The W
Views: 99051758
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.9.07 2059
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Dan Rather Interview Saddam
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(1838 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 509/1528
EXP: 4069958
For next: 121190

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2796 days
Last activity: 2639 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 27.2.03 1759.51
Reposted on: 27.2.10 1802.41
What an absolute farce. This is journalism? An interview set up by a dictator, questions approved by that dictator, filmed, edited, and released by him as well. And you call this an "interview?" This was nothing more than a propaganda piece for Saddam that Rather used to prop up ratings.

Ridiculous.
Promote this thread!
calvinh0560
Boudin rouge
Level: 48

Posts: 262/518
EXP: 803266
For next: 20282

Since: 3.1.02
From: People's Republic of Massachusetts

Since last post: 527 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#2 Posted on 27.2.03 1852.22
Reposted on: 27.2.10 1852.24
The interview was a joke. But Arthurs interview with Sadism back before the Gulf War was a joke too so I was not expecting anything else. What really got me was when they would not let Condoled Rice on to explain the white house side. CBS news said it would be the president or nothing (latter they said they would allow Cheney on). WHO THE HELL IS CBS to say that the Rice is not good enough for their show.
Torchslasher
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 746/3267
EXP: 12703871
For next: 387482

Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 20 hours
#3 Posted on 28.2.03 1253.56
Reposted on: 28.2.10 1259.05
The greatest thing said about this "interview" was said by Charles Barkley of all people. I am paraphrasing here.

Barkley wondered why Rather didn't just kill Saddam. He would have had Rather ask Saddam to go get something to eat, and then stab him in the neck with a fork. It would have saved us all millions of dollars for a war.

(Yes it was a joke by Sir Charles, so don't yell at me.)

(edited by Torchslasher on 28.2.03 1054)
Corajudo
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 75/810
EXP: 1517670
For next: 59885

Since: 7.11.02
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 73 days
Last activity: 3 days
#4 Posted on 28.2.03 1338.28
Reposted on: 28.2.10 1341.47
FYI--In today's Wall Street Journal, there is an editorial from Dan Rather talking about his impressions of Hussein. It's not that interesting and doesn't really present anything new. But, it is a first person account of Hussein so that makes it a little more interesting.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 213

Posts: 1775/16220
EXP: 141123755
For next: 2243152

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 5 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 28.2.03 2053.56
Reposted on: 28.2.10 2059.01

    Originally posted by Torchslasher
    The greatest thing said about this "interview" was said by Charles Barkley of all people. I am paraphrasing here.

    Barkley wondered why Rather didn't just kill Saddam. He would have had Rather ask Saddam to go get something to eat, and then stab him in the neck with a fork. It would have saved us all millions of dollars for a war.

    (Yes it was a joke by Sir Charles, so don't yell at me.)

    (edited by Torchslasher on 28.2.03 1054)

I actually said "man, he shoulda just killed him and saved us the trouble" while watching Rather on Late Night with Bruce Willis (then again, my mind wandered a LOT while Willis floundered), although I wasn't creative enough to suggest Rather use a fork.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 510/1528
EXP: 4069958
For next: 121190

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2796 days
Last activity: 2639 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 1.3.03 1200.46
Reposted on: 1.3.10 1203.48
Bruce Willis has a show on late night?

The thing about the interview that's stupid is... it wasn't an interview, really. It was a puff piece, a la Larry King. I mean, I don't blame Rather for not asking the tough questions, because he likely would have been killed. But if you can't ask legitimate questions, why hold the interview at all? Seems to me it was a shameless ratings stunt that, in the process, helped to legitimize a brutal dictator.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 1973/7534
EXP: 43576442
For next: 725320

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 445 days
Last activity: 445 days
#7 Posted on 1.3.03 1213.38
Reposted on: 1.3.10 1223.58

    Originally posted by PalpatineW
    Bruce Willis has a show on late night?

    The thing about the interview that's stupid is... it wasn't an interview, really. It was a puff piece, a la Larry King. I mean, I don't blame Rather for not asking the tough questions, because he likely would have been killed. But if you can't ask legitimate questions, why hold the interview at all? Seems to me it was a shameless ratings stunt that, in the process, helped to legitimize a brutal dictator.






Willis was filling in for Letterman.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 514/1528
EXP: 4069958
For next: 121190

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2796 days
Last activity: 2639 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 1.3.03 1727.43
Reposted on: 1.3.10 1727.43
Thanks.

Someone over at NRO has put the interview transcript online - minus all of Hussein's replies. Kind of an interesting read, just to capture the lighthearted mood of the whole thing.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Truth, get out of my air.
Next thread: War fighting capabilities of Arab Countries
Previous thread: Saddam as Hitler?
(1838 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Dan Rather Interview SaddamRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.237 seconds.