The W
Views: 99141171
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.9.07 1717
The 7 - Baseball - Fielding statistics Register and log in to post!
(1182 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (4 total)
Eddie Famous
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 40/2182
EXP: 6963648
For next: 224988

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 303 days
Last activity: 297 days
#1 Posted on 3.1.02 1942.31
Reposted on: 3.1.09 1945.51

I've always felt fielding percentage was a bit overrated in describing a players ability on the field.

It should be USED, mind you, but along with someone's RANGE.

Steve Garvey used to have very high percentages at first for the Dodgers all those years, but former 1st baseman Wes Parker (considered one of the best at that position ever) pointed out that one of the reasons Garvey's pct was high was that he rarely got to tough plays. Easier plays=higher average. Parker saw a LOT more Dodger games than I ever did, so I believe him.

Roberto Clemente had some rather poor fielding averages for an outfielder, but he certainly was among the best ever because of his incredible range and arm.

On the other hand, I believe it was Brian Downing for some reason, had a perfect fielding average in the outfield for one 100+ game season, but had all the range you'd expect an ex-catcher to have.


A bit off-my-own-topic...the Strat-o-matic replay games have gotten around the average/range difficulty by giving the range factor 1 to 5, and error factor zero and up, with the higher numbers being worse. In the example above, Clemente would be a 1-20, and Downing a 4-0.





***The train of love's deceiving...if she ain't gone she's leaving***

Promote this thread!
cfgb
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 12/1753
EXP: 5002973
For next: 206276

Since: 2.1.02
From: Ottawa, Ontario

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 22 min.
#2 Posted on 3.1.02 2100.53
Reposted on: 3.1.09 2113.27
I've got to agree... I remember Jeff Blauser used to get a really bad rap for the amount of errors he'd commit in a single season. However, I saw him diving at balls and trying to make plays that alot of shortstops would simply let by or hang on to because the play is impossible.

Whereas, Ryne Sandberg is credited with great defense and a sparkling fielding percentage despite in his later years not trying on anything even remotely out of his range.

I'm using those guys as examples, but it rings true around the league. Defense is something you have to watch first hand and not numbers.




Contact cfgb
Visit my homepage
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 130

Posts: 28/5174
EXP: 25430453
For next: 300193

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 9 hours
#3 Posted on 3.1.02 2118.24
Reposted on: 3.1.09 2142.05
RANGE FACTOR



.
Eddie Famous
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 42/2182
EXP: 6963648
For next: 224988

Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 303 days
Last activity: 297 days
#4 Posted on 3.1.02 2121.09
Reposted on: 3.1.09 2142.17

Sandberg used to be very good to his left, but was useless to his right. When Morandini took over the job at second, I was amazed how many more grounders he was able to get to than Sandberg.

Not that I would ever put Mick in the same category of player, other than "former Cub second basemen."



***Optioned to Pawtucket (IL), April 6***



(edited by Eddie Famous on 3.1.02 1922)
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Tino to Cards...
Next thread: Cubskis
Previous thread: Padres...
(1182 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Baseball - Fielding statisticsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.219 seconds.