The W
Views: 110122368
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
9.2.09 2249
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Dan Rather Interview Saddam
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(2015 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 509/1528
EXP: 4286875
For next: 95370

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 3304 days
Last activity: 3147 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 27.2.03 1759.51
Reposted on: 27.2.10 1802.41
What an absolute farce. This is journalism? An interview set up by a dictator, questions approved by that dictator, filmed, edited, and released by him as well. And you call this an "interview?" This was nothing more than a propaganda piece for Saddam that Rather used to prop up ratings.

Ridiculous.
Promote this thread!
calvinh0560
Boudin rouge
Level: 49

Posts: 262/518
EXP: 846085
For next: 37804

Since: 3.1.02
From: People's Republic of Massachusetts

Since last post: 1035 days
Last activity: 11 hours
#2 Posted on 27.2.03 1852.22
Reposted on: 27.2.10 1852.24
The interview was a joke. But Arthurs interview with Sadism back before the Gulf War was a joke too so I was not expecting anything else. What really got me was when they would not let Condoled Rice on to explain the white house side. CBS news said it would be the president or nothing (latter they said they would allow Cheney on). WHO THE HELL IS CBS to say that the Rice is not good enough for their show.
Torchslasher
Knackwurst
Level: 109

Posts: 746/3304
EXP: 13611052
For next: 348638

Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 71 days
Last activity: 5 days
#3 Posted on 28.2.03 1253.56
Reposted on: 28.2.10 1259.05
The greatest thing said about this "interview" was said by Charles Barkley of all people. I am paraphrasing here.

Barkley wondered why Rather didn't just kill Saddam. He would have had Rather ask Saddam to go get something to eat, and then stab him in the neck with a fork. It would have saved us all millions of dollars for a war.

(Yes it was a joke by Sir Charles, so don't yell at me.)

(edited by Torchslasher on 28.2.03 1054)
Corajudo
Frankfurter
Level: 59

Posts: 75/810
EXP: 1604168
For next: 68970

Since: 7.11.02
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 581 days
Last activity: 84 days
#4 Posted on 28.2.03 1338.28
Reposted on: 28.2.10 1341.47
FYI--In today's Wall Street Journal, there is an editorial from Dan Rather talking about his impressions of Hussein. It's not that interesting and doesn't really present anything new. But, it is a first person account of Hussein so that makes it a little more interesting.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 219

Posts: 1775/16770
EXP: 156229907
For next: 1705707

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 22 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 28.2.03 2053.56
Reposted on: 28.2.10 2059.01

    Originally posted by Torchslasher
    The greatest thing said about this "interview" was said by Charles Barkley of all people. I am paraphrasing here.

    Barkley wondered why Rather didn't just kill Saddam. He would have had Rather ask Saddam to go get something to eat, and then stab him in the neck with a fork. It would have saved us all millions of dollars for a war.

    (Yes it was a joke by Sir Charles, so don't yell at me.)

    (edited by Torchslasher on 28.2.03 1054)

I actually said "man, he shoulda just killed him and saved us the trouble" while watching Rather on Late Night with Bruce Willis (then again, my mind wandered a LOT while Willis floundered), although I wasn't creative enough to suggest Rather use a fork.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 510/1528
EXP: 4286875
For next: 95370

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 3304 days
Last activity: 3147 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 1.3.03 1200.46
Reposted on: 1.3.10 1203.48
Bruce Willis has a show on late night?

The thing about the interview that's stupid is... it wasn't an interview, really. It was a puff piece, a la Larry King. I mean, I don't blame Rather for not asking the tough questions, because he likely would have been killed. But if you can't ask legitimate questions, why hold the interview at all? Seems to me it was a shameless ratings stunt that, in the process, helped to legitimize a brutal dictator.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 154

Posts: 1973/7534
EXP: 46002142
For next: 359832

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 954 days
Last activity: 954 days
#7 Posted on 1.3.03 1213.38
Reposted on: 1.3.10 1223.58

    Originally posted by PalpatineW
    Bruce Willis has a show on late night?

    The thing about the interview that's stupid is... it wasn't an interview, really. It was a puff piece, a la Larry King. I mean, I don't blame Rather for not asking the tough questions, because he likely would have been killed. But if you can't ask legitimate questions, why hold the interview at all? Seems to me it was a shameless ratings stunt that, in the process, helped to legitimize a brutal dictator.






Willis was filling in for Letterman.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 514/1528
EXP: 4286875
For next: 95370

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 3304 days
Last activity: 3147 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 1.3.03 1727.43
Reposted on: 1.3.10 1727.43
Thanks.

Someone over at NRO has put the interview transcript online - minus all of Hussein's replies. Kind of an interesting read, just to capture the lighthearted mood of the whole thing.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Truth, get out of my air.
Next thread: War fighting capabilities of Arab Countries
Previous thread: Saddam as Hitler?
(2015 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Dan Rather Interview SaddamRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.539 seconds.