 549/1084
EXP: 2415359
For next: 46505

Since: 6.1.02
From: not Japan

Since last post: 2895 days
Last activity: 2892 days
#9 Posted on 5.3.03 2139.51
Reposted on: 5.3.10 2140.34
I don't feel like going to check, but I'm pretty sure that some of the seats Bush is filling were left empty from Clinton's administration because the Senate (then Republican controlled) wouldn't approve them/bring them to a vote.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Do we really want these people making decisions for us?
Next thread: Score one for the Good Guys!
Previous thread: 50 Years Without Stalin
(1811 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Estrada "Filibuster"Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.216 seconds.