I can understand grading wrestlers for their performances and such so far this year, but surely when it comes to grading the bookers, it comes down to a lot of hearsay and speculation. It seems a little off to be judging people on this 'evidence'.
Originally posted by A-MOLI can understand grading wrestlers for their performances and such so far this year, but surely when it comes to grading the bookers, it comes down to a lot of hearsay and speculation. It seems a little off to be judging people on this 'evidence'.
Actually I believe they were right on the mark. Are you happy with the quality booking you have seen in the WWE this year?
I agree with A-wol, he didn't give a link but 411. But they graded individual bookers not the booking as a whole. I am smarky in many ways (I'll admit it) but one thing I still can't do is act like I *know* who booked what.
Something as simple as the women division, who booked Trish/Jazz pretty good stuff, really helped both women. Molly/Trish fat ass angle pretty stupid and actually hurt both girls. I have no idea if it's the same person or differnt people all I know one I enjoyed the other I didn't.
I liked what was booked with IC title RVD/Eddie/Brock recently I don't like the tag with Rikishi/ Billy/ Chuck/ Rico.
All I do know is whoever booked the World title match at WRestleMania with HHH vs. STephanie errr Jericho. Should have his or her mouth glued shut and a typewriter dropped on his/her hands
(edited by Net Hack Slasher on 11.7.02 2157) I don't get it, everyone loves rats, but they don't want to drink the rats milk?
If I could play Devil's Advocate for a moment - at the time of that PPV, HHH was on the Smackdown roster, so in the most technical sense, it wasn't a RAW-only PPV. (Just like how Booker T made a guest appearance at Rebellion towards the end of 2002.)